Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1981672] Re: phased updates API and client for aptitude

2022-08-03 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Julian,

Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Do note that aptitude is mostly unmaintained these days.

I have to object here as well:

There's no development currently, but it is _not_ unmaintained. (And
the current RC bug in Debian will soon be addressed. I'm just back
from holidays.)

Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-|  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981672

Title:
  phased updates API and client for aptitude

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in aptitude package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Having the configuration at
  https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phased-updates-in-apt-in-21-04/20345/24
  it fails to work.

  The phased updates get distributed on some hosts anyways for 22.04.

  Please properly document and test this, and provide a working
  configuration to opt out from phased updates.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1981672/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1981672] Re: apt phased out broken code, missing documentation to opt out

2022-08-03 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Julian,

Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> aptitude is not a reliable tool that respects your choices like that
> (its solver will happily suggest solutions violating your wishes; it

I have to object here. It very well respects the user's wishes and
also has a setting where the user can configure it should propose
solutions violating holds and forbids.

> also generally is too happy to remove packages),

Again, this solely depends on your settings.

Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-|  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1981672

Title:
  phased updates API and client for aptitude

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in aptitude package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Having the configuration at
  https://discourse.ubuntu.com/t/phased-updates-in-apt-in-21-04/20345/24
  it fails to work.

  The phased updates get distributed on some hosts anyways for 22.04.

  Please properly document and test this, and provide a working
  configuration to opt out from phased updates.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1981672/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1960727] Re: When apt holds back updates, it fails to inform the user of the reason

2022-02-12 Thread Axel Beckert
** Package changed: aptitude (Ubuntu) => apt (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1960727

Title:
  When apt holds back updates, it fails to inform the user of the reason

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  In the case where apt refuses to install and holds back certain
  packages, only the following output is produced:

  root@system:/home/admin# apt upgrade
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree   
  Reading state information... Done
  Calculating upgrade... Done
  The following packages have been kept back:
[ List of packages ]
  0 upgraded, 0 newly installed, 0 to remove and 24 not upgraded.

  
  Missing is any explanation about which package is responsible for apt 
refusing to perform its job, or even what is the reason for that package being 
uninstallable.

  This bug leads users to believe that official Ubuntu packages are
  routinely misconstructed, corrupt, or otherwise junk.

  Fix: Instead of apt simply responding "No Dave, I'm Afraid I Can't Do
  that", correct the output to include the specific package that has a
  missing or unresolved dependency, so the user a) has confidence that
  the process works correctly and b) can proceed with fixing the
  problem.

  
  This bug is longstanding, so I don't think version details are required, but 
they follow anyway:

  1) Distributor ID: Ubuntu
  Description:Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS
  Release:20.04
  Codename:   focal

  2) # apt --version
  apt 2.0.6 (amd64)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1960727/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 (8.x) a.k.a pcre (without the 3) in favor of pcre2 (10.x)

2021-11-28 Thread Axel Beckert
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #18
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=18

** Also affects: zsh (Debian) via
   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=18
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1792544

Title:
  demotion of pcre3 (8.x) a.k.a pcre (without the 3) in favor of pcre2
  (10.x)

Status in aide package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in anope package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in apache2 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in apr-util package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in clamav package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in exim4 package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in freeradius package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in git package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in glib2.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in grep package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in haproxy package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libpam-mount package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libselinux package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in nginx package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in nmap package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in pcre3 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in php-defaults package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in php7.2 package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in postfix package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in python-pyscss package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in quagga package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in rasqal package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in slang2 package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in sssd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in tilix package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in ubuntu-core-meta package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in vte2.91 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in wget package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in zsh package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in zsh package in Debian:
  Unknown

Bug description:
  https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-
  archive/transitions/html/pcre2-main.html

  demotion of pcre3 in favor of pcre2. These packages need analysis what
  needs to be done for the demotion of pcre3:

  Packages which are ready to build with pcre2 should be marked as
  'Triaged', packages which are not ready should be marked as
  'Incomplete'.

  --
  For clarification: pcre2 is actually newer than pcre3.  pcre3 is just poorly 
named.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aide/+bug/1792544/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 (8.x) a.k.a pcre (without the 3) in favor of pcre2 (10.x)

2019-05-01 Thread Axel Beckert
zsh is not really fixed. Please see the changelog entry of 5.6.2-3 which
states:

  * [92175749] Revert "Switch from the deprecated libpcre3 to the newer
(!) libpcre2." libpcre2 is not a drop-in replacement and not detected
by zsh's configure script. (Closes: #909084, reopens LP#1792544)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to glib2.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1792544

Title:
  demotion of pcre3 (8.x) a.k.a pcre (without the 3) in favor of pcre2
  (10.x)

Status in aide package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in anope package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in apache2 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in apr-util package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in clamav package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in exim4 package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in freeradius package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in git package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in glib2.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in grep package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in haproxy package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libpam-mount package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in libselinux package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nginx package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in nmap package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in pcre3 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in php-defaults package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in php7.2 package in Ubuntu:
  Won't Fix
Status in postfix package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in python-pyscss package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in quagga package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in rasqal package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in slang2 package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in sssd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in tilix package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in ubuntu-core-meta package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in vte2.91 package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in wget package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in zsh package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-
  archive/transitions/html/pcre2-main.html

  demotion of pcre3 in favor of pcre2. These packages need analysis what
  needs to be done for the demotion of pcre3:

  Packages which are ready to build with pcre2 should be marked as
  'Triaged', packages which are not ready should be marked as
  'Incomplete'.

  --
  For clarification: pcre2 is actually newer than pcre3.  pcre3 is just poorly 
named.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aide/+bug/1792544/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 in favor of pcre2

2018-09-18 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi,

Andreas Hasenack wrote:
> I've seen the wget debian change, but just switching builddeps from pcre3-dev 
> to pcre2-dev and rebuilding isn't enough. The package ends up not finding 
> pcre and doesn't enable it:
> checking for PCRE... no
> checking pcre.h usability... no
> checking pcre.h presence... no
> checking for pcre.h... no
> ...
>   Libs:  -luuid -lidn2 -lnettle -lgnutls -lz -lpsl 
> 
> So while the package builds, it's not using pcre.
> 
> I tried to switch apache, and while I could make it find pcre2-config and use 
> it, pcre2 has different libraries than pcre3:
> pcre3-config --libs: -lpcre
> pcre2-config --libs: no such parameter
> 
> In pcre2, we have --libs8, --libs-posix, --libs32 and --libs16, but no
> --libs. Is this a bug in pcre2-config?

Indeed, same for zsh:

checking for pcre-config... no
checking pcre.h usability... no
checking pcre.h presence... no
checking for pcre.h... no
checking for pcre_compile... no
checking for pcre_study... no
checking for pcre_exec... no
[...]
../../Test/V07pcre.ztst: starting.
../../Test/V07pcre.ztst: skipped (the zsh/pcre module is not available)

→ Back to Incomplete. I'll revert that commit from the recent 5.6.2-2
  upload.

Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert , https://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-|  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE


** Changed in: zsh (Ubuntu)
   Status: Triaged => Incomplete

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to grep in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1792544

Title:
  demotion of pcre3 in favor of pcre2

Status in aide package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in apache2 package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in apr-util package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in clamav package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in exim4 package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in freeradius package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in git package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in glib2.0 package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in grep package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in haproxy package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in libpam-mount package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in libselinux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in nginx package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nmap package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in pcre3 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in php7.2 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in postfix package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in python-pyscss package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in quagga package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in rasqal package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in slang2 package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in sssd package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in wget package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete
Status in zsh package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  demotion of pcre3 in favor of pcre2. These packages need analysis what
  needs to be done for the demotion of pcre3:

  Packages which are ready to build with pcre2 should be marked as
  'Triaged', packages which are not ready should be marked as
  'Incomplete'.

  aide
  apache2
  apr-util
  clamav
  exim4
  freeradius
  git
  glib2.0
  grep
  haproxy
  libpam-mount
  libselinux
  nginx
  nmap
  php7.2
  postfix
  python-pyscss
  quagga
  rasqal
  slang2
  sssd
  wget
  zsh

  --

  For clarification: pcre2 is actually newer than pcre3.  pcre3 is just
  poorly named (according to jbicha).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aide/+bug/1792544/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1792544] Re: demotion of pcre3 in favor of pcre2

2018-09-15 Thread Axel Beckert
zsh in Debian Unstable (5.6.2-1) seems to build fine if I exchange
libpcre3-dev by libpcre2-dev in Build-Depends and Build-Using (via
debian/rules).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to grep in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1792544

Title:
  demotion of pcre3 in favor of pcre2

Status in aide package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in apache2 package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in apr-util package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in clamav package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in exim4 package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in freeradius package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in git package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in glib2.0 package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in grep package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in haproxy package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in libpam-mount package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in libselinux package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in nginx package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in nmap package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in pcre3 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in php7.2 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in postfix package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in python-pyscss package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in quagga package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in rasqal package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in slang2 package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in sssd package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in wget package in Ubuntu:
  New
Status in zsh package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  demotion of pcre3 in favor of pcre2. These packages need analysis what
  needs to be done for the demotion of pcre3:

  Packages which are ready to build with pcre2 should be marked as
  'Triaged', packages which are not ready should be marked as
  'Incomplete'.

  aide
  apache2
  apr-util
  clamav
  exim4
  freeradius
  git
  glib2.0
  grep
  haproxy
  libpam-mount
  libselinux
  nginx
  nmap
  php7.2
  postfix
  python-pyscss
  quagga
  rasqal
  slang2
  sssd
  wget
  zsh

  --

  For clarification: pcre2 is actually newer than pcre3.  pcre3 is just
  poorly named (according to jbicha).

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/aide/+bug/1792544/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1055551] Re: zsh can causes ps to generate error message

2016-11-11 Thread Axel Beckert
Yes, this does no more appear in at least 16.04 Xenial. And Xenial has
procps 3.3.10 which should have fixed this issue. Hence closing. Thanks
for the hint.

** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu)
   Status: Confirmed => Fix Released

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to procps in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/101

Title:
  zsh can causes ps to generate error message

Status in procps package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  (ps|grep foo;echo)
  Signal 18 (CONT) caught by ps (procps-ng version 3.3.3).
  ps:display.c:59: please report this bug

  
  (ps;echo)  # works
  (ps|grep foo) # works
  (ps|grep foo;echo) # fails

  This behaviour seems to be caused by zsh since it is not observable
  using bash. Note too that this bug cannot be recreated on precise.

  zsh configuration is stock "system configuration" (run zsh for first
  time and select option (2) - system defaults).

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
  Package: zsh 5.0.0-2ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-15.22-generic 3.5.4
  Uname: Linux 3.5.0-15-generic i686
  ApportVersion: 2.5.2-0ubuntu4
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Mon Sep 24 16:01:37 2012
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.10 "Quantal Quetzal" - Alpha i386 (20120530)
  ProcEnviron:
   LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
   TERM=xterm
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/zsh
  SourcePackage: zsh
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/procps/+bug/101/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1503382] Re: unable to install python3.4 dev on fresh ubuntu cloud image

2015-10-07 Thread Axel Beckert
This issue has been caused because the python3.4 upload to trusty-
updates from 24th of September has been reverted yesterday and has been
replaced by the previous upload. See
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1500768

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3.4 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1503382

Title:
  unable to install python3.4 dev on fresh ubuntu cloud image

Status in python3.4 package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Latest cloud ubuntu trusty image (06-Oct-2015 10:34)  https://cloud-
  images.ubuntu.com/trusty/current/

  apt-get update && apt-get upgrade # works fine

  # apt-get install python3.4-dev
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree   
  Reading state information... Done
  Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
  requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
  distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
  or been moved out of Incoming.
  The following information may help to resolve the situation:

  The following packages have unmet dependencies:
   python3.4-dev : Depends: python3.4 (= 3.4.0-2ubuntu1.1) but 
3.4.3-1ubuntu1~14.04.1 is to be installed
   Depends: libpython3.4-dev (= 3.4.0-2ubuntu1.1) but it is not 
going to be installed
   Depends: libpython3.4 (= 3.4.0-2ubuntu1.1) but it is not 
going to be installed
  E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

  # apt-get install libpython3.4-dev
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree   
  Reading state information... Done
  Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
  requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
  distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
  or been moved out of Incoming.
  The following information may help to resolve the situation:

  The following packages have unmet dependencies:
   libpython3.4-dev : Depends: libpython3.4-stdlib (= 3.4.0-2ubuntu1.1) but 
3.4.3-1ubuntu1~14.04.1 is to be installed
  Depends: libpython3.4 (= 3.4.0-2ubuntu1.1) but it is not 
going to be installed
  E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken packages.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: python3.4-dev (not installed)
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-65.105-generic 3.13.11-ckt26
  Uname: Linux 3.13.0-65-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.15
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Tue Oct  6 17:36:17 2015
  SourcePackage: python3.4
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3.4/+bug/1503382/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1500768] Re: python3.4.3 SRU break requests

2015-10-07 Thread Axel Beckert
So you leave all users of the trusty-updates with packages installed
that are newer than what is available in the archives and hence take the
chance to get proper security updates in the future?

# apt-cache policy python3.4
python3.4:
  Installed: 3.4.3-1ubuntu1~14.04.1
  Candidate: 3.4.3-1ubuntu1~14.04.1
  Version table:
 *** 3.4.3-1ubuntu1~14.04.1 0
100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 3.4.0-2ubuntu1.1 0
500 http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu/ trusty-updates/main amd64 Packages
500 http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-security/main amd64 
Packages
 3.4.0-2ubuntu1 0
500 http://ubuntu.ethz.ch/ubuntu/ trusty/main amd64 Packages

Please do reverting in the future _only_ by uploading a package with
properly increased version number, e.g.
3.4.3+really3.4.0-0ubuntu1~14.04.1.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3.4 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1500768

Title:
  python3.4.3 SRU break requests

Status in python3.4 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in python3.4 source package in Trusty:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Sicne the upgade to python 3.4.3 on trusty, I'm getting this error when using 
a squid proxy:
  
https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/All/job/udtc-trusty-tests/1946/label=ps-trusty-desktop-amd64-1,type=large/testReport/tests.large.test_android/AndroidSDKTests/test_default_android_sdk_install/

  The code is using python-requests, with verify=True for ssl connection
  (default). Some tests are testing that invalid certificates are
  rejected:  https://github.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-
  make/blob/master/umake/network/download_center.py#L129

  Rerunning the same code with previous trusty package (3.4.0~trusty1)
  doesn't show up this issue. It seems that SNI is broken for the trusty
  version of python3-requests with 3.4.3. (See the FAQ http://www
  .python-requests.org/en/latest/community/faq/ with "What are “hostname
  doesn’t match” errors?" and the stackoverflow question.

  I did run a test, grabbing requests 2.7 and backporting it to trusty
  (I needed to as well to take python3-urllib3 willy version).

  So, 3.4.3 has an incompatible change for existing projects and people
  with proxys are starting to see some breakage like in
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-make/+bug/1499890.

  Can we get it fix somehow, reverting the incompatible change breaking
  SNI (I wonder if this is "Changed in version 3.4.3: This class now
  performs all the necessary certificate and hostname checks by default.
  To revert to the previous, unverified, behavior
  ssl._create_unverified_context() can be passed to the context
  parameter." in https://docs.python.org/3/library/http.client.html or
  something else) so that existing code can either get a new compatible
  python-requests or avoid incompatible changes in python 3.4.3?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3.4/+bug/1500768/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


Re: [Touch-packages] [Bug 1500768] Re: python3.4.3 SRU break requests

2015-10-07 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi Oli,

Oli wrote:
> I understand that this is a WiP and this has been done to stop more
> people hitting this issue, but is there a good way to downgrade to the
> last version temporarily?

We used "apt-get install -y --force-yes
python3.4{,-minimal}=3.4.0-2ubuntu1.1
libpython3.4{,-minimal,-stdlib}=3.4.0-2ubuntu1.1".

You might want to adjust the list of packages depending on which
packages you have installed. (Usage of "{…,…}" requires bash, zsh or
similar as shell.)

Regards, Axel
-- 
 ,''`.  |  Axel Beckert <a...@debian.org>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' :  |  Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `'   |  4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329  6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `-|  1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486  202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to python3.4 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1500768

Title:
  python3.4.3 SRU break requests

Status in python3.4 package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in python3.4 source package in Trusty:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Sicne the upgade to python 3.4.3 on trusty, I'm getting this error when using 
a squid proxy:
  
https://jenkins.qa.ubuntu.com/view/All/job/udtc-trusty-tests/1946/label=ps-trusty-desktop-amd64-1,type=large/testReport/tests.large.test_android/AndroidSDKTests/test_default_android_sdk_install/

  The code is using python-requests, with verify=True for ssl connection
  (default). Some tests are testing that invalid certificates are
  rejected:  https://github.com/ubuntu/ubuntu-
  make/blob/master/umake/network/download_center.py#L129

  Rerunning the same code with previous trusty package (3.4.0~trusty1)
  doesn't show up this issue. It seems that SNI is broken for the trusty
  version of python3-requests with 3.4.3. (See the FAQ http://www
  .python-requests.org/en/latest/community/faq/ with "What are “hostname
  doesn’t match” errors?" and the stackoverflow question.

  I did run a test, grabbing requests 2.7 and backporting it to trusty
  (I needed to as well to take python3-urllib3 willy version).

  So, 3.4.3 has an incompatible change for existing projects and people
  with proxys are starting to see some breakage like in
  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-make/+bug/1499890.

  Can we get it fix somehow, reverting the incompatible change breaking
  SNI (I wonder if this is "Changed in version 3.4.3: This class now
  performs all the necessary certificate and hostname checks by default.
  To revert to the previous, unverified, behavior
  ssl._create_unverified_context() can be passed to the context
  parameter." in https://docs.python.org/3/library/http.client.html or
  something else) so that existing code can either get a new compatible
  python-requests or avoid incompatible changes in python 3.4.3?

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/python3.4/+bug/1500768/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1448259] Re: Systemd does not send SIGTERM first on shutdown

2015-05-11 Thread Axel Beckert
** Bug watch added: Debian Bug tracker #784720
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784720

** Also affects: systemd (Debian) via
   http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784720
   Importance: Unknown
   Status: Unknown

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to systemd in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1448259

Title:
  Systemd does not send SIGTERM first on shutdown

Status in systemd:
  Unknown
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in systemd source package in Vivid:
  Fix Committed
Status in systemd package in Debian:
  Unknown
Status in systemd package in Fedora:
  Unknown

Bug description:
  It has been normal that applications first get the SIGTERM signal
  before SIGKILL on shutdown/reboot in order to successfully finish any
  pending tasks. Now it seem this logic has been changed to something
  else, causing problems to mosh and many others:

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mosh/+bug/1446982

  SIGTERM  suggestion can be seen here:

  http://unixhelp.ed.ac.uk/CGI/man-cgi?shutdown+8

  I created this error report to find out the correct way for
  applications to fix this problem or to create one fix to systemd,
  bringing back the old BSD shutdown functionality.

  This report is for Ubuntu 15.04.

  SRU TEST CASE:
   - Open a terminal, enter some commands, then run reboot.
   - After a reboot, chances are very high that your bash history does not 
contain your most recently typed commands
   - With the updated package, the bash history should be intact.

  REGRESSION POTENTIAL:
   - The original commit was applied because of an inherent race condition with 
cgroup's release_agent -- in rare corner cases an nspawn container (probably 
also LXC) can miss them. In that case it's possible that you instead get a 90s 
timeout on the unit that is shutting down. But this does not mean data loss, 
just a rare shutdown hang from containers (for the record, I never actually saw 
that hanging with LXC), so I think it's a good trade-off.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/systemd/+bug/1448259/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp