[tor-relays] removal from the Fallback Directory list

[contact-tor-turing]

hello, I managed until now the relay tor-turing -  
8456DFA94161CDD99E480C2A2992C366C6564410 - ip 62.210.254.132 for four years and 
it was in the list of Fallback Directory. However he did not answer for 2 
weeks, the support of my hosting provider told me that the motherboard is out 
of order and data are irrecoverable, so it should remove it from the list of 
Fallback Directory.

thank you.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] tor-relays Digest, Vol 73, Issue 29

[contact]

On 2017-02-20 04:00, tor-relays-requ...@lists.torproject.org wrote:

Send tor-relays mailing list submissions to
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
tor-relays-requ...@lists.torproject.org

You can reach the person managing the list at
tor-relays-ow...@lists.torproject.org

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of tor-relays digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. large server farms (cont...@charlieluna.com)
   2. Re: large server farms (teor)
   3. Re: large server farms (Duncan)
   4. Re: large server farms (I)
   5. Re: large server farms (niftybunny)
   6. Re: large server farms (anondroid)


--

Message: 1
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 16:44:25 -0800
From: cont...@charlieluna.com
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: [tor-relays] large server farms
Message-ID: <457551c757ee4a355917f577d2f9a...@charlieluna.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed

I'm highly interested in us creating a large server farm for Tor
services. The only question is how to get the coaxial cable ran from 
the

server facility to each subscriber. The power requirements could be
handled by solar and wind systems and any water needs can be created by
means of water collection systems and solar heat collectors for hot
water. I think it's totally feasible. What do you guys think?

Also, I'm very hardcore about taking back the internet for the people.
No more of this for-profit stuff where we get throttled and our freedom
of speech is abridged. Internet for the people is a means of freedom of
speech. Let's take it back.


--

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 11:47:46 +1100
From: teor 
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] large server farms
Message-ID: 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"



On 20 Feb 2017, at 11:44, cont...@charlieluna.com wrote:

I'm highly interested in us creating a large server farm for Tor 
services. The only question is how to get the coaxial cable ran from 
the server facility to each subscriber


Tor is a decentralised network, that's designed to be secure even if
users aren't directly connected to their network entry points.

Can you tell us what you're trying to achieve for users by centralising
Tor services like this?

(And what services you intend to provide?)

T

--
Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
xmpp: teor at torproject dot org




-- next part --
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 801 bytes
Desc: Message signed with OpenPGP
URL:


--

Message: 3
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 01:41:47 +
From: Duncan 
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] large server farms
Message-ID: 
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8

Hi

This seems like it would centralize some of the network. There are
already concerns about regular data-centers being able to access Tor
relays - someone malicious (yourself, someone compelling you, another
party etc) could then have access to lots of Tor relays at once, for
good or ill.

Have you considered these issues at all?

D

On 20/02/17 00:44, cont...@charlieluna.com wrote:

I'm highly interested in us creating a large server farm for Tor
services. The only question is how to get the coaxial cable ran from
the server facility to each subscriber. The power requirements could
be handled by solar and wind systems and any water needs can be
created by means of water collection systems and solar heat collectors
for hot water. I think it's totally feasible. What do you guys think?

Also, I'm very hardcore about taking back the internet for the people.
No more of this for-profit stuff where we get throttled and our
freedom of speech is abridged. Internet for the people is a means of
freedom of speech. Let's take it back.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays




--

Message: 4
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 18:31:41 -0800
From: I 
To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
Subject: Re: [tor-relays] large server farms
Message-ID: <8f58cc00c4e.04e8beatthebasta...@inbox.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Hot water?




--

Message: 5
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 03:36:37 +0100
From: niftybunny 
To: tor-relays@lists.to

[tor-relays] large server farms

[contact]

I'm highly interested in us creating a large server farm for Tor 
services. The only question is how to get the coaxial cable ran from the 
server facility to each subscriber. The power requirements could be 
handled by solar and wind systems and any water needs can be created by 
means of water collection systems and solar heat collectors for hot 
water. I think it's totally feasible. What do you guys think?


Also, I'm very hardcore about taking back the internet for the people. 
No more of this for-profit stuff where we get throttled and our freedom 
of speech is abridged. Internet for the people is a means of freedom of 
speech. Let's take it back.

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Relays with broken DirPorts

[tor-contact]

Hello,

I'm the operator of one of the mentioned relays (81.7.14.227).  Thanks,
Tim, for pointing this issue out to me. I'll try to help with this as
much as I can.

So far, I have not been able to reproduce this issue. With the python
script from #18688, I am getting results of approx. 0.20s.

On 01.04.2016 19:11, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote:
> These relays all appear at least somewhat overrated by BWauths and are
> not rate-limiting with BandwidthRate.

My server has a 100 Mbit/s interface and the options
'RelayBandwidthRate' and 'RelayBandwidthBurst' are set to 40 Mbit/s.
I've reduced it to 30 Mbit/s for the time being.

> DirPort performance is bad due to a saturated physical link or 'tc'
> bandwidth limit, so TCP congestion back-off kicks in.

I will try to do some testing next week, to see how fast/stable my
network connection actually is.



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

Re: [tor-relays] Opt-In Trial: Fallback Directory Mirrors

[contact]

Hi Nick,

On Thu, 17 Dec 2015 at 09:07:16 -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> In December 2015, we created a list of ~400 candidate fallbacks.
> https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/attachment/ticket/15775/fallback_dirs.inc
> 
> If your relay is on this list, and you expect it to be on the same IP
> address(es) and port for at least 2 years, please consider opting-in
> for this trial.

Sure, feel free to add these two:

  jaures  2CDCFED0142B28B002E89D305CBA2E26063FADE2
  bakunin 92CFD9565B24646CAC2D172D3DB503D69E777B8A

Cheers,
-- 
Guilhem.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays