Re: [tor-relays] Yay, Complaints

2018-08-25 Thread I
!


___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Yay, Complaints

2018-08-25 Thread Conrad Rockenhaus


> On Aug 24, 2018, at 3:50 PM, Dave Warren  wrote:
> 
> On 2018-08-23 17:56, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote:
>> This mainly seemed to be an issue of miscommunication - I had one party that 
>> I was in communication with at the beginning who said that this was going to 
>> be a perfectly okay endeavor, equipment gets plugged in, day one passes with 
>> a couple of abuse complaints, no problems. Day two comes around, and a new 
>> guy comes in. That’s when it hit the fan.
> 
> Do you think it was an actual miscommunication, or perhaps just a salesdroid 
> selling something different than they actually offer?
> 

Since I contacted someone in their abuse department, I believe it’s more of the 
lines of miscommunication. Maybe the abuse people are confused :/


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Yay, Complaints

2018-08-24 Thread Dave Warren

On 2018-08-23 17:56, Conrad Rockenhaus wrote:



This mainly seemed to be an issue of miscommunication - I had one party that I 
was in communication with at the beginning who said that this was going to be a 
perfectly okay endeavor, equipment gets plugged in, day one passes with a 
couple of abuse complaints, no problems. Day two comes around, and a new guy 
comes in. That’s when it hit the fan.


Do you think it was an actual miscommunication, or perhaps just a 
salesdroid selling something different than they actually offer?


___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Yay, Complaints

2018-08-23 Thread Conrad Rockenhaus


> On Aug 23, 2018, at 6:20 PM, I  wrote:
> 
> When I've met the same attitude I've had some luck by immediately saying they 
> could wipe the hard drive to exterminate all devils, and even give me a 
> different ip address, to show my interest in keeping our relationship going. 
> I told them torrenting is not what tor's for and I want to get rid of them as 
> much as anybody.
> 
> Since they didn't comprehend or listen properly to the longer sensible 
> explanation it was surprising that they liked the simple story.
> 
> Rob
> 

This mainly seemed to be an issue of miscommunication - I had one party that I 
was in communication with at the beginning who said that this was going to be a 
perfectly okay endeavor, equipment gets plugged in, day one passes with a 
couple of abuse complaints, no problems. Day two comes around, and a new guy 
comes in. That’s when it hit the fan.

They listened to reason and that was good enough with me. This gives me a 
chance to repair the relationship to the point where I can eventually open the 
relays back up at some point. In fact, they’ve stated that they don’t care if 
the relays are completely open, they just don’t want to deal with the 
complaints. If Irdeto actually followed emailed me per the ARIN database (like 
the other complaining parties did today), there wouldn’t be any problem. The 
problem lays with the fact that Irdeto has consistently decided to disregard 
the fact that these IPs are reassigned and just emails the upstream, probably 
because they know they would get more of a reaction that way.

Thanks,

Conrad



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Yay, Complaints

2018-08-23 Thread I
When I've met the same attitude I've had some luck by immediately saying they 
could wipe the hard drive to exterminate all devils, and even give me a 
different ip address, to show my interest in keeping our relationship going. I 
told them torrenting is not what tor's for and I want to get rid of them as 
much as anybody.

Since they didn't comprehend or listen properly to the longer sensible 
explanation it was surprising that they liked the simple story.

Rob


___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Yay, Complaints

2018-08-23 Thread torix
Dear Conrad,

I picked the first, less reduced policy from 
https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/ReducedExitPolicy and changed 
my OR/DirPorts from the defaults as it suggested.  Not sure if I should have 
picked the 2nd, even more reduced policy or not.

--torix


Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.

‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On August 23, 2018 4:54 PM, Conrad Rockenhaus  wrote:

> It’s located in Denver, but Colin had a good suggestion to have everyone run 
> a reduced exit policy for now until things cool down a little, and the 
> provider seemed to cool down their stance after I approached them with that 
> idea and stated that they just wanted the flood of abuse emails to stop, and 
> even suggested that I reach out to the copyright holders and try to get them 
> to contact me directly, since the IPs are SWIPped to me and that is the 
> proper procedure anyway.
>
> So, the new colo stays alive for now…. I’ll let things cool down for a bit 
> then we’ll open the exit policies back up and see where things go from there.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Conrad
>
> > On Aug 23, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Franklin Bynum frank...@bynumlaw.net wrote:
> > Where is your hardware physically located? If it’s in the United States, I 
> > can probably help you get your stuff back.
> > —
> > Franklin Bynum
> > Lawyer
> > Bynum Law Office
> > 708 Main Street
> > Houston, Texas 77002
> > Dial “713 LAW FIRM”
> > +1 713 529-3476
> >
> > > On Aug 23, 2018, at 07:51, Conrad Rockenhaus con...@rockenhaus.com wrote:
> > > So, new equipment gets plugged into a colo…. I’m a dude that was looking 
> > > to increase AS diversity on Tor and well, decided to add a new colo to 
> > > the mix.
> > > Two exit relays are brought online on properly SWIPed IP addresses. These 
> > > exit relays have only been online for about 24 hours.
> > > An organization, known as Irdeto Intelligence, ignores the fact that the 
> > > IP addresses are SWIPed and sends abuse complaints to my upstream 
> > > providers asking them to straighten me out, because I’m a pox on society 
> > > because people are torrenting via Tor. They have sent over 40 emails in 
> > > the last 12 hours.
> > > Some dude-man, who calls himself a “Network Security Administrator” who 
> > > asked me to explain what Tor is……….because he’s a Network Security 
> > > Administrator……..has told me that due to the volume of complaints I need 
> > > to block the offending applications from their network.
> > > I told him that I spoke with them prior to bringing this stuff online, 
> > > explained what Tor was, explained what a Tor exit was, explained that it 
> > > will generate complaints, explained the DCMA liability, explained the 
> > > whole thing…..and was told that they were okay with it.
> > > I’m sorry for the bitching and moaning…it’s just another case of doing 
> > > everything right and now I’m quite worried that they’ll not only pull the 
> > > plug, that I’ll have to fight to get my Cisco UCS blade server back (and 
> > > other assorted equipment) which is totally not going to be cool.
> > > Conrad
> > >
> > > tor-relays mailing list
> > > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> > > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> >
> > tor-relays mailing list
> > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Yay, Complaints

2018-08-23 Thread Conrad Rockenhaus
It’s located in Denver, but Colin had a good suggestion to have everyone run a 
reduced exit policy for now until things cool down a little, and the provider 
seemed to cool down their stance after I approached them with that idea and 
stated that they just wanted the flood of abuse emails to stop, and even 
suggested that I reach out to the copyright holders and try to get them to 
contact me directly, since the IPs are SWIPped to me and that is the proper 
procedure anyway.

So, the new colo stays alive for now…. I’ll let things cool down for a bit then 
we’ll open the exit policies back up and see where things go from there.

Thanks,

Conrad

> On Aug 23, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Franklin Bynum  wrote:
> 
> Where is your hardware physically located? If it’s in the United States, I 
> can probably help you get your stuff back.
> 
> —
> Franklin Bynum
> Lawyer
> Bynum Law Office
> 708 Main Street
> Houston, Texas 77002
> Dial “713 LAW FIRM”
> +1 713 529-3476
> 
>> On Aug 23, 2018, at 07:51, Conrad Rockenhaus  wrote:
>> 
>> So, new equipment gets plugged into a colo…. I’m a dude that was looking to 
>> increase AS diversity on Tor and well, decided to add a new colo to the mix.
>> 
>> Two exit relays are brought online on properly SWIPed IP addresses. These 
>> exit relays have only been online for about 24 hours.
>> 
>> An organization, known as Irdeto Intelligence, ignores the fact that the IP 
>> addresses are SWIPed and sends abuse complaints to my upstream providers 
>> asking them to straighten me out, because I’m a pox on society because 
>> people are torrenting via Tor. They have sent over 40 emails in the last 12 
>> hours.
>> 
>> Some dude-man, who calls himself a “Network Security Administrator” who 
>> asked me to explain what Tor is……….because he’s a Network Security 
>> Administrator……..has told me that due to the volume of complaints I need to 
>> block the offending applications from their network.
>> 
>> I told him that I spoke with them prior to bringing this stuff online, 
>> explained what Tor was, explained what a Tor exit was, explained that it 
>> will generate complaints, explained the DCMA liability, explained the whole 
>> thing…..and was told that they were okay with it.
>> 
>> I’m sorry for the bitching and moaning…it’s just another case of doing 
>> everything right and now I’m quite worried that they’ll not only pull the 
>> plug, that I’ll have to fight to get my Cisco UCS blade server back (and 
>> other assorted equipment) which is totally not going to be cool.
>> 
>> Conrad
>> ___
>> tor-relays mailing list
>> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
>> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
> 
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays



signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Yay, Complaints

2018-08-23 Thread Franklin Bynum
Where is your hardware physically located? If it’s in the United States, I can 
probably help you get your stuff back. 

—
Franklin Bynum
Lawyer
Bynum Law Office
708 Main Street
Houston, Texas 77002
Dial “713 LAW FIRM”
+1 713 529-3476

> On Aug 23, 2018, at 07:51, Conrad Rockenhaus  wrote:
> 
> So, new equipment gets plugged into a colo…. I’m a dude that was looking to 
> increase AS diversity on Tor and well, decided to add a new colo to the mix.
> 
> Two exit relays are brought online on properly SWIPed IP addresses. These 
> exit relays have only been online for about 24 hours.
> 
> An organization, known as Irdeto Intelligence, ignores the fact that the IP 
> addresses are SWIPed and sends abuse complaints to my upstream providers 
> asking them to straighten me out, because I’m a pox on society because people 
> are torrenting via Tor. They have sent over 40 emails in the last 12 hours.
> 
> Some dude-man, who calls himself a “Network Security Administrator” who asked 
> me to explain what Tor is……….because he’s a Network Security 
> Administrator……..has told me that due to the volume of complaints I need to 
> block the offending applications from their network.
> 
> I told him that I spoke with them prior to bringing this stuff online, 
> explained what Tor was, explained what a Tor exit was, explained that it will 
> generate complaints, explained the DCMA liability, explained the whole 
> thing…..and was told that they were okay with it.
> 
> I’m sorry for the bitching and moaning…it’s just another case of doing 
> everything right and now I’m quite worried that they’ll not only pull the 
> plug, that I’ll have to fight to get my Cisco UCS blade server back (and 
> other assorted equipment) which is totally not going to be cool.
> 
> Conrad
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] Yay, Complaints

2018-08-23 Thread Colin Childs
Hi Conrad,

Thank you for running exit relays and helping diversify the Tor network. I’m 
sorry to hear you’re experiencing this issue with Irdeto / your colocation 
facility, I understand how frustrating these situations can be. 

I’m going to reach out to you off list to discuss this issue further and offer 
some potential short-term / long-term solutions.

Thanks again, you should be receiving an email from me shortly. 

> On Aug 23, 2018, at 7:51 AM, Conrad Rockenhaus  wrote:
> 
> Signed PGP part
> So, new equipment gets plugged into a colo…. I’m a dude that was looking to 
> increase AS diversity on Tor and well, decided to add a new colo to the mix.
> 
> Two exit relays are brought online on properly SWIPed IP addresses. These 
> exit relays have only been online for about 24 hours.
> 
> An organization, known as Irdeto Intelligence, ignores the fact that the IP 
> addresses are SWIPed and sends abuse complaints to my upstream providers 
> asking them to straighten me out, because I’m a pox on society because people 
> are torrenting via Tor. They have sent over 40 emails in the last 12 hours.
> 
> Some dude-man, who calls himself a “Network Security Administrator” who asked 
> me to explain what Tor is……….because he’s a Network Security 
> Administrator……..has told me that due to the volume of complaints I need to 
> block the offending applications from their network.
> 
> I told him that I spoke with them prior to bringing this stuff online, 
> explained what Tor was, explained what a Tor exit was, explained that it will 
> generate complaints, explained the DCMA liability, explained the whole 
> thing…..and was told that they were okay with it.
> 
> I’m sorry for the bitching and moaning…it’s just another case of doing 
> everything right and now I’m quite worried that they’ll not only pull the 
> plug, that I’ll have to fight to get my Cisco UCS blade server back (and 
> other assorted equipment) which is totally not going to be cool.
> 
> Conrad
> 
> 

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


[tor-relays] Yay, Complaints

2018-08-23 Thread Conrad Rockenhaus
So, new equipment gets plugged into a colo…. I’m a dude that was looking to 
increase AS diversity on Tor and well, decided to add a new colo to the mix.

Two exit relays are brought online on properly SWIPed IP addresses. These exit 
relays have only been online for about 24 hours.

An organization, known as Irdeto Intelligence, ignores the fact that the IP 
addresses are SWIPed and sends abuse complaints to my upstream providers asking 
them to straighten me out, because I’m a pox on society because people are 
torrenting via Tor. They have sent over 40 emails in the last 12 hours.

Some dude-man, who calls himself a “Network Security Administrator” who asked 
me to explain what Tor is……….because he’s a Network Security 
Administrator……..has told me that due to the volume of complaints I need to 
block the offending applications from their network.

I told him that I spoke with them prior to bringing this stuff online, 
explained what Tor was, explained what a Tor exit was, explained that it will 
generate complaints, explained the DCMA liability, explained the whole 
thing…..and was told that they were okay with it.

I’m sorry for the bitching and moaning…it’s just another case of doing 
everything right and now I’m quite worried that they’ll not only pull the plug, 
that I’ll have to fight to get my Cisco UCS blade server back (and other 
assorted equipment) which is totally not going to be cool.

Conrad


signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays