Re: [topbraid-users] All rules that determine whether something will have a function factory - where?

2019-07-18 Thread Holger Knublauch
Hmm, it's hard to diagnose this problem without seeing the actual files. 
And it is hard for the tool to show a list of functions that do *not* 
work, because it cannot anticipate what you're trying to call.


As a final random guess, maybe there are conflicting namespace prefixes 
assigned to different namespaces, and the system randomly picks the 
"other" one.


Holger


On 18/07/2019 23:31, Jack Hodges wrote:
This happens before and after a refresh of system registries (always 
my first check). This is with TBCME version 6.2.2. I would actually 
like to see the problem with any SPIN function or template flagged in 
the interface. Right now I don't find out until I try to execute it in 
a SPARQL tab from a vocabulary. I do not want to send these kinds of 
requests to the forum if there is documentation somewhere that I can 
print and tape onto my monitor that I can look at when I see this 
warning. Thank you.


On Wednesday, July 17, 2019 at 3:24:10 PM UTC-7, Holger Knublauch wrote:

Does this also happen after you do a refresh of the system
registries (System menu in TBC)? And are we talking about TBC or EDG?

Holger


On 18/07/2019 06:13, Jack Hodges wrote:

I continue to develop logic in spin functions and templates and
sometimes I get a function factory and sometimes I don't. Is
there document that says for a function or a template what rules
must be satisfied to avoid the "X has no function factory" error?
I am naming the files properly (e.g., foo.spin.ttl or
foo.sms.ttl), but there appear to be other requirements. If there
is no such document, does anyone have notes? Thankyou!

Jack
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the

Google Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
send an email to topbrai...@googlegroups.com .
To view this discussion on the web visit

https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/19451735-f65c-4b08-b1e8-6c5875e9aee4%40googlegroups.com

.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout
.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/37ecd910-22aa-420f-86b4-927d031e8d7d%40googlegroups.com 
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid 
Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/17a65970-f032-c300-9471-d7ee7aca946c%40topquadrant.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [topbraid-users] All rules that determine whether something will have a function factory - where?

2019-07-18 Thread Jack Hodges
This happens before and after a refresh of system registries (always my 
first check). This is with TBCME version 6.2.2. I would actually like to 
see the problem with any SPIN function or template flagged in the 
interface. Right now I don't find out until I try to execute it in a SPARQL 
tab from a vocabulary. I do not want to send these kinds of requests to the 
forum if there is documentation somewhere that I can print and tape onto my 
monitor that I can look at when I see this warning. Thank you.

On Wednesday, July 17, 2019 at 3:24:10 PM UTC-7, Holger Knublauch wrote:
>
> Does this also happen after you do a refresh of the system registries 
> (System menu in TBC)? And are we talking about TBC or EDG?
>
> Holger
>
>
> On 18/07/2019 06:13, Jack Hodges wrote:
>
> I continue to develop logic in spin functions and templates and sometimes 
> I get a function factory and sometimes I don't. Is there document that says 
> for a function or a template what rules must be satisfied to avoid the "X 
> has no function factory" error? I am naming the files properly (e.g., 
> foo.spin.ttl or foo.sms.ttl), but there appear to be other requirements. If 
> there is no such document, does anyone have notes? Thankyou! 
>
> Jack
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to topbrai...@googlegroups.com .
> To view this discussion on the web visit 
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/19451735-f65c-4b08-b1e8-6c5875e9aee4%40googlegroups.com
>  
> 
> .
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/37ecd910-22aa-420f-86b4-927d031e8d7d%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


Re: [topbraid-users] All rules that determine whether something will have a function factory - where?

2019-07-17 Thread Holger Knublauch
Does this also happen after you do a refresh of the system registries 
(System menu in TBC)? And are we talking about TBC or EDG?


Holger


On 18/07/2019 06:13, Jack Hodges wrote:
I continue to develop logic in spin functions and templates and 
sometimes I get a function factory and sometimes I don't. Is there 
document that says for a function or a template what rules must be 
satisfied to avoid the "X has no function factory" error? I am naming 
the files properly (e.g., foo.spin.ttl or foo.sms.ttl), but there 
appear to be other requirements. If there is no such document, does 
anyone have notes? Thankyou!


Jack
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google 
Groups "TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send 
an email to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/19451735-f65c-4b08-b1e8-6c5875e9aee4%40googlegroups.com 
.

For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TopBraid 
Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/1ca028fb-23dd-7e07-0e0f-98836e79895b%40topquadrant.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.


[topbraid-users] All rules that determine whether something will have a function factory - where?

2019-07-17 Thread Jack Hodges
I continue to develop logic in spin functions and templates and sometimes I 
get a function factory and sometimes I don't. Is there document that says 
for a function or a template what rules must be satisfied to avoid the "X 
has no function factory" error? I am naming the files properly (e.g., 
foo.spin.ttl or foo.sms.ttl), but there appear to be other requirements. If 
there is no such document, does anyone have notes? Thankyou!

Jack

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TopBraid Suite Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to topbraid-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/topbraid-users/19451735-f65c-4b08-b1e8-6c5875e9aee4%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.