[Touch-packages] [Bug 2063503] Re: NVidia drivers won't install completely

2024-04-25 Thread James Baker
This appears to be the issue. DRM_UNLOCKED does not exist for nvidia-
drm-drv.c to compile. Missing ot changed kernel header?

# CC [M]  
/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/545.29.06/build/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-gem-nvkms-memory.o
  cc 
-Wp,-MMD,/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/545.29.06/build/nvidia-drm/.nvidia-drm-gem-nvkms-memory.o.d
 -nostdinc -I./arch/x86/include -I./arch/x86/include/generated  -I./include 
-I./arch/x86/include/uapi -I./arch/x86/include/generated/uapi -I./include/uapi 
-I./include/generated/uapi -include ./include/linux/compiler-version.h -include 
./include/linux/kconfig.h -I./ubuntu/include -include 
./include/linux/compiler_types.h -D__KERNEL__ -fmacro-prefix-map=./= -std=gnu11 
-fshort-wchar -funsigned-char -fno-common -fno-PIE -fno-strict-aliasing 
-mno-sse -mno-mmx -mno-sse2 -mno-3dnow -mno-avx -fcf-protection=none -m64 
-falign-jumps=1 -falign-loops=1 -mno-80387 -mno-fp-ret-in-387 
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=3 -mskip-rax-setup -mtune=generic -mno-red-zone 
-mcmodel=kernel -Wno-sign-compare -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables 
-mindirect-branch=thunk-extern -mindirect-branch-register 
-mindirect-branch-cs-prefix -mfunction-return=thunk-extern -fno-jump-tables 
-mharden-sls=all -fpatchable-function-entry=16,16 
-fno-delete-null-pointer-checks -O2 -fno-allow-store-data-races 
-fstack-protector-strong -fno-omit-frame-pointer -fno-optimize-sibling-calls 
-ftrivial-auto-var-init=zero -fno-stack-clash-protection 
-fzero-call-used-regs=used-gpr -pg -mrecord-mcount -mfentry -DCC_USING_FENTRY 
-falign-functions=16 -fstrict-flex-arrays=3 -fno-strict-overflow 
-fno-stack-check -fconserve-stack -Wall -Wundef 
-Werror=implicit-function-declaration -Werror=implicit-int -Werror=return-type 
-Werror=strict-prototypes -Wno-format-security -Wno-trigraphs 
-Wno-frame-address -Wno-address-of-packed-member -Wmissing-declarations 
-Wmissing-prototypes -Wframe-larger-than=1024 -Wno-main 
-Wno-unused-but-set-variable -Wno-unused-const-variable -Wno-dangling-pointer 
-Wvla -Wno-pointer-sign -Wcast-function-type -Wno-stringop-overflow 
-Wno-array-bounds -Wno-alloc-size-larger-than -Wimplicit-fallthrough=5 
-Werror=date-time -Werror=incompatible-pointer-types -Werror=designated-init 
-Wenum-conversion -Wno-unused-but-set-variable -Wno-unused-const-variable 
-Wno-restrict -Wno-packed-not-aligned -Wno-format-overflow 
-Wno-format-truncation -Wno-stringop-truncation -Wno-missing-field-initializers 
-Wno-type-limits -Wno-shift-negative-value -Wno-maybe-uninitialized 
-Wno-sign-compare -g -gdwarf-5 
-I/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/545.29.06/build/common/inc 
-I/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/545.29.06/build -Wall -Wno-cast-qual -Wno-error 
-Wno-format-extra-args -D__KERNEL__ -DMODULE -DNVRM 
-DNV_VERSION_STRING=\"545.29.06\" -DNV_FILESYSTEM_ACCESS_AVAILABLE=1 
-Wno-unused-function -Wuninitialized -fno-strict-aliasing -ffreestanding 
-mno-red-zone -mcmodel=kernel -DNV_UVM_ENABLE -Werror=undef -DNV_SPECTRE_V2=0 
-DNV_KERNEL_INTERFACE_LAYER -I/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/545.29.06/build/nvidia-drm 
-UDEBUG -U_DEBUG -DNDEBUG -DNV_BUILD_MODULE_INSTANCES=0  
-fsanitize=bounds-strict -fsanitize=shift -fsanitize=bool -fsanitize=enum  
-DMODULE  -DKBUILD_BASENAME='"nvidia_drm_gem_nvkms_memory"' 
-DKBUILD_MODNAME='"nvidia_drm"' -D__KBUILD_MODNAME=kmod_nvidia_drm -c -o 
/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/545.29.06/build/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-gem-nvkms-memory.o 
/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/545.29.06/build/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-gem-nvkms-memory.c   
; ./tools/objtool/objtool --hacks=jump_label --hacks=noinstr --hacks=skylake 
--retpoline --rethunk --sls --stackval --static-call --uaccess --prefix=16   
--module 
/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/545.29.06/build/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-gem-nvkms-memory.o
In file included from 
/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/545.29.06/build/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-drv.c:64:
/var/lib/dkms/nvidia/545.29.06/build/nvidia-drm/nvidia-drm-drv.c:1489:40: 
error: ‘DRM_UNLOCKED’ undeclared here (not in a function); did you mean 
‘VM_LOCKED’?
 1489 |   DRM_RENDER_ALLOW|DRM_UNLOCKED),
  |^~~~
./include/drm/drm_ioctl.h:155:26: note: in definition of macro 
‘DRM_IOCTL_DEF_DRV’
  155 | .flags = _flags,
\
  |  ^~

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063503

Title:
  NVidia drivers won't install completely

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  ll versions of the nvidia driver fail to install no matter what.
  Including the one downloaded from Nvidia. It doesn't matter the
  version.

  :~$ sudo apt install nvidia-driver-550
  [sudo] password for jim: 
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree... Done
  Reading state information... Done
  The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required:
nvidia-firmware-545-545.29.06
  Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2063503] Re: NVidia drivers won't install completely

2024-04-25 Thread James Baker
** Attachment added: "The make.log referred to in my comment above"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg/+bug/2063503/+attachment/5770654/+files/make.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to xorg in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2063503

Title:
  NVidia drivers won't install completely

Status in xorg package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  ll versions of the nvidia driver fail to install no matter what.
  Including the one downloaded from Nvidia. It doesn't matter the
  version.

  :~$ sudo apt install nvidia-driver-550
  [sudo] password for jim: 
  Reading package lists... Done
  Building dependency tree... Done
  Reading state information... Done
  The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required:
nvidia-firmware-545-545.29.06
  Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove it.
  The following additional packages will be installed:
libnvidia-cfg1-550 libnvidia-common-550 libnvidia-compute-550
libnvidia-compute-550:i386 libnvidia-decode-550 libnvidia-decode-550:i386
libnvidia-encode-550 libnvidia-encode-550:i386 libnvidia-extra-550
libnvidia-fbc1-550 libnvidia-fbc1-550:i386 libnvidia-gl-550
libnvidia-gl-550:i386 nvidia-compute-utils-550 nvidia-dkms-550
nvidia-firmware-550-550.67 nvidia-kernel-common-550 nvidia-kernel-source-550
nvidia-utils-550 xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-550
  The following packages will be REMOVED:
libnvidia-cfg1-545 libnvidia-common-545 libnvidia-compute-545
libnvidia-compute-545:i386 libnvidia-decode-545 libnvidia-decode-545:i386
libnvidia-encode-545 libnvidia-encode-545:i386 libnvidia-extra-545
libnvidia-fbc1-545 libnvidia-fbc1-545:i386 libnvidia-gl-545
libnvidia-gl-545:i386 nvidia-compute-utils-545 nvidia-dkms-545
nvidia-driver-545 nvidia-kernel-common-545 nvidia-kernel-source-545
nvidia-utils-545 xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-545
  The following NEW packages will be installed:
libnvidia-cfg1-550 libnvidia-common-550 libnvidia-compute-550
libnvidia-compute-550:i386 libnvidia-decode-550 libnvidia-decode-550:i386
libnvidia-encode-550 libnvidia-encode-550:i386 libnvidia-extra-550
libnvidia-fbc1-550 libnvidia-fbc1-550:i386 libnvidia-gl-550
libnvidia-gl-550:i386 nvidia-compute-utils-550 nvidia-dkms-550
nvidia-driver-550 nvidia-firmware-550-550.67 nvidia-kernel-common-550
nvidia-kernel-source-550 nvidia-utils-550 xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-550
  0 upgraded, 21 newly installed, 20 to remove and 15 not upgraded.
  2 not fully installed or removed.
  Need to get 360 MB of archives.
  After this operation, 14.7 MB of additional disk space will be used.
  Do you want to continue? [Y/n] 
  Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/multiverse amd64 nvidia-dkms-550 
amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [35.8 kB]
  Get:2 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-cfg1-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [155 kB]
  Get:3 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-common-550 all 550.67-0ubuntu3 [14.8 kB]
  Get:4 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-compute-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [41.3 MB]
  Get:5 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted i386 
libnvidia-compute-550 i386 550.67-0ubuntu3 [41.2 MB]
  Get:6 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-decode-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [2,028 kB]
  Get:7 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted i386 
libnvidia-decode-550 i386 550.67-0ubuntu3 [2,470 kB]
  Get:8 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted i386 
libnvidia-encode-550 i386 550.67-0ubuntu3 [115 kB]
  Get:9 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-encode-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [105 kB]
  Get:10 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-extra-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [72.9 kB]
  Get:11 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-fbc1-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [56.4 kB]
  Get:12 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted i386 
libnvidia-fbc1-550 i386 550.67-0ubuntu3 [61.9 kB]
  Get:13 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-gl-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [155 MB]
  Get:14 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted i386 
libnvidia-gl-550 i386 550.67-0ubuntu3 [33.8 MB]
  Get:15 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
nvidia-compute-utils-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [123 kB]
  Get:16 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
nvidia-kernel-source-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [41.7 MB]
  Get:17 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
nvidia-firmware-550-550.67 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [38.1 MB]
  Get:18 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
nvidia-kernel-common-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [120 kB]
  Get:19 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2063503] Re: NVidia drivers won't install completely

2024-04-25 Thread James Baker
Tried again after purging all things NVidia and rebooting.

:~$ sudo ubuntu-drivers install --recommended
udevadm hwdb is deprecated. Use systemd-hwdb instead.
udevadm hwdb is deprecated. Use systemd-hwdb instead.
udevadm hwdb is deprecated. Use systemd-hwdb instead.
udevadm hwdb is deprecated. Use systemd-hwdb instead.
udevadm hwdb is deprecated. Use systemd-hwdb instead.
udevadm hwdb is deprecated. Use systemd-hwdb instead.
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
The following additional packages will be installed:
  libnvidia-cfg1-545 libnvidia-common-545 libnvidia-compute-545 
libnvidia-decode-545 libnvidia-encode-545 libnvidia-extra-545 
libnvidia-fbc1-545 libnvidia-gl-545 libnvidia-gl-545:i386 
nvidia-compute-utils-545
  nvidia-firmware-545-545.29.06 nvidia-kernel-common-545 
nvidia-kernel-source-545 nvidia-prime nvidia-settings nvidia-utils-545 
xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-545
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libnvidia-cfg1-545 libnvidia-common-545 libnvidia-compute-545 
libnvidia-decode-545 libnvidia-encode-545 libnvidia-extra-545 
libnvidia-fbc1-545 libnvidia-gl-545 libnvidia-gl-545:i386 
nvidia-compute-utils-545
  nvidia-dkms-545 nvidia-driver-545 nvidia-firmware-545-545.29.06 
nvidia-kernel-common-545 nvidia-kernel-source-545 nvidia-prime nvidia-settings 
nvidia-utils-545 xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-545
0 upgraded, 19 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
Need to get 0 B/338 MB of archives.
After this operation, 908 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Selecting previously unselected package libnvidia-cfg1-545:amd64.
(Reading database ... 339019 files and directories currently installed.)
Preparing to unpack 
.../00-libnvidia-cfg1-545_545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libnvidia-cfg1-545:amd64 (545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libnvidia-common-545.
Preparing to unpack 
.../01-libnvidia-common-545_545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1_all.deb ...
Unpacking libnvidia-common-545 (545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libnvidia-compute-545:amd64.
Preparing to unpack 
.../02-libnvidia-compute-545_545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libnvidia-compute-545:amd64 (545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libnvidia-decode-545:amd64.
Preparing to unpack 
.../03-libnvidia-decode-545_545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libnvidia-decode-545:amd64 (545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libnvidia-encode-545:amd64.
Preparing to unpack 
.../04-libnvidia-encode-545_545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libnvidia-encode-545:amd64 (545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libnvidia-extra-545:amd64.
Preparing to unpack 
.../05-libnvidia-extra-545_545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libnvidia-extra-545:amd64 (545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libnvidia-fbc1-545:amd64.
Preparing to unpack 
.../06-libnvidia-fbc1-545_545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking libnvidia-fbc1-545:amd64 (545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libnvidia-gl-545:i386.
Preparing to unpack 
.../07-libnvidia-gl-545_545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1_i386.deb ...
dpkg-query: no packages found matching libnvidia-gl-535
Unpacking libnvidia-gl-545:i386 (545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package libnvidia-gl-545:amd64.
Preparing to unpack 
.../08-libnvidia-gl-545_545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1_amd64.deb ...
dpkg-query: no packages found matching libnvidia-gl-535
Unpacking libnvidia-gl-545:amd64 (545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-compute-utils-545.
Preparing to unpack 
.../09-nvidia-compute-utils-545_545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-compute-utils-545 (545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-kernel-source-545.
Preparing to unpack 
.../10-nvidia-kernel-source-545_545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-kernel-source-545 (545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-firmware-545-545.29.06.
Preparing to unpack 
.../11-nvidia-firmware-545-545.29.06_545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-firmware-545-545.29.06 (545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-kernel-common-545.
Preparing to unpack 
.../12-nvidia-kernel-common-545_545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-kernel-common-545 (545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1) ...
Selecting previously unselected package nvidia-dkms-545.
Preparing to unpack 
.../13-nvidia-dkms-545_545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1_amd64.deb ...
Unpacking nvidia-dkms-545 (545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1) ...
Selecting previously 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2063503] [NEW] NVidia drivers won't install completely

2024-04-25 Thread James Baker
Public bug reported:

ll versions of the nvidia driver fail to install no matter what.
Including the one downloaded from Nvidia. It doesn't matter the version.

:~$ sudo apt install nvidia-driver-550
[sudo] password for jim: 
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
The following package was automatically installed and is no longer required:
  nvidia-firmware-545-545.29.06
Use 'sudo apt autoremove' to remove it.
The following additional packages will be installed:
  libnvidia-cfg1-550 libnvidia-common-550 libnvidia-compute-550
  libnvidia-compute-550:i386 libnvidia-decode-550 libnvidia-decode-550:i386
  libnvidia-encode-550 libnvidia-encode-550:i386 libnvidia-extra-550
  libnvidia-fbc1-550 libnvidia-fbc1-550:i386 libnvidia-gl-550
  libnvidia-gl-550:i386 nvidia-compute-utils-550 nvidia-dkms-550
  nvidia-firmware-550-550.67 nvidia-kernel-common-550 nvidia-kernel-source-550
  nvidia-utils-550 xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-550
The following packages will be REMOVED:
  libnvidia-cfg1-545 libnvidia-common-545 libnvidia-compute-545
  libnvidia-compute-545:i386 libnvidia-decode-545 libnvidia-decode-545:i386
  libnvidia-encode-545 libnvidia-encode-545:i386 libnvidia-extra-545
  libnvidia-fbc1-545 libnvidia-fbc1-545:i386 libnvidia-gl-545
  libnvidia-gl-545:i386 nvidia-compute-utils-545 nvidia-dkms-545
  nvidia-driver-545 nvidia-kernel-common-545 nvidia-kernel-source-545
  nvidia-utils-545 xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-545
The following NEW packages will be installed:
  libnvidia-cfg1-550 libnvidia-common-550 libnvidia-compute-550
  libnvidia-compute-550:i386 libnvidia-decode-550 libnvidia-decode-550:i386
  libnvidia-encode-550 libnvidia-encode-550:i386 libnvidia-extra-550
  libnvidia-fbc1-550 libnvidia-fbc1-550:i386 libnvidia-gl-550
  libnvidia-gl-550:i386 nvidia-compute-utils-550 nvidia-dkms-550
  nvidia-driver-550 nvidia-firmware-550-550.67 nvidia-kernel-common-550
  nvidia-kernel-source-550 nvidia-utils-550 xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-550
0 upgraded, 21 newly installed, 20 to remove and 15 not upgraded.
2 not fully installed or removed.
Need to get 360 MB of archives.
After this operation, 14.7 MB of additional disk space will be used.
Do you want to continue? [Y/n] 
Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/multiverse amd64 nvidia-dkms-550 
amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [35.8 kB]
Get:2 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-cfg1-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [155 kB]
Get:3 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-common-550 all 550.67-0ubuntu3 [14.8 kB]
Get:4 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-compute-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [41.3 MB]
Get:5 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted i386 
libnvidia-compute-550 i386 550.67-0ubuntu3 [41.2 MB]
Get:6 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-decode-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [2,028 kB]
Get:7 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted i386 
libnvidia-decode-550 i386 550.67-0ubuntu3 [2,470 kB]
Get:8 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted i386 
libnvidia-encode-550 i386 550.67-0ubuntu3 [115 kB]
Get:9 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-encode-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [105 kB]
Get:10 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-extra-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [72.9 kB]
Get:11 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-fbc1-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [56.4 kB]
Get:12 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted i386 
libnvidia-fbc1-550 i386 550.67-0ubuntu3 [61.9 kB]
Get:13 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
libnvidia-gl-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [155 MB]
Get:14 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted i386 
libnvidia-gl-550 i386 550.67-0ubuntu3 [33.8 MB]
Get:15 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
nvidia-compute-utils-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [123 kB]
Get:16 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
nvidia-kernel-source-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [41.7 MB]
Get:17 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
nvidia-firmware-550-550.67 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [38.1 MB]
Get:18 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
nvidia-kernel-common-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [120 kB]
Get:19 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
nvidia-utils-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [521 kB]
Get:20 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
xserver-xorg-video-nvidia-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [1,616 kB]
Get:21 http://ca.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu noble/restricted amd64 
nvidia-driver-550 amd64 550.67-0ubuntu3 [486 kB]
Fetched 360 MB in 30s (11.8 MB/s)  
(Reading database ... 339762 files and directories currently installed.)
Removing nvidia-driver-545 (545.29.06-0ubuntu0~gpu24.04.1) ...
Removing nvidia-dkms-545 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 2029120] Re: /usr/bin/unattended-upgrade leaking and saturating RAM in 30 seconds

2023-12-18 Thread Ronald Baker
Hello, I notice the same problem as reported by Aurélien. It happens
daily at the time the unattended upgrades are scheduled. Sometimes it
lasts only a minute, sometimes longer. But when it occurs at a moment
that an unresponsive system is not acceptable, this causes problems. It
consumes 90% memory (32 Gb RAM - swapfile is twice that size)! Until now
I didn't notice an out of memory for that process, but it seems that it
keeps growing until it fills the whole memory available.

Ubuntu 22.04.3

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to unattended-upgrades in
Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2029120

Title:
  /usr/bin/unattended-upgrade leaking and saturating RAM in 30 seconds

Status in unattended-upgrades package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Hello,
  We are facing a huge memory leak with unattended-upgrade binary. It appears 
that in around 20s, 2.9Go (80%) of RAM is consumed by the process making the 
system unresponsive (even a basic 'ps' command remains stuck).
  The swap was voluntarily disabled, but anyway I do not expect such a process 
to consume up to 3Go of RAM in nominal operation.

  Note: the logs were captured on a system configured in French. I
  manually translated some words below, which could explain it is not
  exactly what you would have on an english based system.

  Ubuntu release:
  Description:Ubuntu 22.04 LTS
  Release:22.04

  Package version:
  unattended-upgrades:
    Installed : 2.8ubuntu1
    Candidate : 2.8ubuntu1
   Version table :
   *** 2.8ubuntu1 500
  500 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main amd64 Packages
  500 http://fr.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu jammy/main i386 Packages
  100 /var/lib/dpkg/status

  In attachment you will find 2 files:
  - periodic monitoring of available memory (with free -m)
  - periodic monitoring of highest memory consumer processes (with ps + sort on 
memory column)
  - screenshot of syslog (from a distinct run) showing that unattended-upgr 
went out of memory and was killed by OOM. You can also see that the run occured 
as part of the apt-daily service.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/unattended-upgrades/+bug/2029120/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2034986] Re: some text became unreadable during a distribution upgrade

2023-10-18 Thread Michael Baker
Just now upgrading ubuntu-mate 23.04 to 23.10 and encountered the
corrupt text issues.  Screenshot attached.

** Attachment added: "corruption.png"
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-release-upgrader/+bug/2034986/+attachment/5710737/+files/corruption.png

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034986

Title:
  some text became unreadable during a distribution upgrade

Status in Cinnamon:
  New
Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  New
Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader source package in Lunar:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-meta source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader source package in Mantic:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

   * On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running
     ubuntu-release-upgrader, the displayed font of running
     applications (including the upgrader) becomes very corrupted.

   * This is not just a display problem, it is also a functional one.
     The release upgrader will have text corrupted to the point
     where a dialog asks a decision, and displays two buttons, but the
     text is unreadable and one has to guess which button is the one
     that carries out their desired action.

   * In the early parts of the upgrader tool, users are told in bold:
     "To prevent data loss close all open applications and documents."
     This is just before the "Start Upgrade" button is available.
     But they may not do so.  Many applications may have a corrupted
     font.

   * To address this, an additional environment variable is being
     passed along to pkexec, XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP, as this is the
     critical criteria for making the Mate version of the fix work.

   * Also in the change are
     * an update to tests
 * from pre-build.sh
       * an update of the mirrors.cfg, adding and removing several
 mirrors
       * a refresh of the po files

  [ Test Plan ]

   * acquire an Ubuntu Mate environment running Ubuntu Lunar on amd64

   * as user, run "update-manager -d"

   * monitor the "Distribution Upgrade" screen.  During the "Installing
     the upgrades" step (and mind that this step will be long), observe
     the text of the "Distribution Upgrade" screen and verify that the
     font does not corrupt.

   * Repeat the above for Ubuntu Desktop

  [ Where problems could occur ]

   * We are changing, at release time, ubuntu-release upgrader.  If we
     are careless, we could regress upgrades for a wider group of users
     than just Ubuntu Mate.  That said, it is believed that passing the
     additional XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP variable is relatively low risk.

  [ Other Info ]

   * TBD

  ---

  Original description:

  I was upgrading from Lunar to Mantic the other day and left a couple
  of applications open during the upgrade process. During the upgrade
  the text in audacious became unreadable (I'll attach a screenshot) and
  I seem to recall the title bar of Firefox being unreadable but the
  contents of web pages still being readable.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
  Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:23.10.5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-4.4-generic 6.5.0
  Uname: Linux 6.5.0-4-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia zfs
  ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CrashDB: ubuntu
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Sep  8 15:39:27 2023
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-08-10 (1855 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20180725)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  Symptom: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to mantic on 2023-09-06 (2 days ago)
  VarLogDistupgradeAptclonesystemstate.tar.gz: Error: command ['pkexec', 'cat', 
'/var/log/dist-upgrade/apt-clone_system_state.tar.gz'] failed with exit code 
126: Error executing command as another user: Request dismissed
  VarLogDistupgradeTermlog:

  mtime.conffile..etc.update-manager.meta-release:
  2021-05-27T16:30:16.970490

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinnamon-project/+bug/2034986/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 2034986] Re: some text became unreadable during a distribution upgrade

2023-10-18 Thread Michael Baker
Am in the process of an Ubuntu-Mate 23.04 to 23.10 upgrade and have the
corrupted text issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-meta in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2034986

Title:
  some text became unreadable during a distribution upgrade

Status in Cinnamon:
  New
Status in Ubuntu MATE:
  New
Status in ubuntu-meta package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader source package in Jammy:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader source package in Lunar:
  Fix Committed
Status in ubuntu-meta source package in Mantic:
  Fix Released
Status in ubuntu-release-upgrader source package in Mantic:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  [ Impact ]

   * On Ubuntu Mate with the Lunar series, when running
     ubuntu-release-upgrader, the displayed font of running
     applications (including the upgrader) becomes very corrupted.

   * This is not just a display problem, it is also a functional one.
     The release upgrader will have text corrupted to the point
     where a dialog asks a decision, and displays two buttons, but the
     text is unreadable and one has to guess which button is the one
     that carries out their desired action.

   * In the early parts of the upgrader tool, users are told in bold:
     "To prevent data loss close all open applications and documents."
     This is just before the "Start Upgrade" button is available.
     But they may not do so.  Many applications may have a corrupted
     font.

   * To address this, an additional environment variable is being
     passed along to pkexec, XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP, as this is the
     critical criteria for making the Mate version of the fix work.

   * Also in the change are
     * an update to tests
 * from pre-build.sh
       * an update of the mirrors.cfg, adding and removing several
 mirrors
       * a refresh of the po files

  [ Test Plan ]

   * acquire an Ubuntu Mate environment running Ubuntu Lunar on amd64

   * as user, run "update-manager -d"

   * monitor the "Distribution Upgrade" screen.  During the "Installing
     the upgrades" step (and mind that this step will be long), observe
     the text of the "Distribution Upgrade" screen and verify that the
     font does not corrupt.

   * Repeat the above for Ubuntu Desktop

  [ Where problems could occur ]

   * We are changing, at release time, ubuntu-release upgrader.  If we
     are careless, we could regress upgrades for a wider group of users
     than just Ubuntu Mate.  That said, it is believed that passing the
     additional XDG_CURRENT_DESKTOP variable is relatively low risk.

  [ Other Info ]

   * TBD

  ---

  Original description:

  I was upgrading from Lunar to Mantic the other day and left a couple
  of applications open during the upgrade process. During the upgrade
  the text in audacious became unreadable (I'll attach a screenshot) and
  I seem to recall the title bar of Firefox being unreadable but the
  contents of web pages still being readable.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
  Package: ubuntu-release-upgrader-core 1:23.10.5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.5.0-4.4-generic 6.5.0
  Uname: Linux 6.5.0-4-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia zfs
  ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  CrashDB: ubuntu
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Fri Sep  8 15:39:27 2023
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-08-10 (1855 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20180725)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  Symptom: ubuntu-release-upgrader
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to mantic on 2023-09-06 (2 days ago)
  VarLogDistupgradeAptclonesystemstate.tar.gz: Error: command ['pkexec', 'cat', 
'/var/log/dist-upgrade/apt-clone_system_state.tar.gz'] failed with exit code 
126: Error executing command as another user: Request dismissed
  VarLogDistupgradeTermlog:

  mtime.conffile..etc.update-manager.meta-release:
  2021-05-27T16:30:16.970490

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinnamon-project/+bug/2034986/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1993571] Re: After 5.19.0-15, intel wifi 6 no longer available

2022-11-14 Thread Jeffrey Baker
The 'unavailability' of the wifi interface is apparently a path-
dependent bug in network manager or a related component. I was not able
to fix it in place, but a scratch reinstall of Kinetic fixed it. So it
can't be the kernel.

** Package changed: linux (Ubuntu) => network-manager (Ubuntu)

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to network-manager in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1993571

Title:
  After 5.19.0-15, intel wifi 6 no longer available

Status in network-manager package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Since 5.19.0-16, which is also the kernel that broke booting on
  11/12-gen Intel graphics, my Intel wifi is no longer working. This
  continues with the present release candidate kernel package -21. The
  wifi status reports simply that it is "unavailable" and no means to
  make it "available" is evident to me.

  On all prior kernels and Jammy it worked fine.

  % sudo iwconfig wlo1
  wlo1  IEEE 802.11  ESSID:off/any  
Mode:Managed  Access Point: Not-Associated   Tx-Power=-2147483648 
dBm   
Retry short limit:7   RTS thr:off   Fragment thr:off
Encryption key:off
Power Management:on

  % sudo nmcli device show wlo1
  GENERAL.DEVICE: wlo1
  GENERAL.TYPE:   wifi
  GENERAL.HWADDR: 38:87:D5:13:C1:30
  GENERAL.MTU:1500
  GENERAL.STATE:  20 (unavailable)
  GENERAL.CONNECTION: --
  GENERAL.CON-PATH:   --
  IP4.GATEWAY:--
  IP6.GATEWAY:--

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.10
  Package: linux-image-5.19.0-21-generic 5.19.0-21.21
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.19.0-21.21-generic 5.19.7
  Uname: Linux 5.19.0-21-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.23.1-0ubuntu3
  Architecture: amd64
  AudioDevicesInUse:
   USERPID ACCESS COMMAND
   /dev/snd/controlC0:  jwb1179 F wireplumber
   /dev/snd/seq:jwb1176 F pipewire
  CRDA: N/A
  CasperMD5CheckResult: unknown
  Date: Wed Oct 19 10:24:26 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-12-31 (292 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 20.04.3 LTS "Focal Fossa" - Release amd64 (20210819)
  MachineType: ASUS System Product Name
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   LANG=en_US.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/zsh
  ProcFB:
   
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.19.0-21-generic 
root=UUID=74e4f833-7902-4b06-9e40-e5b191272e08 ro quiet splash irqaffinity=0-15 
isolcpus=16-19 vt.handoff=7
  PulseList: Error: command ['pacmd', 'list'] failed with exit code 1: No 
PulseAudio daemon running, or not running as session daemon.
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   linux-restricted-modules-5.19.0-21-generic N/A
   linux-backports-modules-5.19.0-21-generic  N/A
   linux-firmware 20220923.gitf09bebf3-0ubuntu1
  SourcePackage: linux
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to kinetic on 2022-06-07 (133 days ago)
  dmi.bios.date: 08/25/2022
  dmi.bios.release: 20.3
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 2003
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Default string
  dmi.board.name: PRIME Z690-P WIFI D4
  dmi.board.vendor: ASUSTeK COMPUTER INC.
  dmi.board.version: Rev 1.xx
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: Default string
  dmi.chassis.type: 3
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Default string
  dmi.chassis.version: Default string
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr2003:bd08/25/2022:br20.3:svnASUS:pnSystemProductName:pvrSystemVersion:rvnASUSTeKCOMPUTERINC.:rnPRIMEZ690-PWIFID4:rvrRev1.xx:cvnDefaultstring:ct3:cvrDefaultstring:skuSKU:
  dmi.product.family: To be filled by O.E.M.
  dmi.product.name: System Product Name
  dmi.product.sku: SKU
  dmi.product.version: System Version
  dmi.sys.vendor: ASUS

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/network-manager/+bug/1993571/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1972790] Re: Can't connect to hotspot created on ubuntu

2022-10-05 Thread Baker
My machine can't connect with the ubuntu software, when wpa_supplicant version 
is 2.10. On the version 2.9 of wpa_supplicant, the machine can connect with 
that. But, the internet does not work.
After the firewall of the ubuntu software is disable, my machine can connect 
the internet. But the internet is not available if I enable the firewall, 
again. Even if only the hotspot is handled as an exception in the firewall, the 
result is the same.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972790

Title:
  Can't connect to hotspot created on ubuntu

Status in wpa package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  We currently have older systems (18.04) with hotspot's and we will migrate to 
22.04.
  Anything work's fine, expect the hotspot.
  The Hotspot will be created and is visible in the WLAN-List, but if the 
security is set to "WPA & WPA2 Personal" we get the error message "Failed to 
connect to the network".
  If we change the Security to "WPA3 Personal" we get the error message 
"Invalid Password", even if the password is correct.
  As soon we remove the security (change it to "none"), we can connect with out 
any problems.

  We can reproduce it with a fresh installtion of the Ubuntu Server
  22.04 and the following two commands:

  apt install network-manager

  nmcli c add type wifi ifname wlp3s0 con-name Hotspot autoconnect yes
  ssid test-ap 802-11-wireless.mode ap 802-11-wireless.band bg
  802-11-wireless.mac-address "80:45:dd:f0:27:ba" wifi-sec.group ccmp
  wifi-sec.key-mgmt wpa-psk wifi-sec.pairwise ccmp wifi-sec.proto rsn
  wifi-sec.psk "test12345" ipv4.addresses 192.168.60.1/24 ipv4.method
  shared && nmcli connection up Hotspot

  
  We thought it could be similar to this issue: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wpa/+bug/1958267
  Because if we test it with 20.04 it worked fine, because 20.04 uses the 
Version 2:2.9.0-21build1 as described in the Ticket.

  As @Sebastian Bacher suggested 
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wpa/+bug/1958267/comments/58), i 
created a own report.
  In the attachment is the requested log file.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: wpasupplicant 2:2.10-6 [modified: 
lib/systemd/system/wpa_supplicant.service]
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-25.25-generic 5.15.30
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-25-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  Date: Tue May 10 07:24:15 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-05-10 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220421)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: wpa
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wpa/+bug/1972790/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1972790] Re: Can't connect to hotspot created on ubuntu

2022-09-29 Thread Baker
my wpa_supplicant version is 2.9
but, it is not working for me.

iphone se3, ios 15.7
it is not connected. infinite loading.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to wpa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1972790

Title:
  Can't connect to hotspot created on ubuntu

Status in wpa package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  We currently have older systems (18.04) with hotspot's and we will migrate to 
22.04.
  Anything work's fine, expect the hotspot.
  The Hotspot will be created and is visible in the WLAN-List, but if the 
security is set to "WPA & WPA2 Personal" we get the error message "Failed to 
connect to the network".
  If we change the Security to "WPA3 Personal" we get the error message 
"Invalid Password", even if the password is correct.
  As soon we remove the security (change it to "none"), we can connect with out 
any problems.

  We can reproduce it with a fresh installtion of the Ubuntu Server
  22.04 and the following two commands:

  apt install network-manager

  nmcli c add type wifi ifname wlp3s0 con-name Hotspot autoconnect yes
  ssid test-ap 802-11-wireless.mode ap 802-11-wireless.band bg
  802-11-wireless.mac-address "80:45:dd:f0:27:ba" wifi-sec.group ccmp
  wifi-sec.key-mgmt wpa-psk wifi-sec.pairwise ccmp wifi-sec.proto rsn
  wifi-sec.psk "test12345" ipv4.addresses 192.168.60.1/24 ipv4.method
  shared && nmcli connection up Hotspot

  
  We thought it could be similar to this issue: 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wpa/+bug/1958267
  Because if we test it with 20.04 it worked fine, because 20.04 uses the 
Version 2:2.9.0-21build1 as described in the Ticket.

  As @Sebastian Bacher suggested 
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wpa/+bug/1958267/comments/58), i 
created a own report.
  In the attachment is the requested log file.

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 22.04
  Package: wpasupplicant 2:2.10-6 [modified: 
lib/systemd/system/wpa_supplicant.service]
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.15.0-25.25-generic 5.15.30
  Uname: Linux 5.15.0-25-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu82
  Architecture: amd64
  CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
  Date: Tue May 10 07:24:15 2022
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2022-05-10 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 22.04 LTS "Jammy Jellyfish" - Release amd64 
(20220421)
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: wpa
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/wpa/+bug/1972790/+subscriptions


-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1851504] Re: encrypted root fails to cryptsetup on disco

2019-12-04 Thread Chris Baker
It looks like this issue might be resolved in a recent update.
At least for me, /lib is now a softlink to /usr/lib and the original cryptroot 
script will now find libgcc_s.so.1 and add it to the initramfs.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851504

Title:
  encrypted root fails to cryptsetup on disco

Status in cryptsetup:
  New
Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  There is a subtle error message during update-initramfs:

  find: '': No such file or directory

  I could trace this to /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/cryptroot line
  430:

  # libargon2 uses pthread_cancel
  LIBC_DIR="$(ldd /sbin/cryptsetup | sed -nr 's#.* => 
(/lib.*)/libc\.so\.[0-9.-]+ \(0x[[:xdigit:]]+\)$#\1#p')"
  >   find -L "$LIBC_DIR" -maxdepth 1 -name 'libgcc_s.*' -type f | while read 
so; do
  copy_exec "$so"
  done

  ldd output shows:

  libc.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
  (0x7f41aa8c4000)

  so the library is not in /lib anymore but /usr/lib

  The root cause of this may be an update to libc, however the script
  may need adjusting anyway.

  cat /etc/lsb-release
  DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
  DISTRIB_RELEASE=19.04
  DISTRIB_CODENAME=disco
  DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 19.04"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cryptsetup/+bug/1851504/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1851504] Re: encrypted root fails to cryptsetup on disco

2019-11-16 Thread Chris Baker
This bug is affecting me on Kubuntu 19.04.
I rebooted my computer this morning and typed my password into cryptsetup 
during boot only to get the message "libgcc_s.so.1 must be installed for 
pthread_cancel to work".

There are a few factors that I believe should cause the priority of this issue 
to be increased:
1. Advanced boot options cannot be used to recover
   Selecting recovery mode from grub menu or older kernel/initramfs versions 
doesn't help.
   All of my old initramfs images have been updated to no longer include 
libgcc_s.so.1.
2. The initramfs scripts do not recover gracefully
   It has taken me at least 4 hours to recover from this issue because copying 
libgcc_s.so.1 from a usb stick into the initramfs isn't enough to recover. Upon 
exiting the recovery shell, it simply indicated that the root couldn't be 
mounted and dumped me back to the shell again.
   I manually ran cryptsetup to open the LUKS volume and this still resulted in 
getting dumped back to the initramfs shell.
   The problem, I think, is that the cryptsetup fails several times (in 
local-top and in local-premount or local-block) before the mount is considered 
failed and the initial recovery console is presented. So, when exiting the 
shell, it tries to resume at a point well past the initial mounting attempt.

I finally got the computer to boot by copying libgcc_s.so.1 from another
computer into the recovery initramfs. I then had to source
scripts/functions and run_scripts local-top. After that I was able to
boot, but I don't remember if I also did a run_scripts local-premount.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1851504

Title:
  encrypted root fails to cryptsetup on disco

Status in cryptsetup:
  New
Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  There is a subtle error message during update-initramfs:

  find: '': No such file or directory

  I could trace this to /usr/share/initramfs-tools/hooks/cryptroot line
  430:

  # libargon2 uses pthread_cancel
  LIBC_DIR="$(ldd /sbin/cryptsetup | sed -nr 's#.* => 
(/lib.*)/libc\.so\.[0-9.-]+ \(0x[[:xdigit:]]+\)$#\1#p')"
  >   find -L "$LIBC_DIR" -maxdepth 1 -name 'libgcc_s.*' -type f | while read 
so; do
  copy_exec "$so"
  done

  ldd output shows:

  libc.so.6 => /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
  (0x7f41aa8c4000)

  so the library is not in /lib anymore but /usr/lib

  The root cause of this may be an update to libc, however the script
  may need adjusting anyway.

  cat /etc/lsb-release
  DISTRIB_ID=Ubuntu
  DISTRIB_RELEASE=19.04
  DISTRIB_CODENAME=disco
  DISTRIB_DESCRIPTION="Ubuntu 19.04"

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/cryptsetup/+bug/1851504/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1815889]

2019-03-11 Thread Baker-dylan-c
I'm removing this from the 19.0 blocking tracker. Generally we don't add
bugs to block a release if they were present in the previous release,
additionally there doesn't seem to be any consensus on a solution, at
this moment. If there is a fix implemented I'd be happy to pull that
into a later 19.0 release.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815889

Title:
  qemu-system-x86_64 crashed with signal 31 in
  __pthread_setaffinity_new()

Status in Mesa:
  Confirmed
Status in QEMU:
  New
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in qemu package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in mesa source package in Disco:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Unable to launch Default Fedora 29 images in gnome-boxes

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.04
  Package: qemu-system-x86 1:3.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.19.0-12.13-generic 4.19.18
  Uname: Linux 4.19.0-12-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu20
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu Feb 14 11:00:45 2019
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64
  KvmCmdLine: COMMAND STAT  EUID  RUID   PID  PPID %CPU COMMAND
  MachineType: Dell Inc. Precision T3610
  ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user)
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.19.0-12-generic 
root=UUID=939b509b-d627-4642-a655-979b44972d17 ro splash quiet vt.handoff=1
  Signal: 31
  SourcePackage: qemu
  StacktraceTop:
   __pthread_setaffinity_new (th=, cpusetsize=128, 
cpuset=0x7f5771fbf680) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pthread_setaffinity.c:34
   () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/radeonsi_dri.so
   () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/radeonsi_dri.so
   start_thread (arg=) at pthread_create.c:486
   clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:95
  Title: qemu-system-x86_64 crashed with signal 31 in 
__pthread_setaffinity_new()
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to disco on 2018-11-14 (91 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo video
  dmi.bios.date: 11/14/2018
  dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: A18
  dmi.board.name: 09M8Y8
  dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.board.version: A01
  dmi.chassis.type: 7
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA18:bd11/14/2018:svnDellInc.:pnPrecisionT3610:pvr00:rvnDellInc.:rn09M8Y8:rvrA01:cvnDellInc.:ct7:cvr:
  dmi.product.name: Precision T3610
  dmi.product.sku: 05D2
  dmi.product.version: 00
  dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mesa/+bug/1815889/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1815889]

2019-03-06 Thread Baker-dylan-c
We're getting down to just a few bugs blocking 19.0, so I'm pinging
those bugs to see what the progress is?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815889

Title:
  qemu-system-x86_64 crashed with signal 31 in
  __pthread_setaffinity_new()

Status in Mesa:
  Confirmed
Status in QEMU:
  New
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in qemu package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged
Status in mesa source package in Disco:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  Unable to launch Default Fedora 29 images in gnome-boxes

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.04
  Package: qemu-system-x86 1:3.1+dfsg-2ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.19.0-12.13-generic 4.19.18
  Uname: Linux 4.19.0-12-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu20
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu Feb 14 11:00:45 2019
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/qemu-system-x86_64
  KvmCmdLine: COMMAND STAT  EUID  RUID   PID  PPID %CPU COMMAND
  MachineType: Dell Inc. Precision T3610
  ProcEnviron: PATH=(custom, user)
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-4.19.0-12-generic 
root=UUID=939b509b-d627-4642-a655-979b44972d17 ro splash quiet vt.handoff=1
  Signal: 31
  SourcePackage: qemu
  StacktraceTop:
   __pthread_setaffinity_new (th=, cpusetsize=128, 
cpuset=0x7f5771fbf680) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/pthread_setaffinity.c:34
   () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/radeonsi_dri.so
   () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/radeonsi_dri.so
   start_thread (arg=) at pthread_create.c:486
   clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/x86_64/clone.S:95
  Title: qemu-system-x86_64 crashed with signal 31 in 
__pthread_setaffinity_new()
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to disco on 2018-11-14 (91 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo video
  dmi.bios.date: 11/14/2018
  dmi.bios.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: A18
  dmi.board.name: 09M8Y8
  dmi.board.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.board.version: A01
  dmi.chassis.type: 7
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Dell Inc.
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnDellInc.:bvrA18:bd11/14/2018:svnDellInc.:pnPrecisionT3610:pvr00:rvnDellInc.:rn09M8Y8:rvrA01:cvnDellInc.:ct7:cvr:
  dmi.product.name: Precision T3610
  dmi.product.sku: 05D2
  dmi.product.version: 00
  dmi.sys.vendor: Dell Inc.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mesa/+bug/1815889/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1815236]

2019-02-27 Thread Baker-dylan-c
The mentioned patch has landed in master and 19.0 (presumably it is or
will be in 18.3 shortly), is this okay to close?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mesa in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1815236

Title:
  totem assert failure: totem: src/intel/genxml/gen9_pack.h:72:
  __gen_uint: La declaración `v <= max' no se cumple.

Status in Mesa:
  Fix Released
Status in mesa package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in totem package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/totem/issues/297 (Not GNOME)

  ---

  I'm not sure, but this happened after updating to gstreamer 1.15.1, I
  have problems when I maximize totem.

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 19.04
  Package: totem 3.30.0-4ubuntu1
  Uname: Linux 4.20.7-042007-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu20
  Architecture: amd64
  AssertionMessage: totem: src/intel/genxml/gen9_pack.h:72: __gen_uint: La 
declaración `v <= max' no se cumple.
  CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
  Date: Thu Feb  7 18:40:29 2019
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/totem
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-12-02 (68 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS "Bionic Beaver" - Release amd64 
(20180725)
  ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/totem --gapplication-service
  Signal: 6
  SourcePackage: totem
  StacktraceTop:
   __assert_fail_base (fmt=0x7ff31939be23 , assertion=0x7ff312a5416c "v <= max", 
file=0x7ff312a5644c "src/intel/genxml/gen9_pack.h", line=72, 
function=) at assert.c:92
   __GI___assert_fail (assertion=0x7ff312a5416c "v <= max", file=0x7ff312a5644c 
"src/intel/genxml/gen9_pack.h", line=72, function=0x7ff312a56938 "__gen_uint") 
at assert.c:101
   ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/i965_dri.so
   ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/i965_dri.so
   ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/dri/i965_dri.so
  Title: totem assert failure: totem: src/intel/genxml/gen9_pack.h:72: 
__gen_uint: La declaración `v <= max' no se cumple.
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to disco on 2018-12-02 (67 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/mesa/+bug/1815236/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1813434] [NEW] package libpolkit-agent-1-0 0.105-20ubuntu0.18.04.4 failed to install/upgrade: unable to sync directory '/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/': Input/output error

2019-01-26 Thread Stephen Baker
Public bug reported:

this shows up on startup

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: libpolkit-agent-1-0 0.105-20ubuntu0.18.04.4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-43.46-generic 4.15.18
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-43-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.5
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Jan 26 18:30:41 2019
DuplicateSignature:
 package:libpolkit-agent-1-0:0.105-20ubuntu0.18.04.4
 Unpacking gir1.2-polkit-1.0 (0.105-20ubuntu0.18.04.4) over 
(0.105-20ubuntu0.18.04.1) ...
 dpkg: error processing archive 
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-STjm8e/008-libpolkit-agent-1-0_0.105-20ubuntu0.18.04.4_amd64.deb
 (--unpack):
  unable to sync directory '/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/': Input/output error
ErrorMessage: unable to sync directory '/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/': Input/output 
error
InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-11-13 (1900 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.10 "Saucy Salamander" - Release amd64 (20131016.1)
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.6, Python 3.6.7, python3-minimal, 3.6.7-1~18.04
PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.15rc1, python-minimal, 
2.7.15~rc1-1
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.0.5ubuntu2.1
 apt  1.6.6ubuntu0.1
SourcePackage: policykit-1
Title: package libpolkit-agent-1-0 0.105-20ubuntu0.18.04.4 failed to 
install/upgrade: unable to sync directory '/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/': Input/output 
error
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: policykit-1 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to policykit-1 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1813434

Title:
  package libpolkit-agent-1-0 0.105-20ubuntu0.18.04.4 failed to
  install/upgrade: unable to sync directory '/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/':
  Input/output error

Status in policykit-1 package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  this shows up on startup

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: libpolkit-agent-1-0 0.105-20ubuntu0.18.04.4
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-43.46-generic 4.15.18
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-43-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia_modeset nvidia
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu7.5
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Sat Jan 26 18:30:41 2019
  DuplicateSignature:
   package:libpolkit-agent-1-0:0.105-20ubuntu0.18.04.4
   Unpacking gir1.2-polkit-1.0 (0.105-20ubuntu0.18.04.4) over 
(0.105-20ubuntu0.18.04.1) ...
   dpkg: error processing archive 
/tmp/apt-dpkg-install-STjm8e/008-libpolkit-agent-1-0_0.105-20ubuntu0.18.04.4_amd64.deb
 (--unpack):
unable to sync directory '/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/': Input/output error
  ErrorMessage: unable to sync directory '/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/': Input/output 
error
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2013-11-13 (1900 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 13.10 "Saucy Salamander" - Release amd64 
(20131016.1)
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.6, Python 3.6.7, python3-minimal, 
3.6.7-1~18.04
  PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.15rc1, python-minimal, 
2.7.15~rc1-1
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.19.0.5ubuntu2.1
   apt  1.6.6ubuntu0.1
  SourcePackage: policykit-1
  Title: package libpolkit-agent-1-0 0.105-20ubuntu0.18.04.4 failed to 
install/upgrade: unable to sync directory '/var/lib/dpkg/tmp.ci/': Input/output 
error
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/policykit-1/+bug/1813434/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1699293] [NEW] package tzdata 2017b-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 128

2017-06-20 Thread Ron Baker
Public bug reported:

came up on main screen

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
Package: tzdata 2017b-2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-22.24-generic 4.10.15
Uname: Linux 4.10.0-22-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.5-0ubuntu5
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Jun 20 12:58:39 2017
ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit 
status 128
InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-06-20 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Alpha amd64 (20170613)
PackageArchitecture: all
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.18.24ubuntu1
 apt  1.4.5
SourcePackage: tzdata
Title: package tzdata 2017b-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed 
post-installation script returned error exit status 128
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

** Affects: tzdata (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package artful

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tzdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1699293

Title:
  package tzdata 2017b-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed
  post-installation script returned error exit status 128

Status in tzdata package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  came up on main screen

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
  Package: tzdata 2017b-2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-22.24-generic 4.10.15
  Uname: Linux 4.10.0-22-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.5-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Tue Jun 20 12:58:39 2017
  ErrorMessage: subprocess installed post-installation script returned error 
exit status 128
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2017-06-20 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 17.10 "Artful Aardvark" - Alpha amd64 (20170613)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.18.24ubuntu1
   apt  1.4.5
  SourcePackage: tzdata
  Title: package tzdata 2017b-2 failed to install/upgrade: subprocess installed 
post-installation script returned error exit status 128
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1699293/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 798414] Re: update-initramfs should produce a more helpful error when there isn't enough free space

2017-05-05 Thread Michael Baker
On booting I am told that a system program has encountered an error and asked 
if I want to send a report. On saying yes I'm told that the bug has already 
been reported and that it is "update-initramfs should produce a more helpful 
error when there isn't enough free space".
This is so far from what is happening that it is infuriating.
The basis of the problem is that /boot is not being cleaned up automatically.
This was a bug which was supposedly fixed in 16.04 UTS, but apparently not.
As a retired software engineer I know that I can clean up /boot manually, and 
have done so many times.
However I shouldn't have to.
Please stop classifying the /boot partition being full as "update-initramfs 
should produce a more helpful error when there isn't enough free space".
This bug (/boot not being cleaned up automatically) should be given the highest 
possible importance.
It must be a complete turn of to any ubuntu user who does not have computer 
science skills (and to many who do).

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/798414

Title:
  update-initramfs should produce a more helpful error when there isn't
  enough  free space

Status in initramfs-tools:
  Confirmed
Status in Software Updater:
  New
Status in dpkg package in Ubuntu:
  Invalid
Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  In Progress

Bug description:
  Binary package hint: initramfs-tools

  When generating a new initramfs there is no check for available free
  space, subsequently its possible for update-initramfs to fail due to a
  lack of free space.  This is resulting in package installation
  failures for initramfs-tools.  For example:

  Setting up initramfs-tools (0.98.8ubuntu3) ...
  update-initramfs: deferring update (trigger activated)
  Processing triggers for initramfs-tools ...
  update-initramfs: Generating /boot/initrd.img-2.6.38-8-generic

  gzip: stdout: No space left on device
  E: mkinitramfs failure cpio 141 gzip 1
  update-initramfs: failed for /boot/initrd.img-2.6.38-8-generic
  dpkg: error processing initramfs-tools (--configure):
   subprocess installed post-installation script returned error exit status 1

  WORKAROUND:

  Remove unused kernels using computer janitor (not in repositories for
  14.04 or later) or manually free space on your partition containing
  the /boot file system.

  See instructions here
  https://help.ubuntu.com/community/RemoveOldKernels

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/initramfs-tools/+bug/798414/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1661406] [NEW] apparmor failing to be purged on trusty

2017-02-02 Thread Michael Baker
Public bug reported:

Version: 2.10.95-0ubuntu2.5~14.04.1

When executing apt -y purge apparmor.

The purge run but has errors as files do not exist and the rmdir fails
to execute.

rmdir: failed to remove '/var/lib/apparmor/profiles': No such file or
directory

Steps to reproduce:
apt-get update
apt-get -y install apparmor
apt -y purge apparmor

I will put workarounds in place for now in puppet but this is making
puppet not like it..

** Affects: apparmor (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apparmor in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1661406

Title:
  apparmor failing to be purged on trusty

Status in apparmor package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Version: 2.10.95-0ubuntu2.5~14.04.1

  When executing apt -y purge apparmor.

  The purge run but has errors as files do not exist and the rmdir fails
  to execute.

  rmdir: failed to remove '/var/lib/apparmor/profiles': No such file or
  directory

  Steps to reproduce:
  apt-get update
  apt-get -y install apparmor
  apt -y purge apparmor

  I will put workarounds in place for now in puppet but this is making
  puppet not like it..

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apparmor/+bug/1661406/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1591411] Re: systemd-logind must be restarted every ~1000 SSH logins to prevent a ~25 second delay

2016-09-30 Thread Ken Baker
Are there any updates on fixing this in xenial/16.04?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to dbus in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591411

Title:
  systemd-logind must be restarted every ~1000 SSH logins to prevent a
  ~25 second delay

Status in D-Bus:
  Unknown
Status in systemd:
  Unknown
Status in dbus package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed
Status in systemd package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in dbus source package in Xenial:
  Confirmed
Status in systemd source package in Xenial:
  Invalid

Bug description:
  I noticed on a system that accepts large numbers of SSH connections
  that after awhile, SSH sessions were taking ~25 seconds to complete.

  Looking in /var/log/auth.log, systemd-logind starts failing with the
  following:

  Jun 10 23:55:28 test sshd[3666]: pam_unix(sshd:session): session opened for 
user ubuntu by (uid=0)
  Jun 10 23:55:28 test systemd-logind[105]: New session c1052 of user ubuntu.
  Jun 10 23:55:28 test systemd-logind[105]: Failed to abandon session scope: 
Transport endpoint is not connected
  Jun 10 23:55:28 test sshd[3666]: pam_systemd(sshd:session): Failed to create 
session: Message recipient disconnected from message bus without replying

  I reproduced this in an LXD container by doing something like:

  lxc launch ubuntu:x test
  lxc exec test -- login -f ubuntu
  ssh-import-id 

  Then ran a script as follows (passing in ubuntu@):

  while [ 1 ]; do
  (time ssh $1 "echo OK > /dev/null") 2>&1 | grep ^real >> log
  done

  In my case, after 1052 logins, the 1053rd and thereafter were taking
  25+ seconds to complete. Here are some snippets from the log file:

  $ cat log | grep 0m0 | wc -l
  1052

  $ cat log | grep 0m25 | wc -l
  4

  $ tail -5 log
  real  0m0.222s
  real  0m25.232s
  real  0m25.235s
  real  0m25.236s
  real  0m25.239s

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
  Package: systemd 229-4ubuntu5
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-22.40-generic 4.4.8
  Uname: Linux 4.4.0-22-generic x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Sat Jun 11 00:09:34 2016
  MachineType: Notebook W230SS
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=xterm-256color
   PATH=(custom, no user)
  ProcKernelCmdLine: BOOT_IMAGE=/vmlinuz-4.4.0-22-generic 
root=/dev/mapper/ubuntu--vg-root ro quiet splash
  SourcePackage: systemd
  SystemdDelta:
   [EXTENDED]   /lib/systemd/system/rc-local.service → 
/lib/systemd/system/rc-local.service.d/debian.conf
   [EXTENDED]   /lib/systemd/system/systemd-timesyncd.service → 
/lib/systemd/system/systemd-timesyncd.service.d/disable-with-time-daemon.conf

   2 overridden configuration files found.
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  dmi.bios.date: 04/15/2014
  dmi.bios.vendor: American Megatrends Inc.
  dmi.bios.version: 4.6.5
  dmi.board.asset.tag: Tag 12345
  dmi.board.name: W230SS
  dmi.board.vendor: Notebook
  dmi.board.version: Not Applicable
  dmi.chassis.asset.tag: No Asset Tag
  dmi.chassis.type: 9
  dmi.chassis.vendor: Notebook
  dmi.chassis.version: N/A
  dmi.modalias: 
dmi:bvnAmericanMegatrendsInc.:bvr4.6.5:bd04/15/2014:svnNotebook:pnW230SS:pvrNotApplicable:rvnNotebook:rnW230SS:rvrNotApplicable:cvnNotebook:ct9:cvrN/A:
  dmi.product.name: W230SS
  dmi.product.version: Not Applicable
  dmi.sys.vendor: Notebook

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/dbus/+bug/1591411/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1591797] Re: Only run FIPS self tests when FIPS is enabled

2016-08-25 Thread Ken Baker
Chris, I can confirm that 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.3 in xenial-proposed on armhf
works as expected.

** Tags removed: verification-needed
** Tags added: verification-done

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591797

Title:
  Only run FIPS self tests when FIPS is enabled

Status in openssl package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  The FIPS changes added in 1.0.2g-1ubuntu3/1.0.2g-1ubuntu4 as discussed
  in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1553309
  always run the FIPS self tests independent of FIPS being enabled (via
  /proc/sys/crypto/fips_enabled).

  The performance impact of running these FIPS tests on armhf
  (beaglebone and raspberry pi 2&3) is significant (~ 700ms).  On amd64
  it is measurable but far less significant (~ 10ms).  On a long running
  process this may be insignificant, but for command line tools this is
  problematic.  I've seen performance differences with wget, dig,
  nslookup, and host.  I am sure there are others.  The specific numbers
  above are from the sample code below.

  The relevant initialization can be found in crypto/o_init.c:
  static void init_fips_mode(void)
  {
  char buf[2] = "0";
  int fd;

  /* Ensure the selftests always run */
  FIPS_mode_set(1);

  /* For now, do not enforce fips mode via env var
  if (getenv("OPENSSL_FORCE_FIPS_MODE") != NULL) {
  buf[0] = '1';
  } else if ((fd = open(FIPS_MODE_SWITCH_FILE, O_RDONLY)) >= 0) { */
  if ((fd = open(FIPS_MODE_SWITCH_FILE, O_RDONLY)) >= 0) {
  while (read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf)) < 0 && errno == EINTR) ; close(fd);
  }
  /* Failure reading the fips mode switch file means just not
   * switching into FIPS mode. We would break too many things
   * otherwise..
   */

  if (buf[0] != '1') {
  /* drop down to non-FIPS mode if it is not requested */
  FIPS_mode_set(0);
  } else {
  /* abort if selftest failed */
  FIPS_selftest_check();
  }
  }

  I would like to see these tests only run if /proc/sys/crypto/fips_enabled 
exists, and is 1.  This still meets the original proposal as written in the 
1553309 thread:
  1. openssl must read a 1 from /proc/sys/crypto/fips_enabled.
  2. The selftests must pass
  3. The integrity check must pass

  To see the performance differences you can build and time the following 
program:
  #include 
  #include 

  int main() {
OpenSSL_add_ssl_algorithms();
  }

  To measure the system performance without FIPS I installed 1.0.2g-
  1ubuntu2 from: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/1.0.2g-
  1ubuntu2 on both armhf and amd64.  I have also recompiled 1.0.2g-
  1ubuntu4.1 with the call to FIPS_mode_set(1) commented out.

  When I run the original 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 on my Raspberry Pi I see the 
following times:
  real0m0.690s
  real0m0.683s
  real0m0.705s
  real0m0.690s

  The same system with 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 modified and the call to 
FIPS_mode_set(1) commented out:
  real0m0.010s
  real0m0.010s
  real0m0.009s
  real0m0.012s
  real0m0.010s

  The same system with 1.0.2g-1ubuntu2:
  real0m0.010s
  real0m0.009s
  real0m0.009s
  real0m0.011s
  real0m0.012s

  
  Here is some information about my system:
  $ lsb_release -rd
  Description:Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
  Release:16.04

  $ apt-cache policy libssl1.0.0
  libssl1.0.0:
Installed: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1
Candidate: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1
Version table:
   *** 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 500
  500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports xenial-security/main armhf 
Packages 500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports xenial-updates/main armhf 
Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
   1.0.2g-1ubuntu4 500
  500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports xenial/main armhf Packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1591797/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1614210] Re: Remove incomplete fips in openssl in xenial.

2016-08-25 Thread Ken Baker
I can confirm that 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.3 in xenial-proposed on armhf
resolves the bug I described in
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1591797.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1614210

Title:
  Remove incomplete fips in openssl in xenial.

Status in openssl package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in openssl source package in Xenial:
  Fix Committed
Status in openssl source package in Yakkety:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  Package: openssl-1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1
  Distro: xenial

  The openssl contains incomplete fips patches. In light that the fips
  is incomplete and will not be completed in the main archive and they
  are impacting customers, they should be withdrawn. See lp bugs
  1593953, 1591797, 1594748, 1588524, 1613658. Removal of these fips
  patches will remove these fips-related issues.

  [Test case]
  1. Problem in 1594748
  Note: this problem was reported in upstream openssl and testcase posted there 
also.
  https://rt.openssl.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=4559

  CRYPTO_set_mem_functions() always returns 0 because library
  initialization within fips code already calls CRYPTO_malloc() and
  disables it.

  This testcase should cause openssl to abort, but instead it returns a
  context.

  #include 
  #include 
  #include 
  void * my_alloc(size_t n) { abort(); }
  void my_free(void *p) { abort(); }
  void * my_realloc(void *p, size_t n) { abort(); }
  int main(int argc, const char **argv)
  {
    const SSL_METHOD *method;
    SSL_CTX *ctx;
    CRYPTO_set_mem_functions(my_alloc, my_realloc, my_free);
    SSL_library_init();
    method = SSLv23_client_method();
    ctx = SSL_CTX_new(method);
    printf("Got ctx %p\n", ctx);
    return 0;
  }

  2. Problem in 1593953
  EC key generation allows user to generate keys using EC curves that the EC 
sign and verify
  do not support when OPENSSL_FIPS is defined.
  Testcase taken from lp #1593953

  openssl ecparam -genkey -name Oakley-EC2N-4

  will fail when OPENSSL_FIPS is defined since it causes a fips key-pair 
consistency check to be done.
  Otherwise, without OPENSSL_FIPS defined, the check is not done.

  3. Problem reported in 1588524
  Error code being skipped...

  Testcase taken from lp #1588524

  #include 
  #include 

  int main() {
  int rc;
  unsigned long fips_err;
  SSL_library_init();
  SSL_load_error_strings();
  ERR_load_crypto_strings();
  OpenSSL_add_all_algorithms();
  rc = FIPS_mode_set(1);
  fips_err = ERR_peek_last_error();

  // FIPS_mode_set will return 0 on failure, which is expected if
  // the FIPS module is not compiled. In this case, we should then
  // be able to get the error code
  // CRYPTO_R_FIPS_MODE_NOT_SUPPORTED (0xf06d065)
  // https://wiki.openssl.org/index.php/FIPS_mode_set%28%29
  printf("%d %lu\n", rc, fips_err);
  ERR_print_errors_fp(stdout);

  ERR_free_strings();
  return 0;
  }

  Should report an error message.

  [ Regression potential ]
  Removing the fips patches should decrease regression potential of openssl in 
the main archive.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1614210/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1591797] Re: Only run FIPS self tests when FIPS is enabled

2016-08-22 Thread Ken Baker
Marc Deslauriers,

Will this change to remove the FIPS patches be backported and released
in Xenial?

-- Ken

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591797

Title:
  Only run FIPS self tests when FIPS is enabled

Status in openssl package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  The FIPS changes added in 1.0.2g-1ubuntu3/1.0.2g-1ubuntu4 as discussed
  in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1553309
  always run the FIPS self tests independent of FIPS being enabled (via
  /proc/sys/crypto/fips_enabled).

  The performance impact of running these FIPS tests on armhf
  (beaglebone and raspberry pi 2&3) is significant (~ 700ms).  On amd64
  it is measurable but far less significant (~ 10ms).  On a long running
  process this may be insignificant, but for command line tools this is
  problematic.  I've seen performance differences with wget, dig,
  nslookup, and host.  I am sure there are others.  The specific numbers
  above are from the sample code below.

  The relevant initialization can be found in crypto/o_init.c:
  static void init_fips_mode(void)
  {
  char buf[2] = "0";
  int fd;

  /* Ensure the selftests always run */
  FIPS_mode_set(1);

  /* For now, do not enforce fips mode via env var
  if (getenv("OPENSSL_FORCE_FIPS_MODE") != NULL) {
  buf[0] = '1';
  } else if ((fd = open(FIPS_MODE_SWITCH_FILE, O_RDONLY)) >= 0) { */
  if ((fd = open(FIPS_MODE_SWITCH_FILE, O_RDONLY)) >= 0) {
  while (read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf)) < 0 && errno == EINTR) ; close(fd);
  }
  /* Failure reading the fips mode switch file means just not
   * switching into FIPS mode. We would break too many things
   * otherwise..
   */

  if (buf[0] != '1') {
  /* drop down to non-FIPS mode if it is not requested */
  FIPS_mode_set(0);
  } else {
  /* abort if selftest failed */
  FIPS_selftest_check();
  }
  }

  I would like to see these tests only run if /proc/sys/crypto/fips_enabled 
exists, and is 1.  This still meets the original proposal as written in the 
1553309 thread:
  1. openssl must read a 1 from /proc/sys/crypto/fips_enabled.
  2. The selftests must pass
  3. The integrity check must pass

  To see the performance differences you can build and time the following 
program:
  #include 
  #include 

  int main() {
OpenSSL_add_ssl_algorithms();
  }

  To measure the system performance without FIPS I installed 1.0.2g-
  1ubuntu2 from: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/1.0.2g-
  1ubuntu2 on both armhf and amd64.  I have also recompiled 1.0.2g-
  1ubuntu4.1 with the call to FIPS_mode_set(1) commented out.

  When I run the original 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 on my Raspberry Pi I see the 
following times:
  real0m0.690s
  real0m0.683s
  real0m0.705s
  real0m0.690s

  The same system with 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 modified and the call to 
FIPS_mode_set(1) commented out:
  real0m0.010s
  real0m0.010s
  real0m0.009s
  real0m0.012s
  real0m0.010s

  The same system with 1.0.2g-1ubuntu2:
  real0m0.010s
  real0m0.009s
  real0m0.009s
  real0m0.011s
  real0m0.012s

  
  Here is some information about my system:
  $ lsb_release -rd
  Description:Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
  Release:16.04

  $ apt-cache policy libssl1.0.0
  libssl1.0.0:
Installed: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1
Candidate: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1
Version table:
   *** 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 500
  500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports xenial-security/main armhf 
Packages 500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports xenial-updates/main armhf 
Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
   1.0.2g-1ubuntu4 500
  500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports xenial/main armhf Packages

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1591797/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1591797] [NEW] Only run FIPS self tests when FIPS is enabled

2016-06-12 Thread Ken Baker
Public bug reported:

The FIPS changes added in 1.0.2g-1ubuntu3/1.0.2g-1ubuntu4 as discussed
in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1553309 always
run the FIPS self tests independent of FIPS being enabled (via
/proc/sys/crypto/fips_enabled).

The performance impact of running these FIPS tests on armhf (beaglebone
and raspberry pi 2&3) is significant (~ 700ms).  On amd64 it is
measurable but far less significant (~ 10ms).  On a long running process
this may be insignificant, but for command line tools this is
problematic.  I've seen performance differences with wget, dig,
nslookup, and host.  I am sure there are others.  The specific numbers
above are from the sample code below.

The relevant initialization can be found in crypto/o_init.c:
static void init_fips_mode(void)
{
char buf[2] = "0";
int fd;

/* Ensure the selftests always run */
FIPS_mode_set(1);

/* For now, do not enforce fips mode via env var
if (getenv("OPENSSL_FORCE_FIPS_MODE") != NULL) {
buf[0] = '1';
} else if ((fd = open(FIPS_MODE_SWITCH_FILE, O_RDONLY)) >= 0) { */
if ((fd = open(FIPS_MODE_SWITCH_FILE, O_RDONLY)) >= 0) {
while (read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf)) < 0 && errno == EINTR) ; close(fd);
}
/* Failure reading the fips mode switch file means just not
 * switching into FIPS mode. We would break too many things
 * otherwise..
 */

if (buf[0] != '1') {
/* drop down to non-FIPS mode if it is not requested */
FIPS_mode_set(0);
} else {
/* abort if selftest failed */
FIPS_selftest_check();
}
}

I would like to see these tests only run if /proc/sys/crypto/fips_enabled 
exists, and is 1.  This still meets the original proposal as written in the 
1553309 thread:
1. openssl must read a 1 from /proc/sys/crypto/fips_enabled.
2. The selftests must pass
3. The integrity check must pass

To see the performance differences you can build and time the following program:
#include 
#include 

int main() {
  OpenSSL_add_ssl_algorithms();
}

To measure the system performance without FIPS I installed 1.0.2g-
1ubuntu2 from: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/1.0.2g-
1ubuntu2 on both armhf and amd64.  I have also recompiled 1.0.2g-
1ubuntu4.1 with the call to FIPS_mode_set(1) commented out.

When I run the original 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 on my Raspberry Pi I see the 
following times:
real0m0.690s
real0m0.683s
real0m0.705s
real0m0.690s

The same system with 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 modified and the call to 
FIPS_mode_set(1) commented out:
real0m0.010s
real0m0.010s
real0m0.009s
real0m0.012s
real0m0.010s

The same system with 1.0.2g-1ubuntu2:
real0m0.010s
real0m0.009s
real0m0.009s
real0m0.011s
real0m0.012s


Here is some information about my system:
$ lsb_release -rd
Description:Ubuntu 16.04 LTS
Release:16.04

$ apt-cache policy libssl1.0.0
libssl1.0.0:
  Installed: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1
  Candidate: 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1
  Version table:
 *** 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4.1 500
500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports xenial-security/main armhf 
Packages 500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports xenial-updates/main armhf 
Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
 1.0.2g-1ubuntu4 500
500 http://ports.ubuntu.com/ubuntu-ports xenial/main armhf Packages

** Affects: openssl (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to openssl in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1591797

Title:
  Only run FIPS self tests when FIPS is enabled

Status in openssl package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  The FIPS changes added in 1.0.2g-1ubuntu3/1.0.2g-1ubuntu4 as discussed
  in https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openssl/+bug/1553309
  always run the FIPS self tests independent of FIPS being enabled (via
  /proc/sys/crypto/fips_enabled).

  The performance impact of running these FIPS tests on armhf
  (beaglebone and raspberry pi 2&3) is significant (~ 700ms).  On amd64
  it is measurable but far less significant (~ 10ms).  On a long running
  process this may be insignificant, but for command line tools this is
  problematic.  I've seen performance differences with wget, dig,
  nslookup, and host.  I am sure there are others.  The specific numbers
  above are from the sample code below.

  The relevant initialization can be found in crypto/o_init.c:
  static void init_fips_mode(void)
  {
  char buf[2] = "0";
  int fd;

  /* Ensure the selftests always run */
  FIPS_mode_set(1);

  /* For now, do not enforce fips mode via env var
  if (getenv("OPENSSL_FORCE_FIPS_MODE") != NULL) {
  buf[0] = '1';
  } else if ((fd = open(FIPS_MODE_SWITCH_FILE, O_RDONLY)) >= 0) { */
  if ((fd = open(FIPS_MODE_SWITCH_FILE, O_RDONLY)) >= 0) {
  while (read(fd, buf, sizeof(buf)) < 0 && errno == EINTR) ; close(fd);
  }
  /* 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1313513] Re: mountall does not honour _netdev

2016-02-22 Thread Steve Baker
I seem to be running into this bug on a new build of 14.04.4 when using
an LVM on a multipathed ISCSI drive which I am trying to mount at
/var/lib/mysql.

I'm no upstart guru, so if there is anything I can post to help verify
if it is this bug that is causing an issue please let me know.

If I just add the 'nobootwait' option to fstab will mysql still wait
till the iscsi drive is mounted correctly?

Thanks,
Steve

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to mountall in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1313513

Title:
  mountall does not honour _netdev

Status in mountall package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Hi,

  This is a fresh install of Ubuntu 14.04 LTS AMD64.  I tried
  configuring a Ceph Rados Block Device (rbd) to be mounted during boot
  on /var/lib/one, containing my OpenNebula configuration and database.

  The idea being that should the machine go belly up, I'll have an up-
  to-date snapshot of the OpenNebula data on Ceph to mount on the new
  frontend machine.

  /etc/ceph/rbdmap is configured, I set up /etc/fstab with an entry:

  /dev/rbd/pool/rbdname /var/lib/one xfs defaults,_netdev 0 1

  then rebooted.  According to mount(8), _netdev is supposed to tell
  mountall to skip mounting this device until the network is up.

  As seen from the attached snapshot, it doesn't bother to wait, and
  blindly tries to mount the RBD before connecting to Ceph: this will
  never work.

  mountall seems to rely on *knowing* a list of network file systems:
  this means when someone comes up with a new network file system, or
  uses a conventional disk file system with a remote block device,
  mountall's heuristic falls flat on its face as has been demonstrated
  here.  The problem would also exist for iSCSI, AoE, FibreChannel, nbd
  and drbd devices.

  Due to bug 1313497, the keyboard is non-functional.  Recovery is
  useless as the keyboard is broken there too, and now the machine is
  waiting for a keypress it will never see due to that bug.  A headless
  system would similarly have this problem.

  Two suggestions I would have:
  1. mountall should honour _netdev to decide whether to mount a device or not: 
this gives the user the means to manually tell mountall that the device needs 
network access to operate even if the filesystem looks to be local.  I'd wager 
that if the user specified _netdev, they probably meant it and likely know 
better than mountall.
  2. mountall should time out after a predefined period and NEVER wait 
indefinitely: even if the disk is local.  If a disk goes missing, then it is 
better the machine tries to boot in its degraded state so it can be remotely 
managed and raise an alarm, than to wait for someone to notice the machine 
being down.

  Unfortunately since the machine is now effectively bricked, I can only
  grep proxy server logs to see what packages got installed.
  mountall_2.53_amd64.deb seems to be the culprit.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mountall/+bug/1313513/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1238194] Re: keyboard doesn't work to enter password with encrypted partitions ubuntu 13.10 saucy

2015-12-29 Thread Timothy Baker
I am encountering this same issue running 15.10 as a VM in hyper-v as 
generation 2 vm.
I can't work around it as there is no vm, and disk is encrypted, Sucks as i'll 
have to reinstall from scratch. Any fix that can be made during install? I 
tried the update-initramfs -u -k all but it doesn't fix the issue.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to initramfs-tools in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1238194

Title:
  keyboard doesn't work to enter password with encrypted partitions
  ubuntu 13.10 saucy

Status in initramfs-tools:
  New
Status in initramfs-tools package in Ubuntu:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Precise:
  Fix Released
Status in initramfs-tools source package in Saucy:
  Fix Released

Bug description:
  [Justification]
  With the kernel in 13.10, some systems use a different USB host driver than 
previously.  Failing to include this driver in the initramfs causes regressions 
for users who need to interact with the system in early boot using a USB 
keyboard, such as users with an encrypted root filesystem.  Such systems are 
not bootable with this host driver missing.

  [Test case]
  1. On an affected system, reboot to a kernel from 13.04.
  2. Install the initramfs-tools package from -proposed.
  3. Reboot to the kernel from 13.10.
  4. Verify that you are able to type your passphrase at the prompt in the 
initramfs.

  [Regression potential]
  Minimal.  The update-initramfs script will ignore missing modules (such as 
the many other modules in the list which are built-ins), and the only change 
made is to copy the module into the initramfs: it will only be loaded in the 
initramfs if udev determines it's needed, just as it would load it after 
switching to the root filesystem.

  
  Is the same problem as here but in the new ubuntu 13.10 saucy 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1066376

  I just can't use (i can install) a encrypted partition because when is
  time to introduce the password to unlock partition keyboard is not
  working.

  I don't know how to edit a bug to report it afects other version of
  ubuntu so i created this new bug...

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/initramfs-tools/+bug/1238194/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1440537] [NEW] Friends app not updating after upgrade to vivid

2015-04-05 Thread Ed Baker
Public bug reported:

Last updates were 192 days ago (last time I used the app).

I attached the friends.log file.

** Affects: friends-app (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New

** Attachment added: friends.log
   
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1440537/+attachment/430/+files/friends.log

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to friends-app in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1440537

Title:
  Friends app not updating after upgrade to vivid

Status in friends-app package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Last updates were 192 days ago (last time I used the app).

  I attached the friends.log file.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/friends-app/+bug/1440537/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1373217] Re: package tzdata 2014e-0ubuntu0.12.04 failed to install/upgrade: unable to make backup link of `./usr/share/zoneinfo/ROC' before installing new version: Operation not

2014-10-24 Thread Bob Baker Jr.
This bug now affects me on both 12.04.5 LTS x64 as well as 14.04 LTS
x64.

Package:
/var/cache/apt/archives/tzdata_2014i-0ubuntu0.12.04_all.deb
Error: unable to make backup link of `./usr/share/zoneinfo/ROC' before 
installing new version: Operation not permitted

Tried to install time-zone and daylight-saving time data update.
Same issue that occurred during 14.04 distribution upgrade.

Please investigate this issue immediately, I believe this can become a
very serious bug in the entire Ubuntu timezone system, especially if it
has anything to do with why my apt package became broken after a bad
update.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tzdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1373217

Title:
  package tzdata 2014e-0ubuntu0.12.04 failed to install/upgrade: unable
  to make backup link of `./usr/share/zoneinfo/ROC' before installing
  new version: Operation not permitted

Status in “tzdata” package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I posted about this problem on askubuntu.com. Instead of reiterating
  everything again, please see my post here:

  http://askubuntu.com/questions/520714/cannot-update-or-install-new-
  packages-kubuntu-14-04-1-after-upgrade-from-12-04-5

  This issue must be a bug, I'm just not sure if it is a situation that
  is reproduceable or not. The bug seemed to occur at the upgrade
  process while I still was logged into my Kubuntu 12.04 environment.

  Version prior to upgrade - Kubuntu 12.04.5 LTS x86_64
  Upgraded with Kubuntu 14.04.1 LTS x86_64

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: tzdata 2014e-0ubuntu0.12.04
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-35.62-generic 3.13.11.6
  Uname: Linux 3.13.0-35-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.3
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Tue Sep 23 20:38:23 2014
  DuplicateSignature: package:tzdata:2014e-0ubuntu0.12.04:unable to make backup 
link of `./usr/share/zoneinfo/ROC' before installing new version: Operation not 
permitted
  ErrorMessage: unable to make backup link of `./usr/share/zoneinfo/ROC' before 
installing new version: Operation not permitted
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-11 (165 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 
(20120423)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: tzdata
  Title: package tzdata 2014e-0ubuntu0.12.04 failed to install/upgrade: unable 
to make backup link of `./usr/share/zoneinfo/ROC' before installing new 
version: Operation not permitted
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-09-06 (18 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1373217/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1373217] [NEW] package tzdata 2014e-0ubuntu0.12.04 failed to install/upgrade: unable to make backup link of `./usr/share/zoneinfo/ROC' before installing new version: Operation no

2014-09-23 Thread Bob Baker Jr.
Public bug reported:

I posted about this problem on askubuntu.com. Instead of reiterating
everything again, please see my post here:

http://askubuntu.com/questions/520714/cannot-update-or-install-new-
packages-kubuntu-14-04-1-after-upgrade-from-12-04-5

This issue must be a bug, I'm just not sure if it is a situation that is
reproduceable or not. The bug seemed to occur at the upgrade process
while I still was logged into my Kubuntu 12.04 environment.

Version prior to upgrade - Kubuntu 12.04.5 LTS x86_64
Upgraded with Kubuntu 14.04.1 LTS x86_64

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: tzdata 2014e-0ubuntu0.12.04
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-35.62-generic 3.13.11.6
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-35-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.3
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Sep 23 20:38:23 2014
DuplicateSignature: package:tzdata:2014e-0ubuntu0.12.04:unable to make backup 
link of `./usr/share/zoneinfo/ROC' before installing new version: Operation not 
permitted
ErrorMessage: unable to make backup link of `./usr/share/zoneinfo/ROC' before 
installing new version: Operation not permitted
InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-11 (165 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 
(20120423)
PackageArchitecture: all
SourcePackage: tzdata
Title: package tzdata 2014e-0ubuntu0.12.04 failed to install/upgrade: unable to 
make backup link of `./usr/share/zoneinfo/ROC' before installing new version: 
Operation not permitted
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-09-06 (18 days ago)

** Affects: tzdata (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package trusty

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to tzdata in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1373217

Title:
  package tzdata 2014e-0ubuntu0.12.04 failed to install/upgrade: unable
  to make backup link of `./usr/share/zoneinfo/ROC' before installing
  new version: Operation not permitted

Status in “tzdata” package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  I posted about this problem on askubuntu.com. Instead of reiterating
  everything again, please see my post here:

  http://askubuntu.com/questions/520714/cannot-update-or-install-new-
  packages-kubuntu-14-04-1-after-upgrade-from-12-04-5

  This issue must be a bug, I'm just not sure if it is a situation that
  is reproduceable or not. The bug seemed to occur at the upgrade
  process while I still was logged into my Kubuntu 12.04 environment.

  Version prior to upgrade - Kubuntu 12.04.5 LTS x86_64
  Upgraded with Kubuntu 14.04.1 LTS x86_64

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: tzdata 2014e-0ubuntu0.12.04
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-35.62-generic 3.13.11.6
  Uname: Linux 3.13.0-35-generic x86_64
  NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
  ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.3
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Tue Sep 23 20:38:23 2014
  DuplicateSignature: package:tzdata:2014e-0ubuntu0.12.04:unable to make backup 
link of `./usr/share/zoneinfo/ROC' before installing new version: Operation not 
permitted
  ErrorMessage: unable to make backup link of `./usr/share/zoneinfo/ROC' before 
installing new version: Operation not permitted
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-04-11 (165 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Kubuntu 12.04 LTS Precise Pangolin - Release amd64 
(20120423)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  SourcePackage: tzdata
  Title: package tzdata 2014e-0ubuntu0.12.04 failed to install/upgrade: unable 
to make backup link of `./usr/share/zoneinfo/ROC' before installing new 
version: Operation not permitted
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-09-06 (18 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/tzdata/+bug/1373217/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp