[Touch-packages] [Bug 2038998] Re: [amdgpu] Screen artifacts/UI oddities on Wayland
Happened to me also. Saw the attached error in dmesg.
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/2038998/+attachment/5717812/+files/dmesg.log
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2038998
Title:
[amdgpu] Screen artifacts/UI oddities on Wayland
Status in GNOME Shell:
Fix Released
Status in linux package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
Confirmed
Bug description:
Laptop is a Lenovo ThinkPad P14s Gen 2 AMD.
Ryzen 7 PRO 5850U
with Radeon (RX Vega 8?) integrated graphics
16 GB RAM
Running Ubuntu 23.10 (GNOME) from a clean install performed October 9,
2023 from a daily-live/current .iso generated on October 4, 2023.
Wayland
Kernel 6.5.0-9-generic
* * * * *
Installed a pre-release build of Ubuntu 23.10 to my ThinkPad the other
day, was going through setting up and testing the usual programs.
Installed Steam through apt from the 'mantic' repositories. Installed
Proton 8.0 and Steam Linux Runtime 3.0 (Sniper) alongside two
compatible titles.
Screen corruption (white and grey streaks) present in-game when GNOME
UI elements appeared on-screen (e.g., volume, brightness, and keyboard
backlight indicators) and omnipresent after closing either game.
Artifacts remain on screen until log-out or reboot. Artifacts were not
present beforehand.
Artifacts only appeared in Wayland session; not X11/Xorg.
I previously had been running the same games on Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
(GNOME, Wayland) and Kubuntu 22.04 LTS (Plasma, X11/Xorg) on this
computer without issue (kernel 6.2).
* * * * *
Please see subsequent posts for video/images.
Happy to provide any other information as needed. Thanks!
* * * * *
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-9.9-generic 6.5.3
Uname: Linux 6.5.0-9-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Wed Oct 11 01:17:43 2023
DistUpgraded: Fresh install
DistroCodename: mantic
DistroVariant: ubuntu
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes, if not too technical
GraphicsCard:
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. [AMD/ATI] Cezanne [Radeon Vega Series / Radeon
Vega Mobile Series] [1002:1638] (rev d1) (prog-if 00 [VGA controller])
Subsystem: Lenovo Cezanne [Radeon Vega Series / Radeon Vega Mobile Series]
[17aa:509b]
MachineType: {report['dmi.sys.vendor']} {report['dmi.product.name']}
ProcEnviron:
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
PATH=(custom, no user)
SHELL=/bin/bash
TERM=xterm-256color
XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-6.5.0-9-generic
root=/dev/mapper/ubuntu--vg-ubuntu--lv ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
Symptom: display
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
dmi.bios.date: 05/15/2023
dmi.bios.release: 1.24
dmi.bios.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.bios.version: R1MET54W (1.24 )
dmi.board.asset.tag: Not Available
dmi.board.name: 21A00068US
dmi.board.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.board.version: SDK0T76530 WIN
dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Information
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: LENOVO
dmi.chassis.version: None
dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.24
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnLENOVO:bvrR1MET54W(1.24):bd05/15/2023:br1.24:efr1.24:svnLENOVO:pn21A00068US:pvrThinkPadP14sGen2a:rvnLENOVO:rn21A00068US:rvrSDK0T76530WIN:cvnLENOVO:ct10:cvrNone:skuLENOVO_MT_21A0_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPadP14sGen2a:
dmi.product.family: ThinkPad P14s Gen 2a
dmi.product.name: 21A00068US
dmi.product.sku: LENOVO_MT_21A0_BU_Think_FM_ThinkPad P14s Gen 2a
dmi.product.version: ThinkPad P14s Gen 2a
dmi.sys.vendor: LENOVO
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.115-1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 23.2.1-1ubuntu3
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:21.1.7-3ubuntu2
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-3
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel
2:2.99.917+git20210115-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
1:1.0.17-2build1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/gnome-shell/+bug/2038998/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2043114] Re: sshd segmentation fault on 20.04.6 (focal)
Thank you Ivaylo for creating this bug report and helping make Ubuntu better! I have 2 follow up questions: 1. How often do these segmentation faults occur for you? 2. Have you tried to SSH to the Focal server from multiple other systems? Do you encounter this issue with multiple systems, or is it only observed with one? Could you also run `apport-collect 2043114` in the server that is encountering the seg faults? This will gather debugging information that may be valuable. I see the backtrace has the error nextinuse = I briefly looked into the upstream repository to try and find related commits to this issue and didn't see any commits pop out at me -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043114 Title: sshd segmentation fault on 20.04.6 (focal) Status in openssh package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: We have a physical server running Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS (amd64) and openssh-server 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9. Sometimes sshd crashes with a segmentation fault on remote login with key authentication: [193107.651745] sshd[1229630]: segfault at 5557eba6a008 ip 7f2326a2ca53 sp 7ffcba40c510 error 4 in libc-2.31.so[7f23269b8000+178000] We’ve changed only the following values in the stock sshd_config file: LogLevel DEBUG PasswordAuthentication no MaxStartups 100:30:100 The server is used for automated software testing, and sometimes our test suite might make a large amount of SSH connections in a short period of time, which seems to be correlated with the crashes. But at the same time, I have to note that the connection count was not near the MaxStartups limit, and we’ve had crashes before adding that setting. Since the backtrace shows the debug logging function in the stack, we’re currently experimenting with using `LogLevel INFO` to try and isolate the issue. I am attaching the backtrace. I could provide the full dump file, although I am hesitant due to the possibility of private keys or other sensitive information leaking. # apt-cache policy openssh-server openssh-server: Installed: 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 Candidate: 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 Version table: *** 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 500 500 http://mirrors.storpool.com/ubuntu/archive focal-updates/main amd64 Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:8.2p1-4 500 500 http://mirrors.storpool.com/ubuntu/archive focal/main amd64 Packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2043114/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2043114] Re: sshd segmentation fault on 20.04.6 (focal)
Thanks for getting back to me! 1. The crash seems to happen in a large percentage of the runs of a particular test that does a lot of rapid SSH connections to the machine. Sadly, I don’t have an exact number, but 50% probably wouldn’t be an exaggeration. It was also happening in the setup part of the test harness when it was making a large amount of parallel connections, but we spread those out a bit. 2. The connections all happen from a single test machine. I could try to test if this is repeatable when they’re spread over multiple sources, but that’s not how our test suite works. As for the debugging information, I will first try to reproduce the crash on a throwaway machine (VM shouldn’t make a difference, I think), as to avoid any potential leaks of host keys or other sensitive information. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043114 Title: sshd segmentation fault on 20.04.6 (focal) Status in openssh package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: We have a physical server running Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS (amd64) and openssh-server 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9. Sometimes sshd crashes with a segmentation fault on remote login with key authentication: [193107.651745] sshd[1229630]: segfault at 5557eba6a008 ip 7f2326a2ca53 sp 7ffcba40c510 error 4 in libc-2.31.so[7f23269b8000+178000] We’ve changed only the following values in the stock sshd_config file: LogLevel DEBUG PasswordAuthentication no MaxStartups 100:30:100 The server is used for automated software testing, and sometimes our test suite might make a large amount of SSH connections in a short period of time, which seems to be correlated with the crashes. But at the same time, I have to note that the connection count was not near the MaxStartups limit, and we’ve had crashes before adding that setting. Since the backtrace shows the debug logging function in the stack, we’re currently experimenting with using `LogLevel INFO` to try and isolate the issue. I am attaching the backtrace. I could provide the full dump file, although I am hesitant due to the possibility of private keys or other sensitive information leaking. # apt-cache policy openssh-server openssh-server: Installed: 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 Candidate: 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 Version table: *** 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 500 500 http://mirrors.storpool.com/ubuntu/archive focal-updates/main amd64 Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:8.2p1-4 500 500 http://mirrors.storpool.com/ubuntu/archive focal/main amd64 Packages To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2043114/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2043114] Re: sshd segmentation fault on 20.04.6 (focal)
While trying to reproduce the segfault, I encountered another crash, an abort in malloc this time. I cannot be absolutely sure, but it seems that they might be related, so I am uploading the report now. Edit: forgot to mention, it seems that the abort has also occurred on the physical machine that I initially reported the crash on. ** Tags added: apport-collected focal ** Description changed: We have a physical server running Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS (amd64) and openssh-server 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9. Sometimes sshd crashes with a segmentation fault on remote login with key authentication: [193107.651745] sshd[1229630]: segfault at 5557eba6a008 ip 7f2326a2ca53 sp 7ffcba40c510 error 4 in libc-2.31.so[7f23269b8000+178000] We’ve changed only the following values in the stock sshd_config file: LogLevel DEBUG PasswordAuthentication no MaxStartups 100:30:100 The server is used for automated software testing, and sometimes our test suite might make a large amount of SSH connections in a short period of time, which seems to be correlated with the crashes. But at the same time, I have to note that the connection count was not near the MaxStartups limit, and we’ve had crashes before adding that setting. Since the backtrace shows the debug logging function in the stack, we’re currently experimenting with using `LogLevel INFO` to try and isolate the issue. I am attaching the backtrace. I could provide the full dump file, although I am hesitant due to the possibility of private keys or other sensitive information leaking. # apt-cache policy openssh-server openssh-server: Installed: 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 Candidate: 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 Version table: *** 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 500 500 http://mirrors.storpool.com/ubuntu/archive focal-updates/main amd64 Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:8.2p1-4 500 500 http://mirrors.storpool.com/ubuntu/archive focal/main amd64 Packages + --- + ProblemType: Bug + ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.27 + Architecture: amd64 + CasperMD5CheckResult: skip + DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 + Package: openssh-server 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 + PackageArchitecture: amd64 + ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-128.144-generic 5.4.210 + Tags: focal + Uname: Linux 5.4.0-128-generic x86_64 + UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2021-01-13 (1030 days ago) + UserGroups: N/A + _MarkForUpload: True -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043114 Title: sshd segmentation fault on 20.04.6 (focal) Status in openssh package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: We have a physical server running Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS (amd64) and openssh-server 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9. Sometimes sshd crashes with a segmentation fault on remote login with key authentication: [193107.651745] sshd[1229630]: segfault at 5557eba6a008 ip 7f2326a2ca53 sp 7ffcba40c510 error 4 in libc-2.31.so[7f23269b8000+178000] We’ve changed only the following values in the stock sshd_config file: LogLevel DEBUG PasswordAuthentication no MaxStartups 100:30:100 The server is used for automated software testing, and sometimes our test suite might make a large amount of SSH connections in a short period of time, which seems to be correlated with the crashes. But at the same time, I have to note that the connection count was not near the MaxStartups limit, and we’ve had crashes before adding that setting. Since the backtrace shows the debug logging function in the stack, we’re currently experimenting with using `LogLevel INFO` to try and isolate the issue. I am attaching the backtrace. I could provide the full dump file, although I am hesitant due to the possibility of private keys or other sensitive information leaking. # apt-cache policy openssh-server openssh-server: Installed: 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 Candidate: 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 Version table: *** 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 500 500 http://mirrors.storpool.com/ubuntu/archive focal-updates/main amd64 Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:8.2p1-4 500 500 http://mirrors.storpool.com/ubuntu/archive focal/main amd64 Packages --- ProblemType: Bug ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.27 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: openssh-server 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-128.144-generic 5.4.210 Tags: focal Uname: Linux 5.4.0-128-generic x86_64 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2021-01-13 (1030 days ago) UserGroups: N/A _MarkForUpload: True To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/o
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2043114] ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043114/+attachment/5717894/+files/ProcCpuinfoMinimal.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043114 Title: sshd segmentation fault on 20.04.6 (focal) Status in openssh package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: We have a physical server running Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS (amd64) and openssh-server 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9. Sometimes sshd crashes with a segmentation fault on remote login with key authentication: [193107.651745] sshd[1229630]: segfault at 5557eba6a008 ip 7f2326a2ca53 sp 7ffcba40c510 error 4 in libc-2.31.so[7f23269b8000+178000] We’ve changed only the following values in the stock sshd_config file: LogLevel DEBUG PasswordAuthentication no MaxStartups 100:30:100 The server is used for automated software testing, and sometimes our test suite might make a large amount of SSH connections in a short period of time, which seems to be correlated with the crashes. But at the same time, I have to note that the connection count was not near the MaxStartups limit, and we’ve had crashes before adding that setting. Since the backtrace shows the debug logging function in the stack, we’re currently experimenting with using `LogLevel INFO` to try and isolate the issue. I am attaching the backtrace. I could provide the full dump file, although I am hesitant due to the possibility of private keys or other sensitive information leaking. # apt-cache policy openssh-server openssh-server: Installed: 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 Candidate: 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 Version table: *** 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 500 500 http://mirrors.storpool.com/ubuntu/archive focal-updates/main amd64 Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:8.2p1-4 500 500 http://mirrors.storpool.com/ubuntu/archive focal/main amd64 Packages --- ProblemType: Bug ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.27 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: openssh-server 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-128.144-generic 5.4.210 Tags: focal Uname: Linux 5.4.0-128-generic x86_64 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2021-01-13 (1030 days ago) UserGroups: N/A _MarkForUpload: True To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2043114/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2043114] Dependencies.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043114/+attachment/5717893/+files/Dependencies.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043114 Title: sshd segmentation fault on 20.04.6 (focal) Status in openssh package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: We have a physical server running Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS (amd64) and openssh-server 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9. Sometimes sshd crashes with a segmentation fault on remote login with key authentication: [193107.651745] sshd[1229630]: segfault at 5557eba6a008 ip 7f2326a2ca53 sp 7ffcba40c510 error 4 in libc-2.31.so[7f23269b8000+178000] We’ve changed only the following values in the stock sshd_config file: LogLevel DEBUG PasswordAuthentication no MaxStartups 100:30:100 The server is used for automated software testing, and sometimes our test suite might make a large amount of SSH connections in a short period of time, which seems to be correlated with the crashes. But at the same time, I have to note that the connection count was not near the MaxStartups limit, and we’ve had crashes before adding that setting. Since the backtrace shows the debug logging function in the stack, we’re currently experimenting with using `LogLevel INFO` to try and isolate the issue. I am attaching the backtrace. I could provide the full dump file, although I am hesitant due to the possibility of private keys or other sensitive information leaking. # apt-cache policy openssh-server openssh-server: Installed: 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 Candidate: 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 Version table: *** 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 500 500 http://mirrors.storpool.com/ubuntu/archive focal-updates/main amd64 Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:8.2p1-4 500 500 http://mirrors.storpool.com/ubuntu/archive focal/main amd64 Packages --- ProblemType: Bug ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.27 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: openssh-server 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-128.144-generic 5.4.210 Tags: focal Uname: Linux 5.4.0-128-generic x86_64 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2021-01-13 (1030 days ago) UserGroups: N/A _MarkForUpload: True To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2043114/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2043114] ProcEnviron.txt
apport information ** Attachment added: "ProcEnviron.txt" https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043114/+attachment/5717895/+files/ProcEnviron.txt -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043114 Title: sshd segmentation fault on 20.04.6 (focal) Status in openssh package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: We have a physical server running Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS (amd64) and openssh-server 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9. Sometimes sshd crashes with a segmentation fault on remote login with key authentication: [193107.651745] sshd[1229630]: segfault at 5557eba6a008 ip 7f2326a2ca53 sp 7ffcba40c510 error 4 in libc-2.31.so[7f23269b8000+178000] We’ve changed only the following values in the stock sshd_config file: LogLevel DEBUG PasswordAuthentication no MaxStartups 100:30:100 The server is used for automated software testing, and sometimes our test suite might make a large amount of SSH connections in a short period of time, which seems to be correlated with the crashes. But at the same time, I have to note that the connection count was not near the MaxStartups limit, and we’ve had crashes before adding that setting. Since the backtrace shows the debug logging function in the stack, we’re currently experimenting with using `LogLevel INFO` to try and isolate the issue. I am attaching the backtrace. I could provide the full dump file, although I am hesitant due to the possibility of private keys or other sensitive information leaking. # apt-cache policy openssh-server openssh-server: Installed: 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 Candidate: 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 Version table: *** 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 500 500 http://mirrors.storpool.com/ubuntu/archive focal-updates/main amd64 Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:8.2p1-4 500 500 http://mirrors.storpool.com/ubuntu/archive focal/main amd64 Packages --- ProblemType: Bug ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.27 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: openssh-server 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-128.144-generic 5.4.210 Tags: focal Uname: Linux 5.4.0-128-generic x86_64 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2021-01-13 (1030 days ago) UserGroups: N/A _MarkForUpload: True To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2043114/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2043114] Re: sshd segmentation fault on 20.04.6 (focal)
Apologies for the multiple messages, but I was under the impression that apport-collect would upload the actual core dump file here :) ** Attachment added: "sshd abort crash report" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2043114/+attachment/5717896/+files/_usr_sbin_sshd.0.crash -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043114 Title: sshd segmentation fault on 20.04.6 (focal) Status in openssh package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: We have a physical server running Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS (amd64) and openssh-server 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9. Sometimes sshd crashes with a segmentation fault on remote login with key authentication: [193107.651745] sshd[1229630]: segfault at 5557eba6a008 ip 7f2326a2ca53 sp 7ffcba40c510 error 4 in libc-2.31.so[7f23269b8000+178000] We’ve changed only the following values in the stock sshd_config file: LogLevel DEBUG PasswordAuthentication no MaxStartups 100:30:100 The server is used for automated software testing, and sometimes our test suite might make a large amount of SSH connections in a short period of time, which seems to be correlated with the crashes. But at the same time, I have to note that the connection count was not near the MaxStartups limit, and we’ve had crashes before adding that setting. Since the backtrace shows the debug logging function in the stack, we’re currently experimenting with using `LogLevel INFO` to try and isolate the issue. I am attaching the backtrace. I could provide the full dump file, although I am hesitant due to the possibility of private keys or other sensitive information leaking. # apt-cache policy openssh-server openssh-server: Installed: 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 Candidate: 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 Version table: *** 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 500 500 http://mirrors.storpool.com/ubuntu/archive focal-updates/main amd64 Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:8.2p1-4 500 500 http://mirrors.storpool.com/ubuntu/archive focal/main amd64 Packages --- ProblemType: Bug ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.27 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: openssh-server 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-128.144-generic 5.4.210 Tags: focal Uname: Linux 5.4.0-128-generic x86_64 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2021-01-13 (1030 days ago) UserGroups: N/A _MarkForUpload: True To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2043114/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2043114] Re: sshd segmentation fault on 20.04.6 (focal)
After some more "stress testing" with GNU parallel, I was able to reproduce the segmentation fault, too. See attachment. ** Attachment added: "sshd segmentation fault crash report" https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2043114/+attachment/5717935/+files/_usr_sbin_sshd.0.crash -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssh in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043114 Title: sshd segmentation fault on 20.04.6 (focal) Status in openssh package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Bug description: We have a physical server running Ubuntu 20.04.6 LTS (amd64) and openssh-server 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9. Sometimes sshd crashes with a segmentation fault on remote login with key authentication: [193107.651745] sshd[1229630]: segfault at 5557eba6a008 ip 7f2326a2ca53 sp 7ffcba40c510 error 4 in libc-2.31.so[7f23269b8000+178000] We’ve changed only the following values in the stock sshd_config file: LogLevel DEBUG PasswordAuthentication no MaxStartups 100:30:100 The server is used for automated software testing, and sometimes our test suite might make a large amount of SSH connections in a short period of time, which seems to be correlated with the crashes. But at the same time, I have to note that the connection count was not near the MaxStartups limit, and we’ve had crashes before adding that setting. Since the backtrace shows the debug logging function in the stack, we’re currently experimenting with using `LogLevel INFO` to try and isolate the issue. I am attaching the backtrace. I could provide the full dump file, although I am hesitant due to the possibility of private keys or other sensitive information leaking. # apt-cache policy openssh-server openssh-server: Installed: 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 Candidate: 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 Version table: *** 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 500 500 http://mirrors.storpool.com/ubuntu/archive focal-updates/main amd64 Packages 500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu focal-security/main amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status 1:8.2p1-4 500 500 http://mirrors.storpool.com/ubuntu/archive focal/main amd64 Packages --- ProblemType: Bug ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu27.27 Architecture: amd64 CasperMD5CheckResult: skip DistroRelease: Ubuntu 20.04 Package: openssh-server 1:8.2p1-4ubuntu0.9 PackageArchitecture: amd64 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.4.0-128.144-generic 5.4.210 Tags: focal Uname: Linux 5.4.0-128-generic x86_64 UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to focal on 2021-01-13 (1030 days ago) UserGroups: N/A _MarkForUpload: True To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssh/+bug/2043114/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2043215] [NEW] Since upgrading to Ubuntu 23.10, the stylus (pen) does not work in Xorg.
Public bug reported:
There is more information on this issue:
https://github.com/xournalpp/xournalpp/issues/5303
and the other bug report that is linked there.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-10.10-generic 6.5.3
Uname: Linux 6.5.0-10-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Fri Nov 10 07:17:22 2023
DistUpgraded: 2023-11-06 20:32:35,715 DEBUG Running PostInstallScript:
'/usr/lib/ubuntu-advantage/upgrade_lts_contract.py'
DistroCodename: mantic
DistroVariant: ubuntu
DkmsStatus:
virtualbox/7.0.10, 6.2.0-36-generic, x86_64: installed
virtualbox/7.0.10, 6.5.0-10-generic, x86_64: installed
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
GraphicsCard:
Intel Corporation HD Graphics 5500 [8086:1616] (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA
controller])
Subsystem: Fujitsu Limited. HD Graphics 5500 [10cf:1898]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-05-25 (899 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.04 "Hirsute Hippo" - Release amd64 (20210420)
MachineType: {report['dmi.sys.vendor']} {report['dmi.product.name']}
ProcEnviron:
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
PATH=(custom, no user)
SHELL=/bin/bash
TERM=xterm-256color
XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.5.0-10-generic
root=UUID=ce1b5a3a-3fee-4143-a385-d16e7d44c53a ro i8042.notimeout i8042.nomux
quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to mantic on 2023-11-07 (3 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 12/21/2015
dmi.bios.release: 1.15
dmi.bios.vendor: FUJITSU // Phoenix Technologies Ltd.
dmi.bios.version: Version 1.15
dmi.board.name: FJNB288
dmi.board.vendor: FUJITSU
dmi.board.version: D2
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: FUJITSU
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnFUJITSU//PhoenixTechnologiesLtd.:bvrVersion1.15:bd12/21/2015:br1.15:svnFUJITSU:pnLIFEBOOKT935:pvr:rvnFUJITSU:rnFJNB288:rvrD2:cvnFUJITSU:ct10:cvr:sku:
dmi.product.name: LIFEBOOK T935
dmi.sys.vendor: FUJITSU
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.115-1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 23.2.1-1ubuntu3
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:21.1.7-3ubuntu2.1
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-3
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel
2:2.99.917+git20210115-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau 1:1.0.17-2build1
** Affects: xorg (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Tags: amd64 apport-bug mantic ubuntu
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043215
Title:
Since upgrading to Ubuntu 23.10, the stylus (pen) does not work in
Xorg.
Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
There is more information on this issue:
https://github.com/xournalpp/xournalpp/issues/5303
and the other bug report that is linked there.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-10.10-generic 6.5.3
Uname: Linux 6.5.0-10-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Fri Nov 10 07:17:22 2023
DistUpgraded: 2023-11-06 20:32:35,715 DEBUG Running PostInstallScript:
'/usr/lib/ubuntu-advantage/upgrade_lts_contract.py'
DistroCodename: mantic
DistroVariant: ubuntu
DkmsStatus:
virtualbox/7.0.10, 6.2.0-36-generic, x86_64: installed
virtualbox/7.0.10, 6.5.0-10-generic, x86_64: installed
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
GraphicsCard:
Intel Corporation HD Graphics 5500 [8086:1616] (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA
controller])
Subsystem: Fujitsu Limited. HD Graphics 5500 [10cf:1898]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-05-25 (899 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.04 "Hirsute Hippo" - Release amd64 (20210420)
MachineType: {report['dmi.sys.vendor']} {report['dmi.product.name']}
ProcEnviron:
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
PATH=(custom, no user)
SHELL=/bin/bash
TERM=xterm-256color
XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.5.0-10-generic
root=UUID=ce1b5a3a-3fee-4143-a385-d16e7d44c53a ro i8042.notimeout i8042.nomux
quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to mantic on 2023-11-07 (3 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 12/21/2015
dmi.bios.release: 1.15
dmi.bios.vendor: FUJITSU // Phoenix Technologies Ltd.
dmi.bios.version: Version 1.15
dmi.board.name: FJNB288
dmi.board.vendor: FUJITSU
dmi.board.version: D2
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: FUJITSU
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnFUJITS
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2043215] Re: Since upgrading to Ubuntu 23.10, the stylus (pen) does not work in Xorg.
I have the same problem. My "Wacom One" works on GIMP, but not in Krita
and MyPaint.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043215
Title:
Since upgrading to Ubuntu 23.10, the stylus (pen) does not work in
Xorg.
Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
New
Bug description:
There is more information on this issue:
https://github.com/xournalpp/xournalpp/issues/5303
and the other bug report that is linked there.
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
Package: xorg 1:7.7+23ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-10.10-generic 6.5.3
Uname: Linux 6.5.0-10-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu5
Architecture: amd64
BootLog: Error: [Errno 13] Permission denied: '/var/log/boot.log'
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CompositorRunning: None
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Fri Nov 10 07:17:22 2023
DistUpgraded: 2023-11-06 20:32:35,715 DEBUG Running PostInstallScript:
'/usr/lib/ubuntu-advantage/upgrade_lts_contract.py'
DistroCodename: mantic
DistroVariant: ubuntu
DkmsStatus:
virtualbox/7.0.10, 6.2.0-36-generic, x86_64: installed
virtualbox/7.0.10, 6.5.0-10-generic, x86_64: installed
ExtraDebuggingInterest: Yes
GraphicsCard:
Intel Corporation HD Graphics 5500 [8086:1616] (rev 09) (prog-if 00 [VGA
controller])
Subsystem: Fujitsu Limited. HD Graphics 5500 [10cf:1898]
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-05-25 (899 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 21.04 "Hirsute Hippo" - Release amd64 (20210420)
MachineType: {report['dmi.sys.vendor']} {report['dmi.product.name']}
ProcEnviron:
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
PATH=(custom, no user)
SHELL=/bin/bash
TERM=xterm-256color
XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-6.5.0-10-generic
root=UUID=ce1b5a3a-3fee-4143-a385-d16e7d44c53a ro i8042.notimeout i8042.nomux
quiet splash vt.handoff=7
SourcePackage: xorg
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to mantic on 2023-11-07 (3 days ago)
dmi.bios.date: 12/21/2015
dmi.bios.release: 1.15
dmi.bios.vendor: FUJITSU // Phoenix Technologies Ltd.
dmi.bios.version: Version 1.15
dmi.board.name: FJNB288
dmi.board.vendor: FUJITSU
dmi.board.version: D2
dmi.chassis.type: 10
dmi.chassis.vendor: FUJITSU
dmi.modalias:
dmi:bvnFUJITSU//PhoenixTechnologiesLtd.:bvrVersion1.15:bd12/21/2015:br1.15:svnFUJITSU:pnLIFEBOOKT935:pvr:rvnFUJITSU:rnFJNB288:rvrD2:cvnFUJITSU:ct10:cvr:sku:
dmi.product.name: LIFEBOOK T935
dmi.sys.vendor: FUJITSU
version.compiz: compiz N/A
version.libdrm2: libdrm2 2.4.115-1
version.libgl1-mesa-dri: libgl1-mesa-dri 23.2.1-1ubuntu3
version.libgl1-mesa-glx: libgl1-mesa-glx N/A
version.xserver-xorg-core: xserver-xorg-core 2:21.1.7-3ubuntu2.1
version.xserver-xorg-input-evdev: xserver-xorg-input-evdev N/A
version.xserver-xorg-video-ati: xserver-xorg-video-ati 1:19.1.0-3
version.xserver-xorg-video-intel: xserver-xorg-video-intel
2:2.99.917+git20210115-1
version.xserver-xorg-video-nouveau: xserver-xorg-video-nouveau
1:1.0.17-2build1
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/2043215/+subscriptions
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2043234] [NEW] Symlink for resolv.conf is wrong on fresh install
You have been subscribed to a public bug: Hello. Sorry for disturb, may I ask you please to confirm if im not doing anything wrong with new installation? Its being a while since the problem exists AT LEAST IN MY CASE with "faulty path" for symlinc at resolv.conf I believe its keep happening since 18.04 version and even now in 22.04 So, in the fresh install the path looks like this: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 Feb 17 2023 resolv.conf -> ../run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf but once im running : sudo ln -sf /run/systemd/resolve/resolv.conf /etc/resolv.conf everything works fine. By everything I mean when I run nslookup. Regards, Vitalii Sharapov ** Affects: systemd (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Symlink for resolv.conf is wrong on fresh install https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043234 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2043234] Re: Symlink for resolv.conf is wrong on fresh install
** Package changed: ubuntu-docs (Ubuntu) => systemd (Ubuntu) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043234 Title: Symlink for resolv.conf is wrong on fresh install Status in systemd package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: Hello. Sorry for disturb, may I ask you please to confirm if im not doing anything wrong with new installation? Its being a while since the problem exists AT LEAST IN MY CASE with "faulty path" for symlinc at resolv.conf I believe its keep happening since 18.04 version and even now in 22.04 So, in the fresh install the path looks like this: lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 39 Feb 17 2023 resolv.conf -> ../run/systemd/resolve/stub-resolv.conf but once im running : sudo ln -sf /run/systemd/resolve/resolv.conf /etc/resolv.conf everything works fine. By everything I mean when I run nslookup. Regards, Vitalii Sharapov To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/systemd/+bug/2043234/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 2043236] [NEW] [Latitude 7440, Realtek ALC289, top speakers and headphones play at same time
Public bug reported: The laptop has 2 speakers on the bottom and 2 speakers on the top. When plugging headphones into the 3.5mm jack, the bottom speakers are auto- muted as they are supposed to be (confirmed this in alsamixer); the top speakers however continue to output sound- the headphones work fine, but the top speakers play at the same time. If you go into alsamixer to play with levels, you will note that changing "headphones" volume also changes the volume of the speakers on the top. In fact, even with the headphones unplugged, alsamixer shows a "headphones" section (which will control top speaker volume). The bottom speakers which are muted properly are called "Speakers" in alsamixer. It seems this is a pin issue- it seems that the headphones and the top speakers are linked in some way. The headphone plug action properly mutes all speakers on Windows 11, so this seems to be a software issue. In case it helps: I have reproduced this behavior on Ubuntu 23.10's live installer, and also on Fedora 39 Workstation's live installer. My Ubuntu 22.04 install is completely up-to-date. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-36.37~22.04.1-generic 6.2.16 Uname: Linux 6.2.0-36-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: poeticrpm 1781 F pulseaudio CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Fri Nov 10 14:17:20 2023 InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-10-06 (35 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 (20230807.2) PackageArchitecture: all ProcEnviron: TERM=xterm-256color PATH=(custom, no user) XDG_RUNTIME_DIR= LANG=en_US.UTF-8 SHELL=/bin/bash SourcePackage: alsa-driver Symptom: audio Symptom_AlsaPlaybackTest: ALSA playback test through plughw:PCH failed Symptom_Card: Built-in Audio - HDA Intel PCH Symptom_Jack: Black Headphone Out, Right Symptom_Type: None of the above Title: [Latitude 7440, Realtek ALC289, Black Headphone Out, Right] Playback problem UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install) dmi.bios.date: 09/12/2023 dmi.bios.release: 1.8 dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.bios.version: 1.8.1 dmi.board.name: 0NDV55 dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.board.version: A00 dmi.chassis.type: 10 dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc. dmi.ec.firmware.release: 1.6 dmi.modalias: dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvr1.8.1:bd09/12/2023:br1.8:efr1.6:svnDellInc.:pnLatitude7440:pvr:rvnDellInc.:rn0NDV55:rvrA00:cvnDellInc.:ct10:cvr:sku0C0B: dmi.product.family: Latitude dmi.product.name: Latitude 7440 dmi.product.sku: 0C0B dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc. mtime.conffile..etc.modprobe.d.alsa-base.conf: 2023-11-10T13:48:00.967491 ** Affects: alsa-driver (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Tags: amd64 apport-bug jammy wayland-session -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to alsa-driver in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2043236 Title: [Latitude 7440, Realtek ALC289, top speakers and headphones play at same time Status in alsa-driver package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: The laptop has 2 speakers on the bottom and 2 speakers on the top. When plugging headphones into the 3.5mm jack, the bottom speakers are auto-muted as they are supposed to be (confirmed this in alsamixer); the top speakers however continue to output sound- the headphones work fine, but the top speakers play at the same time. If you go into alsamixer to play with levels, you will note that changing "headphones" volume also changes the volume of the speakers on the top. In fact, even with the headphones unplugged, alsamixer shows a "headphones" section (which will control top speaker volume). The bottom speakers which are muted properly are called "Speakers" in alsamixer. It seems this is a pin issue- it seems that the headphones and the top speakers are linked in some way. The headphone plug action properly mutes all speakers on Windows 11, so this seems to be a software issue. In case it helps: I have reproduced this behavior on Ubuntu 23.10's live installer, and also on Fedora 39 Workstation's live installer. My Ubuntu 22.04 install is completely up-to-date. ProblemType: Bug DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04 Package: alsa-base 1.0.25+dfsg-0ubuntu7 ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.2.0-36.37~22.04.1-generic 6.2.16 Uname: Linux 6.2.0-36-generic x86_64 ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82.5 Architecture: amd64 AudioDevicesInUse: USERPID ACCESS COMMAND /dev/snd/controlC0: poeticrpm 1781 F pulseaudio CasperMD5CheckResult: pass CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME Date: Fri Nov 10 14:17:20 2023 InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-10-06 (35 days ago) InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 22.04.3 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 (20230807.2) PackageArchitectur
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1942260] Re: compress firmware in /lib/firmware
That kernel option was not easy to find, but it's working now. FW_LOADER_COMPRESS=y FW_LOADER_COMPRESS_ZSTD=y -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1942260 Title: compress firmware in /lib/firmware Status in firmware-sof package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in linux-firmware package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in linux-firmware-raspi package in Ubuntu: Confirmed Status in firmware-sof source package in Mantic: Fix Released Status in initramfs-tools source package in Mantic: Fix Released Status in linux-firmware source package in Mantic: Fix Released Status in linux-firmware-raspi source package in Mantic: Confirmed Bug description: -- initramfs-tools [Impact] * linux supports xz compressed linux-firmware which saves disk space. In focal, initramfs-tools only knows how to included uncompressed firmware files (even when kernel supports loading compressed ones). Newer releases of linux-firmware may use compressed firmware files only, in such cases it would be nice for focal's initramfs-tools to support compressed firmware files in case of partial or incomplete upgrades (i.e. linux-firmware force installed or upgraded, without newer initramfs-tools). The proposed changes to initramfs-tools are backwards and forwards compatible, they prefer to include uncompressed firmware files; and if missing, include compressed firmware files in their uncompressed form. Thus maintaining compatibility with any kernels, irrespective of compressed/uncompressed firmware inputs. [Test Plan] * Compress all files shipped by linux-firmware with xz * Rebuild initrd * Check that all the same firmware files are still included in the initramfs, in their uncompressed form as before [Where problems could occur] * This SRU is precautionary to prevent accidental installation of compressed linux-firmware from generating incorrect initramfs. It should be noted that whilst initramfs-tools would create a compatible initramfs with any kernels, pre-v5.3 kernels do not support xz compressed firmware files at runtime. Mixing this new initramfs with compressed firmwares and pre 5.3 kernels may lead to expectations of supporting compressed firmware files with them only working at initrd stage and not at runtime. [Other Info] Original bug report Some facts: - The linux kernel has supported loading xz compressed firmware since 5.3 - The size of /lib/firmware in impish is ~650Mb (and growing) - The compressed size of firmware could be ~230Mb It would be nice to install compressed firmware to save space. Here are the plans from the Fedora project: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompressKernelFirmware To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firmware-sof/+bug/1942260/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1482959] Re: Showing that upgrading a package with "apt-get install" does it also set to manual installed
Same thing when downgrading a package by "apt-get install" e.g. after you remove a PPA. I think apt could try to retain auto/manual states in these cases. But could there be a case where dependencies change when you upgrade/downgrade? Would it be safer to search the packages that depend on the automatically installed packages and tell apt to downgrade it and the dependencies? I doubt current apt can downgrade dependencies automatically. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1482959 Title: Upgrading/downgrading a package with "apt-get install" should not make the package marked as manually installed, if it was not before Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 15.10 dev with apt 1.0.9.10ubuntu6 and if a specific package gets upgraded with "apt-get install" it gets also set to manual installed if it is an automatic installed package but this could be unexpected for the user. Maybe similar if the user tries to install an already up-to-date automatic installed package apt could tell the user then that the package got set to manual installed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1482959/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1482959] Re: Upgrading/downgrading a package with "apt-get install" should not make the package marked as manually installed, if it was not before
** Summary changed: - Showing that upgrading a package with "apt-get install" does it also set to manual installed + Upgrading/downgrading a package with "apt-get install" should not make the package marked as manually installed, if it was not before -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1482959 Title: Upgrading/downgrading a package with "apt-get install" should not make the package marked as manually installed, if it was not before Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 15.10 dev with apt 1.0.9.10ubuntu6 and if a specific package gets upgraded with "apt-get install" it gets also set to manual installed if it is an automatic installed package but this could be unexpected for the user. Maybe similar if the user tries to install an already up-to-date automatic installed package apt could tell the user then that the package got set to manual installed. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1482959/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1482959] Re: Upgrading/downgrading a package with "apt-get install" should not make the package marked as manually installed, if it was not before
** Description changed: - I'm using Ubuntu 15.10 dev with apt 1.0.9.10ubuntu6 and if a specific + I'm using Ubuntu 15.10 dev with apt 1.0.9.10ubuntu6. If a specific package gets upgraded with "apt-get install" it gets also set to manual - installed if it is an automatic installed package but this could be - unexpected for the user. Maybe similar if the user tries to install an - already up-to-date automatic installed package apt could tell the user - then that the package got set to manual installed. + installed even if it is an automatic installed package. That could be + unexpected for the user. Maybe similarly if the user tries to reinstall + an already up-to-date automatically installed package, apt must not make + the package marked as manually installed; see a fixed bug #139448. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1482959 Title: Upgrading/downgrading a package with "apt-get install" should not make the package marked as manually installed, if it was not before Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 15.10 dev with apt 1.0.9.10ubuntu6. If a specific package gets upgraded with "apt-get install" it gets also set to manual installed even if it is an automatic installed package. That could be unexpected for the user. Maybe similarly if the user tries to reinstall an already up-to-date automatically installed package, apt must not make the package marked as manually installed; see a fixed bug #139448. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1482959/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 139448] Re: apt should not set packages to manually installed when reinstalling
Relating Bug #1482959 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/139448 Title: apt should not set packages to manually installed when reinstalling Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: ISI\jhaltom@station-1:/var/crash$ sudo apt-get install --reinstall cpp-4.2 Reading package lists... Done Building dependency tree Reading state information... Done cpp-4.2 set to manual installed. 0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 1 reinstalled, 0 to remove and 28 not upgraded. I don't think this is appropiate to do. It should only be set to manually installed when it is being installed from scratch. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/139448/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1482959] Re: Upgrading/downgrading a package with "apt-get install" should not make the package marked as manually installed, if it was not before
Related thread from year2020: https://askubuntu.com/q/1303795/21005 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1482959 Title: Upgrading/downgrading a package with "apt-get install" should not make the package marked as manually installed, if it was not before Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Bug description: I'm using Ubuntu 15.10 dev with apt 1.0.9.10ubuntu6. If a specific package gets upgraded with "apt-get install" it gets also set to manual installed even if it is an automatic installed package. That could be unexpected for the user. Maybe similarly if the user tries to reinstall an already up-to-date automatically installed package, apt must not make the package marked as manually installed; see a fixed bug #139448. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1482959/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
