Re: [tor-talk] Setting up own meek servers

2017-03-08 Thread m.ajiao
A very interesting example is the GAE proxy software XX-Net (formerly GoAgent)

One Google account can be used to register for up to 10 instances, but you can 
lookup at their public AppID list:

https://github.com/XX-net/XX-Net/blob/master/code/default/gae_proxy/local/proxy.ini

Thousands of public AppIDs are contributed by users.

ยป len(public_appid.split('|'))
1727

-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


Re: [tor-talk] Setting up own meek servers

2017-03-08 Thread Nathan Freitas
On Wed, Mar 8, 2017, at 10:20 AM, Jonathan Marquardt wrote:
> So, when meek-google was suspended, one of the recommendations for people
> was 
> to set up their own apps in AppEngine as meek servers.
> 
> https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2016-June/041699.html
> 
> Wouldn't it be a good idea to encourage people to do so, but in a way
> that 
> everyone and not just themselfes can benefit from that? Perhaps they
> could 
> make them public or these things make themselfes public just like with
> any 
> other bridge? Has this idea been discussed before?
> 
> Individual supporters running these reflectors could also cut down on
> costs. 
> And in the case of Google AppEngine, these bridge adresses could perhaps
> be 
> distributed using bridges.torproject.org and GetTor, so Google doesn't 
> instantly notice them.
>

I completely agree with this. There should be a push for community
hosting of all Meek cloud services type, and not just Google.

+n
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk


[tor-talk] Setting up own meek servers

2017-03-08 Thread Jonathan Marquardt
So, when meek-google was suspended, one of the recommendations for people was 
to set up their own apps in AppEngine as meek servers.

https://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-talk/2016-June/041699.html

Wouldn't it be a good idea to encourage people to do so, but in a way that 
everyone and not just themselfes can benefit from that? Perhaps they could 
make them public or these things make themselfes public just like with any 
other bridge? Has this idea been discussed before?

Individual supporters running these reflectors could also cut down on costs. 
And in the case of Google AppEngine, these bridge adresses could perhaps be 
distributed using bridges.torproject.org and GetTor, so Google doesn't 
instantly notice them.
-- 
4096R/1224DBD299A4F5F3
47BC 7DE8 3D46 2E8B ED18  AA86 1224 DBD2 99A4 F5F3


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-- 
tor-talk mailing list - tor-talk@lists.torproject.org
To unsubscribe or change other settings go to
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk