Re: [tor-relays] High speed Tor relay advice

2016-08-15 Thread grarpamp
On 8/15/16, Roman Mamedov  wrote:
> To me these seem to be just two loosely related facts, the latter merely
> I don't see any "network calculations" being presented.

Was an fyi for the OP, who may or may not be doing calculations,
regardless of presentation to us.

> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megabyte: "The megabyte is a multiple of the
> unit byte for digital information. Its recommended unit symbol is MB."
> MB/s is a long-accepted shorthand for Megabyte per second, and yes, Mb/s is
> megabit per second. But please, take your "MiB" lunacy elsewhere.

The current published standards of standards bodies, you
would find that "M" for binary is deprecated in favor of Mi, thus
making MiB no such lunacy. Then there is proper context, where
manufacturers are getting sued, and some unixes and apps are
correcting their stats output, be it in underlying quantities and/or
in naming with bits(b) for network in decimal (for interfacing with
network providers and hardware), and bytes(B) for disk and ram
in binary (for interfacing with read() call of 2^3=8 bits (byte) [1]).
MB is thus bit of deprecated legacy mashup.
What is lunacy is perpetuating legacy ambiguous terminology
and context against standards. Things like mars climate orbiter
happen when you do that.

[1] Though I'd suggest having switches to optional display
disk/ram rates per sec in decimal bits for easier network
throughput checks at those location in system.)

No worries, the next pint of beer is on me, while I bitch about
the "8GB" stick I tested having far less than 8E9 bytes ;)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEC_60027
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISO/IEC_8
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_prefix
http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/si-brochure/
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/binary.html
http://members.optus.net/alexey/prefBin.xhtml
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] High speed Tor relay advice

2016-08-15 Thread Michael Armbruster
On 2016-08-15 at 08:52, Roman Mamedov wrote:
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megabyte: "The megabyte is a multiple of the
> unit byte for digital information. Its recommended unit symbol is MB."
> MB/s is a long-accepted shorthand for Megabyte per second, and yes, Mb/s is
> megabit per second. But please, take your "MiB" lunacy elsewhere.

Well, "MiB" is a completely other unit than MB, so that's no lunacy, but
in fact a different unit called "Mebibyte". Mebibytes are exactly 1024 x
1024 bytes or 2^10 multiplied by 2^10 bytes and those binary prefixes
give a more "accurate" representation of the size than the SI prefixes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mebibyte

Best,
Michael




signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] High speed Tor relay advice

2016-08-14 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Mon, 15 Aug 2016 02:35:49 -0400
grarpamp  wrote:

> On 8/14/16, i3  wrote:
> > My new server has 10Gb/s connection (I've observed it at 900MB/s to the 
> > drives
> 
> Depending on whether you meant MiB/s or MB/s,
> you may find your network calculations off by 350Mbps,

To me these seem to be just two loosely related facts, the latter merely
supporting the notion that the network connection is capable of way more than
1Gbps. I don't see any "network calculations" being presented.

> Standard use is decimal and bits for network "Mbps",
> and binary and bytes for disk "MiB". "MB/s" is neither.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Megabyte: "The megabyte is a multiple of the
unit byte for digital information. Its recommended unit symbol is MB."
MB/s is a long-accepted shorthand for Megabyte per second, and yes, Mb/s is
megabit per second. But please, take your "MiB" lunacy elsewhere.

-- 
With respect,
Roman


pgpDOdkTquYcv.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] High speed Tor relay advice

2016-08-14 Thread grarpamp
On 8/14/16, i3  wrote:
> My new server has 10Gb/s connection (I've observed it at 900MB/s to the drives

Depending on whether you meant MiB/s or MB/s,
you may find your network calculations off by 350Mbps,
which is a sizable tor relay's worth itself.
Standard use is decimal and bits for network "Mbps",
and binary and bytes for disk "MiB". "MB/s" is neither.

Your drives quote yields 7.2Gbps minimum.

> CPU: 6x Xeon E5-2620v3 vCores

Being subject to vps provider, and depending on
how the cpu's and clocks are parceled out, core
count can help there. This cpu is 2.4GHz.
"5 other people" sounds like you may have a whole core.

Anyway, you'll enjoy taking it for spin :)


For those doing dedi or colo, clock speed and cpu
generation per price can be large factor, fastest is 4.0GHz,
lots of 4x cores near there.

Some synthetic comparison charts...
http://cpubenchmark.net/singleThread.html
http://cpubenchmark.net/high_end_cpus.html
VPS might have some careful reason to even look at...
http://www.cpubenchmark.net/multi_cpu.html

Intel released some skylake v5 etc since last I looked...
http://ark.intel.com/Search/Advanced?s=t&RetailSkuAvailable=true&FilterCurrentProducts=true&CoreCountMin=4&AESTech=true
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] High speed Tor relay advice

2016-08-14 Thread Roman Mamedov
On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 20:57:13 -0400
George  wrote:

> > Alternately, run ntpdate via cron every few hours, to avoid running
> > an unnecessary network service. (Recent security issues in ntp remain
> > unpatched in some distributions.)
> 
> There's actually a technical problem with running ntpdate periodically.
> NTP works by slowly and carefully adjusting the time, accounting for any
> local gaps without breaking any precise-time requiring daemons or
> functions, like databases.  ntpdate might be used on startup (or with
> ntpd_sync_on_start), but it's deprecated last I read. Tools like rdate
> are not replacements for an ntp daemon on a production system.
> 
> You might even notice the tor daemon isn't fond of abrupt time
> adjustments, and will bark in the log about it.

I do the same (ntpdate in crontab) and have never seen any issues with that.
If you run ntpdate often enough (in my case I find every 6 hours suffices)
your computer clock will never have the chance to drift far enough away, so
that the ntpdate adjustment would disrupt anything.

-- 
With respect,
Roman


pgpe6GoHJEQ4Z.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] High speed Tor relay advice

2016-08-14 Thread George
On 08/14/16 20:48, teor wrote:
> 
>> On 15 Aug 2016, at 06:54, Green Dream 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> - You should install ntp make sure your clock is synced.
> 
> Alternately, run ntpdate via cron every few hours, to avoid running
> an unnecessary network service. (Recent security issues in ntp remain
> unpatched in some distributions.)

There's actually a technical problem with running ntpdate periodically.
NTP works by slowly and carefully adjusting the time, accounting for any
local gaps without breaking any precise-time requiring daemons or
functions, like databases.  ntpdate might be used on startup (or with
ntpd_sync_on_start), but it's deprecated last I read. Tools like rdate
are not replacements for an ntp daemon on a production system.

You might even notice the tor daemon isn't fond of abrupt time
adjustments, and will bark in the log about it.

Don't like the standard ntpd?  Try openntpd (.org) which is probably in
your OS's port/pkg system, if not in its base already.  Totally
adequate, secure and small ntpd replacement.

g

-- 



5F77 765E 40D6 5340 A0F5 3401 4997 FF11 A86F 44E2



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] High speed Tor relay advice

2016-08-14 Thread teor

> On 15 Aug 2016, at 06:54, Green Dream  wrote:
> 
> - You should install ntp make sure your clock is synced.

Alternately, run ntpdate via cron every few hours, to avoid running an 
unnecessary network service.
(Recent security issues in ntp remain unpatched in some distributions.)

Tim

Tim Wilson-Brown (teor)

teor2345 at gmail dot com
PGP C855 6CED 5D90 A0C5 29F6 4D43 450C BA7F 968F 094B
ricochet:ekmygaiu4rzgsk6n
xmpp: teor at torproject dot org








signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] High speed Tor relay advice

2016-08-14 Thread Green Dream
Hi i3,

Thanks for running relays! Agreed you will want to run multiple instances
to make the most of your host.

The Xeon E5-2620v3 does have AES-NI, which is good.

Other items to consider:

- On most linux/unix systems the ulimits will be set too low by default. On
debian-like linux, higher limits for Tor might look like the following in
/etc/security/limits.conf:

debian-tor softnofile  64000
debian-tor hardnofile  64000

- There are a lot of possible syctl tweaks. You could check out
https://raw.githubusercontent.com/torservers/server-config-templates/master/sysctl.conf.
I use these values on my non-exit relays:

net.core.wmem_max = 12582912
net.core.rmem_max = 12582912
net.ipv4.tcp_rmem = 10240 87380 12582912
net.ipv4.tcp_wmem = 10240 87380 12582912
net.ipv4.conf.default.send_redirects = 1
net.ipv4.conf.all.rp_filter = 0
net.ipv4.conf.all.send_redirects = 0
kernel.sysrq = 0
net.ipv4.icmp_echo_ignore_broadcasts = 1
net.ipv4.conf.all.accept_redirects = 0
net.ipv4.icmp_ignore_bogus_error_responses = 1
net.ipv4.tcp_no_metrics_save = 1
net.ipv4.tcp_moderate_rcvbuf = 1
net.ipv4.tcp_tw_recycle = 1
net.ipv4.tcp_fin_timeout = 4
net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_time = 60
net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_intvl = 10
net.ipv4.tcp_keepalive_probes = 3
net.ipv4.ip_local_port_range = 1025 65530
net.core.somaxconn = 20480
net.ipv4.tcp_timestamps = 0
fs.file-max = 64000

- You should install ntp make sure your clock is synced.

- You should install a local DNS resolver (unbound, named, dnsmasq,
something along those lines).

This guide has a lot of helpful info:
https://www.torservers.net/wiki/setup/server
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] High speed Tor relay advice

2016-08-14 Thread s7r
Hello,

In this case I suggest you run two separate Tor instances on the same IP
address (it is the maximum allowed). When I say 2 Tor instances I mean 2
separate data directories with separate identities.

If it's a VPS it's already a VM. It does not make sense to create a vm
inside a vm. You can use linux containers or FreeBSD jails if you are on
FreeBSD which work fine in virtual machines, one for each Tor instance.

P.S. If you can, make them exit relays if they're not already. It's not
that much of a hassle, if the provider is mentally sane and just
forwards you the abuse complaints with request to reply within 24 hours.
Most of them are automated emails which do not require replies, and the
rare ones which require reply are from people who just don't know what
Tor is, just explain and they will understand.

On 8/14/2016 5:39 PM, i3 wrote:
> Hey!
> 
> So the server is technically a VPS, it is a slice of a larger server
> that is shared with 5 other people. Though I still have full root
> access. So the whole 10gb/s is not just for me, but from my tests I can
> at least get a few gigabit in real world speeds sustained.
> 
> CPU: 6x Xeon E5-2620v3 vCores
> RAM: 10GB
> 
> I only get one IP address to myself by default. I could probably get
> more though if I feel it is worth it.
> 
> 
> On 14/08/16 15:27, s7r wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> That's neat! Thanks for contributing.
>>
>> How many CPU's / CPU cores does this new server have and does it use
>> AES-NI? How much RAM? Does it have multiple public IP addresses?
>>
>> Currently it's complicated for a single Tor process to saturate a 10Gb/s
>> line, because it's not yet able to use all CPU cores.
>>
>> What I would do if I had multiple public IP addresses: make 4-5 virtual
>> machines, with 1 CPU core each and reasonable RAM (say 8GB per virtual
>> machine) and run 4-5 different relays that would all combined come close
>> to saturate the 10Gb/s link.
>>
>> On 8/14/2016 5:09 PM, i3 wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I've ran multiple Tor relays before but I have moved to a new server and
>>> would like some advice.
>>>
>>> My new server has 10Gb/s connection (I've observed it at 900MB/s to the
>>> drives) with plenty of CPU and RAM to complement. I typically use
>>> default configurations on my relays but I feel that to get the most out
>>> of this one I'll need to do some configuration to tweak it.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have advice on getting the most out of this server, in terms
>>> of speed?
>>>
>>> Thanks



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] High speed Tor relay advice

2016-08-14 Thread starlight . 2016q3
At 17:27 8/14/2016 +0300, s7r wrote:
>What I would do if I had multiple public IP
>addresses: make 4-5 virtual machines

Have to disagree here.  VMs are extremely bad for
latency.  Just go single physical machine and
create different user IDs to isolate the
daemons if you are concerned about someone
breaking into an instance and taking over
the rest.  Another way to isolate without
sacrificing performance is to put each
instance in a Linux container.

All of it more trouble than it's worth IMO.

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] High speed Tor relay advice

2016-08-14 Thread i3
Hey!

So the server is technically a VPS, it is a slice of a larger server
that is shared with 5 other people. Though I still have full root
access. So the whole 10gb/s is not just for me, but from my tests I can
at least get a few gigabit in real world speeds sustained.

CPU: 6x Xeon E5-2620v3 vCores
RAM: 10GB

I only get one IP address to myself by default. I could probably get
more though if I feel it is worth it.


On 14/08/16 15:27, s7r wrote:
> Hey,
>
> That's neat! Thanks for contributing.
>
> How many CPU's / CPU cores does this new server have and does it use
> AES-NI? How much RAM? Does it have multiple public IP addresses?
>
> Currently it's complicated for a single Tor process to saturate a 10Gb/s
> line, because it's not yet able to use all CPU cores.
>
> What I would do if I had multiple public IP addresses: make 4-5 virtual
> machines, with 1 CPU core each and reasonable RAM (say 8GB per virtual
> machine) and run 4-5 different relays that would all combined come close
> to saturate the 10Gb/s link.
>
> On 8/14/2016 5:09 PM, i3 wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I've ran multiple Tor relays before but I have moved to a new server and
>> would like some advice.
>>
>> My new server has 10Gb/s connection (I've observed it at 900MB/s to the
>> drives) with plenty of CPU and RAM to complement. I typically use
>> default configurations on my relays but I feel that to get the most out
>> of this one I'll need to do some configuration to tweak it.
>>
>> Does anyone have advice on getting the most out of this server, in terms
>> of speed?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>
>
> ___
> tor-relays mailing list
> tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] High speed Tor relay advice

2016-08-14 Thread Tristan
On Aug 14, 2016 9:28 AM, "s7r"  wrote:
>
> Currently it's complicated for a single Tor process to saturate a 10Gb/s
> line, because it's not yet able to use all CPU cores.
>

Out of curiosity, what is the maximum speed a single Tor instance can
achieve? Are there any plans for multi-core support?
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] High speed Tor relay advice

2016-08-14 Thread starlight . 2016q3
Suggest running multiple instances of the Tor daemon and
placing them in a single family.  One daemon per physical core
up to perhaps eight.  Only two daemons can be configured for
any two IP addresses so you need at least that many IPs, but
one-IP-per-daemon is ideal.  When deciding how many daemons
to run, take into account any FUP (fair use policy) and/or
true available bandwidth which could be substantially less
than 10G.

You will see better performance if you isolate interrupts to
one or two cores and bind the Tor daemons to other cores,
each with it's own physical core.  If you end up with extra
cores, look into mapping the crypto threads to the spares
though this probably won't make much difference.  Possibly
disable SMT/hyperthreading if you can since virtual cores
give worse latency than what can be achieved with a
one-core/one-thread config.



At 15:09 8/14/2016 +0100, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>I've ran multiple Tor relays before but I have moved to a new server and
>would like some advice.
>
>My new server has 10Gb/s connection (I've observed it at 900MB/s to the
>drives) with plenty of CPU and RAM to complement. I typically use
>default configurations on my relays but I feel that to get the most out
>of this one I'll need to do some configuration to tweak it.
>
>Does anyone have advice on getting the most out of this server, in terms
>of speed?

___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays


Re: [tor-relays] High speed Tor relay advice

2016-08-14 Thread s7r
Hey,

That's neat! Thanks for contributing.

How many CPU's / CPU cores does this new server have and does it use
AES-NI? How much RAM? Does it have multiple public IP addresses?

Currently it's complicated for a single Tor process to saturate a 10Gb/s
line, because it's not yet able to use all CPU cores.

What I would do if I had multiple public IP addresses: make 4-5 virtual
machines, with 1 CPU core each and reasonable RAM (say 8GB per virtual
machine) and run 4-5 different relays that would all combined come close
to saturate the 10Gb/s link.

On 8/14/2016 5:09 PM, i3 wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I've ran multiple Tor relays before but I have moved to a new server and
> would like some advice.
> 
> My new server has 10Gb/s connection (I've observed it at 900MB/s to the
> drives) with plenty of CPU and RAM to complement. I typically use
> default configurations on my relays but I feel that to get the most out
> of this one I'll need to do some configuration to tweak it.
> 
> Does anyone have advice on getting the most out of this server, in terms
> of speed?
> 
> Thanks
> 



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-relays mailing list
tor-relays@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-relays