Re: Topband: substandard quality F double females

2012-12-16 Thread Carl

Has anyone tried RG-8X PL-259 crimp connectors on RG-6?

Carl
KM1H


- Original Message - 
From: Pete Smith N4ZR n...@contesting.com

To: topband@contesting.com
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2012 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: Topband: substandard quality F double females



Amphenol F connectors?  Whoah!

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.

On 12/15/2012 12:35 PM, Jim Brown wrote:

On 12/15/2012 6:52 AM, Charles Bibb - K5ZK wrote:
Which brands/types are the good ones? 


Amphenol, Amphenol, and Amphenol.  Also, the old MIL-spec stuff that 
can be found at most hamfests when OTs clean out their basements.


The shiny new connectors and adapters sold by vendors at hamfests are 
junk -- the center conductors are flimsy, often no more than springs.  
I've had cheap connectors fall apart mechanically, the dielectric of 
connectors intended for soldering will sometimes melt, and so on.  
These junk connectors go intermittent, or overheat with power.


73, Jim K9YC
___
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com



___
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com


-
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1430 / Virus Database: 2634/5461 - Release Date: 12/15/12


___
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com


Re: Topband: substandard quality F double females

2012-12-15 Thread Charles Bibb - K5ZK

At 08:25 AM 12/15/2012, Craig Clark wrote:


I did speak to Lee at Hi-Z yesterday and he warned me about substandard
quality F double females. He has had terrible problems with them.


Which brands/types are the good ones?  Maybe some of mine need replacing...

BTW, I don't think I've ever met a substandard double F female or a 
substandard double D, for that matter. ;-)


73,
Charles - K5ZK

___
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com


Re: Topband: substandard quality F double females

2012-12-15 Thread Bob Eldridge
I did speak to Lee at Hi-Z yesterday and he warned me about 
substandard

quality F double females. He has had terrible problems with them.
 In what respect are they sub-standard?  What kind of problems? 
There is so little that could be defective if the center conductor of 
the coax is the right size to fit the double-female coupler.
Bob VE7BS 


___
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com


Re: Topband: substandard quality F double females

2012-12-15 Thread Jim Brown

On 12/15/2012 6:52 AM, Charles Bibb - K5ZK wrote:
Which brands/types are the good ones? 


Amphenol, Amphenol, and Amphenol.  Also, the old MIL-spec stuff that can 
be found at most hamfests when OTs clean out their basements.


The shiny new connectors and adapters sold by vendors at hamfests are 
junk -- the center conductors are flimsy, often no more than springs.  
I've had cheap connectors fall apart mechanically, the dielectric of 
connectors intended for soldering will sometimes melt, and so on.  These 
junk connectors go intermittent, or overheat with power.


73, Jim K9YC
___
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com


Topband: substandard quality F double females

2012-12-15 Thread Lee K7TJR
I just posted some pictures of my take on F barrel quality
on the Hi-Z website.  You might have to refresh the page
as it is just now posted.   YMMV
Lee  K7TJR   OR

http://www.hizantennas.com/f_connector_quality.pdf;
___
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com


Re: Topband: substandard quality F double females

2012-12-15 Thread Pete Smith N4ZR

Amphenol F connectors?  Whoah!

73, Pete N4ZR
Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
http://reversebeacon.net,
blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
For spots, please go to your favorite
ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.

On 12/15/2012 12:35 PM, Jim Brown wrote:

On 12/15/2012 6:52 AM, Charles Bibb - K5ZK wrote:
Which brands/types are the good ones? 


Amphenol, Amphenol, and Amphenol.  Also, the old MIL-spec stuff that 
can be found at most hamfests when OTs clean out their basements.


The shiny new connectors and adapters sold by vendors at hamfests are 
junk -- the center conductors are flimsy, often no more than springs.  
I've had cheap connectors fall apart mechanically, the dielectric of 
connectors intended for soldering will sometimes melt, and so on.  
These junk connectors go intermittent, or overheat with power.


73, Jim K9YC
___
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com



___
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com


Re: Topband: substandard quality F double females

2012-12-15 Thread Tom W8JI
Which brands/types are the good ones?  Maybe some of mine need 
replacing...


BTW, I don't think I've ever met a substandard double F female or a 
substandard double D, for that matter. ;-)


73,
Charles - K5ZK


Charles,

I'm not sure which brands are bad, but I've been pretty lucky and not run 
into any. It doesn't surprise me, with Chinese manufacturing quality, that 
poor connectors are starting to appear. I think there is a risk people might 
go overboard on connectors based on a few substandard connectors.


I started dealing with F connectors back in the 1970's. I was systems 
engineer at a company that had many dozens or perhaps a hundred or so MATV 
and CATV systems. With hundreds of thousands of connectors, we could not 
tolerate even a small fraction of a percent connector failures.


All of the connectors we used, and I'm sure this applied throughout the 
industry, were tin contacts. The last thing we would use was gold, because 
gold would aggravate something we called fretting corrosion in contact 
with copper clad steel, tinned, or CCA cables. Tin plating was excellent 
under dry circuit conditions, like CATV drop feeds, where no significant 
current flowed through the contact.


Tin plated contacts had to be protected from oxidation by a grease. The 
grease also allows the connectors to be reused over and over without ruining 
the tin. We found a 100% pure silicon dielectric grease best. We used a 
product by GE back then, and I use something called automotive tune up 
grease now. It looks and smells identical. Outside of lightning I have no 
problems with hundreds of F connections in my system.


ALL connectors I have taken apart over the past 40 years have had spring 
contacts. This includes trunk cable connectors. The spring is a two piece 
deal that is sort of double V shaped from the side with one long leg. The 
wire pushes the V point's apart. A good connection requires a pretty good 
spring force. If you insert a piece of dry center conductor in the contact, 
you should be able to feel the female grabbing the wire. It can't feel like 
a zero insertion force connection, or you will have problems.


I would never use gold unless it was against gold. Tin is good for tin to 
tin, tin to silver, and tin to copper. I know of CATV systems that installed 
gold plated connectors and had to go out and remove them. I think Comcast 
got into that once. Besides that, some gold connectors are not even real 
gold. They are just gold colored crap.


My suggestion is to ask advice from and use what the CATV industry uses and 
has used for years. I know everyone thinks gold is magic, but it can be a 
real headache even in cases where it really is gold.


The single most important thing in any connection is to NOT let a stray 
stand get loose and short the connector, to prep the ends properly including 
folding or not folding the shield as required by the cable and connector, 
and to lube the connector with something to keep air and moisture out.


I have many hundreds of F's in my system, and I'm not particularly choosey 
about picking certain brands of females so long as they pass the insertion 
force and pull test (they have to have a definite grabbing friction when 
dry) and are tinned center contacts. The last thing you will find around 
here are gold connectors, unless they mate to another gold contact. I also 
ALWAYS lube the connector with silicon dielectric compound.


73 Tom 


___
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com


Re: Topband: substandard quality F double females

2012-12-15 Thread Mike Waters
Oh really? What about CCS against gold with silicone dielectric compound to
seal out moisture, Tom?

I haven't used those gold-plated connectors yet. Maybe I should return them
for a refund?

73, Mike
www.w0btu.com

On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Tom W8JI w...@w8ji.com wrote:

  The last thing we would use was gold, because gold would aggravate
 something we called fretting corrosion in contact with copper clad steel,
 tinned, or CCA cables. ... I would never use gold unless it was against
 gold. Tin is good for tin to tin, tin to silver, and tin to copper. I know
 of CATV systems that installed gold plated connectors and had to go out and
 remove them.

___
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com


Re: Topband: substandard quality F double females

2012-12-15 Thread Jim Brown

On 12/15/2012 12:04 PM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:

Amphenol F connectors?  Whoah!


Nuts. I didn't read carefully enough. Again.  Thanks Pete.  I was 
thinking UHF.


73, Jim K9YC
___
Topband reflector - topband@contesting.com