Re: [tor-relays] AU Relays and data retention

2017-10-05 Thread I
> Paul wrote
> I did speak to a lawyer and there is no requirement to retain any data if
> you run a node. It's treated as a VPN.
> 
> My question that I sent was more about whether a service (non commercial
> service) was exempt.
> They don't delineate.
> 

Thank you for setting us straight.

Robert


___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] AU Relays and data retention

2017-10-05 Thread Scott Bennett
teor  wrote:

>
> > On 4 Oct 2017, at 22:52, teor  wrote:
> > 
> > But I'm not a lawyer, so you should get your own lawyer.
> > Or run a relay outside Australia.
>
> Or run an exit, because exits never know client IP addresses.
> All they know is the destination. And internet destinations are
> excluded from Australia's retention regime.
>
 That might not be good enough.  An Exit node can also be an entry point
to the tor network.  An Exit node can also even be a Guard node.  Also, an
exit node need not be an Exit node, depending upon the particular ExitPolicy
involved.


  Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
**
* Internet:   bennett at sdf.org   *xor*   bennett at freeshell.org  *
**
* "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good  *
* objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments *
* -- a standing army."   *
*-- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 *
**
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] AU Relays and data retention

2017-10-04 Thread Paul Templeton
Thanx Teor,

I did speak to a lawyer and there is no requirement to retain any data if you 
run a node. It's treated as a VPN.

My question that I sent was more about whether a service (non commercial 
service) was exempt.
They don't delineate.

Paul
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] AU Relays and data retention

2017-10-04 Thread teor

> On 4 Oct 2017, at 22:52, teor  wrote:
> 
> But I'm not a lawyer, so you should get your own lawyer.
> Or run a relay outside Australia.

Or run an exit, because exits never know client IP addresses.
All they know is the destination. And internet destinations are
excluded from Australia's retention regime.

T
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] AU Relays and data retention

2017-10-04 Thread teor

> On 4 Oct 2017, at 20:02, Paul Templeton  wrote:
> 
> The extent of data retention obligations for your relevant service would 
> relate to the extent to which elements of the data set “visible” to you. For 
> example, where a provider does not have “visibility” of a customer’s IP 
> address, it is likely that the IP address was assigned as part of a different 
> relevant service.
> For example, if you have a record of the MAC addresses of users who access 
> your network then this information must be retained for the required period.  
> You are not obliged to retain the identity of the user if this is not 
> information to which you have access.

Tor Guards have access to client IP addresses.
So I'm not sure if you gave inaccurate information to the department,
or they misunderstood what you said.

But, even if you know the client IP address, you may be exempt under
section 4.3 of the FAQs, because the IP address is allocated by the
client's ISP, and you don't know the destination.

4.3. If provider offers an internet access service, is it required to retain IP 
addresses allocated by other providers?

If the service in question only offers connection to the internet, a service 
provider will not be required to retain IP addresses allocated by other 
providers.

However, if a provider offers an additional OTT service, such as VoIP, it will 
be required to retain the relevant destination communication information.

For example, if a provider operates both an internet access service and an OTT 
service—it will be required to retain destination information only for the OTT 
service.

https://www.ag.gov.au/NationalSecurity/DataRetention/Documents/DataRetentionIndustryFAQS.pdf

But I'm not a lawyer, so you should get your own lawyer.
Or run a relay outside Australia.

T___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


[tor-relays] AU Relays and data retention

2017-10-04 Thread Paul Templeton
Hi All,

I have asked the Attorney Generals Department about data retention and got the 
following response.

If you run a relay/bridge here you seem to be exempt from retaining data. If 
your not an ISP and you run a service from home the ISP/carrier will retain the 
data though.

This just general information.

Regards,

Paul

UNCLASSIFIED
Dear Mr Templeton

Thank you for your enquiry to the Office of Communications and Cybercrime.
I am re-sending our reply to your original enquiry that we sent on 12 September 
2017 that seems to have not arrived.
The extent of data retention obligations for your relevant service would relate 
to the extent to which elements of the data set “visible” to you. For example, 
where a provider does not have “visibility” of a customer’s IP address, it is 
likely that the IP address was assigned as part of a different relevant service.
For example, if you have a record of the MAC addresses of users who access your 
network then this information must be retained for the required period.  You 
are not obliged to retain the identity of the user if this is not information 
to which you have access.
Whether the service is being offered on a commercial basis or is free is 
irrelevant in determining a service provider's obligations.
In your email you noted that "The true origin of a connection and the true 
destination will never be known and there will be no way of obtaining the 
information. That also pertains to the ports used in the circuit and all data 
passing through the circuit will be encrypted." This sentence appears to 
suggest that you may be  looking to offer some kind of an internet access 
service, in which case the destination is not required to be retained.
Your reference to encrypted content suggests a VPN. If this is the case and 
this service is not operated you, obligations do not apply. Also, data 
retention would not require you to store the contents of the communications.
Please do not hesitate to contact our office if you require further information.

Regards

Kerry

Office of Communications Access & Cybercrime Intelligence and Identity Security 
Division
T: (02) 6141 2884


The information contained in this email is intended as guidance only.  It does 
not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. If you 
require legal advice, you should consult an independent legal adviser.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays