Re: Topband: Topband list and 630 Meters - the decision

2012-02-22 Thread Terry Conboy
This link worked for me: http://w7ekb.com/mailman/listinfo/600mrg_w7ekb.com

On 2012-02-22 8:14 AM, ZR wrote:
> Sorry about that, I went to bed without testing the link and forgot about
> the subscription process.
> I hope everyone has the correct info now.
>
> Any questions send me a direct email.
>
> Carl
> KM1H
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike Waters"
> To: "topband"
> Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 10:39 PM
> Subject: Re: Topband: Topband list and 630 Meters - the decision
>
>
>> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:58 PM, ZR  wrote:
>>
>>> I recently talked to Ken Gordon, W7EKB, who owns 600...@w7ekb.com, the
>>> 600M experimental group forum about opening it up to hams
>>>
>> Do you have a link to the forum, Carl? It doesn't appear to be on
>> w7ekb.com.
>>
>> 73, Mike
>> www.w0btu.com
>> ___
>> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
>>
>>
>> -
>> No virus found in this message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2113/4825 - Release Date: 02/22/12
>>
> ___
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Topband list and 630 Meters - the decision

2012-02-22 Thread ZR
Sorry about that, I went to bed without testing the link and forgot about 
the subscription process.
I hope everyone has the correct info now.

Any questions send me a direct email.

Carl
KM1H


- Original Message - 
From: "Mike Waters" 
To: "topband" 
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2012 10:39 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: Topband list and 630 Meters - the decision


> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:58 PM, ZR  wrote:
>
>> I recently talked to Ken Gordon, W7EKB, who owns 600...@w7ekb.com, the
>> 600M experimental group forum about opening it up to hams
>>
>
> Do you have a link to the forum, Carl? It doesn't appear to be on 
> w7ekb.com.
>
> 73, Mike
> www.w0btu.com
> ___
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
>
>
> -
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 10.0.1424 / Virus Database: 2113/4825 - Release Date: 02/22/12
> 

___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Topband list and 630 Meters - the decision

2012-02-22 Thread W2XJ
The sign up procedure fails. There seems to be a problem with the 
majordomo address.

On 2/22/12 1:17 AM, Mike Waters wrote:
> Thanks. That must be it. http://www.500kc.com/Maillists.htm
>
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Tod Olson  wrote:
>
>> http://www.500kc.com/
>>
>>
> ___
> UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK
>
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Topband list and 630 Meters - the decision

2012-02-21 Thread Mike Waters
Thanks. That must be it. http://www.500kc.com/Maillists.htm

On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Tod Olson  wrote:

> http://www.500kc.com/
>
>
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Topband list and 630 Meters - the decision

2012-02-21 Thread Tod Olson
Try also

http://www.500kc.com/

Tod, K0TO



On 2/21/12 9:39 PM, "Mike Waters"  wrote:

>On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:58 PM, ZR  wrote:
>
>> I recently talked to Ken Gordon, W7EKB, who owns 600...@w7ekb.com, the
>> 600M experimental group forum about opening it up to hams
>>
>
>Do you have a link to the forum, Carl? It doesn't appear to be on
>w7ekb.com.
>
>73, Mike
>www.w0btu.com
>___
>UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Topband list and 630 Meters - the decision

2012-02-21 Thread Mike Waters
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 7:58 PM, ZR  wrote:

> I recently talked to Ken Gordon, W7EKB, who owns 600...@w7ekb.com, the
> 600M experimental group forum about opening it up to hams
>

Do you have a link to the forum, Carl? It doesn't appear to be on w7ekb.com.

73, Mike
www.w0btu.com
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Re: Topband: Topband list and 630 Meters - the decision

2012-02-21 Thread ZR
I recently talked to Ken Gordon, W7EKB, who owns 600...@w7ekb.com, the 600M 
experimental group forum about opening it up to hams that are interested in 
learning more about the new 630M band before its available in 2013.

The rules are basic and pretty much similar to most other forums. Keep it civil 
or privileges are pulled. A bit off topic is fine.

You will find many similarities with topband and some differences, particularly 
the extended groundwave capability even at 5W ERP.

There are several well known people on the group who are well versed in 
antennas, such as Rudy Severns, N6LF. Getting a signal on the band from a small 
lot is not easy but many have done it and worked long distances.

See some of you there I hope.

Carl
KM1H
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK


Topband: Topband list and 630 Meters - the decision

2012-02-20 Thread Tree
All -

I want to publicly thank the 50 or so of you who gave me input on the issue
of what to do about the new 630 meter band with respect to this reflector.

There were many good comments received.

I think the answers pretty much favored one of two actions:

- Allow some discussion here - and eliminate it when it becomes "too much"
as activity increases.
- No 630 meter discussions here on Topband.

I didn't keep a count of the "votes" - but I believe the second choice
above would have had the most.  However, both of these choices seemed to
indicate that at some point, a different place would be needed to discuss
the 630 Meter band - it was just a matter of when.

It seems that that many of the technical subjects discussed here on Topband
will likely not be very applicable to the new band.  Most stations won't be
able to put up a full sized antenna of any kind.  The concept of measuring
EIRP is new to most of us.  Likely - there will be LOTS of discussion
amongst a small group of people - with the majority of this list not really
interested in the topic (see the recent LOTW discussion for a clear example
of this).  It is possible that the new band will mostly employ computers to
make QSOs.  This is very different than how most of us operate on Topband.

Therefore - it now seems obvious to me that Topband should stay focused on
160 meters.

There is a "Lowfer" list that might be more appropriate for discussions
relating to this band.  I have contacted the list owner and he is fine with
that.  You can find more information about this list here:
http://mailman.qth.net/mailman/listinfo/lowfer.  Also - at least one person
who responded to the question was willing to setup a new reflector focused
on 630 Meters.  I will let him step forward and do that if he decides he
still wants to do that.

If you are interested in both 160 meters and Topband - it shouldn't be too
inconvenient to subscribe to two lists instead of one.  The flip side of
this is having the majority of people on Topband having to delete the large
amount of traffic the interest in this new band is likely going to
generate.

I realize this "decision" might not be to everyone's liking - but I think
most will agree - having a clear direction so everyone can know what to
expect is probably a good thing.  I will now take the reflector back off of
moderation.  I have deleted the few 630 meter messages that were in the
cue. I ask everyone to try and be sensitive to the situation and not
over-do postings on non-topband related subjects.   A little is okay - but
some issues quickly turn into a firestorm (again - see the recent LOTW
discussion).  Those who can't seem to moderate themselves will likely end
up having some help with that.

73 Tree N6TR
Net Control - or "It's a ditry job... but somebody has to do it".
___
UR RST IS ... ... ..9 QSB QSB - hw? BK