Re: [tor-talk] Dutch CA issues fake *.torproject.org cert (among many others)

2011-09-02 Thread Achter Lieber
- Original Message -
From: Roger Dingledine
Sent: 09/01/11 03:47 PM
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: [tor-talk] Dutch CA issues fake *.torproject.org cert (among many 
others)

 For those who haven't been following, check out 
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/diginotar-debacle-and-what-you-should-do-about-it
 You should pay special attention if you're in an environment where your ISP 
(or your government!) might try a man-in-the-middle attack on your interactions 
with https://www.torproject.org/. We stepped up our schedule for switching the 
Tor Browser Bundle to Firefox 6 (which we can build from source on all 
platforms, and thus remove the offending CA ourselves). New bundles are out 
now: https://blog.torproject.org/blog/new-tor-browser-bundles-4 Perhaps now is 
a great time for you to learn how to verify the signatures on Tor packages you 
download: https://www.torproject.org/docs/verifying-signatures --Roger Hello 
Roger. Is it possible to check the signatures for the Browser bundle, which I 
use on a USB with Windows but check the signatures from my Mac? I only use 
internet cafe computers as they are so readily available where I live, are much 
faster t
 han what I have been able to purchase for an ISP provider from my home and 
many times just isn't working. Don't know if that is possible to do from Mac on 
.exe files or whatever. Not real savvy here. Sorry.
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Dutch CA issues fake *.torproject.org cert (among many others)

2011-09-02 Thread Joe Btfsplk

On 9/2/2011 7:55 AM, Achter Lieber wrote:

- Original Message -
From: Roger Dingledine
Sent: 09/01/11 03:47 PM
To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
Subject: [tor-talk] Dutch CA issues fake *.torproject.org cert (among many 
others)

  New bundles are out now: 
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/new-tor-browser-bundles-4 Perhaps now is a 
great time for you to learn how to verify the signatures on Tor packages you 
download: https://www.torproject.org/docs/verifying-signatures
Is it really a risk, d/l  Tor or TBB directly from Tor Project's site, 
that verifying signatures is necessary?  What is the reasoning here - if 
getting files from Tor Project server?


___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Dutch CA issues fake *.torproject.org cert (among many others)

2011-09-02 Thread Joe Btfsplk

On 9/2/2011 9:57 AM, David Carlson wrote:

On 9/2/2011 9:28 AM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:


Is it really a risk, d/l  Tor or TBB directly from Tor Project's site,
that verifying signatures is necessary?  What is the reasoning here -
if getting files from Tor Project server?

___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


I believe that the point of Roger's message was that you or I may not
really be downloading the package from TorProject, if we are using SSL
that is authenticated to a fake certificate.
Thanks.  I'm sure many would appreciate a bit more explanation what 
"...if we are using SSL that is authenticated..." means, in this case.

___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Dutch CA issues fake *.torproject.org cert (among many others)

2011-09-02 Thread David Carlson
On 9/2/2011 9:28 AM, Joe Btfsplk wrote:
> On 9/2/2011 7:55 AM, Achter Lieber wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>> From: Roger Dingledine
>> Sent: 09/01/11 03:47 PM
>> To: tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
>> Subject: [tor-talk] Dutch CA issues fake *.torproject.org cert (among
>> many others)
>>
>>   New bundles are out now:
>> https://blog.torproject.org/blog/new-tor-browser-bundles-4 Perhaps
>> now is a great time for you to learn how to verify the signatures on
>> Tor packages you download:
>> https://www.torproject.org/docs/verifying-signatures
> Is it really a risk, d/l  Tor or TBB directly from Tor Project's site,
> that verifying signatures is necessary?  What is the reasoning here -
> if getting files from Tor Project server?
>
> ___
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>
I believe that the point of Roger's message was that you or I may not
really be downloading the package from TorProject, if we are using SSL
that is authenticated to a fake certificate.

I do not use a Mac, but I was able to use GPA and Kleopatra in Windows
to verify that the bundles I downloaded were signed by Erinn. 
In <

https://www.torproject.org/docs/verifying-signatures>

the procedure for verification spelled out for use on a Mac should work
to verify files containing Windows code.The procedure applies to the
verification computer, not the target computer.

David Carlson



0xDC7C8BF3.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Dutch CA issues fake *.torproject.org cert (among many others)

2011-09-02 Thread Seth David Schoen
Joe Btfsplk writes:

> Is it really a risk, d/l  Tor or TBB directly from Tor Project's
> site, that verifying signatures is necessary?  What is the reasoning
> here - if getting files from Tor Project server?

How do you know it was really the Tor Project server?

-- 
Seth Schoen  
Senior Staff Technologist   https://www.eff.org/
Electronic Frontier Foundation  https://www.eff.org/join
454 Shotwell Street, San Francisco, CA  94110   +1 415 436 9333 x107
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Dutch CA issues fake *.torproject.org cert (among many others)

2011-09-02 Thread Joe Btfsplk

On 9/2/2011 12:11 PM, Seth David Schoen wrote:

Joe Btfsplk writes:


Is it really a risk, d/l  Tor or TBB directly from Tor Project's
site, that verifying signatures is necessary?  What is the reasoning
here - if getting files from Tor Project server?

How do you know it was really the Tor Project server?
I'm not sure.  How do I know when I open an HTTPS bookmark link to my 
bank, that it's my bank?  I don't go through a (manual) signature 
verification process when signing in, or d/l anything from a bank, CC or 
investment company.  Are you answering a question w/ a question?  I 
asked 1st :)


___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Dutch CA issues fake *.torproject.org cert (among many others)

2011-09-02 Thread Collin Anderson
According to a number of bloggers(1), torproject.org was include among those
domains targeted in the certificate breach. In at least the case of Google,
these certificates have been offered to Iranian Internet users by a number
of ISPs, in a number of city.

Risk is a product of situation, and if you are in Iran, Syria, Belarus, et
al, I would exercise at least that level of caution.

(1)
http://www.nu.nl/internet/2603449/mogelijk-nepsoftware-verspreid-naast-aftappen-gmail.html

On Fri, Sep 2, 2011 at 1:11 PM, Seth David Schoen  wrote:

> Joe Btfsplk writes:
>
> > Is it really a risk, d/l  Tor or TBB directly from Tor Project's
> > site, that verifying signatures is necessary?  What is the reasoning
> > here - if getting files from Tor Project server?
>
> How do you know it was really the Tor Project server?
>
> --
> Seth Schoen  
> Senior Staff Technologist   https://www.eff.org/
> Electronic Frontier Foundation  https://www.eff.org/join
> 454 Shotwell Street, San Francisco, CA  94110   +1 415 436 9333 x107
> ___
> tor-talk mailing list
> tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
> https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
>



-- 
*Collin David Anderson*
averysmallbird.com | @cda | Washington, D.C.
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Dutch CA issues fake *.torproject.org cert (among many others)

2011-09-02 Thread andrew
On Fri, Sep 02, 2011 at 01:31:53PM -0400, col...@averysmallbird.com wrote 4.5K 
bytes in 109 lines about:
: According to a number of bloggers(1), torproject.org was include among those

Here's another blogger for your list, 
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/diginotar-debacle-and-what-you-should-do-about-it

-- 
Andrew
pgp key: 0x74ED336B
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


[tor-talk] TBB + vanilla Firefox

2011-09-02 Thread Julian Yon
Hi,

I'm new to this list so please forgive any breaches of etiquette.

I've been using Firefox + Torbutton for a while, but decided to switch
to TBB so I could better keep Tor/non-Tor sessions separated. I
understand you've just switched to FF6 and there will be bugs to iron
out, but...

If I have a TBB session open, and I try to fire up a vanilla Firefox for
some non-anonymous purpose, it detects the remote session and I get a
new Aurora window instead. This seems rather unintuitive; at least, it's
not what I expected. And it seems dangerous. Yes, one can specify
-no-remote, but that's not the point.

Sadly I'm not familiar with the FF code or I'd do something about it
myself. So I thought I'd just draw attention to it instead.

Regards,
Julian



signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
tor-talk mailing list
tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk