Re: [tor-talk] News from Iran
Wow, that surprises me. I know that Syria blocks it with firewalls, and that Syria often seems to take their cues from what Iran does. -Andrew On Oct 4, 2012, at 12:22 AM, and...@torproject.is wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 05:41:05PM -0400, and...@pdqvpn.com wrote 1.0K bytes > in 34 lines about: > : IPsec is trivially easy to block. Most countries do it at the edge with > simple port based firewalls. > > Yes, but not sure they actually block it. As of 6 months ago, china > ignored ipsec. > > -- > Andrew > http://tpo.is/contact > pgp 0x6B4D6475 > ___ > tor-talk mailing list > tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
[tor-talk] (no subject)
___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] News from Iran
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 5:22 AM, wrote: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 05:41:05PM -0400, and...@pdqvpn.com wrote 1.0K bytes > in 34 lines about: > : IPsec is trivially easy to block. Most countries do it at the edge with > simple port based firewalls. > > Yes, but not sure they actually block it. As of 6 months ago, china > ignored ipsec. IPSec was blocked in Ethiopia a few months ago, as far as I know. I wouldn't be surprised if China is blocking it as well. -- Runa A. Sandvik ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] install adobe flash player on TBB
yes, it is disabled in some TBB package but it is absent in other TBB package, how can I install adobe flash on those TBB package? 2012/10/4 > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 10:20:26PM +0200, esolvepol...@gmail.com wrote > 0.5K bytes in 13 lines about: > : I noticed that for some TBB packages on linux, the browser are with > : shockwave flash plugin, while in some other TBB packages, there is no > flash > : plugin? > > We don't ship TBB with flash on any OS. If you already have Flash > installed, TBB may find it but leave it disabled by default. > > -- > Andrew > http://tpo.is/contact > pgp 0x6B4D6475 > ___ > tor-talk mailing list > tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] News from Iran
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 08:40:58AM +0100, runa.sand...@gmail.com wrote 0.6K bytes in 16 lines about: : IPSec was blocked in Ethiopia a few months ago, as far as I know. I : wouldn't be surprised if China is blocking it as well. It would be great to have empirical data rather than "we think this is true because it sounds good". I wonder how we can get this data without spending tons of money buying VMs everywhere. Someday ooni will be up and running for us to do point tests. -- Andrew http://tpo.is/contact pgp 0x6B4D6475 ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] install adobe flash player on TBB
On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 11:53:25AM +0200, esolvepol...@gmail.com wrote 0.9K bytes in 30 lines about: : yes, it is disabled in some TBB package : but it is absent in other TBB package, how can I install adobe flash on : those TBB package? Please detail which packages TBB has enabled Flash. It should be disabled in all packages on all operating systems all the time. And frankly, if you want to shoot yourself in the foot, just enable the plugin in TBB. -- Andrew http://tpo.is/contact pgp 0x6B4D6475 ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] install adobe flash player on TBB
no, in some package, flash plugin is not enabled in TBB by default but in some packages, flash plugin is missing I'm just wondering how to install the flash plugin 2012/10/4 > On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 11:53:25AM +0200, esolvepol...@gmail.com wrote > 0.9K bytes in 30 lines about: > : yes, it is disabled in some TBB package > : but it is absent in other TBB package, how can I install adobe flash on > : those TBB package? > > Please detail which packages TBB has enabled Flash. It should be disabled > in all packages on all operating systems all the time. > > And frankly, if you want to shoot yourself in the foot, just enable the > plugin in TBB. > > -- > Andrew > http://tpo.is/contact > pgp 0x6B4D6475 > ___ > tor-talk mailing list > tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
[tor-talk] SMS app for droid
Is there a decent SMS app that works on droid which can have all traffic funneled through Tor ok? Once upon a time I believe I had TextPlus setup on an iOS device and seemed like it used HTTPS traffic to talk to their servers, and Tor was working with it as far as I could tell. Is there anything like this for droid? This would be a rooted 2.3.7 device. Thanks! ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] News from Iran
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 NotDashEscaped: You need GnuPG to verify this message Just a quick note on China and IPsec. Less than a month or so, I know and confirmed that a certain company inside China still uses Cisco IPsec to communicate with their outside division (EU). I can't name the company here but it is a big one. I worked on that project a while ago and checked recently with a colleague which confirmed me that the tunnel is sill in operation. The question now is if it has ties with the government for that kind of services or not. (bribe, influence, that I don't know). Thanks! David and...@torproject.is: > On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 05:41:05PM -0400, and...@pdqvpn.com wrote > 1.0K bytes in 34 lines about: : IPsec is trivially easy to block. > Most countries do it at the edge with simple port based firewalls. > > Yes, but not sure they actually block it. As of 6 months ago, > china ignored ipsec. > -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJQbZLEAAoJEELoaioR9I02rxQH/0UrC+KCnd7+P7jJsHJJ1RNk 914JKiwV5+A4OPryvbTqmpnmvwqTughPqYTAHQSFYLP9lo2oS1I7YWA61JRiVQUR sjG2R1hBYrTfKAPXO6vASGHHOsnnES5NWa86kEHzQvUh6KFdDx9OtrqF8F/S/Btr VGMess1zYdQb4qvvTs3r+pgP3TDMIpeqREsN12gZ+NQ3crkDQF6rUixpbp2lf8i1 Vw8KrPec+ov7/JNMITvaL4bSM1nnnvjAq8F4cqkHslgS/cYNEbcG5JcuYAN+YXng agskgi+eEzmfr8XMHWd354SXhVnMpM4m1ihrE+Gh6ExZfMzpt2qw58q3mz9rtgk= =fqcl -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] Can we come up with a lighter, easier torified client apps ?
On 4 October 2012 00:27, wrote: > I think you would be the first to want this I don't know if I'd say that... I think TorBrowser could be improved by integrating Tor+Vidalia+Firefox into a single app. This may also go towards fixing the user confusion with having several windows running. Or imagine a VirtualBox where all network traffic from the VM was automatically sent over Tor.. because Tor was embedded in it's network emulation. Of course those are the huge, monolithic cases. Take simpler apps like gpg, ssh, putty, pidgin (god help us), git, svn. While tracking upstream would certainly be a problem, having a statically linked tor and a modified binary that sent everything over Tor I think would go a long way towards getting average users using Tor safely... without ever having to say the words "Proxy" or "Socks" to them. I guess the problems to overcome would be to figure out a way to track upstream easily and identifying use cases where people would really benefit from specific tools, to focus on those first. TorPidginOTR seems like it'd be a likely candidate... unless there's a non-libpurple OTR-enabled chat client. -tom ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] install adobe flash player on TBB
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 14:15:51 +0200 esolve esolve wrote: > no, in some package, flash plugin is not enabled in TBB by default > but in some packages, flash plugin is missing > I'm just wondering how to install the flash plugin In all packages we create/provide, flash is disabled by default. Again, please detail the operating system, tbb version, and which packages have flash enabled by default. The flash plugin appearing or not is dependent upon adobe flash being installed in the operating system. If flash is installed in the operating system already, then you start tbb, it is possible to enable the flash plugin in tbb. If you enable flash in tbb, you may lose all of your anonymity, data, and your milk may be sour as a result of a rogue flash application exfiltrating all of your identity and data from your system over tor or not. If you don't understand these instructions, then don't try to use flash with tor. -- Andrew http://tpo.is/contact pgp 0x6B4D6475 ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] SMS app for droid
Gibberbot is XMPP/instant messaging not SMS, but essentially works like SMS through a service like Jabber, Gmail or Facebook. SMS is not an IP based protocol, so running it over Tor doesn't make much sense. +n ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] SMS app for droid
TextPlus is an external company/app that lets you login to their system and send SMS. The connection I think is HTTPS based from the device, and their system handles SMS delivery. The apps exist for iOS and android - just wanting to know if there's anything else out there like this that can be router through Tor, something that would have an HTTP/HTTPS based connection to begin with I suppose. I'm not knowledgeable enough to know exactly what I'm looking for, unless I've already got the understanding? ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] Can we come up with a lighter, easier torified client apps ?
On 2012-10-04, at 9:45 AM, Tom Ritter wrote: > Of course those are the huge, monolithic cases. Take simpler apps > like gpg, ssh, putty, pidgin (god help us), git, svn. While tracking > upstream would certainly be a problem, having a statically linked tor > and a modified binary that sent everything over Tor I think would go a > long way towards getting average users using Tor safely... without > ever having to say the words "Proxy" or "Socks" to them. I do think proxying through a single daemon is best. But there could also be a simple, graphical equivalent of "torify". Perhaps a Torify icon on the desktop that you drag and drop application icons on. Or a right-click "Launch with Tor" option. But statically linked torX applications for all X would quickly become a packaging nightmare. ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] install adobe flash player on TBB
2012/10/4 Andrew Lewman > On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 14:15:51 +0200 > esolve esolve wrote: > > > no, in some package, flash plugin is not enabled in TBB by default > > but in some packages, flash plugin is missing > > I'm just wondering how to install the flash plugin > > In all packages we create/provide, flash is disabled by default. Again, > please detail the operating system, tbb version, and which packages > have flash enabled by default. > --- I don't know in which packages the flash is enabled, I didn't say that flash is enabled on any package I just mentioned that in some package I can find the plugin, through "Tools->add on->plugin" although it is disabled but in some packages I can't find the plugin through "Tools->add on->plugin" I tried windows 64bit, linux 32 bit and 64 bit > > The flash plugin appearing or not is dependent upon adobe flash being > installed in the operating system. If flash is installed in the > operating system already, then you start tbb, it is possible to enable > the flash plugin in tbb. I have all my system installed with flash, but on linux 64bit machine, flash plugin is in firefox but not in TBB browser. > If you enable flash in tbb, you may lose all > of your anonymity, data, and your milk may be sour as a result of a > rogue flash application exfiltrating all of your identity and data from > your system over tor or not. > > thanks for the information. I don't mind that at the moment. and when viewing youtube, I captured packets on the network interface, I noticed that all traffic is through the Tor node so it seems that flash doesn't bypass the proxy setting at all. > > -- > Andrew > http://tpo.is/contact > pgp 0x6B4D6475 > ___ > tor-talk mailing list > tor-talk@lists.torproject.org > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk > ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] install adobe flash player on TBB
esolve esolve writes: > and when viewing youtube, I captured packets on the network interface, I > noticed that all traffic is through the Tor node > so it seems that flash doesn't bypass the proxy setting at all. The TBB developers' concern about proxy bypass is that sites _can_ make Flash bypass the proxy (if they decide to), not that it always bypasses the proxy. Whether the proxy bypass occurs depends on the particular Flash applet, so while the YouTube applet (for example) is apparently safe, other applets are not safe. This is a problem because people might actively try to identify Tor users, for instance by trying to get them to visit pages that embed Flash applets that do cause a proxy bypass. (Exit node operators could try to do this too: they could modify the HTML code returned by a web site to add an iframe that loads a Flash applet to cause a proxy bypass.) So, it's not that Tor users always lose their anonymity when they use Flash, but that Tor users could lose their anonymity when they use Flash. -- Seth Schoen Senior Staff Technologist https://www.eff.org/ Electronic Frontier Foundation https://www.eff.org/join 454 Shotwell Street, San Francisco, CA 94110 +1 415 436 9333 x107 ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] "Little Snitch" for tor!
Hello Andrew! This may work! How to setup? Mac hasn't the ipchains and other tools. -- Jerzy Łogiewa -- jerz...@interia.eu On Oct 4, 2012, at 12:29 AM, and...@torproject.is wrote: > In the Mac specific context, you could deny all outgoing connections > and then only allow the tor process to exit. You'll then have a firewall > log full of apps and connections trying to get out. > > I know this isn't what you want specifically, but it's one way to do it. ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] "Little Snitch" for tor!
Yes but blocking and allowing per app. "Safari should connect by tor exit" -- Jerzy Łogiewa -- jerz...@interia.eu On Oct 3, 2012, at 1:12 PM, Runa A. Sandvik wrote: >> Since it dont work with tor, I would like to see app like "Little Snitch" on >> Mac for tor connections. It look like >> this:http://www.filescrunch.com/images/downloads/screenshots/4000/3511-1.jpg >> >> Does anyone work on this type of app? What is some not GUI way of doing it >> now? > > You mean an app that would automatically allow TCP connections to > various ports for known Tor relays? ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] SMS app for droid
On 10/04/2012 08:51 PM, First Last wrote: > The apps exist for iOS and android - just wanting to know if there's anything > else out there like this that can be router through Tor, something that would > have an HTTP/HTTPS based connection to begin with I suppose. I'm not > knowledgeable enough to know exactly what I'm looking for, unless I've > already got the understanding? I understand. If you have a rooted device, you can run Orbot with transparent proxying, and all apps will go through Tor. Otherwise, the apps that support Orbot/Tor on an unrooted, stock device are Orweb (browser), Gibberbot (chat/IM), Twitter, DuckDuckGo (search), and Firefox with the Proxy Mobile add-on. ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] Can we come up with a lighter, easier torified client apps ?
Tom, Andrew, On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Tom Ritter wrote: Of course those are the huge, monolithic cases. Take simpler apps like gpg, ssh, putty, pidgin (god help us), git, svn. While tracking upstream would certainly be a problem, having a statically linked tor and a modified binary that sent everything over Tor I think would go a long way towards getting average users using Tor safely... without ever having to say the words "Proxy" or "Socks" to them. I'm a unix engineer and a coder, and even *I* sometime just don't feel up to constructing an entire proxy environment just to make an SSH connection over Tor. And it's not just a case of setup time - there is assurance and testing and periodic fiddling with just to make sure you did it right, have it right and will continue to have it right. And then you wake up at night and wonder if you really, really have the DNS leaking taken care of. I know it's a big can of worms, since everyone has their favorite little binaries, but surely ssh is a good start :) ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] Can we come up with a lighter, easier torified client apps ?
On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 22:36 +, John Case wrote: > Tom, Andrew, > > On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Tom Ritter wrote: > > > Of course those are the huge, monolithic cases. Take simpler apps > > like gpg, ssh, putty, pidgin (god help us), git, svn. While tracking > > upstream would certainly be a problem, having a statically linked tor > > and a modified binary that sent everything over Tor I think would go a > > long way towards getting average users using Tor safely... without > > ever having to say the words "Proxy" or "Socks" to them. > > > I'm a unix engineer and a coder, and even *I* sometime just don't feel up > to constructing an entire proxy environment just to make an SSH connection > over Tor. > > And it's not just a case of setup time - there is assurance and testing > and periodic fiddling with just to make sure you did it right, have it > right and will continue to have it right. And then you wake up at night > and wonder if you really, really have the DNS leaking taken care of. > > I know it's a big can of worms, since everyone has their favorite little > binaries, but surely ssh is a good start :) Have you tried 'torsocks '? Tor doesn't really make sense as a static library, or a library at all. If you want to get proxied sockets, use any SOCKS library and point it at Tor. Tor (running only as an Onion Proxy or "client") has a large amount of application-neutral state -- would every 'favorite little binary' set up a separate set of circuits pre-emptively? If you can sit down with the Tor source code and come up with a compelling narrative for a Tor library that isn't just a SOCKS library, I'd be interested in reading it, but I just don't see how the current Tor design/implementation is in any way amenable to this. -- Sent from Ubuntu signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
[tor-talk] Help with Tor and Flash Player plugin struggle
Hello tor-talk members, I've now tried everything and I cannot get ANY Flash content to play in this Tor-Firefox ESR web browser, even though I've tried installing the Flash player plugin that this browser asks for when I'm on a YouTube page (and even though this computer already had a current Flash Player plugin installed previously). Let me make it clear that privacy is not important to me _/*right now*/_ during this quest to make the Flash Player plugin work with this Tor browser... I can reset any settings for maximum privacy later when I go back to that purpose for using Tor... right now, I'm just trying to make the Tor browser play Flash content. So even though I've /*UNCHECKED*/ the /*Torbutton>Preferences>Security Settings>Disable plugin during Tor usage*/ box, and I installed a new Flash player plugin /*THROUGH*/ this browser, and I even set it to allow all scripts because I thought maybe that was complicating things, /*IT STILL WILL NOT PLAY FLASH CONTENT OF ANY TYPE*/. /*Now, this, explained below, could be part of the problem that I'd like to ask for your help with...*/ If I go to the Tor Browser folder on my hard drive at /*C:>Tor Browser>FirefoxPortable>Data>plugins*/ there are NO Flash plugin files that show up in that folder even after I install a new Flash Player plugin THROUGH this browser... I believe that is why it will not play Flash content. All it does when I install a Flash Player plugin through this Tor browser is to overwrite my Windows 7 system Flash Player plugin, but it does not actually place any Flash Player plugin files in the /*C:>Tor Browser>FirefoxPortable>Data>plugins*/ folder, so that's why this PORTABLE version of the Firefox ESR browser will not play any Flash content... and it doesn't work from the Windows system Flash Player plugin the way that my normal Firefox (NON-TOR) web browser does. My other Firefox web browser sees the the Windows system Flash Player plugin just fine and it does play Flash content correctly. There is, however, one text file that comes stock inside the Tor browser plugins folder and when it is opened it says, /*"Place Firefox plugins in this directory (Flash, Shockwave, etc)"*/. So with some advice from someone on the Adobe help forum, I tried copying the Flash Player plugin files from the Windows system folder at /*C:>Windows>System32>Macromed>Flash*/ in to the Tor browser plugins folder at /*C:>Tor Browser>FirefoxPortable>Data>plugins*/, and that still didn't work. Note that I am closing and re-opening the Tor browser between each of these tests. So I then followed some further advice from the expert on the Adobe help forum and I changed the name of the main Flash Player plugin file that I had copied and pasted in to the Tor browser plugins folder from /*"NPSWF32_11_4_402_278.dll"*/ to /*"NPSWF32.dll"*/, and that still did not work... note that I left all the other files that I copied and pasted from the Windows system Flash plugins folder with the same name they originally had... I tried only changing that one Flash plugin file name, as instructed by the expert on the Adobe help forum. I also tried posting a question about this on the Mozilla Firefox forum, but no one there is able to answer this question. What the problem seems to be is that when this Tor-Firefox ESR 10.0.7 browser installs a Flash Player plugin, it just installs it to the Windows system folder /*(the same way that the normal (non-Tor) Firefox browser does)*/ and _/*NOT*/_ into the Tor-Firefox plugins folder /*C:>Tor Browser>FirefoxPortable>Data>plugins*/, as would be needed for it to be able to play Flash content. No matter what I do, whenever I try to view a YouTube video or any Flash video in this browser, or any Flash graphic content at all, I get the yellow bar at the top of the page that says /*"Additional plugins are required to display all the media on this page - Install Missing Plugins"*/ and there is a banner displayed where the Flash content is supposed to be that says, /*"The Adobe Flash Player is required for video playback - Get the latest Flash Player"*/. And as I explained at the top of this email, I have already installed and re-installed the Flash Player plugin on this computer multiple times, including doing it directly through this Tor-Firefox ESR browser itself. /*So can ANYONE there tell me how to get the correct Flash Player plugin files in to the Tor-Firefox browser plugins folder at C:>Tor Browser>FirefoxPortable>Data>plugins, and where do I get those files? Everything I've tried, which is pretty extensive, has not worked, and it seems that someone there should know about this.*/ Thanks for your help, numetro ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] TorBirdy: what are the known problems with 0.11?
Hi, antispa...@sent.at: >> Also, please use 0.0.13 and not 0.0.11, there are many important bug >> fixes. 0.0.13 will be available from Mozilla add-ons soon (we have >> submitted it for review) [2]. > > Sukhbir, could you make a small tutorial on how to test TorBirdy? I'm > willing to create one or two free accounts via TBB and do the checking, > but I have no idea how. There is no tutorial/ detailed documentation available yet, but tagnaq is writing a user manual for TorBirdy and it should be available soon [0]; for now, you can refer to the (short) TorBirdy installation guide at [1]. [0] - https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/6446 [1] - https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/6446#comment:1 -- Sukhbir ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
[tor-talk] TorBirdy 0.0.13 now available from Mozilla Add-ons
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hi, TorBirdy 0.0.13 has passed preliminary review and is now available from Mozilla Add-ons. You can install TorBirdy 0.0.13 directly from Thunderbird or by downloading the extension in a web browser from: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/torbirdy/ TorBirdy is also available from the Tor Project's servers: https://www.torproject.org/dist/torbirdy/ TorBirdy has been translated into English, German, Serbian, Punjabi, French, Hebrew, Spanish and Dutch. We are looking to translate TorBirdy in more languages that matter to you or your friends. You can help translate TorBirdy resources on Transifex: https://www.transifex.com/projects/p/torproject/resources/ - -- Sukhbir -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- iQIbBAEBCgAGBQJQbkc7AAoJEGiHk1qyl7OR0m0P93AG5fUzp1Okfy4zuAToImki mFA8Dl1QcDh1RLyHGIkGafH9YvNcp4T9pVSV1I+gyDRwld2UMa1RGtnFSna/KGpv sd/cn5PqN0z5tWdIUfH2bCX1zDPPodCP0p1PrsN+gx6PyYbFPxh3WJi6wORJo63Y Nb6yJv1odGjztGXn7+V1B2aGMaZSTknSt2z88RN4y9Jy4x6A3vTECJmq5EqdgsqC UJOG0YUbsgJ0owmMf2mxKuYBEgBj7oPdPkK2JCXbQaCr+1QLA3/VYFCAQY2s89yM +3yB1CJ8aIVW2ScKytLdHTDWQlbPSSzxuE4cEn48t4bBePQdcHcyPA5hu10myIJg cvxdbAYlGP6IDANVSGQNxsSTdGOG2khdXHAuapAv6n/QdprCqGi4MsC9OC7B/V6w RIiv18CTIUdofkc8uBCbjzwu1PJZNOfmpW6P4xuQlcIICInjfJMCk0bGTFn1ed0R 3rc/ET93X1m/AoNsG0079dxXZ5QwW6kv/sPBk+E2vHn1k21/UxPV6nrVVJpgTp9g uJ37RQtshcxrEz5niRUTA50Fem/EopnJnjCOBXr22xmF+jCWbXUrkFlQFOZL7c35 xSgc/l34vd4Lix+UYn2c8cXPLvz4oj+nW/XfSL4QCfZZwOV9EZW7gtPq91cCILL+ ZKj1/XN6mqDXYHVG0Ow= =9bHz -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
Re: [tor-talk] Help with Tor and Flash Player plugin struggle
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012 16:37:00 -0700 numetro wrote: > I've now tried everything and I cannot get ANY Flash content to play in > this Tor-Firefox ESR web browser, even though I've tried installing the > Flash player plugin that this browser asks for when I'm on a YouTube > page (and even though this computer already had a current Flash Player > plugin installed previously). > > Let me make it clear that privacy is not important to me _/*right now*/_ > during this quest to make the Flash Player plugin work with this Tor > browser... I can reset any settings for maximum privacy later when I go > back to that purpose for using Tor... right now, I'm just trying to make > the Tor browser play Flash content. i have gotten Flash content to play on Youtube with the Gnash player plugin (using RequestPolicy to restrict who gets to see my requests) but it is necessary to enable plugins and 3rd party cookies for the session. even then it doesnt work for all videos. you can bypass Flash on Youtube if you enable HTML5 enabled or manually add &webm=1 to the url, but it doesnt work for all videos especially for those that interact with doubleclick.net (i wouldnt be sad if someone nuked those parasites). > So even though I've /*UNCHECKED*/ the /*Torbutton>Preferences>Security > Settings>Disable plugin during Tor usage*/ box, and I installed a new > Flash player plugin /*THROUGH*/ this browser, and I even set it to allow > all scripts because I thought maybe that was complicating things, /*IT > STILL WILL NOT PLAY FLASH CONTENT OF ANY TYPE*/. > > /*Now, this, explained below, could be part of the problem that I'd like > to ask for your help with...*/ > > If I go to the Tor Browser folder on my hard drive at /*C:>Tor > Browser>FirefoxPortable>Data>plugins*/ there are NO Flash plugin files > that show up in that folder even after I install a new Flash Player > plugin THROUGH this browser... I believe that is why it will not play > Flash content. It is very helpful to set the save folder in Gnash, so you can use another player to view vids later. Not useful for you on Windows. Maybe time to switch to gnu/linux? ;) ___ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk@lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk
