Re: [tor-relays] Middle relay IP blocking
secureh...@gmail.com wrote on 8/4/23 01:46: I tried reporting a similar issue a few months ago (post wasn’t approved by moderator). I was running a relay from my home ISP. After a short while certain websites became inaccessible from other computers in my home network that shared the same public IP. After trial and error with other IP addresses (non-Tor) I realized commercial gateway services had blacklisted our IP address. Same here, middle node. In order to access some sites, I have to shut down briefly my modem in order to obtain a new IP, and for a while all goes smoothly again. -- https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/A4E74410D83705EEFF24BC265DE2B2FF39BDA56E ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Strange entries in notices.log
toritdown via tor-relays wrote on 8/22/22 23:49: I am suddenly finding numerous entries in my /var/log/tor/notices log that look like this: Aug 22 01:21:46.000 [warn] Unable to store router descriptor Aug 22 01:21:46.000 [warn] Error writing to "/var/lib/tor/cached-descriptors.new": No space left on device What does this mean? What do I need to do about? "No space left on device". Looks like your disk is full. Free up some space, if you can delete some stuff, or get a larger disk. Probably you can delete older logs that are piling up in /var/log/. Set up a log rotation. -- Bye, Marco https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/A4E74410D83705EEFF24BC265DE2B2FF39BDA56E ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Weird spike in written bytes per second
Roger Dingledine wrote on 5/24/22 02:44: On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 12:18:41PM +0200, Marco Predicatori wrote: the graph shows a marked difference between written bytes per second and read bytes per second om 2022-05-19 and 2022-05-20. In any other day the bytes are roughly the same. What might my node have "written" on those two days? https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/A4E74410D83705EEFF24BC265DE2B2FF39BDA56E A common answer here is that your relay is serving more directory information than usual... Thanks Roger and Jonas. Marco ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] Weird spike in written bytes per second
Hi, the graph shows a marked difference between written bytes per second and read bytes per second om 2022-05-19 and 2022-05-20. In any other day the bytes are roughly the same. What might my node have "written" on those two days? https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/A4E74410D83705EEFF24BC265DE2B2FF39BDA56E Thanks, Marco ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Is my node dropping packets?
Eddie wrote on 8/1/21 7:31 PM: > On 7/29/2021 7:57 AM, Marco Predicatori wrote: >> ...Many packets coming from other Tor nodes where dropped. The Tor log >> doesn't >> mention >> any problem. What may be wrong? >> >> -- > > Not that it helps any, but I see exactly the same scenario on my system as > well. It averages about 200 dropped packets per day. Thanks Eddie and William Kane. Allright then, no need to adjust any firewall rule. -- Bye, Marco https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/A4E74410D83705EEFF24BC265DE2B2FF39BDA56E ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] Is my node dropping packets?
Hi, my Tor node is inside a local network protected by a firewall. Only port 9001 is NATted towards the Tor server. Moreover, I have iptables active on the Tor server itself. The outer firewall blocks any incoming packet except for packets on port 9001 and returning packets from established connections. My iptables blocks several packets which were allowed through by the outer firewall, where I assume they are recognized as returning packets from established connections. Then my local iptables drops them. I can't understand why. You can find here an extract from my Tor node "iptables -L -n" and a typical day's log of dropped packets on the Tor node: https://easyupload.io/m/48if5l Many packets coming from other Tor nodes where dropped. The Tor log doesn't mention any problem. What may be wrong? -- Bye, Marco https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/A4E74410D83705EEFF24BC265DE2B2FF39BDA56E signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Nodes on dynamic IPs don't survive an IP change any more
Marco Predicatori wrote on 6/10/21 10:12 AM: > Hi, > > whenever my IP changes, my node stops relaying traffic, and after a few hours > I > see in the logs > [notice] Heartbeat: It seems like we are not in the cached consensus. > > In past versions I remember seeing in the logs something like "...your ip > seems > to have changed...", followed by a new "...publishing server descriptor...", > as > far as I remember. > > Now I have to monitor my ip, and restart Tor whenever it changes. Wouldn't it > be > nice to go back to the previous behaviour? > Solved. Every minute a crontab job checks wether the public ip has changed. If it has, Tor is restarted. -- https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/A4E74410D83705EEFF24BC265DE2B2FF39BDA56E signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] Nodes on dynamic IPs don't survive an IP change any more
Hi, whenever my IP changes, my node stops relaying traffic, and after a few hours I see in the logs [notice] Heartbeat: It seems like we are not in the cached consensus. In past versions I remember seeing in the logs something like "...your ip seems to have changed...", followed by a new "...publishing server descriptor...", as far as I remember. Now I have to monitor my ip, and restart Tor whenever it changes. Wouldn't it be nice to go back to the previous behaviour? Bye, Marco -- https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/A4E74410D83705EEFF24BC265DE2B2FF39BDA56E signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Tor 0.4.5.6 and missing IPv6
David Goulet wrote on 3/24/21 1:18 PM: > Oops.. this fell off my radar, mis-placed in my Inbox :( Thanks David, no problem. 9 days now of flawless Tor running. Bye, Marco signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Tor 0.4.5.6 and missing IPv6
s7r wrote on 3/11/21 6:16 PM: > I only find this log message unclear: > > [notice] Unable to find IPv6 address for ORPort 9001. You might want to > specify > IPv6Only to it or set an explicit address or set Address. > > I think it means "... You might want to specify *IPv4Only* to it or set it to > an > explicit address or set configure Address." Yes, a clearer message in the logs would have greatly helped to point me towards the obvious, easy solution. Thanks for all your work on Tor. Bye, Marco signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Tor 0.4.5.6 and missing IPv6
William Kane wrote on 3/11/21 6:36 PM: > @s7r: > > You are right, I did not read his torrc. > > Relays on randomly rotated (most ISP's have adopted a 24 hour lease > model) IP addresses are disruptive to long term connections anyway > (this is partially mitigated by not assigning them the stable flag, I need dynamic dns because this particular node is hosted at my home dsl connection. The IP usually lasts several weeks or months. I have the stable flag. > but still) so in my opinion OP should just rent a KVM machine for ~10 > bucks with two static IPv4 and IPv6 addresses, That's obviously a good idea, but I like to keep an eye on my hardware too. And I don't mind mixing my own traffic with that of a middle node. Bye, Marco ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] I was banned from PayPal
potlatch wrote on 3/11/21 12:42 AM: > They specifically state the ban was for: > Providing *file sharing services or access to newsgroups;*... This is beyond ludicrous! Any ISP on the planet offers access to file sharing and newsgroups. I stopped using Paypal many years a go, but in the age of cryptocoins, they really don't make any sense anymore. My 2 cents, Marco ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Tor 0.4.5.6 and missing IPv6
s7r wrote on 3/9/21 3:12 PM: > Please paste your entire torrc (without any sensitive data of course). > We have some slight misbehavior for the IPv6 auto discovery. Here: https://pastebin.com/9VEZD9Zw > Along with the torrc please state if you have IPv6 of any kind to that box and > if yes which kind (tunnel, native, etc.). No IPv6 anywhere around. > Also, you might use `ORPort 9001 IPv4Only` in torrc without any other > modifications besides this and see if the error still occurs. This did the trick! No messages in the last 5 hours, since when I updated torrc and restarted Tor. Thanks! Marco -- https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/A4E74410D83705EEFF24BC265DE2B2FF39BDA56E signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] Tor 0.4.5.6 and missing IPv6
Hi, I've recently upgraded to Tor 0.4.5.6. Everything seems to work fine, but in the notices_log file I have a lot of these lines: [notice] Unable to find IPv6 address for ORPort 9001. You might want to specify IPv6Only to it or set an explicit address or set Address. I don't have IPv6, and any line mentioning IPv6 in the torrc file is commented. Is there anythng I need to do in order to get rid of those notices, or can I just let them be? Thanks, Marco -- https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/A4E74410D83705EEFF24BC265DE2B2FF39BDA56E ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] SSH
Андрей Гвоздев wrote on 9/21/20 11:19 AM: > Hello > I'm running a TOR relay, every time I SSH to my server I see a message > that there were thousands of failed login attempts > Do you see this message too? Plenty, don't worry. Any IP with the ssh port open is targeted. Make sure you keep your server safe as suggested in the other answers. Fail2ban may also help. Bye, Marco https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/A4E74410D83705EEFF24BC265DE2B2FF39BDA56E ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Contact info obfscation
Keifer Bly wrote on 30/06/2018 02:22: > Hello, > > I am aware that email addresses used in the “ContactInfo: “ in a > relay operator’s torrc file is publicly listed on the tor relay. > However, what I am wondering, is there a way to obfuscate the > email address on > http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail... Publish a GPG key instead. Spammers will have to go fetch your email from a keyserver. This is how I did it: http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=a4e74410d83705eeff24bc265de2b2ff39bda56e My two cents, bye, Marco -- https://metrics.torproject.org/rs.html#details/A4E74410D83705EEFF24BC265DE2B2FF39BDA56E signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] proper way to insert PGP key in torrc?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Toralf Förster wrote on 03/11/2016 11:39: >> https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/A1D5528320F51B910C996CE9988FAFAF4780044F >> > Advertised Bandwidth > 76.8 KB/s > > Not too much fun with such a lame relay I fear Very little fun indeed, but still better than nothing. :-) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYGyKmAAoJEB/R9oFxDPMwyngP/0NCwUsYtd3l42fzRbvf89ej NejmVyR3x2trxznSO7tS5eRox8Mqd9QatGrG/WWv6T0Am1a0lKZxoyDT6bw0Jjgu zB9dHPanvIVBtudWexhgFp8NNM793RjLFDy8Onomfm4Pe0kLlsL+dxLuGuI8HWr9 yddM4zN2NX2Z61vatl1P3I/NO/u+7I7kdKCzyiw7uyFICBhsVeMjJ3D7VbunS0DL 83BfJt8GsPBHgCFL2G/D2tEOXtu7zpeLC4O6/02rMs+pjUtbYJ0WajZW8hZXOopj VIcDLu1Z5uBHsxABlxXQYRbf12On0YatQNy7Z8HacKhfUa/w9FkoSgHDSfmSwBEP xBqV13CgPWn9isV598IjnYUC1fxywkr6GMj2cPTyXcZ+wRs6LHDdHJOOQm711uhZ Wzee5FFPDIdq9lRNLPV5QbkaHZWjJJT2dOmnyrI3Qyc9kEMHdF+bUzqKek2byA6l FfLbuN4VKbKs2Gk10K9hK/Orz/mH473q12jFODl/zUjxLO4cTKbBu8FdUR25s70z 5v86TR//DFy59i8Ngd237Gw/AOSodZa/wtF1oNh3ISCX1Z3WrtPeVTT6f0BzEvJA nz3E+nALS3CowuvQwkR6m6iblpk5ZE/7x0Xb+SoRBPIr/z/8clukCixoWZ52+VdI GP1WAS/tEyvaXd8FRjcg =dhOU -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] proper way to insert PGP key in torrc?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Peter Palfrader wrote on 03/11/2016 09:59: > Don't do short keyids. Long keyids are strictly better. > Ideally, provide the full fingerprint. Good advice. Done, thanks. Marco - -- https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/A1D5528320F51B910C996CE9988FAFAF4780044F -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYGxD2AAoJEB/R9oFxDPMwYgcP/3qAFEygnVBlNZxFC449OjPi i/umlE5Nm5ZiOgZrNkL3WYn2LWCeZxSb2xW6XABEdca8cbq/1ykyIGRXelZ0b6vD Qw4+1qaY0hT1tD/ACf7V88nHh6rflYFDvSLatp1r54iig4Gj6KRsbEPcEDgtx08J MScIDbNOQ4JiVH5/v6QoWRlEMm+hF99mUNgM89+crLZGX5bVH1vgVVne6iRHFDTJ oqI2QiAoQSI8uo6luNSIN5+OEBN87TEiXtKYj9q31um5X3vIMXP/3fUBA1q9bdnz 3myi4rsCWTjBCOOYSlFyXAOFuLBeenKXFNSd7oKAjOIFBh0vgZjJ8W2dZ0WffASq ZwYzDiBnc3bHuIU8DMGbPnRSLHsieqeMmM6citLvAiZ6zmCgqC0hz4SUKqW5rKYr gJuNxTaxifrfoKnq4YdWaOWUqiKxMra9aLHi5RQCG6c0dFTxwK29Ei3LyHIQifzu yA0rQ4w5PywitOcDB8zZwROzDPw+XOfgriJ7yH5EJp01bO+zOW67VudUEz4VWtyk uThi86Jsqlky2XNv7x0YqDku4vTkPb07L+t9uc5PS9sN+WPhJq1j33BKmK6BwrEu 6ueyiZjauZpQmeGLkXtAoHOFJfiq8TsUWBdUxaCBBOFLuuBSrwPkOZfRoZXdQRfj K1kmWAgSDB9Fn5BX1eHV =fwM8 -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] proper way to insert PGP key in torrc?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 ane...@tutanota.de wrote on 03/11/2016 09:15: > When I insert my PGP key just like a block of text below the > contactinfo line my Tor relay stops working. What is the correct > way to insert the PGP key into the torrc file? ContactInfo has to be in a single line. Just publish the key id. - From my torrc: ContactInfo 0x710CF330 Look it up on http://pgp.mit.edu This is the result: https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/A1D5528320F51B910C996CE9988FAFAF4780044F Bye, Marco -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYGvrOAAoJEB/R9oFxDPMwf8sP/jkDT5Smb4kJa8RUh03p8e3t x/EyGFsh79ojeUpdu1GWI80YpP8Lub0IA9ymGOPqiJGeUtXhQRULPXhwgtT4YoAm 8Dg7UEt3rwnojKMNRgQv0gu7MAszUFad6zrqnfLiCC7x4ewhLVrqqGeZFNdEyjJO X5HKDPMsv7MVrgmIL1/Uww8pj042lFbd0m8n/9tO7Fx9fOXsTSSw4l/xammtbr7F HkbWYSInFZFIyFLAxHjqWhRTdcpK0dUNtsQ7qFoLqOl48sJ1TDAymebta8S3mMgw gt7otIg3Ap9oZ44MPl9Jl9Ws24jLbRe9y4CgobGu8aakEy66ctQ82+7zRCBY04Uo selFQ9/7knNOj9SW0PTMLYTGSBNX2DtnzVEZyyKX1/3A3/+dWhSHN+hhwA2b/kAM Pex98QLpZJ/hnDnB4zA1CC7JqndblwR2S/0K4mzigC/HmHlHdeqWBsoL+YK8BdOP qhTDq7PI+B6AJLzfZbDccN2gVPZCoAiifgFtCEGfoBWRW4SyI1ZF6vG1Wrwubrf3 IB88C9cTDpfTql4RObuq0U13svaK1VoTTfl2QDlA/Z2AVw4F8HqegPPDKGkmnotS 86i4tkNnTZovyDzmDeZW2B1umrrwu4EHrE08DOlG2UJCzKM7gZolqCRFDVUQMVAC 0pEsh6MNo5GUsTJ5LXRY =JVsI -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Interrogated by Finnish police for alleged idendity crimes, fraud and attempts of fraud
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Juuso Lapinlampi wrote on 31/10/2016 14:25: > Putting the word out: I was interrogated by the Finnish police... All my support to you, for what it's worth. If you are running a Tor node, don't give up. We, who live in relatively decent countries, can afford some police "pressure" every once in a while, instead of people who would risk much worst. Bye, Marco - -- https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/A1D5528320F51B910C996CE9988FAFAF4780044F -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJYF3OvAAoJEB/R9oFxDPMwaJwQAIPs29o+pW8pIFV1FkWx0u43 uQQ0R6GL14osympaTpVMi9w1ZPCC6H1TBOPIs/3r7wr0ALtu5UeDS0cwiOk3SpLL wFct1S6stDKZwwionVonLpH3lmeK0iXSM96pBd9qDM5eKRSJLJV/cBJ8aLuIOVIt Pfxfai16u5/K3mYeS27YR62VtgRaXNqPF26H89/SAuE+CdckX2QvU0ip4JDD8jEJ oidv8OrBD7p8IvMgT2tgSlrrvLk8Bzn5IfY2lg1JxRr6GEY6lzR745gifmJcqWnD 36iza3GH+htWHS0wz99ozqrHBEWQfHT3d1xmOgED78rDx3zWqwc0+/CEqRJgRV52 QBQv0kM4ub8nqbQhk1eQsWNSdeeouSNpQtNU1kM90mttIdfEYb0Xss/F2sEiB86s knt7xwUIoUJiEdeOuSD1+bVypHA6y3IO4fT8EmUZX+vOTGrcpgsFYZgN8wG6cv7c vhDKZRmYHKno/i0mJ+bMdNE0d+1d0ZBiHz7yz24oNyaUeCl/EfyObhNKIxIl5cF4 8z+3NIz3p9frKh/E9xsfvPKRUYD9T+eDUz/hHfqtjRANnXgeP4Iz0BnUhvz8SZ9+ W+hYh9Ci33kBDboKozfJkvaVdG3vFM4qpexL0ZVfg9i3EnhohogRXwRfuysslJYX Qkx6YAv4pVTwhA80IHuW =xXnz -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Got a visit from the police this morning..
Too bad when a Tor node operator is intimidated out of his activity. I understand your position, thank you for your efforts. Marco stig atle steffensen wrote on 01/08/2016 08:15: > I decided today to turn the node into a non-exit node this morning. > The stress of not knowing if something will happen again is too much for > me to go around thinking about. > > I will rather donate some to torproject or other exit operators. -- https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/A1D5528320F51B910C996CE9988FAFAF4780044F ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] NPR story: When A Dark Web Volunteer Gets Raided By The Police
Green Dream wrote on 08/04/2016 01:54: > As I already said, this particular case is not so clear cut. However > letting the police poke around... I didn't realize that Tor was against the police, or vice-versa, at least in decent countries like yours or mine, so far. I don't think it's a good idea to make it sound like it is, or we will have a hard time to explain that Tor is meant for decent people, and just incidentally used by pedophiles, druglords et similia. I wouldn't mind government entities from, say, Switzerland or Sweden, to put up huge lots of exit nodes. But I'm of course dreaming. Bye, Marco -- http://www.predicatori.it/marco/ ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] NPR story: When A Dark Web Volunteer Gets Raided By The Police
krishna e bera wrote on 07/04/2016 04:28: > On 04/06/2016 04:29 AM, Marco Predicatori wrote: >> krishna e bera wrote on 05/04/2016 23:27: >>> On 04/05/2016 02:38 PM, grarpamp wrote: >>>> http://www.npr.org/sections/alltechconsidered/2016/04/04/472992023/when-a-dark-web-volunteer-gets-raided-by-the-police >>> What was the exit node's fingerprint? Is there a blacklist >>> we or the Directory Authorities can add it to? >> >> Tor doesn't need that. Any police department can run as many >> nodes as it wishes. > > It doesnt matter who they were, they could run a copy of his > server as if they were him. (Besides, you never heard of police > sting operations or corrupt police?) Of course, but what would they make of it? They might have 200 perfectly legitimate Tor nodes already, making a blacklist absolutely useless. > Indeed all of his identity keys should be considered > compromised, for example they might have got his secret PGP > keyring as well. That would be his problem, just like anybody who loses control of his hardware by theft or loss. It wouldn't have anything to do with Tor. Bye, Marco ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Tor Exit Node and Skype
Pavel Zhovner, on 06/28/2013 09:37 AM, wrote: Yes, I was experienced the same issues with Skype. Skype blocks connect's from tor network. Same situation here. -- http://www.predicatori.it/marco/ ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
