Re: [tor-relays] Problem upgrading Tor to 0.2.9.9 on Raspbian (Debian Jessie)

2017-02-02 Thread Sean Greenslade 
On January 31, 2017 12:17:00 AM PST, fr33d0m4all  wrote:
>Hi,
>this is not really a Tor issue, but I'd like to know if there is
>someone 
>else like me that is having problems upgrading his Tor installation to 
>the latest version on its Raspberry (running Raspbian based on Debian 
>Jessie):

Post this to a Rasbian list. It's a packaging issue, assuming you haven't done 
anything odd with your packages or repos. 

--Sean
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Minimum port 80 and 443 exit policy

2017-02-02 Thread JovianMallard 
"iff" is shorthand for "if and only if", as opposed to "if [and maybe
otherwise]"

On 02/03/2017 12:16 AM, anondroid wrote:
>> I was wondering what the minimum exit policy was (wrt port 80 and 443) for a 
>> Tor exit relay.
> 
> https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/dir-spec.txt#n2294
> 
> "A router is called an 'Exit' iff it allows exits to at least two of the 
> ports 80, 443, and 6667 and allows exits to at least one /8 address space."
> 
> As an aside, I just noticed there's a typo in the spec there at line 2294 -- 
> it reads"iff" instead of "if".
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Minimum port 80 and 443 exit policy

2017-02-02 Thread teor 

> On 3 Feb 2017, at 16:16, anondroid  wrote:
> 
> > I was wondering what the minimum exit policy was (wrt port 80 and 443) for 
> > a Tor exit relay.
> 
> https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/dir-spec.txt#n2294
> 
> "A router is called an 'Exit' iff it allows exits to at least two of the 
> ports 80, 443, and 6667 and allows exits to at least one /8 address space."

With the introduction of microdescriptors, exits that reject more than
2 IPv4 /8s are considered not to exit to "most addresses".
So they are given port summaries that say they reject all ports, and
clients won't use them.

https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/dir-spec.txt#n2110

For IPv6, Exits summarise their own ports in descriptors, and this is
copied into their microdescriptor:
* in master, Exits that reject more than an IPv6 /16 claim they reject
  all ports,
* in all released versions of tor, Exits that reject any IPv6
  address mistakenly say they reject all ports. This happens by default
  for IPv6 Exits with an ORPort on 0.2.8 and later.

https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/dir-spec.txt#n565
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/21357

> As an aside, I just noticed there's a typo in the spec there at line 2294 -- 
> it reads"iff" instead of "if".

"iif" is shorthand for "if and only if".

T

--
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
xmpp: teor at torproject dot org






signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Minimum port 80 and 443 exit policy

2017-02-02 Thread anondroid 
> I was wondering what the minimum exit policy was (wrt port 80 and 443) for a 
> Tor exit relay.

https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/dir-spec.txt#n2294

"A router is called an 'Exit' iff it allows exits to at least two of the ports 
80, 443, and 6667 and allows exits to at least one /8 address space."

As an aside, I just noticed there's a typo in the spec there at line 2294 -- it 
reads"iff" instead of "if".___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

[tor-relays] Minimum port 80 and 443 exit policy

2017-02-02 Thread Mass Tor 
Hey all,

I was wondering what the minimum exit policy was (wrt port 80 and 443) for
a Tor exit relay. I
cant find any documentation about the minimum exit policy.

Is it possible to have an exit relay exit only to a /16 or a /8 on port 80
and 443?

I've tried having an exit policy that allows exiting to just a /16 on port
80 and 443 and it seems to not stick.

Best
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] (de)bug IPv6 exit policies?

2017-02-02 Thread gustavo panizzo 
On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 11:05:23AM +1100, teor wrote:
> 
> > On 31 Jan 2017, at 20:21, nusenu  wrote:
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > nusenu:
> >> tldr: would you send me your torrc if you aim to route IPv6 exit traffic
> >> and are in the list at the bottom with the third colmn set to NULL?
> > 
> > instead of sending it to me you can add it to the trac entry: (no
> > account needed)
> > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/21357
> 
> We think we have fixed this bug in master.
> 
> You can help us get it backported to 0.3.0 and 0.2.9 by testing tor
> master (or tor nightlies if your packager build them) on your IPv6
> Exit.
> 
> Please let us know if it works!

works for me

https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/5E762A58B1F7FF92E791A1EA4F18695CAC6677CE

i'm using tor 0.3.0.2-alpha-dev-20170201T205811Z-1~d80.jessie+1

thanks


-- 
1AE0 322E B8F7 4717 BDEA BF1D 44BB 1BA7 9F6C 6333

keybase: https://keybase.io/gfa
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays