Re: [tor-relays] Tor Relay Meetup #Fosdem Notes
On Wednesday, February 16, 2022 1:50:19 AM CET li...@for-privacy.net wrote: > After the next location database update, there should be DONE, thanks to Peter Mueller from the IPfire Project and Torproject GeoIP DB gods. (-hiro?) That was damn fast. > > * Is it bad to have too many exit relays in one country? And how many is > > > > too many? > > > > * Norway and the US and DE seems to be quite saturated already with > > exit > > > > relays: > > NO - 37, 481 MiB/s Tor metrics numbers > > US - 536, 4898 MiB/s > > about 200 fewer relays in the US and be 200 more in Luxembourg. US - 374, 3190.21 MiB/s LU - 166, 1864.33 MiB/s https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#search/flag:exit%20country:us https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#search/flag:exit%20country:lu -- ╰_╯ Ciao Marco! Debian GNU/Linux It's free software and it gives you freedom! signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] snowflake incoming UDP ports
Quoting Toralf Förster (2022-02-19 11:15:19) > I do simply run here > > ~/devel/go/src/snowflake/proxy/proxy &>>/tmp/snowflake-proxy.log & > > and was wondering if I have to open special UDP inbound ports ? [...] > but b/c I do have a rather restrict inbound firewall rule set I'm > wondering about that. If you have a restricted firewall you might have what snowflake calls 'restricted NAT', the most useful snowflake proxies are the 'unrestricted NAT' ones, as they allow clients in a more restricted NAT situations to connect to them. You can check the NAT type you have in the logs. If you have restricted NAT I would recommend you to open the UDP port range of 32768-60999. More information about NAT types: https://gitlab.torproject.org/tpo/anti-censorship/pluggable-transports/snowflake/-/wikis/NAT-matching There as a conversation about that in the forum few months ago: https://forum.torproject.net/t/a-few-questions-about-the-standalone-snowflake-proxy/387 -- meskio | https://meskio.net/ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- My contact info: https://meskio.net/crypto.txt -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Nos vamos a Croatan. signature.asc Description: signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] snowflake incoming UDP ports
I do simply run here ~/devel/go/src/snowflake/proxy/proxy &>>/tmp/snowflake-proxy.log & and was wondering if I have to open special UDP inbound ports ? From the stats snowflake iseems to be working: 2022/02/18 19:29:59 In the last 1h0m0s, there are 13 connections. Traffic Relayed ↑ 192 MB, ↓ 192 MB. 2022/02/18 20:29:59 In the last 1h0m0s, there are 21 connections. Traffic Relayed ↑ 451 MB, ↓ 451 MB. 2022/02/18 21:29:59 In the last 1h0m0s, there are 9 connections. Traffic Relayed ↑ 236 MB, ↓ 236 MB. but b/c I do have a rather restrict inbound firewall rule set I'm wondering about that. -- Toralf ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
