Topband: Voltage at top of vertical and scaling?

2019-04-18 Thread Rob Atkinson
I'd also put RF chokes in series with the DC relay lines, at the base
of the vertical antenna to further keep RF off it but also to break it
up so the relay line doesn't detune the 80 m. vertical, perhaps with
another pair at the shack entrance. All this sure seems like a lot
of work which is why I simply hung a wire for 160 inverted L from a 3
foot standoff at the top of my 80 m. mast and did my dual band that
way, using the same ground system for both.

73

Rob
K5UJ
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Voltage at top of vertical and scaling?

2019-04-17 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist



On 4/17/2019 1:40 AM, Ulrich Weiß wrote:

Would like to know how to feed the relay at the top of the vertical...
regards
Uli, DJ2YA




Run a single insulated wire from the bottom to the top of vertical.
Connect a 0.1 uF bypass capacitor from the wire to the vertical
at the top.  Connect another bypass capacitor from the wire to
the vertical at the bottom.  Connect the coil of the relay
across the upper bypass capacitor.

I like to spiral the wire around the vertical just to hold
it in place.  You can also use cable ties or electrical tape
to hold it.

Wind a bifilar choke on a large high permeability (EG #33)
toroid.  Connect one end of the twisted pair across the
bypass capacitor at the bottom of the vertical.  The other
end of the twisted pair from the toroid should also have a bypass
capacitor across it.  The conductor in the pair that is
connected to the vertical should be connected to ground
at the other end.  This provides a DC ground for static
drain purposes.  The other conductor is where you feed
in the coil voltage.

The reason for this arrangement is that the DC currents
due to the relay coil in the bifilar wires are equal
and opposite.  Therefore, the DC does not excite the
toroid and saturate it or magnetize it.  It also avoids
generating any voltage spikes when the coil voltage is switched
off.  About 25 turns on the toroid will work (not critical).

Rick N6RK
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Voltage at top of vertical and scaling?

2019-04-17 Thread Ulrich Weiß

Would like to know how to feed the relay at the top of the vertical...
regards
Uli, DJ2YA

-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- 
From: Richard (Rick) Karlquist

Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2019 2:47 AM
To: Jim Miller ; topband@contesting.com
Subject: Re: Topband: Voltage at top of vertical and scaling?

On 4/16/2019 5:38 AM, Jim Miller wrote:


Is there some zener like ionization at the top that limits the voltage?




jim ab3cv


Supposedly, if you run a kW to a mobile whip on 80 meters, and the
whip has only a 1/4 inch metal ball on the top, you can get corona
discharge, like a Tesla coil.  I have seen this problem fixed by
adding a copper toilet float ball atop the whip.  Air has a
known electric field for breakdown, but it is a complicated
problem to calculate voltage by integrating the electric
field from the tip of the vertical to "infinity".  If interested
in the details, see articles on Telsa coils.

A quarter wave vertical would have MUCH less voltage on top,
of course.  If it's still too high, it is easily reduced by
adding a top hat.

I have a relay at the top of my 80 meter vertical.  As
described in my QST article, I increased the spacing of
the contacts to 1/2 inch.  I have never had any trouble
with this arrangement even at 1500W.  Nor have any readers
of the article reported to me that their relays arc'ed over.

It is far easier to simply overkill the voltage problem
rather than attempt to determine exactly how much voltage
is generated.

Rick N6RK
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector 


_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Voltage at top of vertical and scaling?

2019-04-16 Thread Gary Smith
When I was KA1DQG and in an apartment in 
Bridgeport, CT & not allowed to have 
antennas... I had two Hustler mobile 
sections I used opposed, as a short dipole 
on 80M that was on the carpet floor. Rig 
was a Kenwood 820S & the amp was a SB-221. 

I am here to say I smelled the smoke 
before I saw the two large burnt areas at 
each of the ball ends where the corona 
ripped the carpet a pair of new ones. 

Luckily there was some unused carpet in 
the basement & I did the equivalent of a 
hair plug transfer and all was well.

Corona at the ball end? Oh ya...

73,

Gary
KA1J

> On 4/16/2019 5:38 AM, Jim Miller wrote:
> 
> > Is there some zener like ionization at the top that limits the
> > voltage?
> > 
> 
> > jim ab3cv
> 
> Supposedly, if you run a kW to a mobile whip on 80 meters, and the
> whip has only a 1/4 inch metal ball on the top, you can get corona
> discharge, like a Tesla coil.  I have seen this problem fixed by
> adding a copper toilet float ball atop the whip.  Air has a known
> electric field for breakdown, but it is a complicated problem to
> calculate voltage by integrating the electric field from the tip of
> the vertical to "infinity".  If interested in the details, see
> articles on Telsa coils.
> 
> A quarter wave vertical would have MUCH less voltage on top,
> of course.  If it's still too high, it is easily reduced by
> adding a top hat.
> 
> I have a relay at the top of my 80 meter vertical.  As
> described in my QST article, I increased the spacing of
> the contacts to 1/2 inch.  I have never had any trouble
> with this arrangement even at 1500W.  Nor have any readers
> of the article reported to me that their relays arc'ed over.
> 
> It is far easier to simply overkill the voltage problem
> rather than attempt to determine exactly how much voltage
> is generated.
> 
> Rick N6RK
> _
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
> 



_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Voltage at top of vertical and scaling?

2019-04-16 Thread Richard (Rick) Karlquist

On 4/16/2019 5:38 AM, Jim Miller wrote:


Is there some zener like ionization at the top that limits the voltage?




jim ab3cv


Supposedly, if you run a kW to a mobile whip on 80 meters, and the
whip has only a 1/4 inch metal ball on the top, you can get corona
discharge, like a Tesla coil.  I have seen this problem fixed by
adding a copper toilet float ball atop the whip.  Air has a
known electric field for breakdown, but it is a complicated
problem to calculate voltage by integrating the electric
field from the tip of the vertical to "infinity".  If interested
in the details, see articles on Telsa coils.

A quarter wave vertical would have MUCH less voltage on top,
of course.  If it's still too high, it is easily reduced by
adding a top hat.

I have a relay at the top of my 80 meter vertical.  As
described in my QST article, I increased the spacing of
the contacts to 1/2 inch.  I have never had any trouble
with this arrangement even at 1500W.  Nor have any readers
of the article reported to me that their relays arc'ed over.

It is far easier to simply overkill the voltage problem
rather than attempt to determine exactly how much voltage
is generated.

Rick N6RK
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Voltage at top of vertical and scaling?

2019-04-16 Thread Jeff Blaine

I used a W1W relay at the top of mine for years without incident.

73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com

On 4/16/19 7:22 PM, Jim Miller wrote:

Thanks all for your help on this. It sounds like my 15Kv relay at 53ft on
the 68ft vertical is safe. It's never hot switched and provides connection
to a 160 "tail" to give me my inverted L there. Best I can do on my limited
size, no tree property.

73

jim ab3cv

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 7:52 PM HP  wrote:


Just for grins - did a EZNEC free space - perfect ground - with  80 m
vertical of #12 wire resonant at 3.55 mhz
then put another #12 quarter wave resonant wire at right angles to the top
thru 1 megohm -1500 watts in to the vert
(says its 36.42 + j 0 at source ) says there is 3042 volts at angle -92.56
deg across the 1 meg resistor .

If go to 10 megs it says 3051 at -93.6 deg and base goes to 36.23 +J 0.02

at 10K  its says 1245 v at -29.7 deg and base goes to 41.62 + J 8.2

FWIW and grins --

Hank K7HP

- On Apr 16, 2019, at 6:38 AM, Jim Miller  wrote:

Is there any data on what the voltage might be at the top of a full size
80m vertical at 1500w input?

Is there some zener like ionization at the top that limits the voltage?

If so is there a way to estimate the voltage at lower points along the
vertical? I assume the scaling wouldn't be linear since starting at the
bottom on 36 ohms (sorta) and going to "infinity" at the top would preclude
that.

Thanks

jim ab3cv
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
Reflector



_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Voltage at top of vertical and scaling?

2019-04-16 Thread Jim Miller
Thanks all for your help on this. It sounds like my 15Kv relay at 53ft on
the 68ft vertical is safe. It's never hot switched and provides connection
to a 160 "tail" to give me my inverted L there. Best I can do on my limited
size, no tree property.

73

jim ab3cv

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 7:52 PM HP  wrote:

> Just for grins - did a EZNEC free space - perfect ground - with  80 m
> vertical of #12 wire resonant at 3.55 mhz
> then put another #12 quarter wave resonant wire at right angles to the top
> thru 1 megohm -1500 watts in to the vert
> (says its 36.42 + j 0 at source ) says there is 3042 volts at angle -92.56
> deg across the 1 meg resistor .
>
> If go to 10 megs it says 3051 at -93.6 deg and base goes to 36.23 +J 0.02
>
> at 10K  its says 1245 v at -29.7 deg and base goes to 41.62 + J 8.2
>
> FWIW and grins --
>
> Hank K7HP
>
> - On Apr 16, 2019, at 6:38 AM, Jim Miller  wrote:
>
> Is there any data on what the voltage might be at the top of a full size
> 80m vertical at 1500w input?
>
> Is there some zener like ionization at the top that limits the voltage?
>
> If so is there a way to estimate the voltage at lower points along the
> vertical? I assume the scaling wouldn't be linear since starting at the
> bottom on 36 ohms (sorta) and going to "infinity" at the top would preclude
> that.
>
> Thanks
>
> jim ab3cv
> _
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
>
>
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Voltage at top of vertical and scaling?

2019-04-16 Thread Jeff Blaine
Is this an intellectual exercise or Jim do you want to do something at 
the top of this vert - like hang a vac relay there to engage some 160m 
top hat cap loading wires?


73/jeff/ac0c
alpha-charlie-zero-charlie
www.ac0c.com

On 4/16/19 6:52 PM, HP wrote:

Just for grins - did a EZNEC free space - perfect ground - with 80 m vertical 
of #12 wire resonant at 3.55 mhz
then put another #12 quarter wave resonant wire at right angles to the top thru 
1 megohm -1500 watts in to the vert
(says its 36.42 + j 0 at source ) says there is 3042 volts at angle -92.56 deg 
across the 1 meg resistor .

If go to 10 megs it says 3051 at -93.6 deg and base goes to 36.23 +J 0.02

at 10K its says 1245 v at -29.7 deg and base goes to 41.62 + J 8.2

FWIW and grins --

Hank K7HP

- On Apr 16, 2019, at 6:38 AM, Jim Miller  wrote:

| Is there any data on what the voltage might be at the top of a full size
| 80m vertical at 1500w input?

| Is there some zener like ionization at the top that limits the voltage?

| If so is there a way to estimate the voltage at lower points along the
| vertical? I assume the scaling wouldn't be linear since starting at the
| bottom on 36 ohms (sorta) and going to "infinity" at the top would preclude
| that.

| Thanks

| jim ab3cv
| _
| Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Voltage at top of vertical and scaling?

2019-04-16 Thread HP
Just for grins - did a EZNEC free space - perfect ground - with 80 m vertical 
of #12 wire resonant at 3.55 mhz 
then put another #12 quarter wave resonant wire at right angles to the top thru 
1 megohm -1500 watts in to the vert 
(says its 36.42 + j 0 at source ) says there is 3042 volts at angle -92.56 deg 
across the 1 meg resistor . 

If go to 10 megs it says 3051 at -93.6 deg and base goes to 36.23 +J 0.02 

at 10K its says 1245 v at -29.7 deg and base goes to 41.62 + J 8.2 

FWIW and grins -- 

Hank K7HP 

- On Apr 16, 2019, at 6:38 AM, Jim Miller  wrote: 

| Is there any data on what the voltage might be at the top of a full size
| 80m vertical at 1500w input?

| Is there some zener like ionization at the top that limits the voltage?

| If so is there a way to estimate the voltage at lower points along the
| vertical? I assume the scaling wouldn't be linear since starting at the
| bottom on 36 ohms (sorta) and going to "infinity" at the top would preclude
| that.

| Thanks

| jim ab3cv
| _
| Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Re: Topband: Voltage at top of vertical and scaling?

2019-04-16 Thread Don Kirk
Hi Jim,

Let me take a crack at this based on some online reading I just did, and
the examples I found were based on treating the antenna as a transmission
line (W8JI as well as others treat it this way).  I would estimate the
voltage at the tip of 1/4 wave vertical running 1500 watts to be 3437 Vrms
= 4861 Vpeak.  This is just an estimate using some general assumptions.

Full Details: The above assumes the feedpoint impedance is 35 ohms, and
that the characteristic impedance of a single wire vertical acting as a
transmission line is considered to be between 400 to 650 ohms (I used the
average value of 525 ohms).  Using 525 ohms as the characteristic impedance
of the single wire vertical transmission line, this would translate into an
impedance at the tip of the 1/4 wave wire to be 7875 ohms which appears to
fall into the range of expected tip of antenna impedance values stated
online (easy to transform the feedpoint impedance to the tip of the antenna
since we are dealing with a 1/4 wavelength but you have to take a leap of
faith that the characteristic impedance of the single wire antenna acting
as a transmission line is 525 ohms).  If you then treat the single wire
vertical as a lossless transmission line, the voltage at the tip of the
antenna calculates to be 3437 Vrms (4861 Volts Peak) when running 1500
watts.

The online examples I saw were lacking a lot of detail, and some included
some obvious errors.  Therefore I had to take the best of each example to
come up with my above approximation (assuming the online examples were on
the right track).

I hope others will step in and correct me if they feel I have not
interpreted things correctly.  I'm probably sticking my neck way out on
this one :)

73,
Don (wd8dsb)

On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 8:38 AM Jim Miller  wrote:

> Is there any data on what the voltage might be at the top of a full size
> 80m vertical at 1500w input?
>
> Is there some zener like ionization at the top that limits the voltage?
>
> If so is there a way to estimate the voltage at lower points along the
> vertical? I assume the scaling wouldn't be linear since starting at the
> bottom on 36 ohms (sorta) and going to "infinity" at the top would preclude
> that.
>
> Thanks
>
> jim ab3cv
> _
> Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband
> Reflector
>
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector


Topband: Voltage at top of vertical and scaling?

2019-04-16 Thread Jim Miller
Is there any data on what the voltage might be at the top of a full size
80m vertical at 1500w input?

Is there some zener like ionization at the top that limits the voltage?

If so is there a way to estimate the voltage at lower points along the
vertical? I assume the scaling wouldn't be linear since starting at the
bottom on 36 ohms (sorta) and going to "infinity" at the top would preclude
that.

Thanks

jim ab3cv
_
Searchable Archives: http://www.contesting.com/_topband - Topband Reflector