Re: [tor-relays] unflagged BAD EXIT nodes
Looking through the list of suspect exit nodes, they fall into three categories: 1) very low-bandwidth Window Vista systems running 0.2.4.21 2) recently dead/offline 3) one massive Linux exit The (1) exits might be hacked Windows systems, perhaps part of a botnet --no contact given. Seems an easy call to mark them BAD. The (2)s are probably offline (1)s and so deserve to be marked BAD as they may return. The highly-ranked (3) with 20MB/sec is only three months old and does not provide contact information, resides in the Ukraine. Also an easy call if you ask me: BAD EXIT. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] unflagged BAD EXIT nodes
Could someone comment on why 15 exit nodes discovered to be sniffing and abusing login credentials have not been marked with the BAD EXIT flag? The research appears to be legitimate, involved a good deal of effort, and seems credible: https://chloe.re/2015/06/20/a-month-with-badonions/ was blogged by Sophos, also credible https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2015/06/25/can-you-trust-tors-exit-nodes/ Is there an issue of trust w/r/t this security researcher? An issue of methodology and/or reproducibility? A shortage of resources to follow up? An investigation attempting to identify the operators? The researcher writes that they received a polite reply from and was summarily ignored with no further comment. AND the exits continue to steal and abuse credentials. If true this would be contrary to the inclusiveness generally exhibited by the Tor Project. IMO a likely password-stealing exit should be marked-first, questions asked later. If some kind of mix-up or mistake has occurred, a good operator should readily be able to defend themselves and not feel ruffled for it. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems
Takes a full two weeks for the new-relay cap to be aged-out. Patience. At 13:33 7/2/2015 +, Speak Freely wrote: > >I did as s7r suggested, updated to 0.2.7.1-alpha-dev, >and changed fingerprints. > >And we're still crippled by CW of 20. >(Yes, yes, I know. The relay has gone back >to stage 1/3 because the fingerprints changed.) ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] More consensus weight problems
I did as s7r suggested, updated to 0.2.7.1-alpha-dev, and changed fingerprints. And we're still crippled by CW of 20. (Yes, yes, I know. The relay has gone back to stage 1/3 because the fingerprints changed.) Uptime: > 48 hours Upload/download : 2.1GB, works out to a blazingly fast speed of 12.1KB/s - - I just now did a 1GB speed test while running the relay. (wget -O /dev/null http://speedtest.wdc01.softlayer.com/downloads/test1000.zip) Length: 1073741824 (1.0G) [application/zip] Saving to: `/dev/null' 100%[>] 1,073,741,824 14.1M/s in 86s 2015-07-02 09:23:31 (11.9 MB/s) - `/dev/null' saved [1073741824/1073741824] - - Don't forget to smile! Matt Speak Freely 0x4D9A54A3.asc Description: application/pgp-keys ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor
"So, it's as simple as changing type="text" to type="date"? Turns out that Firefox (and hence Tor Browser) doesn't support this yet, but it falls back to plain text nicely. I just made that change in the mockup. Thanks!" Yes, it's as easy as that! The date selector also works natively on mobile browsers, such as MobileSafari. The plaintext fallback is nice as it supports (as you said) Tor Browser etc. No problem, happy to help, Joshua On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 11:13 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 02/07/15 11:45, Joshua Lee Tucker wrote: > > Hi Karsten, > > > > I've made a patch to the page to add the HTML5 date components - it > > should work nicely across the majority of browsers (maybe even all > > with a plaintext fallback). > > > > I wasn't sure exactly in which format you wanted the patch, so > > I've uploaded it to my server: > > > > http://tucker.wales/tor/exonerator/index.html > > So, it's as simple as changing type="text" to type="date"? > > Turns out that Firefox (and hence Tor Browser) doesn't support this > yet, but it falls back to plain text nicely. > > I just made that change in the mockup. > > Thanks! > > All the best, > Karsten > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1 > Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVlQ7TAAoJEJD5dJfVqbCr+FsH/3M4KV4rBSxP16xbrYh1Q4/R > sGQONZ4ro6YW99LVjs5HXAxm+Vd97lklAjPp/ezEpDzzHBdhoKWo0h4JhI9ldWz1 > DzgNMHuoUk3wBnW1Zf0/JxDkxsa68SOt/rS4MMniROYeYd6a8crs8SrSOtVrXyTw > Rks0IRtw5UaqhJu4+AGAkrloKgtseaJ9jj6ocPGLrrucblp5RY6ykgD9RFH3w0tH > Rp0/5OXtpPH5Blq8KZ5oWLJUw8YZKgsiPJTtTYIgnNlONxAZvAROhDEOi+9wqmAU > LteuLbR8oQ5AyqQvY2TE6M6oZqbnL+tFZBt/NDN/8JVWW5rfp/S1vpmU+RyP1jk= > =qYHZ > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/07/15 11:45, Joshua Lee Tucker wrote: > Hi Karsten, > > I've made a patch to the page to add the HTML5 date components - it > should work nicely across the majority of browsers (maybe even all > with a plaintext fallback). > > I wasn't sure exactly in which format you wanted the patch, so > I've uploaded it to my server: > > http://tucker.wales/tor/exonerator/index.html So, it's as simple as changing type="text" to type="date"? Turns out that Firefox (and hence Tor Browser) doesn't support this yet, but it falls back to plain text nicely. I just made that change in the mockup. Thanks! All the best, Karsten -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVlQ7TAAoJEJD5dJfVqbCr+FsH/3M4KV4rBSxP16xbrYh1Q4/R sGQONZ4ro6YW99LVjs5HXAxm+Vd97lklAjPp/ezEpDzzHBdhoKWo0h4JhI9ldWz1 DzgNMHuoUk3wBnW1Zf0/JxDkxsa68SOt/rS4MMniROYeYd6a8crs8SrSOtVrXyTw Rks0IRtw5UaqhJu4+AGAkrloKgtseaJ9jj6ocPGLrrucblp5RY6ykgD9RFH3w0tH Rp0/5OXtpPH5Blq8KZ5oWLJUw8YZKgsiPJTtTYIgnNlONxAZvAROhDEOi+9wqmAU LteuLbR8oQ5AyqQvY2TE6M6oZqbnL+tFZBt/NDN/8JVWW5rfp/S1vpmU+RyP1jk= =qYHZ -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Karsten, I've made a patch to the page to add the HTML5 date components - it should work nicely across the majority of browsers (maybe even all with a plaintext fallback). I wasn't sure exactly in which format you wanted the patch, so I've uploaded it to my server: http://tucker.wales/tor/exonerator/index.html Thanks, Josh -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mailvelope v0.13.1 Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJVlQg4CRBBU/Budml5+gAA8GIQALZ1cMDF90fzVz+HjKw/ OI6vIsFoM4KU2gBRv/aMi+FIun1imOU3Sbbtnt+TQ8eMrGGxBF7igJ7hUauq D/SK2dnnqSG5ZQNmlqYCtm01+Uu6yi7XTGfTU1h2bm+kp2rMlkwV22sf22az hBtCt8ukhlLm9pi/MEHuSXFIQBSQ2lcFv21Pi4H1J5zEhqNsjXetz13STyXn 15NsrLGpFD7Rc5tm38dqsPJpAzHv4eWe/x1B/r1Bq098Q43RqgYv+8T72Z8B Vu+uQk8RDNgNaIB7WNDgpNWxUsARhL+dH2c7CWFjkm/qDieo/ss9KJrZGqQO 1Hm01gH4i/GhgDMaiJGWLE09gTIpu5DXcwMigMnoGKqJxBnYcLsyxhm4c6L2 9z2lXqNSdA6bfePvDGNJOrm2bs7oJKwX7SxJTN+f7//4aS4xlX6uhPMY9aO0 3xTwNBSDuM2NXzlAdeaUsWEXQ+CcFEmK0y2QNdYPwha0degx8E7yMmSyEOiA T4S9au1bl5Z+wsb3hkBx+yR57Odpj2n9K1f8DMKbMxWJRG2dJ6tMYjNQQqJB 0T9xuETzJbwaaQ2xrLIwIZxVkUtlFQ0G+1uH2rr5Mv/YsdzC+q2WQgqhe+ck BjMxhyJS830Dfg6C08PTFXbhrLxa7B/za27Z27EkCr2Kr4wYvp0V1mXbd/Hc +hA5 =b+dH -END PGP SIGNATURE- On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 02/07/15 11:15, Jens Kubieziel wrote: > > * Karsten Loesing schrieb am 2015-07-02 um 09:40 Uhr: > >> Please take a look at the design mockup, maybe compare it to the > >> existing ExoneraTor service, and let us know your thoughts. > > > > - I find the logo 1 quite nice. - When a user enters the date > > field, it might be helpful when some calendar-like thingie opens. > > So the user can jump to the right month, select the day and the > > correct date format is automatically inserted. This might help the > > user to insert the correct format. > > Great. I think this pretty much matches what Joshua wrote and that I > just replied to. If there's anything else to add, please let me know. > > > - Another approach for wrongly entered dates could be to guess the > > correct date. I suspect that many will make a systematic error > > (exchanging day and month, forget to insert a leading 0 etc.). So > > instead of just saying: »The expected date format is "-MM-DD". > > Example: "2015-03-24"« it might be more helpful to say: »Did you > > mean 2015-03-24?« where the date is a link to > > https://exonerator.torproject.org/?ip=82.220.3.99×tamp=2015-03-24 > > I > > > like this idea. We can totally try out a few other date formats. > Added to the mockup. > > Thanks for the feedback! > > All the best, > Karsten > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v1 > Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVlQVOAAoJEJD5dJfVqbCrGfcIAMy+Be6ANPH35eS7YAMo1QaT > S7jGLLEpfqeV6Gb5wj4MlA/qsZ8VVYmHnYBqgcmz5tUhUaajlXZTG/mFgMpaAceX > nckEvEul8ae7THEq/0g4ufKjdk3c++DCtkwmV+Tfr5EhWoYpqvtYqJWz3rhQaxSw > cgD1/iVLl70r0vMGe32f/sPjZ9zDgCX6id8KT1lA4r3UgExXdkXWZ2W5PDr/oz+n > y+Q5BscjYzKo9Wlm+L25DYaUF6AUDGnOG6i5pCmKc4Dfuwt2fyfma0TdSzb5Fpvz > r+rwA3yQWx9wp9Xn1G9ZKCQiwUznIqCeGOgb52ViS9By779VFDx6s90OS8sWesI= > =wOE9 > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/07/15 11:15, Jens Kubieziel wrote: > * Karsten Loesing schrieb am 2015-07-02 um 09:40 Uhr: >> Please take a look at the design mockup, maybe compare it to the >> existing ExoneraTor service, and let us know your thoughts. > > - I find the logo 1 quite nice. - When a user enters the date > field, it might be helpful when some calendar-like thingie opens. > So the user can jump to the right month, select the day and the > correct date format is automatically inserted. This might help the > user to insert the correct format. Great. I think this pretty much matches what Joshua wrote and that I just replied to. If there's anything else to add, please let me know. > - Another approach for wrongly entered dates could be to guess the > correct date. I suspect that many will make a systematic error > (exchanging day and month, forget to insert a leading 0 etc.). So > instead of just saying: »The expected date format is "-MM-DD". > Example: "2015-03-24"« it might be more helpful to say: »Did you > mean 2015-03-24?« where the date is a link to > https://exonerator.torproject.org/?ip=82.220.3.99×tamp=2015-03-24 I > like this idea. We can totally try out a few other date formats. Added to the mockup. Thanks for the feedback! All the best, Karsten -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVlQVOAAoJEJD5dJfVqbCrGfcIAMy+Be6ANPH35eS7YAMo1QaT S7jGLLEpfqeV6Gb5wj4MlA/qsZ8VVYmHnYBqgcmz5tUhUaajlXZTG/mFgMpaAceX nckEvEul8ae7THEq/0g4ufKjdk3c++DCtkwmV+Tfr5EhWoYpqvtYqJWz3rhQaxSw cgD1/iVLl70r0vMGe32f/sPjZ9zDgCX6id8KT1lA4r3UgExXdkXWZ2W5PDr/oz+n y+Q5BscjYzKo9Wlm+L25DYaUF6AUDGnOG6i5pCmKc4Dfuwt2fyfma0TdSzb5Fpvz r+rwA3yQWx9wp9Xn1G9ZKCQiwUznIqCeGOgb52ViS9By779VFDx6s90OS8sWesI= =wOE9 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/07/15 10:59, Joshua Lee Tucker wrote: > Hi Karsten, Hello Joshua, > I much prefer the design of the first logo (over the existing ones) > - I think it helps to retain ExoneraTor's affiliation with Tor, as > I think the other logos make it too difficult to recognise that Tor > logo. Sounds good, added to the mockup as pro argument for the first logo. Let's collect more arguments and maybe even alternatives. Note that these logos are very quickly drawn using the "paint equivalent on Mac OS X", just to capture the idea. It's easy to make more drafts. And once we have a candidate, we'll ask a real designer to re-draw the logo for us. > The designs look great! > > I have one suggestion: > > Would it not be better to use a date selection component for the > user to select a data? I think the current method of having to > manually input a date, formatted in the correct way, is a little > clunky (I think this is demonstrated in the fact that there's a > design page with a data formatting error). I also added that one as open discussion point. Note that neither Julius nor I are web designers, so we just didn't know how to add such a date selector. I guess the tricky part might be that we wouldn't want to add a JavaScript requirement just for the date selection part. If you have any ideas or even patches, please send them here, and I'll include that in the mockup. > Keep up the great work! Thanks for the feedback! All the best, Karsten > > Joshua Lee Tucker > > On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Karsten Loesing > wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hello relay operators, > > Julius and I have been working on a design mockup for the > ExoneraTor service for the past few months and would want to hear > what you think about this: > > https://people.torproject.org/~karsten/volatile/exonerator-mockup/ > > The main idea behind this redesign was to simplify the existing > ExoneraTor service by omitting technical details (e.g., Tor > descriptor contents) and removing mostly unused features (e.g., > parsing detailed exit policies). > > Please take a look at the design mockup, maybe compare it to the > existing ExoneraTor service, and let us know your thoughts. > > Thanks! > > All the best, Karsten > > - > > > > ___ tor-relays mailing > list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVlQKMAAoJEJD5dJfVqbCr29gIAIr1tlGlVL0d8ZWM4uf5iClb ijkoVOf58rgScJqJd1rQQgNeDig7ZiFOsRytKIdtdIOoUwbsOrfSmRNc3RdYT7FK z2IPdZP96alofFbL7rBcJTvu7sAJ8Mu532DyF6/hn7zxaPAqsLb+nM9zImUVpgfG AloLmzWBcTffZbo5y6Ls8LxKuEl7I3oGTqk9AG/10zo+H5/kxtU39S4kUHK/54vz 2IPMugFtjhVWM6py7ppBPnR9A1Pozw9ZX9kXOj1pVBG9SeT73fEGTSJhdRb2nlZv bqNumxvQBbUDAxb3jrw4Ggr91VNrjHB+CP9AMyyZV5Ajg8dYMme1Jxw5H3HB/IY= =bJ5G -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor
* Karsten Loesing schrieb am 2015-07-02 um 09:40 Uhr: > Please take a look at the design mockup, maybe compare it to the > existing ExoneraTor service, and let us know your thoughts. - I find the logo 1 quite nice. - When a user enters the date field, it might be helpful when some calendar-like thingie opens. So the user can jump to the right month, select the day and the correct date format is automatically inserted. This might help the user to insert the correct format. - Another approach for wrongly entered dates could be to guess the correct date. I suspect that many will make a systematic error (exchanging day and month, forget to insert a leading 0 etc.). So instead of just saying: »The expected date format is "-MM-DD". Example: "2015-03-24"« it might be more helpful to say: »Did you mean 2015-03-24?« where the date is a link to https://exonerator.torproject.org/?ip=82.220.3.99×tamp=2015-03-24 -- Jens Kubieziel http://www.kubieziel.de signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Karsten, I much prefer the design of the first logo (over the existing ones) - I think it helps to retain ExoneraTor's affiliation with Tor, as I think the other logos make it too difficult to recognise that Tor logo. The designs look great! I have one suggestion: Would it not be better to use a date selection component for the user to select a data? I think the current method of having to manually input a date, formatted in the correct way, is a little clunky (I think this is demonstrated in the fact that there's a design page with a data formatting error). Keep up the great work! Joshua Lee Tucker On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Karsten Loesing wrote: - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello relay operators, Julius and I have been working on a design mockup for the ExoneraTor service for the past few months and would want to hear what you think about this: https://people.torproject.org/~karsten/volatile/exonerator-mockup/ The main idea behind this redesign was to simplify the existing ExoneraTor service by omitting technical details (e.g., Tor descriptor contents) and removing mostly unused features (e.g., parsing detailed exit policies). Please take a look at the design mockup, maybe compare it to the existing ExoneraTor service, and let us know your thoughts. Thanks! All the best, Karsten - -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVlOrvAAoJEJD5dJfVqbCr3LoH/RbAW7FdSG53/rAm/FSE1AI+ mJP/c+Uost5iaymfg1n5nAYVMYSNgg3BanItVbRHBd4rdtdcTz0ZhmUDvol5+jHA eUbWwL5M1SmOZdpNGDxx5fGkm7DEcnSFnVMPqN9gFKtm+zSBtNeJ9bcNiktwL7WW VrpElBu3P9N+YLBemN5W9/TYEjEx6q1Mx4t22qij7xBdRfVJKS1XqwwntRSapbLo Y2TCt/rVG2fD7rMIO3vNidCg8eaA4ax7qXJcABAx1+lsPFHoKwCG0nmNZ6FP+Ips XSbk+FHApAK+txzS16NVwdtOpm/YyCQIVaIQ8EjIyKBSlSJDGWRXwgHOBhglliE= =4/zE - -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Mailvelope v0.13.1 Comment: https://www.mailvelope.com wsFcBAEBCAAQBQJVlP0uCRBBU/Budml5+gAA8mEQAK/JNBtdYL24iJyvE4Qq tlub5j6TVOcPj4OnJneMhbxtG0W3elvMTjgr1wdFliEVkrn/kDtLRITzTvin 6S69mP5m7yuiWg3bJIN7yZ9xJwMjWgyCMihVv4qYw1tzTazf3ilshZlt8DfV C4y8HLINhS9G4l2r4PVNS9YkUF4o/x9TYjVvw5zfUXI+zb7YIJNrQqFhhPFH oR6jIy7sXMso7xr1jmJlXtM8TXodz7o6wQRzgObhRVA9j2fnVFtfDiD3wJKg vg0hkr+KOpOQuEXmwlEFbUmoLWnybnxpHutkEsuun1GjK8UgO1u3xC+wmPnw TtDGYHA+5rOl/2SiSeNO90SR689TfgWg3c4+4KykMaz8O3lOzS6PFrEZ28O7 TSwyF2/u0SlnDhyPu2cqSnci/ptlA0CqhfrMInRQLt3jT6CDRTq1b+I7HjlI D61/aQ8ykgJxTXzPQhft3+R+qsGQTCeWHowRaPoGStVISfeUXa0ynQ4/w3Hy NO/FqK6X4pXnZ529Jg/HOQlAwhcfTPfxC9I756JQEzhsRyySoXr+gyNpxXRl EtyqDhmpTxTQZEXZ7wC46sQ1hY48yuRkUzHtuTiab34w8c8wVa6rCW/iJReu HcyURUHLitRkz2OA+IU5uDIrmziF8TcthVgR2OZDYjrZUwDd4Ow39F8ksBrZ anfc =rxW5 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] Simplifying ExoneraTor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello relay operators, Julius and I have been working on a design mockup for the ExoneraTor service for the past few months and would want to hear what you think about this: https://people.torproject.org/~karsten/volatile/exonerator-mockup/ The main idea behind this redesign was to simplify the existing ExoneraTor service by omitting technical details (e.g., Tor descriptor contents) and removing mostly unused features (e.g., parsing detailed exit policies). Please take a look at the design mockup, maybe compare it to the existing ExoneraTor service, and let us know your thoughts. Thanks! All the best, Karsten -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: GPGTools - http://gpgtools.org iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVlOrvAAoJEJD5dJfVqbCr3LoH/RbAW7FdSG53/rAm/FSE1AI+ mJP/c+Uost5iaymfg1n5nAYVMYSNgg3BanItVbRHBd4rdtdcTz0ZhmUDvol5+jHA eUbWwL5M1SmOZdpNGDxx5fGkm7DEcnSFnVMPqN9gFKtm+zSBtNeJ9bcNiktwL7WW VrpElBu3P9N+YLBemN5W9/TYEjEx6q1Mx4t22qij7xBdRfVJKS1XqwwntRSapbLo Y2TCt/rVG2fD7rMIO3vNidCg8eaA4ax7qXJcABAx1+lsPFHoKwCG0nmNZ6FP+Ips XSbk+FHApAK+txzS16NVwdtOpm/YyCQIVaIQ8EjIyKBSlSJDGWRXwgHOBhglliE= =4/zE -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
