Re: [tor-dev] Apple App Store Redux

2013-11-17 Thread Ralf-Philipp Weinmann
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 09:15:58AM +, Georg Koppen wrote:
 Erinn Clark:
  I am at this point in favor of signing OSX packages with their codesigning 
  but
 
 How is this supposed to work with Gitian?

I don't see the problem. You can still verify the output of your Gitian build
against the signed version. After all, signing an app just adds an
LC_CODE_SIGNATURE load command plus associated data to your Mach-O files and a
Contents/_CodeSignature/CodeResources for the resources to your app bundle. To
verify you can simply remove both using command line tools and compare the
signed version against the local Gitian build process output.

Cheers,
Ralf
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev


Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 195: TLS certificate normalization for Tor 0.2.4.x

2012-03-10 Thread Ralf-Philipp Weinmann

On Mar 10, 2012, at 2:18 AM, George Kadianakis wrote:
 
 IIRC stateless TLS session resumption does not quire keeping key
 material. The required key material are all stored on the client side.

You're thinking of this RFC5077 or its predecessor RFC4507, which only became 
implemented in OpenSSL 0.9.9 
(http://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=1574). The usual way to achieve 
session resumption before that was to keep around (cache) symmetric key data 
for a predefined period of time. Trouble is that many unixoid OS distributions 
still ship with a system OpenSSL version  0.9.9.

Cheers,
Ralf
___
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev