[tor-relays] Exit policies pointing to IP blocks not appearing on Globe

2014-06-09 Thread Mendelson Gusmão
Hi! I just setup a tor relay, encouraged by EFF's Tor Challenge. All I have
is a domestic connection. I've read my TOS and my ISP seems to be very
friendly to this case. Although I have a little suspicion about traffic
shaping, my exit node seems to be running very well!

I'm worried about one thing, though. I remember that a while ago, when I
tried to access Facebook using a tor client, I saw a message telling that I
was blocked for using the network. To avoid the other users of my network
to be blocked due to the traffic in my exit node, I managed to add exit
policies rejecting every IP block that belongs to Facebook. However, these
exit policies don't appear in neither globe.torproject.com nor any site
that provides information about nodes.

Are these addresses being scrubbed? How do I make sure that these policies
being applied?

Thanks!
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Running relays at consortia networks [was: JANET/edu]

2014-06-09 Thread Cristóbal Palmer
On Jun 7, 2014 3:27 PM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:


 Has anyone tried approaching these networks themselves
 to see about running relays there? Their bandwidth for sponsored
 things is often free. In the US you might try internet2.edu and all
 its various connecting regional networks.


I'm at a member institution for Internet2, and the buy-in process put us in
a research VLAN outside the university network. I'd be very interested in
hearing from people at other member institutions about coordinating
management of risk such that our service is more supportable and robust.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


[tor-relays] Fwd: Running relays at consortia networks [was: JANET/edu]

2014-06-09 Thread grarpamp
C, there is also a tor-relays-universities list.
Forwarding there to keep the initial chat primed.

Once you have buy in from legal, chairs, security, upstream,
etc this can be a very strong position, often better than pay 'contract'
of random ISP host. I have seen such 'outside' nets used for these
not strictly mission things, such I suggest it in this thread. Different
approach depends on if you can find and house a legitimate paper
producing research purpose, or if you simply will run it for
supporting freedom point of view.

Worth mention is that both internet2 and nanog have mailing lists
where queries and propositions could be sent. Cold contacts at
regionals are not hard to find.

-- Forwarded message --
From: Cristóbal Palmer cmpal...@ibiblio.org
Date: Mon, Jun 9, 2014 at 5:56 PM
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Running relays at consortia networks [was: JANET/edu]
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org

On Jun 7, 2014 3:27 PM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote:
 Has anyone tried approaching these networks themselves
 to see about running relays there? Their bandwidth for sponsored
 things is often free. In the US you might try internet2.edu and all
 its various connecting regional networks.

I'm at a member institution for Internet2, and the buy-in process put
us in a research VLAN outside the university network. I'd be very
interested in hearing from people at other member institutions about
coordinating management of risk such that our service is more
supportable and robust.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays