Re: [tor-relays] Building on a Udoo Dual
Thanks for the reply Andy. I'll try changing the sources.list first. If that doesn't work I found the armel sources, so I can just compile them. Richard On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 8:51 PM, Andy Isaacson a...@hexapodia.org wrote: On Sat, Nov 16, 2013 at 12:09:50PM -0500, Richard Budd wrote: Does anyone know if the Tor Project has sources for top that can be compiled on a Udoo Dual? It's running Ubuntu 11.10 (oneiric) on a ARMv7 processor. I've tried following the instructions on https://www.torproject.org/docs/debian, but I get an Err http://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org/ experimental-oneiric/main tor 0.2.4.17-rc-1~oneiric+1 (dsc) 404 Not Found [IP: 38.229.72.14 80]error when trying to run the sudo apt-get source tor command. The repo contains .dsc files for lucid, precise, quantal and raring. The precise dsc should be fairly close to what's necessary for oneiric, so if you change your sources.list entry for deb.torproject.org from oneiric to precise and re-run sudo apt-get update I suspect the apt-get source will succeed. BTW, since apt-get-source is just downloading files and verifying checksums, you don't need to run it under sudo as long as you run it in a directory where your regular user account has write permissions. Are you sure that you need to compile? From a quick survey it appears that the armel debs might work just fine on the Udoo. -andy ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay in Russia/China
Message: 2 Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 05:20:22 -0500 From: that guy g...@gmx.us To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay in Russia/China Message-ID: 528746e6.1030...@gmx.us Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On 11/15/2013 06:20 PM, tor-relays-requ...@lists.torproject.org wrote: I've heard that some ISPs in China provide uncensored network access to foreign companies. But this is hearsay You are correct but it is not that simple nor widespread. What I've seen most often is execs from big companies getting special considerations so while uncensored might be a stretch there is some truth to the above. I can find out more any time if anyone needs some info please contact me any time as I don't think it will be a big topic of discussion here:) I have seen heavy use of VPN's by western students visiting, or studying in Bejing w/out issue. I'll have very current info and can get some near instant feedback in the next day or two. And to the guys saying avoid the ussa like the plague this wanna-be expat agrees 100%. Sadly! And for a whole lot more than just Tor nodes. But keep in mind that Chinese people like to do things in a tricky way. They might say not censored network but they didn't say they're not monitoring it. The gov has said that they will be strict on ideology in any situation. I did hear about someone in a famous Finnish mobile phone company which will belong to a US operating system making company said they can access facebook directly but I haven't got a chance to see whether they are using an enterprise level VPN or uncensored network. -- --- PGP Fingerprint : 7770 D186 A06E A329 2217 3161 63EB F269 37B8 8644 http://pastebin.com/8W8vyNjb --- ... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. From the United States of America's Declaration of Independence July 4, 1776 --- -- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Tor relay in Russia/China
It sounds like a challenge to get a relay up in China... Perhaps this talk might inpsire a way of helping Tor into China. http://www.ted.com/talks/michael_anti_behind_the_great_firewall_of_china.html Robert GET FREE SMILEYS FOR YOUR IM EMAIL - Learn more at http://www.inbox.com/smileys Works with AIM®, MSN® Messenger, Yahoo!® Messenger, ICQ®, Google Talk™ and most webmails ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] which aws ami?
On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 7:52 PM, I beatthebasta...@inbox.com wrote: Isn't the free deal for one instance only? Yes, it's for one instance per account (and one account counts as an email address plus a credit card). -- Runa A. Sandvik ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 3:47 PM, Eric van der Vlist v...@dyomedea.com wrote: Without bandwidth limitation that's true. OTH, I currently consume only ~ 50 Gbits/month and the limit is 500 Gbits. Would a relay limited to let's say 200 or 300 Gbits/month still be useful for the community? People, can we please mind using the proper units. I know Tor doesn't make it easy because Tor itself incorrectly uses Bytes. But Tor is a network application, and real network apps are measured in 'bits per second', not 'bytes transferred off disk', even if the latter is what silly hosters sell by... mostly due to their presumed need to tie in with their typical customers supposed Apache access_logs. But believe me, what hosters really care about is their upstream bill in bps rate, they're just converting that for access_log presentation to you. Your further mixing of 'giga bits per month' doesn't help *at all*. Please try to use 'bits per second' as the common denominator on this (network application) list. BTW, Gandi is historically a fairly progressive company. The right approach could have some good wins there. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Proper bandwidth units [was: Exit nodes on Gandi]
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 12:14:15AM -0500, grarpamp wrote: People, can we please mind using the proper units. I know Tor doesn't make it easy because Tor itself incorrectly uses Bytes. But Tor is a network application, and real network apps are measured in 'bits per second' I understand your perspective, but Tor is an overlay application just like bittorrent. Tor moves bytes around. It happens that it moves the bytes over the network, so I can see why you would call it a network application. But by your definition I claim it is not. :) That said, yes, always say the whole unit. Do not assume that anybody knows what you mean when you say 'b'. No matter what you mean, there will always be somebody who is certain of what you mean yet is wrong. --Roger ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
