Re: [tor-relays] Why would consensus weight would be declining like this?
On Tue, Mar 18, 2014 at 05:02:07PM -0400, Tora Tora Tora wrote: Declining dramatically https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/90743CFA1B93295B9334CC0C625D22990AABA25F vs https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/CC2F7C6ED12B67CB3882B98213E02DEF2CB82293 that is holding steady A fine research question. A lot of the questions from https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay apply here too. One theory is that it's a result of variance -- they're both relatively small relays, so one stream that uses lots of bandwidth and randomly happens to pick this relay could be enough to skew a few bandwidth tests, pushing you down for a while. In theory it should recover, since both relays are publishing similar underlying self-measured bandwidths: https://exonerator.torproject.org/serverdesc?desc-id=825feea5d643a228e121d0fbfdecf47acff4870f https://exonerator.torproject.org/serverdesc?desc-id=ec726fe88dbc60d18b3402fff2bace3564292546 But it might take quite some time to adjust, since the bandwidth authorities don't measure very often. --Roger ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Why would consensus weight would be declining like this?
Good to know. I guess I will not shutdown underused relay just yet. A prepaid traffic allotment would be a terrible thing to waste! :-) ... A fine research question. A lot of the questions from https://blog.torproject.org/blog/lifecycle-of-a-new-relay apply here too. One theory is that it's a result of variance -- they're both relatively small relays, so one stream that uses lots of bandwidth and randomly happens to pick this relay could be enough to skew a few bandwidth tests, pushing you down for a while. In theory it should recover, since both relays are publishing similar underlying self-measured bandwidths: https://exonerator.torproject.org/serverdesc?desc-id=825feea5d643a228e121d0fbfdecf47acff4870f https://exonerator.torproject.org/serverdesc?desc-id=ec726fe88dbc60d18b3402fff2bace3564292546 But it might take quite some time to adjust, since the bandwidth authorities don't measure very often. --Roger ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Why would consensus weight would be declining like this?
Anyone? Several days ago, both relays had roughly the same consensus weight. On 03/18/2014 05:02 PM, Tora Tora Tora wrote: Declining dramatically https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/90743CFA1B93295B9334CC0C625D22990AABA25F vs https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/CC2F7C6ED12B67CB3882B98213E02DEF2CB82293 that is holding steady ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
[tor-relays] Why would consensus weight would be declining like this?
Declining dramatically https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/90743CFA1B93295B9334CC0C625D22990AABA25F vs https://atlas.torproject.org/#details/CC2F7C6ED12B67CB3882B98213E02DEF2CB82293 that is holding steady ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays