Re: [tor-relays] fresh assault on Tor network
Hi, > On 22 Jun 2019, at 17:23, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote: > > https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html?start=2017-06-22&end=2019-06-22&country=all&events=off It seems to be a significant increase in users all over Iran: https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/30636#comment:8 https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html?start=2017-06-22&end=2019-06-22&country=ir&events=off T signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] fresh assault on Tor network
https://metrics.torproject.org/userstats-relay-country.html?start=2017-06-22&end=2019-06-22&country=all&events=off ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] obfs4proxy installation from deb.torproject.org says Release file expired
Hello, Trying to spin some new obfs4bridges. I am using: deb.torproject.org/torproject.org obfs4proxy main in /etc/apt/sources.list -- I hope this is correct. I get this: E: Release file for https://deb.torproject.org/torproject.org/dists/obfs4proxy/InRelease is expired (invalid since 1d 15h 7min 11s). Updates for this repository will not be applied. Just recently saw Yawning's release notification, is it somehow related? Thanks. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] tor update question
On Website: "update to latest upstream release (bz#1679732) How to install sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f8311ec8a2" Not working! The command there is "dnf". A replacement with "yum" get the following error on my system: "[root@75f449 ~]# yum upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing --advisory=FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f8311ec8a2 Geladene Plugins: fastestmirror Error getting repository data for updates-testing, repository not found [root@75f449 ~]# " Any other solution available? Olaf Am 20.06.19 um 21:31 schrieb nusenu: >> I am running Centos7 (CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core)) and Tor >> v. 0.3.5.7. Now I see in nyx that is is unrecommended, but the epel >> repo doesn't have 0.3.5.8. Should I be adding another repo, or just >> wait, or try to compile my own? > You can get tor 0.3.5.8 on CentOS 7 by enabling the updates-testing repo > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f8311ec8a2 > > > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] BridgeDB currently up but non-functional?
Hi, Phillip. Thanks for the response, and for taking on these issues. I also sent a more detailed direct report to frontd...@torproject.org. It apparently crossed with your reply to this thread in the mail, I wasn't intending to nag. I assume that'll end up forwarded to you as well, hopefully the extra detail I was able to include there will be helpful in debugging the problems. I think the hash ring allocation question may be the most severe and fundamental issue overall. The BridgeDB request page still just now insisted to me yet again that there are no vanilla bridges available at all. Even if plain vanilla ORport bridges are no longer the majority, there must be at least a few dozen (if not a few hundred) remaining, more than enough to ensure at least a few end up in every hash ring. I'd never expect to be told that there are no vanilla bridges available, period, but that's the only result I've gotten over many tries for a few days now. Only getting back 1 or 2 obfs4 choices, which often show up again well past the selection rotation interval, also seems like it points to not filling the hash rings properly. Or maybe something broke in the result filtering stage where it removes supposedly blocked or same-subnet choices? Even if a lot of the obfs4 bridges are unreachable, they should still be showing up in the response lists, and for some reason they aren't. Anyway, thanks again, and if there's anything I can do to help test things feel free to email me directly. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
