[tor-relays] Help with my first relay.
Hi, i want to check if the relay has a good configuration. Also i have another question, why the speed of the relay is so slow, i have a VPS with a connection of 100mb/s, the relay is new. This is torrc: ORPort 443 Exitpolicy reject *:* Nickname Freedom4Anarchists ContactInfo nomail@... RelayBandwidthRate 85 MB RelayBandwidthBurst 90 MB DisableDebuggerAttachment 0 Thanks to all :) ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] avira exits as24875
hey seems like avira is joining us running 24 exits through as24875. seems to be about double the size of mozillas relays. Yay! ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] avira exits as24875
any publication out there about that great effort? whos involved? Am Sonntag, 7. Juni 2015 19:06 schrieb nusenu nus...@openmailbox.org: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 seems like avira is joining us running 24 exits through as24875. seems to be about double the size of mozillas relays. Yes, they joined on 2015-05-11. One of the few groups of relays that actually have a proper MyFamily configuration. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVdHoaAAoJEFv7XvVCELh03i8QALUFslx9yToxWphtmBzw+9/E PehDoa+iRMcSy3v604RvXpahJeIyXz0WaXeLkhW4+xQuERf5s68ZnmtHIhf5QFz9 zCvkIIZ993juauGVRfoTJzU1ACbh0ixvs48tbxCKOMf4sAGYuKeDyT0UtpaPO+u0 GFUGVeypdluziLAvqE2Lg19UR7fxTKk7O4SYvkscYPQAUWc+zaolGp2tk/3sPWni Pu1nbO+iXDl1s4R/+VN3tJRUG2IDAZVBAWA6g2PYU2xRFUVat8SdY8UXiLJJTSsA ANX5fenJtyT/OMvX9lsj/Rn/0k1lJhX27DuLnMEB0aFBm436n5XjVACu+e7xutIK OVds/EwpHCiZcz8+8QM7ERqdXSJvV07UmL53gwUITPPUJ0s5EpHrQve7kPU7jLuR bfLNzyluKQW7yJi0Y0LSMCZIsFiwH8ELxniWq/XesAjQsOcsGjng8qkE7mEf1Qv7 BlQUKbNEt4n07QXBfma6+1fEab32IFeAc42vD6TU57dUnZGK1TbWXyowc3wvAPtx m7kIhr2HzjvIXZS3Oxm8RDy8LWjq1a5w92j+cAqSvbalDle8dhwFDzNkRmd3Z3za +i37uMCBYDLFkpbQCo9mCv/sj1bKxaRub2R62Sdo4G7NkbSIAyErWYWv2LiFXFZX vrOqXw6NgHV7slAaT4tn =5D5J -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] avira exits as24875
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 seems like avira is joining us running 24 exits through as24875. seems to be about double the size of mozillas relays. Yes, they joined on 2015-05-11. One of the few groups of relays that actually have a proper MyFamily configuration. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVdHoaAAoJEFv7XvVCELh03i8QALUFslx9yToxWphtmBzw+9/E PehDoa+iRMcSy3v604RvXpahJeIyXz0WaXeLkhW4+xQuERf5s68ZnmtHIhf5QFz9 zCvkIIZ993juauGVRfoTJzU1ACbh0ixvs48tbxCKOMf4sAGYuKeDyT0UtpaPO+u0 GFUGVeypdluziLAvqE2Lg19UR7fxTKk7O4SYvkscYPQAUWc+zaolGp2tk/3sPWni Pu1nbO+iXDl1s4R/+VN3tJRUG2IDAZVBAWA6g2PYU2xRFUVat8SdY8UXiLJJTSsA ANX5fenJtyT/OMvX9lsj/Rn/0k1lJhX27DuLnMEB0aFBm436n5XjVACu+e7xutIK OVds/EwpHCiZcz8+8QM7ERqdXSJvV07UmL53gwUITPPUJ0s5EpHrQve7kPU7jLuR bfLNzyluKQW7yJi0Y0LSMCZIsFiwH8ELxniWq/XesAjQsOcsGjng8qkE7mEf1Qv7 BlQUKbNEt4n07QXBfma6+1fEab32IFeAc42vD6TU57dUnZGK1TbWXyowc3wvAPtx m7kIhr2HzjvIXZS3Oxm8RDy8LWjq1a5w92j+cAqSvbalDle8dhwFDzNkRmd3Z3za +i37uMCBYDLFkpbQCo9mCv/sj1bKxaRub2R62Sdo4G7NkbSIAyErWYWv2LiFXFZX vrOqXw6NgHV7slAaT4tn =5D5J -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Help with my first relay.
On Sun, Jun 07, 2015 at 06:42:29PM +0200, janarkop...@riseup.net wrote: Hi, i want to check if the relay has a good configuration. Also i have another question, why the speed of the relay is so slow, i have a VPS with a connection of 100mb/s, the relay is new. This is torrc: ORPort 443 Exitpolicy reject *:* Nickname Freedom4Anarchists ContactInfo nomail@... RelayBandwidthRate 85 MB RelayBandwidthBurst 90 MB DisableDebuggerAttachment 0 Be careful! The MB above is megabytes per second. So your 100mbit connection is rate limited to 680mbit. This is why the sample torrc file these days says MBytes rather than MB. As for why your new relay isn't handling much traffic yet, see https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay But also see the recent discussions here about the bandwidth authorities, since a lot of the load on your relay will depend on what weights the bandwidth authorities vote about your relay, and these votes are not exactly perfect lately. Thanks for running a relay! --Roger ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] False exit abuse from server4you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Company unmetered.com (used to be running under PlusServer which is a 'premium' brand of Intergenia but now seems to be running on link11 network) did and probably still does allow Tor Exit nodes to be run on their services. How they handled the generated abuse from these nodes 'upstream' is the big question. On 7-6-2015 10:29, Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner wrote: Intergenia AG does not tolerate TOR nodes in any form. They listed them quite a time in their AGB's. Am 7. Juni 2015 09:55:14 MESZ, schrieb Dr. Who dr...@posteo.is: Fun fact of the week, I got this abuse email on friday: Dear Customer, we've detected that you're running a TOR Exit Node on your machine. Please understand, that we cannot tolerate such a service on our infrastructure. Please ensure, that this service is disabled as soon as possible. Best Regards Your Intergenia Abuse Team followed by over 6000 IPv4 numbers including one of my relay server. First I find it a privacy violation for those other users who might run any form of tor beeing found on an abuse email to me. It should have listed only my own IP number. Secondly I think they should be able to differate between exit and relay servers. I'm eager to hear their response on Monday. Either they keep relays running or I quit, monthly payment is a good idea in that case. Just letting you know... ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays - -- Tim Semeijn Babylon Network pgp 0x5B8A4DDF -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVdBemAAoJEIZioqpbik3fpKcP/is+ItLJ9Ab/QooRgt3w0l/7 vdBiPLk9vAoxrGnfJl7IjqmZZUE4BfNbjUV3HJbMh8uUnTTxSlxK8BmR6NcRVdqR ogl7BFM5lYL1+8mtuUE6hc5Gs5nZXJbLkrREofq7Qan9ma5tyRQKcr6ipGYDQ9oL 4yke8ZMhsCHEDmfr1JSmEtxYVeG8Bx7BB1vj2NzUGl54OamII4/SZRGWsoQhDnTQ Uq5WytNOancOdQNM+CbkAcrfKRa4xzYc7Aq21hU/EViv7Z3YSRz0QFWRRPx1aoWe UAV4ce5m9POtqIpZJbZqJWD0nw1hxmwUe1fn+BwfHucUSaO/eUqA1uM/TEBnQnWv SANTaVg+L+kqn1owCmYLBpk78U2C7Z8r0GrofwI3BHN+xMDZJi8V7gywKZhiTbUZ sJkMdTtuJkoTKH4RGfZlSgoxIXP4COzz/S0RNhGWCOk0+rLTATkkFfSJoNaLJixD g/xSe2hx34vZ5UA7k7iXQZ3W4AxOasQTc3siZycccu/m8nk826LB366kkx3+misl txIRExXqzRX4QzqPuO1XwVnJ5HXjG6FlFMGI5uJ/svzKD679IZqNj0ZVJ5ivT0p4 eFzcsLxBcQcZEQDm6nL5zZ2l39fxClZgE/R20TDGYVIsGl+qhhnxe4099NaoEPSq lo2mhFvlH4plBDp/hs5M =or38 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Bridge Usage and Setup
I want to investigate why obfs4 is nearly never used. hi, may you want to have a look into tails bug #9268 adressing some obfs issue ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] False exit abuse from server4you
Let's hope so, as Unmetered hosts a pretty significant amount of exit traffic. Several of my exits run there and I too received the abuse notifications. I've contacted Unmetered for clarification and will return to this thread as soon as I hear more. The way unmetered has always handled abuse traffic is simple: customer gets 3 days to respond to the message, or the server gets temporarily disconnected. I don't think there's any human interaction with abuse reports on their side. Tom Tim Semeijn schreef op 07/06/15 om 12:06: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Company unmetered.com (used to be running under PlusServer which is a 'premium' brand of Intergenia but now seems to be running on link11 network) did and probably still does allow Tor Exit nodes to be run on their services. How they handled the generated abuse from these nodes 'upstream' is the big question. On 7-6-2015 10:29, Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner wrote: Intergenia AG does not tolerate TOR nodes in any form. They listed them quite a time in their AGB's. Am 7. Juni 2015 09:55:14 MESZ, schrieb Dr. Who dr...@posteo.is: Fun fact of the week, I got this abuse email on friday: Dear Customer, we've detected that you're running a TOR Exit Node on your machine. Please understand, that we cannot tolerate such a service on our infrastructure. Please ensure, that this service is disabled as soon as possible. Best Regards Your Intergenia Abuse Team followed by over 6000 IPv4 numbers including one of my relay server. First I find it a privacy violation for those other users who might run any form of tor beeing found on an abuse email to me. It should have listed only my own IP number. Secondly I think they should be able to differate between exit and relay servers. I'm eager to hear their response on Monday. Either they keep relays running or I quit, monthly payment is a good idea in that case. Just letting you know... ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays - -- Tim Semeijn Babylon Network pgp 0x5B8A4DDF -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVdBemAAoJEIZioqpbik3fpKcP/is+ItLJ9Ab/QooRgt3w0l/7 vdBiPLk9vAoxrGnfJl7IjqmZZUE4BfNbjUV3HJbMh8uUnTTxSlxK8BmR6NcRVdqR ogl7BFM5lYL1+8mtuUE6hc5Gs5nZXJbLkrREofq7Qan9ma5tyRQKcr6ipGYDQ9oL 4yke8ZMhsCHEDmfr1JSmEtxYVeG8Bx7BB1vj2NzUGl54OamII4/SZRGWsoQhDnTQ Uq5WytNOancOdQNM+CbkAcrfKRa4xzYc7Aq21hU/EViv7Z3YSRz0QFWRRPx1aoWe UAV4ce5m9POtqIpZJbZqJWD0nw1hxmwUe1fn+BwfHucUSaO/eUqA1uM/TEBnQnWv SANTaVg+L+kqn1owCmYLBpk78U2C7Z8r0GrofwI3BHN+xMDZJi8V7gywKZhiTbUZ sJkMdTtuJkoTKH4RGfZlSgoxIXP4COzz/S0RNhGWCOk0+rLTATkkFfSJoNaLJixD g/xSe2hx34vZ5UA7k7iXQZ3W4AxOasQTc3siZycccu/m8nk826LB366kkx3+misl txIRExXqzRX4QzqPuO1XwVnJ5HXjG6FlFMGI5uJ/svzKD679IZqNj0ZVJ5ivT0p4 eFzcsLxBcQcZEQDm6nL5zZ2l39fxClZgE/R20TDGYVIsGl+qhhnxe4099NaoEPSq lo2mhFvlH4plBDp/hs5M =or38 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays smime.p7s Description: S/MIME-cryptografische ondertekening ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Bridge Usage and Setup
On Sun, 7 Jun 2015 12:31:52 +0200 tor-server-crea...@use.startmail.com wrote: I want to investigate why obfs4 is nearly never used. hi, may you want to have a look into tails bug #9268 adressing some obfs issue You mean, a Tails issue that happens to affect obfs4 since it likes to write large-ish packets, and what may be a Linux kernel issue that possibly makes the PLPMTUD code not that great. I have a packet capture that I need to go over but, since it is tcpdump output from a terminal and not a pcap file I've been putting it off, but the fact that TCP/IP breaks when write calls are done when the system is breaking PMTUD is not an obfs4 issue. In sane environments where PMTUD works, obfs4 has no issues with shorter than normal MSS. Regards, -- Yawning Angel pgpdutIpIar2D.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] False exit abuse from server4you
Am 07.06.2015 um 10:29 schrieb Josef 'veloc1ty' Stautner: Intergenia AG does not tolerate TOR nodes in any form. They listed them quite a time in their AGB's. Intergenia as the mother company might have this in their AGB, but as I have my server at server4you I'm bound to their AGBs and I can't find anything against tor there. FAQ: What may I install on my server? Everything. Without exception! You have full root access on your server and thus may install everything, as long as it is not against the law. And no word within the legal terms. Am 7. Juni 2015 09:55:14 MESZ, schrieb Dr. Who dr...@posteo.is: Fun fact of the week, I got this abuse email on friday: Dear Customer, we've detected that you're running a TOR Exit Node on your machine. Please understand, that we cannot tolerate such a service on our infrastructure. Please ensure, that this service is disabled as soon as possible. Best Regards Your Intergenia Abuse Team followed by over 6000 IPv4 numbers including one of my relay server. First I find it a privacy violation for those other users who might run any form of tor beeing found on an abuse email to me. It should have listed only my own IP number. Secondly I think they should be able to differate between exit and relay servers. I'm eager to hear their response on Monday. Either they keep relays running or I quit, monthly payment is a good idea in that case. Just letting you know... ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] (n00b) Exit node question
You've should put a # before reject *.* to stop it being a rule that is operating.Rob -Original Message-From: li...@revi.pe.krSent: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 12:49:51 +0900To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.orgSubject: [tor-relays] (n00b) Exit node questionHello, it's my first time running an exit. (Well, I'm n00b in running a relay too :p) I think I followed the guidelines correctly to be an exit (with some modification from reduced exit policy on trac), but atlas and globe reports that my exitpolicy is "reject *:*". My configuration is at [1]. Please tell me what's wrong here. Thanks! [1]: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/P740 -- Revi https://www.revi.pe.kr -- Sent from Android -- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] (n00b) Exit node question
Just a guess: iirc, putting an asterisk (*) for ExitPolicies, it's counted as AF_UNSPEC, thus adding the rule for both ipv6 and ipv4. Since policy rules are considered in the order they're listed (ie rules stated first override later rules), the ExitPolicy reject6 *:* being first, counts as rejecting *:* totally. Try setting both reject rules last, if that works maybe you can merge up rules for a simpler config And, thanks for running a relay. Hong, Yongmin: Hello, it's my first time running an exit. (Well, I'm n00b in running a relay too :p) I think I followed the guidelines correctly to be an exit (with some modification from reduced exit policy on trac), but atlas and globe reports that my exitpolicy is reject *:*. My configuration is at [1]. Please tell me what's wrong here. Thanks! [1]: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/P740 -- Revi https://www.revi.pe.kr -- Sent from Android -- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] (n00b) Exit node question
Ok, I've put reject rules at the bottom (and updated the paste). Let's see what globeatlas say. -- Revi https://www.revi.pe.kr -- Sent from Android -- 2015. 6. 8. 오후 1:07에 n...@cock.li n...@cock.li님이 작성: Just a guess: iirc, putting an asterisk (*) for ExitPolicies, it's counted as AF_UNSPEC, thus adding the rule for both ipv6 and ipv4. Since policy rules are considered in the order they're listed (ie rules stated first override later rules), the ExitPolicy reject6 *:* being first, counts as rejecting *:* totally. Try setting both reject rules last, if that works maybe you can merge up rules for a simpler config And, thanks for running a relay. Hong, Yongmin: Hello, it's my first time running an exit. (Well, I'm n00b in running a relay too :p) I think I followed the guidelines correctly to be an exit (with some modification from reduced exit policy on trac), but atlas and globe reports that my exitpolicy is reject *:*. My configuration is at [1]. Please tell me what's wrong here. Thanks! [1]: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/P740 -- Revi https://www.revi.pe.kr -- Sent from Android -- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] (n00b) Exit node question
Hello, it's my first time running an exit. (Well, I'm n00b in running a relay too :p) I think I followed the guidelines correctly to be an exit (with some modification from reduced exit policy on trac), but atlas and globe reports that my exitpolicy is reject *:*. My configuration is at [1]. Please tell me what's wrong here. Thanks! [1]: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/P740 -- Revi https://www.revi.pe.kr -- Sent from Android -- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] (n00b) Exit node question
That was rubbish so ignore it.Rob -Original Message-From: li...@revi.pe.krSent: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 12:49:51 +0900To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.orgSubject: [tor-relays] (n00b) Exit node questionHello, it's my first time running an exit. (Well, I'm n00b in running a relay too :p) I think I followed the guidelines correctly to be an exit (with some modification from reduced exit policy on trac), but atlas and globe reports that my exitpolicy is "reject *:*". My configuration is at [1]. Please tell me what's wrong here. Thanks! [1]: https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/P740 -- Revi https://www.revi.pe.kr -- Sent from Android -- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] BWAUTH weightings too volatile. . .twitchy
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2015 14:37:01 -0400 From: starlight.201...@binnacle.cx At 04:12 6/7/2015 +1000, teor wrote: Please let me know how you go - the 0.2.6.x series should also be relatively ASAN and UBSAN clean, as Tor has been tested with them since late 2014. I've run 0.2.4.x and 0.2.5.x with ASAN live in production with no problems when the relay had less bandwidth. Performance hit is something like 30% extra CPU. Also had it on libssl.so and libevent.so, but was too expensive to run on libcrypto.so. UBSAN seems expense and doesn't seem it would run other than test, but I didn't work on it long and am not 100% certain. Was trying ASAN extra stack checking at the time, which may have been the culprit. As I said in my previous email, if you're running releases before 0.2.6.6 (2015), Tor won't run under UBSAN due to issues that have been fixed in subsequent releases. If you're running on architectures other than x86_64, Tor won't run under UBSAN due to a known issue in the donna C code. teor teor2345 at gmail dot com pgp 0xABFED1AC https://gist.github.com/teor2345/d033b8ce0a99adbc89c5 teor at blah dot im OTR D5BE4EC2 255D7585 F3874930 DB130265 7C9EBBC7 signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] False exit abuse from server4you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Intergenia AG does not tolerate TOR nodes in any form. They listed them quite a time in their AGB's. Am 7. Juni 2015 09:55:14 MESZ, schrieb Dr. Who dr...@posteo.is: Fun fact of the week, I got this abuse email on friday: Dear Customer, we've detected that you're running a TOR Exit Node on your machine. Please understand, that we cannot tolerate such a service on our infrastructure. Please ensure, that this service is disabled as soon as possible. Best Regards Your Intergenia Abuse Team followed by over 6000 IPv4 numbers including one of my relay server. First I find it a privacy violation for those other users who might run any form of tor beeing found on an abuse email to me. It should have listed only my own IP number. Secondly I think they should be able to differate between exit and relay servers. I'm eager to hear their response on Monday. Either they keep relays running or I quit, monthly payment is a good idea in that case. Just letting you know... ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: APG v1.1.1 iQJABAEBCgAqBQJVdAEEIxxKb3NlZiBTdGF1dG5lciA8aGVsbG9AdmVsb2MxdHku ZGU+AAoJEBFG75D/KiADL2gP+wWgU1WhgGAjdu0DmjVKqVdeF516wf3aw8h3gBRU orkCGrGCmNtCWzv95U2dGdfaZnlFSN8WdYG08yEgtlvdQoyKFlAwGQhpRoJdox+h UhLsMiyXXeGlAauOOtpf0td0j5Fd3n+ofBwg8VX8L1GWuFoXa3i55wpcvaDzGOF0 TpfTGuD21noBCKduBJK4h9zIvsA5u+8GkWvnX7BPKVFrKIMi6X5fGvAuHAzMlBJ+ HzcejMilt6L02r+hQcO7k1uFaj3LNU4vPP8vJ9fcl1baaYIaOyJxSrCiZAuqDCOL 7iGRhni0veYXcvR0LfhFyJgcSBKFKaEUol+2cwBuMke0c/LRbbBvP+ZZKspcOohu iVMv4dgEM4qt5fYD8RnJZ8T4h8Ogz4oGJUpU+BRKz30yy4m46fiuIZANf/9uRazA p18wiscD9RCc9+pUKFL5Vl3skYb6ZX8SERJi2q19YOMTSH5jLguNK1f2njppbdfr 2BaDatb/vUr7koeqggKIVGTHONv+5dZqJ84tncItlyY24voPa2peIeSYu9zKHx5U VJ/GXxXLB3tjQ84BE7iGj1W+HuoMQoI09zbw5YnTlq8iIHm17Xf/5KtUXPXTtoTz mumSSiYawefm82SSB0KlIbls4MHU9/wreN68qDmR3x8hsRTeDumo58exjFoi2jfW Us9t =xAw1 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] False exit abuse from server4you
Fun fact of the week, I got this abuse email on friday: Dear Customer, we've detected that you're running a TOR Exit Node on your machine. Please understand, that we cannot tolerate such a service on our infrastructure. Please ensure, that this service is disabled as soon as possible. Best Regards Your Intergenia Abuse Team followed by over 6000 IPv4 numbers including one of my relay server. First I find it a privacy violation for those other users who might run any form of tor beeing found on an abuse email to me. It should have listed only my own IP number. Secondly I think they should be able to differate between exit and relay servers. I'm eager to hear their response on Monday. Either they keep relays running or I quit, monthly payment is a good idea in that case. Just letting you know... ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
