Re: Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size

2018-01-03 Thread Adrian Van Der Byl
Sorry it seems the link I posted got broken.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=440029073004475&set=pcb.745473342286
826&type=3&theater&ifg=1

73
Adrian 
VK2WF

-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Adrian
Van Der Byl
Sent: Thursday, 4 January 2018 9:44 AM
To: 'Mike DeChristopher'; topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size

I have to agree with Mike, physical strength is important.
I am on an exposed ridge where the winds are quite strong.
I use stainless steel wire rope as part of the top hat supported with 19mm
dia al tubing spokes.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=440029073004475&set=pcb.745473342286
826&type=3&theater&ifg=1

Adrian
VK2WF


-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike
DeChristopher
Sent: Thursday, 4 January 2018 6:28 AM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size

Bruce,

I used to resonate my tower on 80m with 22 ga wire in two directions.
Never a problem with power handling at 1.5kW; I probably would have used
bigger stuff if I had any in the garage at the time.

Like others here, I think the real issue is that these wires will become de
facto guy wires, and so physical strength becomes relevant.

73,
Mike N1TA


On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 10:31 AM, Bruce Osterberg  wrote:
> Good Morning:\
>
> To improve my 160 vertical I want to change its configuration from an 
> inverted L to a Capacity Hat Vertical.  Vertical will be 57 Feet high 
> with Capacity Hat wires.  I am using an 18 Meter Spider pole.  I plan 
> on running
> 1.5 KW to it.  Looking at spider pole website it says 18 Gage wire for 
> the Vertical part and 26 Gage wire for the capacity Hat.  But it says 
> nothing about the power handling capacity of these wires, (both 
> vertical and horizontal).  I know the spider pole is a bit flimsy at 
> the 55 foot level so a smaller wire is needed but I am sure someone on 
> this reflector has the answers I need.
>
> Bruce N9BX 73
>
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size

2018-01-03 Thread Adrian Van Der Byl
I have to agree with Mike, physical strength is important.
I am on an exposed ridge where the winds are quite strong.
I use stainless steel wire rope as part of the top hat supported with 19mm
dia al tubing spokes.

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=440029073004475&set=pcb.745473342286
826&type=3&theater&ifg=1

Adrian 
VK2WF


-Original Message-
From: Topband [mailto:topband-boun...@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Mike
DeChristopher
Sent: Thursday, 4 January 2018 6:28 AM
To: topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size

Bruce,

I used to resonate my tower on 80m with 22 ga wire in two directions.
Never a problem with power handling at 1.5kW; I probably would have used
bigger stuff if I had any in the garage at the time.

Like others here, I think the real issue is that these wires will become de
facto guy wires, and so physical strength becomes relevant.

73,
Mike N1TA


On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 10:31 AM, Bruce Osterberg  wrote:
> Good Morning:\
>
> To improve my 160 vertical I want to change its configuration from an 
> inverted L to a Capacity Hat Vertical.  Vertical will be 57 Feet high 
> with Capacity Hat wires.  I am using an 18 Meter Spider pole.  I plan 
> on running
> 1.5 KW to it.  Looking at spider pole website it says 18 Gage wire for 
> the Vertical part and 26 Gage wire for the capacity Hat.  But it says 
> nothing about the power handling capacity of these wires, (both 
> vertical and horizontal).  I know the spider pole is a bit flimsy at 
> the 55 foot level so a smaller wire is needed but I am sure someone on 
> this reflector has the answers I need.
>
> Bruce N9BX 73
>
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size

2018-01-03 Thread Mike DeChristopher
Bruce,

I used to resonate my tower on 80m with 22 ga wire in two directions.
Never a problem with power handling at 1.5kW; I probably would have
used bigger stuff if I had any in the garage at the time.

Like others here, I think the real issue is that these wires will
become de facto guy wires, and so physical strength becomes relevant.

73,
Mike N1TA


On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 10:31 AM, Bruce Osterberg  wrote:
> Good Morning:\
>
> To improve my 160 vertical I want to change its configuration from an
> inverted L to a Capacity Hat Vertical.  Vertical will be 57 Feet high with
> Capacity Hat wires.  I am using an 18 Meter Spider pole.  I plan on running
> 1.5 KW to it.  Looking at spider pole website it says 18 Gage wire for the
> Vertical part and 26 Gage wire for the capacity Hat.  But it says nothing
> about the power handling capacity of these wires, (both vertical and
> horizontal).  I know the spider pole is a bit flimsy at the 55 foot level so
> a smaller wire is needed but I am sure someone on this reflector has the
> answers I need.
>
> Bruce N9BX 73
>
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size

2018-01-02 Thread VK3HJ
In my station for the past several years I have run a top loaded vertical of 
similar dimension to what you propose.


A Spider pole is something I would only use in a portable application, not a 
permanent home station antenna.


My antenna uses telescopic aluminium tubing tapering from about 65 mm to 25 
mm and is around 19 m in length. I originally used six top loading wires of 
around 6 m each of Flexweave wire. This turned out to be too heavy and 
unwieldy and made the antenna unstable, especially when erecting it. I 
changed the top hat to three wires of about 9 m each using medium duty 
hookup wire (14x0.32, 1.13 sq mm). Now what I did, I think is rather 
ingenious if I may say so, in that I used 4 mm poly rope to guy the top (and 
three levels below) and wove the top loading wire into the top guy rope, so 
that the rope did the supporting as a guy, and also carried the top loading 
wire. This has the advantage of holding up the top loading wires, which are 
terminated in a lug onto a small stainless bolt at the top of the aluminium, 
and also does not seem to attract the cockies with their bolt-cutter beaks. 
The wire is light, and does not cause excessive sag. I secure the top guys 
out about 20 m from the centre.


This has survived some decent storms, and bird attack.

Current at the top of the antenna should not be an issue. The main concerns 
would be mechanical.


When I have used a Spider pole on DXpedition, medium duty hookup wire as 
described above seems ok, even to the feed point, but I've only used a low 
duty cycle mode like CW.


73,

Luke VK3HJ 


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size

2018-01-02 Thread Don Greenbaum

Bruce, and George is always loud where ever he goes

Don
N1DG

At 07:19 PM 1/2/2018, GEORGE WALLNER wrote:
Bruce, I often use an 18 m Spiderpole with two loading wires, sloping out 
from the tip at about 60 degrees. I use 18 gauge insulated wires and run 
1500 W. I have not seen any signs of overheating. Current is less through 
the top part of the antenna so wire diameter is less critical (but the 
voltages can be very high at the wire ends!). I would, however, use 
thicker wire on the vertical part of the antenna (AWG 12 or larger). 
Alternatively, use three or four parallel wires on the vertical section 
(tied together both at the bottom and top). Space them out around the 
pole. You can see a 43 foot version (being tested for the upcoming KH1 
expedition) at C6AGU, on QRZ.com. I have ran 1000 W on that antenna 
without issues. 73, George On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 09:31:48 -0600   Bruce 
Osterberg  wrote: > Good Morning:\ > > To improve my 160 
vertical ... 26 Gage >wire for the capacity Hat.  > > Bruce N9BX 73 > > 
_ > Topband Reflector Archives 
- >http://www.contesting.com/_topband _ Topband Reflector 
Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


N1DG--Licensed since 1962
www.goldtel.net
EX-WB2DND, A61AD (GUEST OP, QSL MGR), A52DG, C92DG, /KH4, /KH9, /BV, /VP8O, 
/VS6, /4X, /9V
Webmaster: VP8O, K4M, BS7H, K5K, A52A, VK0IR, 9M0C, ZK1XXP, WB2DND/KH9, 
BQ9P, ZL9CI

QSL Manager:  A61AD, A61AO, A61X, A61AQ, KH7Z
Member:  NCDXF, CWops, ARRL, DDXA, YCCC
2006 Inductee into the CQ DX Hall of Fame
Treasurer, NCDXF
DON GREENBAUM , DUXBURY, MA, USA

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Re: Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size

2018-01-02 Thread GEORGE WALLNER




Bruce,

I often use an 18 m Spiderpole with two loading wires, 
sloping out from the tip at about 60 degrees. I use 18 
gauge insulated wires and run 1500 W. I have not seen any 
signs of overheating. Current is less through the top part 
of the antenna so wire diameter is less critical (but the 
voltages can be very high at the wire ends!). I would, 
however, use thicker wire on the vertical part of the 
antenna (AWG 12 or larger). Alternatively, use three or 
four parallel wires on the vertical section (tied together 
both at the bottom and top). Space them out around the 
pole.


You can see a 43 foot version (being tested for the 
upcoming KH1 expedition) at C6AGU, on QRZ.com. I have ran 
1000 W on that antenna without issues.


73,

George

On Tue, 2 Jan 2018 09:31:48 -0600
 Bruce Osterberg  wrote:

Good Morning:\

To improve my 160 vertical ... 26 Gage 
wire for the capacity Hat.  


Bruce N9BX 73

_
Topband Reflector Archives - 
http://www.contesting.com/_topband


_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband

Re: Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size

2018-01-02 Thread Raymond Benny
Hello Bruce,

I have a 72 ft irrigation pipe vertical for 160m. It is much stronger that
your Spider pole. I use 16 ga wire for my 4 top hat wires. I'm not sure how
many top hat wires you have in mind, but with 4 wires, they also act as guy
wires at the top.

If you use 4 wires, the current would be divided equally, so I'm sure you
can get by with small gauge wire, perhaps 22 ga, although that seems small
to me. If the Spider pole is too flimsy for larger wire, you may have to
guy it more often.

The top hat wires need be as horizontal as possible, but on flat land, mine
are pulled away from the vertical as far possible which is about 100 ft in
each direction for me. You can only do what you can, but it will work!

HNY & GL,

Ray,
N6VR

PS, I see that the A70X operation is on 160m. For a rare IOTA, and to work
the world, that is the last band they should be on. But I guess the guys
are having fun...

On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 8:31 AM, Bruce Osterberg  wrote:

> Good Morning:\
>
> To improve my 160 vertical I want to change its configuration from an
> inverted L to a Capacity Hat Vertical.  Vertical will be 57 Feet high with
> Capacity Hat wires.  I am using an 18 Meter Spider pole.  I plan on running
> 1.5 KW to it.  Looking at spider pole website it says 18 Gage wire for the
> Vertical part and 26 Gage wire for the capacity Hat.  But it says nothing
> about the power handling capacity of these wires, (both vertical and
> horizontal).  I know the spider pole is a bit flimsy at the 55 foot level
> so a smaller wire is needed but I am sure someone on this reflector has the
> answers I need.
>
> Bruce N9BX 73
>
> _
> Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband




-- 
Ray,
N6VR
_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband


Topband: Capacity Hat Wire Size

2018-01-02 Thread Bruce Osterberg

Good Morning:\

To improve my 160 vertical I want to change its configuration from an 
inverted L to a Capacity Hat Vertical.  Vertical will be 57 Feet high 
with Capacity Hat wires.  I am using an 18 Meter Spider pole.  I plan on 
running 1.5 KW to it.  Looking at spider pole website it says 18 Gage 
wire for the Vertical part and 26 Gage wire for the capacity Hat.  But 
it says nothing about the power handling capacity of these wires, (both 
vertical and horizontal).  I know the spider pole is a bit flimsy at the 
55 foot level so a smaller wire is needed but I am sure someone on this 
reflector has the answers I need.


Bruce N9BX 73

_
Topband Reflector Archives - http://www.contesting.com/_topband