Re: [tor-relays] Question about relay speed + quick question about IPV6

2016-10-03 Thread Sheesh
Nevermind. It got its flags back and is now working a expected. :)

Thanks for everybody's help!


On 03.10.2016 05:45, Sheesh wrote:
>
> Alright, thank you!
>
> I'm just wondering why I have only a few connections (14 inbound, 1
> outbound) right now. But I guess that's because the relay lost its
> stable and fast flag due to server move and several restarts and now
> needs some time to reestablish?
>
>
> On 03.10.2016 04:03, teor wrote:
>>> On 2 Oct 2016, at 18:59, Sheesh  wrote:
>>>
>>> Thank you! Two last questions, though (hope it's okay): Do I need to put 
>>> ExitPolicy reject6 *:* in my torrc or is this covered by ExitPolicy reject 
>>> *:*?
>> ExitPolicy reject *:* applies to both IPv4 and IPv6.
>> And your relay won't exit on IPv4 unless you set ExitRelay to 1, and won't 
>> exit on IPv6 unless you set IPv6Exit and ExitRelay to 1.
>>
>>> Also why do I always have 4 or 8 circuits open? At least that's what 
>>> tor-arm shows me.
>> Because tor preemptively builds circuits for you to use when you need them.
>> When your relay publishes a descriptor, it will make more circuits as needed 
>> to relay client traffic.
>>
>> Tim
>>
>>> On 03.10.2016 03:34, teor wrote:
> On 2 Oct 2016, at 17:17, Sheesh 
>  wrote:
>
> Thanks for everybody's input. I decided to move the relay keys to the
> new server but I'm not entirely sure if I start another slow (500KB/s)
> one or just seed some Linux distros or do something else helpful.
>
> Also I do have a question about IPv6:
> If I read right I just have to add
> ORPort [IPv6]:Port
> DirPort [IPv6]:Port
>
 You only need the ORPort, the IPv6 DirPort isn't needed any more.
 (It was used by a few of the 0.2.8 alpha series, but removed before the
 stable release.)


> is this correct?
> Can I specify the same ports I use for IPv4 (443 and 80)?
>
 Yes, this should work on most OSs, if it doesn't, please file a bug.


> Also since I have a couple of IPv6 available but a non-exit relay is it
> still necessary to set OutboundBindAddress?
>
 OutboundBindAddress can be used twice, once with an IPv4 address and once
 with an IPv6 address. Outbound traffic on a non-exit relay is all IPv4,
 and it will use the routing table if you don't use OutboundBindAddress.

 Unless you have multiple IPv4 addresses, it won't make any difference.

 T

 --
 Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

 teor2345 at gmail dot com
 PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
 ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
 xmpp: teor at torproject dot org










 ___
 tor-relays mailing list

 tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
 https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>>> ___
>>> tor-relays mailing list
>>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>> T
>>
>> --
>> Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)
>>
>> teor2345 at gmail dot com
>> PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
>> ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
>> xmpp: teor at torproject dot org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
>
>
>
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] The Onion Box v3.0: Web Interface for your Tor relay

2016-10-03 Thread Ralph Wetzel

Hi Ralph!

 

The correct answer (as of now) is that there *was* no way of running The Onion Box without mixing in code from Debian versions flagged as "unstable".

I've just created a small modification so that The Box supports now APScheduler v3.x as well as v2.x.

Be aware that this is not heavily tested - yet works flawless in my development environment.


 

Feel encouraged to contact me in case you have any issues or feedback (good or bad).


Thank's for using The Onion Box!

Have fun!


 

Best regards,

 

Ralph


 

Gesendet: Sonntag, 02. Oktober 2016 um 18:12 Uhr
Von: "Ralph Seichter" 
An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] The Onion Box v3.0: Web Interface for your Tor relay

Just to make sure I'm not misunderstanding something: The Onion Box
requires APScheduler 3.x, which is not available in Debian Jessie and
Jessie-Backports? That means there's no way of running The Onion Box
without mixing in code from Debian versions flagged as "unstable"?

-Ralph
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays




 

 
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays