Re: [tor-relays] Failure from drain-fd
I added these items to the torrc file: logtimegranularity 1 log [edge] debug file c:\tor\data\tor\logfile001.log In the regular log I see this warning: Nov 04 14:40:47.507 [warn] Failure from drain_fd: No error [4953 similar message(s) suppressed in last 7200 seconds] In the debug logfile I see these events around the same timeframe: Nov 04 14:40:26.965 [info] connection_edge_process_relay_cell(): sendme cell dropped, unknown stream (streamid 61113). Nov 04 14:40:30.484 [debug] connection_edge_process_relay_cell(): Now seen 10957 relay cells here (command 6, stream 0). Nov 04 14:40:33.043 [debug] connection_edge_process_relay_cell(): Now seen 10958 relay cells here (command 14, stream 0). Nov 04 14:40:35.403 [debug] connection_edge_process_relay_cell(): Now seen 10959 relay cells here (command 14, stream 0). Nov 04 14:40:36.975 [debug] connection_edge_process_relay_cell(): Now seen 10960 relay cells here (command 14, stream 0). Nov 04 14:40:38.527 [debug] connection_edge_process_relay_cell(): Now seen 10961 relay cells here (command 6, stream 0). Nov 04 14:40:43.288 [debug] connection_edge_process_relay_cell(): Now seen 10962 relay cells here (command 14, stream 0). Nov 04 14:40:44.730 [debug] connection_edge_process_relay_cell(): Now seen 10963 relay cells here (command 33, stream 0). Nov 04 14:40:46.067 [debug] connection_edge_process_relay_cell(): Now seen 10964 relay cells here (command 14, stream 0). Nov 04 14:40:47.413 [debug] connection_edge_process_relay_cell(): Now seen 10965 relay cells here (command 14, stream 0). Nov 04 14:40:47.912 [debug] connection_edge_process_relay_cell(): Now seen 10966 relay cells here (command 14, stream 0). Nov 04 14:40:48.256 [debug] connection_edge_process_relay_cell(): Now seen 10967 relay cells here (command 6, stream 0). Otherwise I also see lots of these: Nov 04 14:40:20.037 [debug] connection_edge_package_raw_inbuf(): -1: Packaging 498 bytes (7677 waiting). Nov 04 14:40:20.037 [debug] connection_edge_package_raw_inbuf(): conn->package_window is now 396 Nov 04 14:40:20.037 [debug] circuit_consider_stop_edge_reading(): considering circ->package_window 896 Nov 04 14:40:20.037 [debug] connection_edge_package_raw_inbuf(): -1: Packaging 498 bytes (7179 waiting). Nov 04 14:40:20.037 [debug] connection_edge_package_raw_inbuf(): conn->package_window is now 395 Nov 04 14:40:20.037 [debug] circuit_consider_stop_edge_reading(): considering circ->package_window 895 Nov 04 14:40:20.037 [debug] connection_edge_package_raw_inbuf(): -1: Packaging 498 bytes (6681 waiting). Is this helpful or should I remove the "[edge]" domain and let it log everything? Thanks, Brian > Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2015 00:14:05 -0500 > To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > From: starlight.201...@binnacle.cx > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Failure from drain-fd > > At 23:58 10/28/2015 -0500, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote: > > Log debug file logfile001 > > If the volume of messages is too high, > you might have luck with "domain" > logging, which narrows it to > particular functional realms, for > example: > > setconf Log="[edge] debug file logfile001" > > where the "edge" domain relates to event > processing. See > >Log [domain,...] > > in > >https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html.en > > for details and the full list of message domains. > > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Failure from drain-fd
At 23:58 10/28/2015 -0500, starlight.201...@binnacle.cx wrote: > Log debug file logfile001 If the volume of messages is too high, you might have luck with "domain" logging, which narrows it to particular functional realms, for example: setconf Log="[edge] debug file logfile001" where the "edge" domain relates to event processing. See Log [domain,...] in https://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html.en for details and the full list of message domains. ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Failure from drain-fd
> On 2 Oct 2015, at 00:24, Brian Walker <torre...@outlook.com> wrote: > > Looks like the status of the ticket has been updated to Resolved with the > comment: > > "Merged to master; if this helps us find a real bug, that bugfix will be > backportable." > > I'm now on v2.6.10 with Libevent 2.0.21-stable, OpenSSL 1.0.1p and Zlib 1.2.8 > on Server 2012 R2 and I'm still seeing the warnings. As 0.2.6.10 was the stable release 6 weeks ago, it does not have this fix. The master branch referred to in the ticket is now 0.2.7.3-rc. If you are comfortable using release-candidate code, please try it, otherwise, there should be a 0.2.7.3 stable release soon. > > Brian > > > Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 20:47:04 -0400 > > From: a...@mit.edu <mailto:a...@mit.edu> > > To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org> > > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Failure from drain-fd > > > > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 05:13:45PM -0700, Brian Walker wrote: > > > Anybody know what this means? My logs are littered with it. > > > > > > Tor v2.6.9 with Libevent 2.0.21-stable, OpenSSL 1.0.1o and Zlib 1.2.8 on > > > Windows Server 2012 R2. > > > > > > Aug 06 13:26:35.000 [warn] Failure from drain_fd [3892 similar message(s) > > > suppressed in last 7200 seconds] > > > Aug 06 15:26:37.000 [warn] Failure from drain_fd [3526 similar message(s) > > > suppressed in last 7200 seconds] > > > > Exciting. > > > > You might be among the few people running a recent Tor version on Windows > > as a relay. So thank you for reporting issues. > > > > I've filed > > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/16741 > > based on poking around the code a bit. > > > > Depending on how that ticket goes, we may then be in a better position > > to guess at what's going wrong for you. :) > > > > Thanks! > > --Roger > > > > ___ > > tor-relays mailing list > > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays> Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Failure from drain-fd
Is there a version compiled for Windows? The closest I could find is this: https://dist.torproject.org/torbrowser/5.5a3/tor-win32-0.2.7.2-alpha.zip From: teor2...@gmail.com Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 01:28:25 +0200 To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Failure from drain-fd On 2 Oct 2015, at 00:24, Brian Walker <torre...@outlook.com> wrote:Looks like the status of the ticket has been updated to Resolved with the comment: "Merged to master; if this helps us find a real bug, that bugfix will be backportable." I'm now on v2.6.10 with Libevent 2.0.21-stable, OpenSSL 1.0.1p and Zlib 1.2.8 on Server 2012 R2 and I'm still seeing the warnings. As 0.2.6.10 was the stable release 6 weeks ago, it does not have this fix. The master branch referred to in the ticket is now 0.2.7.3-rc. If you are comfortable using release-candidate code, please try it, otherwise, there should be a 0.2.7.3 stable release soon. Brian > Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 20:47:04 -0400 > From: a...@mit.edu > To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Failure from drain-fd > > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 05:13:45PM -0700, Brian Walker wrote: > > Anybody know what this means? My logs are littered with it. > > > > Tor v2.6.9 with Libevent 2.0.21-stable, OpenSSL 1.0.1o and Zlib 1.2.8 on > > Windows Server 2012 R2. > > > > Aug 06 13:26:35.000 [warn] Failure from drain_fd [3892 similar message(s) > > suppressed in last 7200 seconds] > > Aug 06 15:26:37.000 [warn] Failure from drain_fd [3526 similar message(s) > > suppressed in last 7200 seconds] > > Exciting. > > You might be among the few people running a recent Tor version on Windows > as a relay. So thank you for reporting issues. > > I've filed > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/16741 > based on poking around the code a bit. > > Depending on how that ticket goes, we may then be in a better position > to guess at what's going wrong for you. :) > > Thanks! > --Roger > > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___tor-relays mailing listtor-relays@lists.torproject.orghttps://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Failure from drain-fd
Apologies, that’s hidden rather deep, isn’t it? I’ve logged https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/17209 <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/17209> so we can fix this. The fix you want is only in 0.2.7.3. I assume we will compile a version for Windows either: * when 0.2.7.3 becomes stable, or * when 0.2.7.3 is used by a Tor Browser release. Alternately, you could compile from source, if you are able to do that. https://dist.torproject.org/tor-0.2.7.3-rc.tar.gz <https://dist.torproject.org/tor-0.2.7.3-rc.tar.gz> Tim > On 2 Oct 2015, at 03:44, Brian Walker <torre...@outlook.com> wrote: > > Is there a version compiled for Windows? > > The closest I could find is this: > https://dist.torproject.org/torbrowser/5.5a3/tor-win32-0.2.7.2-alpha.zip > <https://dist.torproject.org/torbrowser/5.5a3/tor-win32-0.2.7.2-alpha.zip> > > From: teor2...@gmail.com > Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2015 01:28:25 +0200 > To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Failure from drain-fd > > > On 2 Oct 2015, at 00:24, Brian Walker <torre...@outlook.com > <mailto:torre...@outlook.com>> wrote: > > Looks like the status of the ticket has been updated to Resolved with the > comment: > > "Merged to master; if this helps us find a real bug, that bugfix will be > backportable." > > I'm now on v2.6.10 with Libevent 2.0.21-stable, OpenSSL 1.0.1p and Zlib 1.2.8 > on Server 2012 R2 and I'm still seeing the warnings. > > As 0.2.6.10 was the stable release 6 weeks ago, it does not have this fix. > > The master branch referred to in the ticket is now 0.2.7.3-rc. If you are > comfortable using release-candidate code, please try it, otherwise, there > should be a 0.2.7.3 stable release soon. > > > Brian > > > Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 20:47:04 -0400 > > From: a...@mit.edu <mailto:a...@mit.edu> > > To: tor-relays@lists.torproject.org <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org> > > Subject: Re: [tor-relays] Failure from drain-fd > > > > On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 05:13:45PM -0700, Brian Walker wrote: > > > Anybody know what this means? My logs are littered with it. > > > > > > Tor v2.6.9 with Libevent 2.0.21-stable, OpenSSL 1.0.1o and Zlib 1.2.8 on > > > Windows Server 2012 R2. > > > > > > Aug 06 13:26:35.000 [warn] Failure from drain_fd [3892 similar message(s) > > > suppressed in last 7200 seconds] > > > Aug 06 15:26:37.000 [warn] Failure from drain_fd [3526 similar message(s) > > > suppressed in last 7200 seconds] > > > > Exciting. > > > > You might be among the few people running a recent Tor version on Windows > > as a relay. So thank you for reporting issues. > > > > I've filed > > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/16741 > > <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/16741> > > based on poking around the code a bit. > > > > Depending on how that ticket goes, we may then be in a better position > > to guess at what's going wrong for you. :) > > > > Thanks! > > --Roger > > > > ___ > > tor-relays mailing list > > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org> > > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > > <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays> > ___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays> > Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) > > teor2345 at gmail dot com > PGP 968F094B > > teor at blah dot im > OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F > > > ___ tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays>___ > tor-relays mailing list > tor-relays@lists.torproject.org <mailto:tor-relays@lists.torproject.org> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays > <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays> Tim Wilson-Brown (teor) teor2345 at gmail dot com PGP 968F094B teor at blah dot im OTR CAD08081 9755866D 89E2A06F E3558B7F B5A9D14F signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
Re: [tor-relays] Failure from drain-fd
On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 05:13:45PM -0700, Brian Walker wrote: Anybody know what this means? My logs are littered with it. Tor v2.6.9 with Libevent 2.0.21-stable, OpenSSL 1.0.1o and Zlib 1.2.8 on Windows Server 2012 R2. Aug 06 13:26:35.000 [warn] Failure from drain_fd [3892 similar message(s) suppressed in last 7200 seconds] Aug 06 15:26:37.000 [warn] Failure from drain_fd [3526 similar message(s) suppressed in last 7200 seconds] Exciting. You might be among the few people running a recent Tor version on Windows as a relay. So thank you for reporting issues. I've filed https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/16741 based on poking around the code a bit. Depending on how that ticket goes, we may then be in a better position to guess at what's going wrong for you. :) Thanks! --Roger ___ tor-relays mailing list tor-relays@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays
