Re: [tor-dev] archive.is and archive.fo are using CloudFlare. Is the TorBrowser add-on cfc useless now?
Dear Tor developers, there is a new development in the area of Tor-friendly web archives: On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 11:42:45AM +, Yawning Angel wrote: > On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:15:05 +0100 > Christian Pietsch wrote: > > Considering that cfc was created in order to evade the CloudFlare > > captcha, this is quite a disappointment. Is cfc useless now? Can it be > > fixed? > > It was a proof of concept that I no longer have time to work on. Fair enough. > > What is the reason why archive.org is not used? I hear they are almost > > done setting up an onion service for the Internet Archive. > > Because, out of all the similar services that are available, I like > archive.is the most. Two weeks ago, an Onion Site for the Internet Archive was announced: http://hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?/archives/750-Freedom-of-Information.html Some tech people at the Internet Archive were informed well ahead of this announcement, and they are happy with it. I expect this Onion Site to remain stable for quite a while. I have not hacked a Firefox extension before, and I would be glad if somebody else came forward to modify cfc accordingly. Cheers, Christian -- Christian Pietsch | library technologist also volunteering for Digitalcourage e.V., Marktstr. 18, D-33602 Bielefeld, Germany https://digitalcourage.de | https://bigbrotherawards.de signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
Re: [tor-dev] archive.is and archive.fo are using CloudFlare. Is the TorBrowser add-on cfc useless now?
On Wed, 18 Jan 2017 12:15:05 +0100 Christian Pietsch wrote: > Considering that cfc was created in order to evade the CloudFlare > captcha, this is quite a disappointment. Is cfc useless now? Can it be > fixed? It was a proof of concept that I no longer have time to work on. > What is the reason why archive.org is not used? I hear they are almost > done setting up an onion service for the Internet Archive. Because, out of all the similar services that are available, I like archive.is the most. Regards, -- Yawning Angel pgpsmCmx8FO59.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
[tor-dev] archive.is and archive.fo are using CloudFlare. Is the TorBrowser add-on cfc useless now?
Hi Yawning, hi all, sorry if this is old news, but I just noticed that archive.is not only redirects me to archive.fo (which I noticed before), but archive.fo now greets me with a CloudFlare captcha. Considering that cfc was created in order to evade the CloudFlare captcha, this is quite a disappointment. Is cfc useless now? Can it be fixed? David F suggested using Memento which I think is an interesting idea, having participated in one of their hackathons. One caveat: Memento would point to to various archives not all of which might be suitable. What is the reason why archive.org is not used? I hear they are almost done setting up an onion service for the Internet Archive. Cheers, C: On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 10:16:31PM +, Yawning Angel wrote: > Source: https://git.schwanenlied.me/yawning/cfc -- Christian Pietsch, volunteering for Digitalcourage e.V., Bielefeld, Germany Nominations sought for the German Big Brother Awards: https://bigbrotherawards.de Verfassungsbeschwerde gegen Vorratsdatenspeicherung: https://digitalcourage.de/weg-mit-vds Appell gegen den geplanten Datenschutz-Abbau: https://digitalcourage.de/rettet-den-datenschutz Umfrage zum Datenschutztag 2017: https://datenschutztag.org/survey/ signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev
