Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:  (none)
 Type:  defect   | Status:
 |  needs_revision
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:  Tor:
 |  0.4.0.x-final
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-bridge, sponsor8-maybe,  |  Actual Points:
  bootstrap, 033-triage-20180320,|
  033-removed-20180320   |
Parent ID:  #28018   | Points:  1
 Reviewer:  arma |Sponsor:
 |  Sponsor19
-+-
Changes (by gaba):

 * sponsor:  Sponsor8-can => Sponsor19


--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:  (none)
 Type:  defect   | Status:
 |  needs_revision
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:  Tor:
 |  0.4.0.x-final
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-bridge, sponsor8-maybe,  |  Actual Points:
  bootstrap, 033-triage-20180320,|
  033-removed-20180320   |
Parent ID:  #28018   | Points:  1
 Reviewer:  arma |Sponsor:
 |  Sponsor8-can
-+-

Comment (by gaba):

 @catalyst Can we close this ticket as it could be resolved when addressing
 [https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/27308 #27308] ?

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:  (none)
 Type:  defect   | Status:
 |  needs_revision
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:  Tor:
 |  0.3.6.x-final
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-bridge, sponsor8-maybe,  |  Actual Points:
  bootstrap, 033-triage-20180320,|
  033-removed-20180320   |
Parent ID:  #28018   | Points:  1
 Reviewer:  arma |Sponsor:
 |  Sponsor8-can
-+-

Comment (by catalyst):

 #27308 is the more general case of this kind of problem.

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:  (none)
 Type:  defect   | Status:
 |  needs_revision
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:  Tor:
 |  0.3.6.x-final
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-bridge, sponsor8-maybe,  |  Actual Points:
  bootstrap, 033-triage-20180320,|
  033-removed-20180320   |
Parent ID:  #28018   | Points:  1
 Reviewer:  arma |Sponsor:
 |  Sponsor8-can
-+-
Changes (by catalyst):

 * parent:  #25502 => #28018


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:41 nickm]:
 > If we do this, I think it falls under #25502 ?  Apparently there is code
 here that we might be able to use.
 The bug11966 branch seems to be about bootstrap reporting, so this
 probably belongs under #28018.

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:  (none)
 Type:  defect   | Status:
 |  needs_revision
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:  Tor:
 |  0.3.6.x-final
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-bridge, sponsor8-maybe,  |  Actual Points:
  bootstrap, 033-triage-20180320,|
  033-removed-20180320   |
Parent ID:  #25502   | Points:  1
 Reviewer:  arma |Sponsor:
 |  Sponsor8-can
-+-
Changes (by nickm):

 * status:  assigned => needs_revision


--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:  (none)
 Type:  defect   | Status:
 |  assigned
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:  Tor:
 |  0.3.6.x-final
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-bridge, sponsor8-maybe,  |  Actual Points:
  bootstrap, 033-triage-20180320,|
  033-removed-20180320   |
Parent ID:  #25502   | Points:  1
 Reviewer:  arma |Sponsor:
 |  Sponsor8-can
-+-
Changes (by nickm):

 * status:  needs_revision => assigned
 * cc: isis (removed)
 * cc: ahf, dgoulet (added)
 * owner:  isis => (none)
 * parent:   => #25502
 * milestone:  Tor: unspecified => Tor: 0.3.6.x-final


Comment:

 If we do this, I think it falls under #25502 ?  Apparently there is code
 here that we might be able to use.

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:  isis
 Type:  defect   | Status:
 |  needs_revision
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:  Tor:
 |  0.3.2.x-final
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-bridge sponsor8-maybe bootstrap  |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:   | Points:  1
 Reviewer:  arma |Sponsor:
 |  Sponsor8-can
-+-

Comment (by isis):

 If there's someone who is primarily Sponsor8 funded who'd like to work on
 this, lmk. Otherwise I can revisit my patch and probably call it SponsorM-
 can.

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:  isis
 Type:  defect   | Status:
 |  needs_revision
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:  Tor:
 |  unspecified
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-bridge sponsor8-maybe bootstrap  |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:   | Points:  1
 Reviewer:  arma |Sponsor:
-+-
Changes (by mcs):

 * cc: brade, mcs (added)


--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:  isis
 Type:  defect   | Status:
 |  needs_revision
 Priority:  Medium   |  Milestone:  Tor:
 |  unspecified
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |Version:
 Severity:  Normal   | Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-bridge sponsor8-maybe bootstrap  |  Actual Points:
Parent ID:   | Points:  1
 Reviewer:  arma |Sponsor:
-+-
Changes (by nickm):

 * cc: catalyst (added)
 * keywords:  tor-bridge => tor-bridge sponsor8-maybe bootstrap


--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
--+--
 Reporter:  arma  |  Owner:  isis
 Type:  defect| Status:  needs_revision
 Priority:  Medium|  Milestone:  Tor: unspecified
Component:  Core Tor/Tor  |Version:
 Severity:  Normal| Resolution:
 Keywords:  tor-bridge|  Actual Points:
Parent ID:| Points:  1
 Reviewer:  arma  |Sponsor:
--+--
Changes (by nickm):

 * keywords:  tor-bridge, review-group-3, TorCoreTeam201608 => tor-bridge


--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:  isis
 Type:  defect   | Status:
 Priority:  Medium   |  needs_review
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |  Milestone:  Tor:
 Severity:  Normal   |  0.2.9.x-final
 Keywords:  tor-bridge, TorCoreTeam201606,   |Version:
  review-group-3 | Resolution:
Parent ID:   |  Actual Points:
 Reviewer:  arma | Points:  1
 |Sponsor:
-+-
Changes (by nickm):

 * keywords:  tor-bridge, TorCoreTeam201606, review-group-2 => tor-bridge,
 TorCoreTeam201606, review-group-3


--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:  isis
 Type:  defect   | Status:
 Priority:  Medium   |  needs_review
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |  Milestone:  Tor:
 Severity:  Normal   |  0.2.9.x-final
 Keywords:  tor-bridge, TorCoreTeam201606,   |Version:
  review-group-2 | Resolution:
Parent ID:   |  Actual Points:
 Reviewer:  arma | Points:  1
 |Sponsor:
-+-
Changes (by arma):

 * keywords:  tor-bridge, TorCoreTeam201606, review-group-3 => tor-bridge,
 TorCoreTeam201606, review-group-2


Comment:

 I think issue (C) is present in {{{bug11966}}}.

 (Also, I am sorry for being flaky here. I am not having time to be a good
 developer this month so far.)

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:  isis
 Type:  defect   | Status:
 Priority:  Medium   |  needs_review
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |  Milestone:  Tor:
 Severity:  Normal   |  0.2.9.x-final
 Keywords:  tor-bridge, TorCoreTeam201606,   |Version:
  review-group-2 | Resolution:
Parent ID:   |  Actual Points:
 Reviewer:  arma | Points:  1
 |Sponsor:
-+-
Changes (by isis):

 * status:  needs_revision => needs_review


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:18 dgoulet]:
 > @isis, before this can be merged upstream, a control-spec patch is
 needed. imo `bug11966` is ready for merge but still let's make sure `C)`
 (from arma review) is actually addressed.

 Yeah, (C) only applies to `bug11966_v2`.

 There's a control-spec.txt patch in my torspec.git repo, in the `bug11966`
 [https://gitweb.torproject.org/user/isis/torspec.git/log/?h=bug11966
 branch].

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:  isis
 Type:  defect   | Status:
 Priority:  Medium   |  needs_revision
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |  Milestone:  Tor:
 Severity:  Normal   |  0.2.9.x-final
 Keywords:  tor-bridge, TorCoreTeam201606,   |Version:
  review-group-2 | Resolution:
Parent ID:   |  Actual Points:
 Reviewer:  arma | Points:  1
 |Sponsor:
-+-
Changes (by dgoulet):

 * keywords:  tor-bridge, TorCoreTeam201605, review-group-2 => tor-bridge,
 TorCoreTeam201606, review-group-2
 * status:  merge_ready => needs_revision


Comment:

 @isis, before this can be merged upstream, a control-spec patch is needed.
 imo `bug11966` is ready for merge but still let's make sure `C)` (from
 arma review) is actually addressed.

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:  isis
 Type:  defect   | Status:
 Priority:  Medium   |  merge_ready
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |  Milestone:  Tor:
 Severity:  Normal   |  0.2.9.x-final
 Keywords:  tor-bridge, TorCoreTeam201605,   |Version:
  review-group-2 | Resolution:
Parent ID:   |  Actual Points:
 Reviewer:  arma | Points:  1
 |Sponsor:
-+-

Comment (by dgoulet):

 Replying to [comment:16 arma]:
 > A) This wants a control-spec.txt patch too (Section 5.5 at the bottom).

 Indeed

 >
 > B) {{{+  BOOTSTRAP_STATUS_REQUESTING_BRIDGE_DESC=3,}}}
 > Doesn't this want to be =18? Oh, I see there is discussion above on this
 topic. I need to read that discussion more, but I hope to not buy it. If
 two of us like the 18% approach more, but there are bugs, we should
 explore and fix those bugs.

 v2 branch is not ideal. The right branch is `bug11966`. (same for C).

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:  isis
 Type:  defect   | Status:
 Priority:  Medium   |  merge_ready
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |  Milestone:  Tor:
 Severity:  Normal   |  0.2.9.x-final
 Keywords:  tor-bridge, TorCoreTeam201605,   |Version:
  review-group-2 | Resolution:
Parent ID:   |  Actual Points:
 Reviewer:  arma | Points:  1
 |Sponsor:
-+-

Comment (by arma):

 A) This wants a control-spec.txt patch too (Section 5.5 at the bottom).

 B) {{{+  BOOTSTRAP_STATUS_REQUESTING_BRIDGE_DESC=3,}}}
 Doesn't this want to be =18? Oh, I see there is discussion above on this
 topic. I need to read that discussion more, but I hope to not buy it. If
 two of us like the 18% approach more, but there are bugs, we should
 explore and fix those bugs.

 C) The change in circuitbuild.c now no longer triggers
 BOOTSTRAP_STATUS_REQUESTING_STATUS in some cases? And it's not clear that
 we will necessarily get back into circuit_send_next_onion_skin() later, to
 trigger it? So does that mean there are now cases where we accidentally
 skip this bootstrap phase?

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:  isis
 Type:  defect   | Status:
 Priority:  Medium   |  merge_ready
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |  Milestone:  Tor:
 Severity:  Normal   |  0.2.9.x-final
 Keywords:  tor-bridge, TorCoreTeam201605,   |Version:
  review-group-2 | Resolution:
Parent ID:   |  Actual Points:
 Reviewer:  arma | Points:  1
 |Sponsor:
-+-
Changes (by dgoulet):

 * status:  needs_review => merge_ready


Comment:

 Ok! Thanks for the explanation, now it's clearer. :)

 Yeah I think the 18% step alone is fine. Our circuit is opened and we are
 about to request the bridge descriptor followed by 20% which is getting
 the consensus using that bridge. Sounds good.

 The branch `bug11966` in your repo lgtm!

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:  isis
 Type:  defect   | Status:
 Priority:  Medium   |  needs_review
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |  Milestone:  Tor:
 Severity:  Normal   |  0.2.9.x-final
 Keywords:  tor-bridge, TorCoreTeam201605,   |Version:
  review-group-2 | Resolution:
Parent ID:   |  Actual Points:
 Reviewer:  arma | Points:  1
 |Sponsor:
-+-
Changes (by isis):

 * status:  needs_information => needs_review


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:13 dgoulet]:
 > One question. When we trigger the
 `BOOTSTRAP_STATUS_REQUESTING_BRIDGE_DESC` control event, we do it in the
 circuit building function instead of the "requesting bridge desc" function
 which I assume is `directory_get_from_dirserver`.
 >

 So... what happens is that we just build a circuit to our bridge, without
 knowing it's key, and then we ask the bridge for the consensus. The bridge
 responds with its descriptor. Then, usually, because the scheduled events
 run we call `fetch_bridge_descriptors()` and the bridge gives us the
 descriptor again. ''Then'' we decide "oh, I actually have the bridge
 descriptor, now I can ask for the consensus again." When we ask for the
 consensus again, at this point is the first time that any of the code in
 `directory.c` is called, but never before that (because of this fumbling
 around that happens with fetching the bridge descriptor).

 However, if we were to trigger `BOOTSTRAP_STATUS_REQUESTING_BRIDGE_DESC`
 in `fetch_bridge_descriptors`,  then it seems like we would want to make
 this event be at like 3% bootstrapped, because "15%" is "establishing an
 encrypted directory connection" where the "directory" in question is
 actually the bridge (for which we already have it's descriptor at this
 point, because the stupid fumbling) and the point that we get the
 descriptor is before `BOOTSTRAP_STATUS_CONN_DIR=5` (5%).

 > For instance, `BOOTSTRAP_STATUS_REQUESTING_DESCRIPTORS` is used when we
 realize we need more descriptors rather than when the circuit is built for
 that request. What if that onehop circuit never gets build, we won't know
 that it was because we requested a bridge descriptor?

 Ah. That is true.

 --

 Okay, there's an alternate version of the patch in my `bug11966_v2`
 [https://gitweb.torproject.org/user/isis/tor.git/log/?h=bug11966_v2
 branch] and it does like this:

 {{{
 May 31 15:11:45.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 0%: Starting
 May 31 15:11:45.000 [notice] Delaying directory fetches: No running
 bridges
 May 31 15:11:46.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 3%: Asking for bridge
 descriptors
 May 31 15:11:46.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 5%: Connecting to directory
 server
 May 31 15:11:46.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 10%: Finishing handshake with
 directory server
 May 31 15:11:46.000 [notice] Learned fingerprint
 8F347C5673390E46642B06A7B1F4088B59437AD0 for bridge 127.0.0.1:5009.
 May 31 15:11:46.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 15%: Establishing an encrypted
 directory connection
 May 31 15:11:46.000 [notice] new bridge descriptor 'test009br' (fresh):
 $8F347C5673390E46642B06A7B1F4088B59437AD0~test009br at 127.0.0.1
 May 31 15:11:46.000 [notice] I learned some more directory information,
 but not enough to build a circuit: We have no usable consensus.
 May 31 15:11:47.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus
 consensus
 May 31 15:11:47.000 [notice] Bootstrapped 25%: Loading networkstatus
 consensus
 }}}

 (FWIW, I still like the 18% method better but I don't really care either
 way.)

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
-+-
 Reporter:  arma |  Owner:  isis
 Type:  defect   | Status:
 Priority:  Medium   |  needs_information
Component:  Core Tor/Tor |  Milestone:  Tor:
 Severity:  Normal   |  0.2.9.x-final
 Keywords:  tor-bridge, TorCoreTeam201605,   |Version:
  review-group-2 | Resolution:
Parent ID:   |  Actual Points:
 Reviewer:  arma | Points:  1
 |Sponsor:
-+-
Changes (by dgoulet):

 * status:  needs_review => needs_information


Comment:

 One question. When we trigger the
 `BOOTSTRAP_STATUS_REQUESTING_BRIDGE_DESC` control event, we do it in the
 circuit building function instead of the "requesting bridge desc" function
 which I assume is `directory_get_from_dirserver`.

 For instance, `BOOTSTRAP_STATUS_REQUESTING_DESCRIPTORS` is used when we
 realize we need more descriptors rather than when the circuit is built for
 that request. What if that onehop circuit never gets build, we won't know
 that it was because we requested a bridge descriptor?

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
---+---
 Reporter:  arma   |  Owner:  isis
 Type:  defect | Status:  needs_review
 Priority:  Medium |  Milestone:  Tor:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor   |  0.2.9.x-final
 Severity:  Normal |Version:
 Keywords:  tor-bridge, TorCoreTeam201605  | Resolution:
Parent ID: |  Actual Points:
 Reviewer:  arma   | Points:  1
   |Sponsor:
---+---
Changes (by isis):

 * milestone:  Tor: 0.2.8.x-final => Tor: 0.2.9.x-final


Comment:

 Replying to [comment:10 nickm]:
 > I'm concerned about all the things that look at this number.  Can we
 defer merging this to 0.2.9?
 >

 That's fine by me. I was wondering why it hadn't been bumped to 0.2.9, and
 why it received the TorCoreTeam201605 tag. (I had assumed you or arma
 wanted it prioritised for some reason.)

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
---+---
 Reporter:  arma   |  Owner:  isis
 Type:  defect | Status:  needs_review
 Priority:  Medium |  Milestone:  Tor:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor   |  0.2.8.x-final
 Severity:  Normal |Version:
 Keywords:  tor-bridge, TorCoreTeam201605  | Resolution:
Parent ID: |  Actual Points:
 Reviewer:  arma   | Points:  1
   |Sponsor:
---+---

Comment (by nickm):

 I'm concerned about all the things that look at this number.  Can we defer
 merging this to 0.2.9?

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
---+---
 Reporter:  arma   |  Owner:  isis
 Type:  defect | Status:  needs_review
 Priority:  Medium |  Milestone:  Tor:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor   |  0.2.8.x-final
 Severity:  Normal |Version:
 Keywords:  tor-bridge, TorCoreTeam201605  | Resolution:
Parent ID: |  Actual Points:
 Reviewer:  arma   | Points:  small
   |Sponsor:
---+---
Changes (by arma):

 * reviewer:   => arma


--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs

Re: [tor-bugs] #11966 [Core Tor/Tor]: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for bridge users

[Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki]

#11966: "Bootstrapped 20%: Asking for networkstatus consensus" is a lie for 
bridge
users
---+---
 Reporter:  arma   |  Owner:  isis
 Type:  defect | Status:  needs_review
 Priority:  Medium |  Milestone:  Tor:
Component:  Core Tor/Tor   |  0.2.8.x-final
 Severity:  Normal |Version:
 Keywords:  tor-bridge, TorCoreTeam201605  | Resolution:
Parent ID: |  Actual Points:
 Reviewer: | Points:  small
   |Sponsor:
---+---
Changes (by isis):

 * status:  assigned => needs_review
 * severity:   => Normal


Comment:

 Please see my `bug11966`
 [https://gitweb.torproject.org/user/isis/tor.git/log/?h=bug11966 branch].

--
Ticket URL: 
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki 
The Tor Project: anonymity online
___
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs