[tor-relays] monitoring the relay : zabbix?
How do you monitor the tor relay server and the relay itself, on a remote box? Zabbix seemed to have less overhead and simpler setup than nagios or icinga, so i started to set it up. Then i saw the note on https://www.torservers.net/wiki/setup/zabbix that they do not use it anymore, and i am wondering what is wrong with it. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] ISP, Abuses , Intrusion Prevention etc.
On 10/10/2016 11:43 AM, Green Dream wrote: >>> I set up my own ISP (AS28715) so I could run Tor exits etc without any >>> trouble. >> >> Could you share a bit more about what is involved in doing that? > > > I'd also be very interested in learning more about setting up an ISP > for Tor. Is it a non-profit? How many man hours did it take (roughly) > to get the structure in place? How much money (roughly) did it take? > How much legal consultation did it require to setup? I'm intrigued by this myself. Although Brass Horn Communications is a British entity, and the best practice is for exit nodes to be run under the aegis of *some* sort of corporate set-up (non-profit, shell company, libraries, university IT departments, and what-have-you), I hadn't known that a /pro forma/ ISP was even a thing, if indeed that's what we're talking about here. 0xDD79757F.asc Description: application/pgp-keys signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] new warn message: Duplicate rendezvous cookie in ESTABLISH_RENDEZVOUS.
George Kadianakis: > I took a brief look at the relevant code, and I'm also not sure what's > causing the issue. More digging required. Toralf Förster: > Something I should worry about ? I think one should emphasize that relay operators shouldn't worry about it since it's client(s) [hopefully not little-t-tor one(s)] who send such cells. Thanks everybody reporting about this issue! -- Ivan Markin ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] new warn message: Duplicate rendezvous cookie in ESTABLISH_RENDEZVOUS.
Little update : No more "ESTABLISH_RENDEZVOUS" logged since this day... 07/10/2016 08:09, Petrusko : > x2 too on a non-exit relay : > Oct 06 13:35:22.000 (UTC+2) > > But nothing a 2nd relay process on the same machine... -- Petrusko PubKey EBE23AE5 C0BF 2184 4A77 4A18 90E9 F72C B3CA E665 EBE2 3AE5 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] 'No space left on device' glitch causing log failure
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016, at 04:28 PM, Andreas Krey wrote: > On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:15:46 +, Geoff Down wrote: > ... > > Needless to say, the disk is not full and 'tor' can write to that > > directory just fine now. > > Question is whether it was full (or out of quota) at the time > of these messages. MacOS has/had a habit of throwing a few GB on > the disk and then removing them again. > > Andreas > It would have to have been several tens of GB - nothing else running at the time threw an error either. I'll try a HUP as suggested. -- http://www.fastmail.com - Send your email first class ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] ISP, Abuses , Intrusion Prevention etc.
>> I set up my own ISP (AS28715) so I could run Tor exits etc without any >> trouble. > > Could you share a bit more about what is involved in doing that? I'd also be very interested in learning more about setting up an ISP for Tor. Is it a non-profit? How many man hours did it take (roughly) to get the structure in place? How much money (roughly) did it take? How much legal consultation did it require to setup? ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] 'No space left on device' glitch causing log failure
On Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 03:15:46PM +0100, Geoff Down wrote: > Hi all, > these are the last entries in my log, but my bridge is still listed on > Atlas and client functionality is fine. Latest stable version on > OSX10.4. > Needless to say, the disk is not full and 'tor' can write to that > directory just fine now. Yes, once Tor has failed to write to its log file, that file descriptor is essentially broken until you instruct Tor to try again. If you send Tor a HUP signal, it will reset a bunch of things, including its logs. I would assume that it really did run out of space, if only for that moment. That said, OSX10.4 is Tiger, right? The one that became unsupported over seven years ago? (But let's not make this thread about whether it's morally appropriate to run obsolete OSes -- except to acknowledge that maybe it has bugs in it.) --Roger ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] 'No space left on device' glitch causing log failure
On Mon, 10 Oct 2016 15:15:46 +, Geoff Down wrote: ... > Needless to say, the disk is not full and 'tor' can write to that > directory just fine now. Question is whether it was full (or out of quota) at the time of these messages. MacOS has/had a habit of throwing a few GB on the disk and then removing them again. Andreas -- "Totally trivial. Famous last words." From: Linus TorvaldsDate: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:29:21 -0800 ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] new warn message: Duplicate rendezvous cookie in ESTABLISH_RENDEZVOUS.
Toralf Försterwrites: > [ text/plain ] > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > Today I got this for the first since I run exits: > > Oct 06 08:23:03.000 [warn] Duplicate rendezvous cookie in > ESTABLISH_RENDEZVOUS. > > Something I should worry about ? > Hello and thanks for reporting this issue! I opened a trac ticket about this, as that's a better way to handle little-t-tor bugs. Please feel free to contribute there: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/20332 I took a brief look at the relevant code, and I'm also not sure what's causing the issue. More digging required. > - -- > Toralf > PGP: C4EACDDE 0076E94E, OTR: 420E74C8 30246EE7 > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iF4EAREIAAYFAlf2Dz0ACgkQxOrN3gB26U5LMAD+POAhOITGeYh5CFdOwFxgfzMf > 510EN+mxt+3nTAFXgrIA/1BUXnr1DXh61y5ttIxSoVGJb95r8FTrnKiDTZ23yBkV > =vFhm > -END PGP SIGNATURE- > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] 'No space left on device' glitch causing log failure
Is it possible you have a disk or user quota setup? On October 10, 2016 9:15:46 AM CDT, Geoff Downwrote: >Hi all, > these are the last entries in my log, but my bridge is still listed on > Atlas and client functionality is fine. Latest stable version on > OSX10.4. >Needless to say, the disk is not full and 'tor' can write to that >directory just fine now. > >Oct 05 22:52:09.000 [warn] Couldn't open "/Users/tor/tor/state.tmp" >(/Users/tor/tor/state) for writing: No space left on device >Oct 05 22:52:09.000 [warn] Unable to write state to file >"/Users/tor/tor/state"; will try again later >Oct 05 23:10:27.000 [warn] Couldn't open >"/Users/tor/tor/cached-consensus.tmp" (/Users/tor/tor/cached-consensus) >for writing: No space left on device >Oct 05 23:11:32.000 [warn] Error writing to >"/Users/tor/tor/cached-descriptors.new": No space left on device >Oct 05 23:11:32.000 [warn] Unable to store router descriptor >{more of the same until Oct 05 23:11:34.000} > >GD > >-- >http://www.fastmail.com - Access all of your messages and folders > wherever you are > >___ >tor-relays mailing list >tor-relays@lists.torproject.org >https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays Jason Jung 7942 B145 5E45 1D53 37C8 1204 8DA4 A1DB CBE6 35AE ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] ISP, Abuses , Intrusion Prevention etc.
On 10/10/16 12:41, Gareth Llewellyn wrote: > > I set up my own ISP (AS28715) so I could run Tor exits etc without any > trouble. Could you share a bit more about what is involved in doing that? Thanks -Kevin ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] 'No space left on device' glitch causing log failure
Hi all, these are the last entries in my log, but my bridge is still listed on Atlas and client functionality is fine. Latest stable version on OSX10.4. Needless to say, the disk is not full and 'tor' can write to that directory just fine now. Oct 05 22:52:09.000 [warn] Couldn't open "/Users/tor/tor/state.tmp" (/Users/tor/tor/state) for writing: No space left on device Oct 05 22:52:09.000 [warn] Unable to write state to file "/Users/tor/tor/state"; will try again later Oct 05 23:10:27.000 [warn] Couldn't open "/Users/tor/tor/cached-consensus.tmp" (/Users/tor/tor/cached-consensus) for writing: No space left on device Oct 05 23:11:32.000 [warn] Error writing to "/Users/tor/tor/cached-descriptors.new": No space left on device Oct 05 23:11:32.000 [warn] Unable to store router descriptor {more of the same until Oct 05 23:11:34.000} GD -- http://www.fastmail.com - Access all of your messages and folders wherever you are ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] ISP, Abuses , Intrusion Prevention etc.
On 9 Oct 2016 11:36, "pa011"wrote: > > - what forces drive ISP's to behave like they do with abuses? > - maybe Exit volunteers and here especially the big ones could ask some questions to their ISP to get more light on this I set up my own ISP (AS28715) so I could run Tor exits etc without any trouble. > > I do refer to my old questions -still unanswered: > > -is it just the more work for rather poor money handling(forwarding) > those abuses ? Yes. Every abuse ticket is a person answering that abuse ticket instead of helping a customer who is potentially paying for support. It's also that some of the abuse emails can be quite threatening (e.g. blacklisting the entire /24 or reporting the "crime" to local Police etc) some of the smaller ISPs can get intimidated by those threats. > - to whom else do ISP's have to report what they are doing with received > abuses? In the UK; No one. > - must ISP's answer to the origin of the abuse? No. But is polite to do so. > - who is getting a copy of all that conversation(if at all)? Depends on the ISPs policies / any applicable laws. (In the UK and at least as far as my ISP is concerned; no-one) > - can an ISP loose its license (with too many or badly handled abuses)? AFAIK; No. In the UK I guess one could appeal to Court if an ISP wasn't preventing its network from being used to your detriment but I'm not sure how far you'd get. > - are there any regulatory burdens for them - if so which ones? Yes. Lots depending on the country. > - are ISP's treated different in different parts of the world? Very much so. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] TOR Services on Microsoft Azure
Update on my Azure-Exit: https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/0534295ACFD5A84312183B41D3FB275E9ADD9EE2 It already has consensus weight 1200 after less than two weeks and its raising. Everyone should use this option to give the TOR-Network a good push. After my free time has finished, i'll try to download an image of this Exit and create a second account on azure. Technical question: Could it be useful to save the keys and the fingerprint to use it on a "new" VPS to start with better performance? Best, volker Gesendet: Samstag, 01. Oktober 2016 um 18:23 Uhr Von: "Volker Mink"An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: AW: [tor-relays] TOR Services on Microsoft Azure Hi John. I think this depends on the distribution used. Of course you can use own distributions and images. I used the standard ubuntu which was suggested from Azure and did nothing than installing TOR (apt-get install tor), modifing the torrc-file and configured the port-forwarding. Thats all. -volker Von: tor-relays [mailto:tor-relays-boun...@lists.torproject.org] Im Auftrag von John Ricketts Gesendet: Samstag, 1. Oktober 2016 11:46 An: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Betreff: Re: [tor-relays] TOR Services on Microsoft Azure Volker, Thank you for sharing! Is Azure able to run the latest Tor release of 0.2.8.8? You're running 0.2.4.27 at this time. Thanks! John On Oct 1, 2016, at 00:55, Volker Mink wrote: Hi. I read some pages on the internet about TOR-servers on cloud-services like Microsoft Azure or Amazon AWS. Just gave it a try on Azure and it works like a charm! You can sign up for free and receive credits worth ~200$. With this credits you can safely run an unlimited VPS for about 4-5 month. https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/0534295ACFD5A84312183B41D3FB275E9ADD9EE2 i think im going to give Amazon AWS also a try J regards, volker ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays