Re: [tor-relays] Policy Question: Tor Exits at Universities, Corporate Networks, etc

2018-09-02 Thread Gary
On Sun, 2 Sep 2018 at 01:05, Mirimir  wrote:

>  Maybe also an indicator in
> Tor browser, showing the censorship level of the exit that they're using.
>

Good idea, as previously said, different counties block/censor different
things, so simply changing a circuit will get around this (for now).

With reference to torrents in the UK, as Sam said, not all are blocked. Its
basically a game of whack-a-mole with the courts. Every time the courts
order ISP's to block a particular domain name (eg torrent.com) the site
will simply change domain name (eg to different-torrent-name.com) until the
courts order the ISP's to block it again a few months time. I am uncertain
if, for example, someone were to set up a new ISP they would have to follow
the previous court blocking orders or they would need to be "re-issued" to
the new ISP.

Thanks
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Policy Question: Tor Exits at Universities, Corporate Networks, etc

2018-09-02 Thread Sam Pizzey
On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 1:05 AM, Mirimir  wrote:
> Damn, I hadn't considered that :( I guess that I had assumed such
> blocking was limited to consumer-level ISPs. Not uplinks in data
> centers.

This is the case for the UK, yes (it's not actually even all
consumer-level ISP's, mine for example does not conform to it). Can't
speak for other countries.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Policy Question: Tor Exits at Universities, Corporate Networks, etc

2018-09-01 Thread Mirimir
On 09/01/2018 04:47 PM, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote:
> I know this is an issue of semantics here, but when you say “Tor Exit in 
> Turkey censoring access to various access to various websites” you’re kind of 
> putting the onus on them directly instead of the repressive anti-free speech 
> regime that they are operating the the exit under. Why not be more clear and 
> direct with your language and state the “Tor Exit in Turkey that is being 
> actively censored by it’s upstream” or the “Tor Exit that is being actively 
> censored by an unknown third party” instead of putting the blame on them?

True. But however you say it, there's still censorship.

> Furthermore, even western countries have limits to what you can access from 
> those countries. As others have said - you can’t access torrent sites from 
> the UK, heck, you can’t even access EncyclopediaDramatica (certain pages of 
> it anyway) from Australia. Should we mark those exits as bad because they 
> can’t access certain pages as well?

Damn, I hadn't considered that :( I guess that I had assumed such
blocking was limited to consumer-level ISPs. Not uplinks in data
centers. If that's actually the case, perhaps such censored relays
should be in a separate category, and not enabled by default. Or as a
configuration option, or an option in Tor browser, similar to the
security slider.

But I can see how that reduces anonymity. So maybe the best option is to
publicize the problem, and remind users that they ought to try new
circuits when they find stuff unreachable. Maybe also an indicator in
Tor browser, showing the censorship level of the exit that they're using.

>> On Sep 1, 2018, at 4:56 PM, Nathaniel Suchy  wrote:
>>
>> Recently we've been discussing a Tor Exit in Turkey censoring access to 
>> various websites.
>>
>> It's less to some err, disagreements on what should and should not be 
>> allowed. I've seen a few opinions:
>> *) It grants an outside view at what Turkey censors
>> *) It could push new tor users away
>>
>> This leads me to question if it's okay for a Tor Exit to be on a censored 
>> network are the following scenarios now allowed?
>> *) A Tor Exit behind a Corporate Network and Web Filter
>> *) A Tor Exit behind a University Network and Web Filter
>> Under the logic with the Turkey exit relay it should be right?
>>
>> Cordially,
>> Nathaniel
>> ___
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
> 
> 
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Policy Question: Tor Exits at Universities, Corporate Networks, etc

2018-09-01 Thread Conrad Rockenhaus
I know this is an issue of semantics here, but when you say “Tor Exit in Turkey 
censoring access to various access to various websites” you’re kind of putting 
the onus on them directly instead of the repressive anti-free speech regime 
that they are operating the the exit under. Why not be more clear and direct 
with your language and state the “Tor Exit in Turkey that is being actively 
censored by it’s upstream” or the “Tor Exit that is being actively censored by 
an unknown third party” instead of putting the blame on them?

Furthermore, even western countries have limits to what you can access from 
those countries. As others have said - you can’t access torrent sites from the 
UK, heck, you can’t even access EncyclopediaDramatica (certain pages of it 
anyway) from Australia. Should we mark those exits as bad because they can’t 
access certain pages as well?



> On Sep 1, 2018, at 4:56 PM, Nathaniel Suchy  wrote:
> 
> Recently we've been discussing a Tor Exit in Turkey censoring access to 
> various websites.
> 
> It's less to some err, disagreements on what should and should not be 
> allowed. I've seen a few opinions:
> *) It grants an outside view at what Turkey censors
> *) It could push new tor users away
> 
> This leads me to question if it's okay for a Tor Exit to be on a censored 
> network are the following scenarios now allowed?
> *) A Tor Exit behind a Corporate Network and Web Filter
> *) A Tor Exit behind a University Network and Web Filter
> Under the logic with the Turkey exit relay it should be right?
> 
> Cordially,
> Nathaniel
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Policy Question: Tor Exits at Universities, Corporate Networks, etc

2018-09-01 Thread Mirimir
On 09/01/2018 02:56 PM, Nathaniel Suchy wrote:
> Recently we've been discussing a Tor Exit in Turkey censoring access to
> various websites.
> 
> It's less to some err, disagreements on what should and should not be
> allowed. I've seen a few opinions:
> *) It grants an outside view at what Turkey censors

Then it should be in a separate category, not used by default, but
available for research purposes.

> *) It could push new tor users away

That's how I see it. But maybe it's unlikely enough to matter.

> This leads me to question if it's okay for a Tor Exit to be on a censored
> network are the following scenarios now allowed?
> *) A Tor Exit behind a Corporate Network and Web Filter
> *) A Tor Exit behind a University Network and Web Filter
> Under the logic with the Turkey exit relay it should be right?
> 
> Cordially,
> Nathaniel

I see absolutely no use for such censored relays. As others have said,
what does it matter whether relay operators do bad things, or whether
they run relays in environments that do bad things? Bad things are bad
things, whatever the reason.
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


[tor-relays] Policy Question: Tor Exits at Universities, Corporate Networks, etc

2018-09-01 Thread Nathaniel Suchy
Recently we've been discussing a Tor Exit in Turkey censoring access to
various websites.

It's less to some err, disagreements on what should and should not be
allowed. I've seen a few opinions:
*) It grants an outside view at what Turkey censors
*) It could push new tor users away

This leads me to question if it's okay for a Tor Exit to be on a censored
network are the following scenarios now allowed?
*) A Tor Exit behind a Corporate Network and Web Filter
*) A Tor Exit behind a University Network and Web Filter
Under the logic with the Turkey exit relay it should be right?

Cordially,
Nathaniel
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays