[Touch-packages] [Bug 1753433] [NEW] jackd crashed with SIGABRT

2018-03-05 Thread David Kastrup
Public bug reported:

Probably happened in connection with shotcut crashing while being
connected to Jackd.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: jackd2 1.9.12~dfsg-2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-10.11-lowlatency 4.15.3
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-10-lowlatency x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.8-0ubuntu10
Architecture: amd64
CrashCounter: 1
CurrentDesktop: XFCE
Date: Mon Mar  5 11:12:22 2018
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/jackd
InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-14 (2333 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/jackd -T -ndefault -t 200 -p 2048 -R -T -d alsa -n 2 -r 
96000 -p 512 -d hw:Intel,0
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: jackd2
StacktraceTop:
 () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
 () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
 () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
 __cxa_rethrow () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
 () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjackserver.so.0
Title: jackd crashed with SIGABRT
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-01-23 (41 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout fax floppy lpadmin lxd plugdev 
pulse-access sambashare

** Affects: jackd2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-crash bionic need-amd64-retrace third-party-packages

** Information type changed from Private to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to jackd2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1753433

Title:
  jackd crashed with SIGABRT

Status in jackd2 package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Probably happened in connection with shotcut crashing while being
  connected to Jackd.

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: jackd2 1.9.12~dfsg-2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-10.11-lowlatency 4.15.3
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-10-lowlatency x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.8-0ubuntu10
  Architecture: amd64
  CrashCounter: 1
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  Date: Mon Mar  5 11:12:22 2018
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/jackd
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-14 (2333 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
  ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/jackd -T -ndefault -t 200 -p 2048 -R -T -d alsa -n 2 -r 
96000 -p 512 -d hw:Intel,0
  Signal: 6
  SourcePackage: jackd2
  StacktraceTop:
   () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
   () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
   () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
   __cxa_rethrow () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libstdc++.so.6
   () at /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libjackserver.so.0
  Title: jackd crashed with SIGABRT
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-01-23 (41 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout fax floppy lpadmin lxd plugdev 
pulse-access sambashare

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jackd2/+bug/1753433/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1786635] [NEW] (appstreamcli:8218): GLib-CRITICAL error on exit of apt-get update

2018-08-11 Thread David Kastrup
Public bug reported:

# sudo apt-get update 
Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic InRelease [242 kB]
Hit:2 http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu cosmic InRelease  
 
Hit:3 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic-updates InRelease 
 
Hit:4 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic-security InRelease
Hit:5 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic-backports InRelease
Get:6 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/universe Sources [9310 kB]
Get:7 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/main amd64 DEP-11 Metadata [470 
kB]
Get:8 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/main DEP-11 48x48 Icons [120 kB]
Get:9 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/main DEP-11 64x64 Icons [243 kB]
Get:10 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/universe amd64 Packages [8764 kB]
Get:11 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/universe amd64 DEP-11 Metadata 
[3320 kB]   
   
Get:12 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/universe DEP-11 48x48 Icons 
[2464 kB]   
  
Get:13 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/universe DEP-11 64x64 Icons 
[8480 kB]   
  
Get:14 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/multiverse amd64 DEP-11 Metadata 
[48.4 kB]   
 
Get:15 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/multiverse DEP-11 64x64 Icons 
[221 kB]

Fetched 33.7 MB in 13s (2607 kB/s)  

 

(appstreamcli:8218): GLib-CRITICAL **: 20:12:55.088: g_atomic_ref_count_dec: 
assertion 'g_atomic_int_get (arc) > 0' failed
Reading package lists... Done

The GLib-CRITICAL message sounds like there should be something done
about it.  It does not appear when everything is completely up to date
(and consequently to "Fetched ..." message appears either).

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.10
Package: apt 1.7.0~alpha2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.17.0-6.7-lowlatency 4.17.9
Uname: Linux 4.17.0-6-lowlatency x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu7
Architecture: amd64
CurrentDesktop: XFCE
Date: Sat Aug 11 20:14:01 2018
InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-14 (2493 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
SourcePackage: apt
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to cosmic on 2018-07-30 (12 days ago)

** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug cosmic third-party-packages

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1786635

Title:
  (appstreamcli:8218): GLib-CRITICAL error on exit of apt-get update

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  # sudo apt-get update 
  Get:1 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic InRelease [242 kB]
  Hit:2 http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu cosmic InRelease
   
  Hit:3 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic-updates InRelease   
   
  Hit:4 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic-security InRelease
  Hit:5 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic-backports InRelease
  Get:6 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/universe Sources [9310 kB]
  Get:7 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/main amd64 DEP-11 Metadata [470 
kB]
  Get:8 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/main DEP-11 48x48 Icons [120 kB]
  Get:9 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/main DEP-11 64x64 Icons [243 kB]
  Get:10 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/universe amd64 Packages [8764 
kB]
  Get:11 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/universe amd64 DEP-11 Metadata 
[3320 kB]   
   
  Get:12 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/universe DEP-11 48x48 Icons 
[2464 kB]   
  
  Get:13 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/universe DEP-11 64x64 Icons 
[8480 kB]   
  
  Get:14 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/multiverse amd64 DEP-11 
Metadata [48.4 kB]  
  
  Get:15 http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic/multiverse DEP-11 64x64 Icons 
[221 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1766310] [NEW] apt-get install memtest86+ fails to create /etc/grub.d/20_memtest86+

2018-04-23 Thread David Kastrup
Public bug reported:

Removing/purging the file and/or using --reinstall options do not help.
Removing the file and installing it with

dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/memtest86+_5.01-3ubuntu2_amd64.deb

works.

When calling dpkg --verify on the apt-installed package, the missing
file is flagged.

I have no idea what causes this.  The file name ending in + maybe?  But
wouldn't apt call dpkg for installation anyway?

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
Package: apt 1.6.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-15.16-lowlatency 4.15.15
Uname: Linux 4.15.0-15-lowlatency x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu6
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Apr 23 19:15:11 2018
InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-14 (2383 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
SourcePackage: apt
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-01-23 (90 days ago)

** Affects: apt (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-bug bionic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766310

Title:
  apt-get install memtest86+ fails to create /etc/grub.d/20_memtest86+

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Removing/purging the file and/or using --reinstall options do not
  help.  Removing the file and installing it with

  dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/memtest86+_5.01-3ubuntu2_amd64.deb

  works.

  When calling dpkg --verify on the apt-installed package, the missing
  file is flagged.

  I have no idea what causes this.  The file name ending in + maybe?
  But wouldn't apt call dpkg for installation anyway?

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: apt 1.6.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-15.16-lowlatency 4.15.15
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-15-lowlatency x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu6
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Mon Apr 23 19:15:11 2018
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-14 (2383 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
  SourcePackage: apt
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-01-23 (90 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1766310/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1766310] Re: apt-get install memtest86+ fails to create /etc/grub.d/20_memtest86+

2018-04-23 Thread David Kastrup
Note that

https://askubuntu.com/questions/126160/how-can-i-add-the-memtest86
-options-back-to-the-grub-menu

would suggest that this strange situation has been subsisting for years
by now so it would not appear that many packages apart from memtest86+
are affected by this bug.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766310

Title:
  apt-get install memtest86+ fails to create /etc/grub.d/20_memtest86+

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Removing/purging the file and/or using --reinstall options do not
  help.  Removing the file and installing it with

  dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/memtest86+_5.01-3ubuntu2_amd64.deb

  works.

  When calling dpkg --verify on the apt-installed package, the missing
  file is flagged.

  I have no idea what causes this.  The file name ending in + maybe?
  But wouldn't apt call dpkg for installation anyway?

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: apt 1.6.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-15.16-lowlatency 4.15.15
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-15-lowlatency x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu6
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Mon Apr 23 19:15:11 2018
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-14 (2383 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
  SourcePackage: apt
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-01-23 (90 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1766310/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1766310] Re: apt-get install memtest86+ fails to create /etc/grub.d/20_memtest86+

2018-04-23 Thread David Kastrup
I haven't removed /etc/grub.d/memtest86+ myself: maybe it has been
declared a configuration file at some point of time and/or some
intermediate version of memtest86+ decided to remove it.  The
independent askubuntu experience would suggest something like that.

I have to admit that _now_ purging memtest86+ and reinstalling it via
apt-get install also installs the memtest+ program.

So while I really had to put up a fight until I got
/etc/grub.d/memtest86+ back into my system, I cannot at the current
point offer a recipe for how it got lost originally.  The anecdotal
report from the linked Askubuntu question would suggest that I am not
alone in this particular respect but I am currently not able to state
how to get there.  The system in question might have been changed from
an i386 system to an amd64 system without installing from scratch.  I'd
not rule out that the procedure changing the packages and architecture
to amd64 might have been involved.

At the point of time of reporting the problem, I thought I had a better
grasp of the situation.

Maybe a removed conffile should be treated differently from a changed
(like empty) conffile?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1766310

Title:
  apt-get install memtest86+ fails to create /etc/grub.d/20_memtest86+

Status in apt package in Ubuntu:
  Incomplete

Bug description:
  Removing/purging the file and/or using --reinstall options do not
  help.  Removing the file and installing it with

  dpkg -i /var/cache/apt/archives/memtest86+_5.01-3ubuntu2_amd64.deb

  works.

  When calling dpkg --verify on the apt-installed package, the missing
  file is flagged.

  I have no idea what causes this.  The file name ending in + maybe?
  But wouldn't apt call dpkg for installation anyway?

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.04
  Package: apt 1.6.1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.15.0-15.16-lowlatency 4.15.15
  Uname: Linux 4.15.0-15-lowlatency x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.9-0ubuntu6
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Mon Apr 23 19:15:11 2018
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-14 (2383 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
  SourcePackage: apt
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to bionic on 2018-01-23 (90 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1766310/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1791132] [NEW] package libgtk-3-0 3.23.2-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to overwrite shared '/etc/gtk-3.0/settings.ini', which is different from other instances of pa

2018-09-06 Thread David Kastrup
Public bug reported:

Don't think I changed the configuration file manually ever.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.10
Package: libgtk-3-0 3.23.2-1ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.17.0-9.10-lowlatency 4.17.17
Uname: Linux 4.17.0-9-lowlatency x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu9
Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu Sep  6 18:36:08 2018
ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite shared '/etc/gtk-3.0/settings.ini', which is 
different from other instances of package libgtk-3-0:amd64
InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-14 (2519 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.6, Python 3.6.6+, python3-minimal, 3.6.6-1
PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.15, python-minimal, 2.7.15-3
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.19.0.5ubuntu4
 apt  1.7.0~alpha3
SourcePackage: gtk+3.0
Title: package libgtk-3-0 3.23.2-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying to 
overwrite shared '/etc/gtk-3.0/settings.ini', which is different from other 
instances of package libgtk-3-0:amd64
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to cosmic on 2018-07-30 (38 days ago)

** Affects: gtk+3.0 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-package cosmic

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to gtk+3.0 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1791132

Title:
  package libgtk-3-0 3.23.2-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying
  to overwrite shared '/etc/gtk-3.0/settings.ini', which is different
  from other instances of package libgtk-3-0:amd64

Status in gtk+3.0 package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Don't think I changed the configuration file manually ever.

  ProblemType: Package
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 18.10
  Package: libgtk-3-0 3.23.2-1ubuntu1
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.17.0-9.10-lowlatency 4.17.17
  Uname: Linux 4.17.0-9-lowlatency x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.10-0ubuntu9
  Architecture: amd64
  Date: Thu Sep  6 18:36:08 2018
  ErrorMessage: trying to overwrite shared '/etc/gtk-3.0/settings.ini', which 
is different from other instances of package libgtk-3-0:amd64
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-14 (2519 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
  Python3Details: /usr/bin/python3.6, Python 3.6.6+, python3-minimal, 3.6.6-1
  PythonDetails: /usr/bin/python2.7, Python 2.7.15, python-minimal, 2.7.15-3
  RelatedPackageVersions:
   dpkg 1.19.0.5ubuntu4
   apt  1.7.0~alpha3
  SourcePackage: gtk+3.0
  Title: package libgtk-3-0 3.23.2-1ubuntu1 failed to install/upgrade: trying 
to overwrite shared '/etc/gtk-3.0/settings.ini', which is different from other 
instances of package libgtk-3-0:amd64
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to cosmic on 2018-07-30 (38 days ago)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gtk+3.0/+bug/1791132/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1707083] [NEW] mkrfc2734 crashed with SIGSEGV in get_leaf_size()

2017-07-27 Thread David Kastrup
Public bug reported:

Happened when called with sudo.  As normal user, there did not seem to
be a problem.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
Package: libavc1394-tools 0.5.4-4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.11.0-10.15-lowlatency 4.11.8
Uname: Linux 4.11.0-10-lowlatency i686
ApportVersion: 2.20.6-0ubuntu4
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri Jul 28 01:30:27 2017
Dependencies:
 gcc-7-base 7.1.0-7ubuntu1
 libavc1394-0 0.5.4-4
 libc6 2.24-12ubuntu1
 libgcc1 1:7.1.0-7ubuntu1
 libraw1394-11 2.1.2-1
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/mkrfc2734
InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-14 (2113 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
ProcCmdline: mkrfc2734
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0xb7726304 :mov(%eax),%eax
 PC (0xb7726304) ok
 source "(%eax)" (0xc374a91c) not located in a known VMA region (needed 
readable region)!
 destination "%eax" ok
SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: libavc1394
StacktraceTop:
 get_leaf_size () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/librom1394.so.0
 rom1394_get_size () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/librom1394.so.0
 ?? ()
 __libc_start_main (main=0x80487b0, argc=1, argv=0xbff4d5c4, init=0x8048a70, 
fini=0x8048ad0, rtld_fini=0xb7788080 <_dl_fini>, stack_end=0xbff4d5bc) at 
../csu/libc-start.c:291
 ?? ()
Title: mkrfc2734 crashed with SIGSEGV in get_leaf_size()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups:

** Affects: libavc1394 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-crash artful i386 need-i386-retrace

** Information type changed from Private to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to libavc1394 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1707083

Title:
  mkrfc2734 crashed with SIGSEGV in get_leaf_size()

Status in libavc1394 package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Happened when called with sudo.  As normal user, there did not seem to
  be a problem.

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
  Package: libavc1394-tools 0.5.4-4
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.11.0-10.15-lowlatency 4.11.8
  Uname: Linux 4.11.0-10-lowlatency i686
  ApportVersion: 2.20.6-0ubuntu4
  Architecture: i386
  Date: Fri Jul 28 01:30:27 2017
  Dependencies:
   gcc-7-base 7.1.0-7ubuntu1
   libavc1394-0 0.5.4-4
   libc6 2.24-12ubuntu1
   libgcc1 1:7.1.0-7ubuntu1
   libraw1394-11 2.1.2-1
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/mkrfc2734
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-14 (2113 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
  ProcCmdline: mkrfc2734
  SegvAnalysis:
   Segfault happened at: 0xb7726304 :  mov(%eax),%eax
   PC (0xb7726304) ok
   source "(%eax)" (0xc374a91c) not located in a known VMA region (needed 
readable region)!
   destination "%eax" ok
  SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
  Signal: 11
  SourcePackage: libavc1394
  StacktraceTop:
   get_leaf_size () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/librom1394.so.0
   rom1394_get_size () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/librom1394.so.0
   ?? ()
   __libc_start_main (main=0x80487b0, argc=1, argv=0xbff4d5c4, init=0x8048a70, 
fini=0x8048ad0, rtld_fini=0xb7788080 <_dl_fini>, stack_end=0xbff4d5bc) at 
../csu/libc-start.c:291
   ?? ()
  Title: mkrfc2734 crashed with SIGSEGV in get_leaf_size()
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups:

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libavc1394/+bug/1707083/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1709461] [NEW] jackd assert failure: jackd: src/libieee1394/IsoHandlerManager.cpp:1795: bool IsoHandlerManager::IsoHandler::enable(int): Assertion `m_handle == NULL' failed.

2017-08-08 Thread David Kastrup
Public bug reported:

Daisy-chained devices, trying to select one for operation.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
Package: jackd2 1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-2ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.11.0-10.15-lowlatency 4.11.8
Uname: Linux 4.11.0-10-lowlatency x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.6-0ubuntu4
Architecture: amd64
AssertionMessage: jackd: src/libieee1394/IsoHandlerManager.cpp:1795: bool 
IsoHandlerManager::IsoHandler::enable(int): Assertion `m_handle == NULL' failed.
CrashCounter: 1
CurrentDesktop: XFCE
Date: Tue Aug  8 20:47:34 2017
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/jackd
InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-14 (2125 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
ProcCmdline: jackd -d firewire -d fw:0 -r 96000 -p 512 -n 3
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: jackd2
StacktraceTop:
 __assert_fail_base (fmt=, 
assertion=assertion@entry=0x7f5fe688a1b7 "m_handle == NULL", 
file=file@entry=0x7f5fe6889058 "src/libieee1394/IsoHandlerManager.cpp", 
line=line@entry=1795, function=function@entry=0x7f5fe688ada0 "bool 
IsoHandlerManager::IsoHandler::enable(int)") at assert.c:92
 __GI___assert_fail (assertion=0x7f5fe688a1b7 "m_handle == NULL", 
file=0x7f5fe6889058 "src/libieee1394/IsoHandlerManager.cpp", line=1795, 
function=0x7f5fe688ada0 "bool IsoHandlerManager::IsoHandler::enable(int)") at 
assert.c:101
 IsoHandlerManager::IsoHandler::enable(int) () at /usr/lib/libffado.so.2
 IsoHandlerManager::IsoHandler::updateState() () at /usr/lib/libffado.so.2
 IsoHandlerManager::IsoTask::updateShadowMapHelper() () at 
/usr/lib/libffado.so.2
Title: jackd assert failure: jackd: src/libieee1394/IsoHandlerManager.cpp:1795: 
bool IsoHandlerManager::IsoHandler::enable(int): Assertion `m_handle == NULL' 
failed.
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout fax floppy lpadmin lxd plugdev 
pulse-access sambashare

** Affects: jackd2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Medium
 Status: New


** Tags: amd64 apport-crash artful

** Information type changed from Private to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to jackd2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1709461

Title:
  jackd assert failure: jackd:
  src/libieee1394/IsoHandlerManager.cpp:1795: bool
  IsoHandlerManager::IsoHandler::enable(int): Assertion `m_handle ==
  NULL' failed.

Status in jackd2 package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Daisy-chained devices, trying to select one for operation.

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
  Package: jackd2 1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-2ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.11.0-10.15-lowlatency 4.11.8
  Uname: Linux 4.11.0-10-lowlatency x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.6-0ubuntu4
  Architecture: amd64
  AssertionMessage: jackd: src/libieee1394/IsoHandlerManager.cpp:1795: bool 
IsoHandlerManager::IsoHandler::enable(int): Assertion `m_handle == NULL' failed.
  CrashCounter: 1
  CurrentDesktop: XFCE
  Date: Tue Aug  8 20:47:34 2017
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/jackd
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-14 (2125 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
  ProcCmdline: jackd -d firewire -d fw:0 -r 96000 -p 512 -n 3
  Signal: 6
  SourcePackage: jackd2
  StacktraceTop:
   __assert_fail_base (fmt=, 
assertion=assertion@entry=0x7f5fe688a1b7 "m_handle == NULL", 
file=file@entry=0x7f5fe6889058 "src/libieee1394/IsoHandlerManager.cpp", 
line=line@entry=1795, function=function@entry=0x7f5fe688ada0 "bool 
IsoHandlerManager::IsoHandler::enable(int)") at assert.c:92
   __GI___assert_fail (assertion=0x7f5fe688a1b7 "m_handle == NULL", 
file=0x7f5fe6889058 "src/libieee1394/IsoHandlerManager.cpp", line=1795, 
function=0x7f5fe688ada0 "bool IsoHandlerManager::IsoHandler::enable(int)") at 
assert.c:101
   IsoHandlerManager::IsoHandler::enable(int) () at /usr/lib/libffado.so.2
   IsoHandlerManager::IsoHandler::updateState() () at /usr/lib/libffado.so.2
   IsoHandlerManager::IsoTask::updateShadowMapHelper() () at 
/usr/lib/libffado.so.2
  Title: jackd assert failure: jackd: 
src/libieee1394/IsoHandlerManager.cpp:1795: bool 
IsoHandlerManager::IsoHandler::enable(int): Assertion `m_handle == NULL' failed.
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout fax floppy lpadmin lxd plugdev 
pulse-access sambashare

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jackd2/+bug/1709461/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1705570] Re: jackd crashed with SIGSEGV in Streaming::StreamProcessor::packetsStopped()

2017-08-24 Thread David Kastrup
Only a single device connected, the connection might have been
unreliable while I plugged a headphone.  dmesg says:

[  566.417496] firewire_core :15:00.1: created device fw1: GUID 
0005950400400fc2, S400
[  567.712261] firewire_core :15:00.1: BM lock failed (timeout), making 
local node (ffc0) root
[  567.712267] firewire_core :15:00.1: phy config: new root=ffc0, 
gap_count=5
[ 3122.465682] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: DMA context still active (0x2411)
[ 3157.256925] jackd[3206]: segfault at 64 ip 7f47653b56fc sp 
7ffc73e76980 error 6 in libffado.so.2.3.0[7f47651fe000+37f000]
[ 3232.497578] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.497941] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.498649] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.499225] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.499422] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.499799] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.500279] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.500547] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.500924] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.501283] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.501679] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.502076] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.502411] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.502779] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.503139] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.503536] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.503898] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.504280] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.504654] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.505051] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.505400] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.505779] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.506133] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.506526] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3232.507288] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3233.016244] firewire_core :15:00.1: rediscovered device fw0
[ 3245.052188] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3245.052351] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3245.052558] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: isochronous cycle inconsistent
[ 3245.052990] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: node ID not valid, new bus reset in 
progress
[ 3245.560197] firewire_core :15:00.1: giving up on node ffc0: reading 
config rom failed: bus reset
[ 3245.560247] firewire_core :15:00.1: rediscovered device fw0
[ 3245.560255] firewire_core :15:00.1: giving up on node ffc1: reading 
config rom failed: bus reset
[ 3245.560261] firewire_core :15:00.1: giving up on node ffc0: reading 
config rom failed: bus reset

and on the command line I get

dak@lola:~$ ffado-test Discover
---
FFADO test and diagnostic utility
Part of the FFADO project -- www.ffado.org
Version: 2.3.0-
(C) 2008, Daniel Wagner, Pieter Palmers
This program comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY.
---

Could not initialize device manager
1503588845175934: Fatal (devicemanager.cpp)[ 187] initialize: No firewire 
adapters (ports) found.
no message buffer overruns

Which is a bit unsettling because the firewire adapter is actually
built-in:

15:00.1 FireWire (IEEE 1394): Ricoh Co Ltd R5C832 IEEE 1394 Controller
(rev 04)

Syslog also contains:

Aug 24 17:31:41 lola kernel: [ 3122.465682] firewire_ohci :15:00.1: DMA 
context still active (0x2411)
Aug 24 17:32:16 lola kernel: [ 3157.256925] jackd[3206]: segfault at 64 ip 
7f47653b56fc sp 7ffc73e76980 error 6 in 
libffado.so.2.3.0[7f47651fe000+37f000]

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to jackd2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1705570

Title:
  jackd crashed with SIGSEGV in
  Streaming::StreamProcessor::packetsStopped()

Status in jackd2 package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Started jackd (version 2) with

  jackd -d firewire -r 96000

  and had a Mackie Onyx 

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1665359] Re: apport-gtk crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message()

2017-03-06 Thread David Kastrup
** Information type changed from Private to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1665359

Title:
  apport-gtk crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message()

Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  No further information available.

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
  Package: apport-gtk 2.20.4-0ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.9.0-15.16-lowlatency 4.9.5
  Uname: Linux 4.9.0-15-lowlatency x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.4-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: i386
  CurrentDesktop: MATE
  Date: Thu Feb 16 14:46:52 2017
  ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-14 (1952 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
  InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python3.5
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python3 /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk
  Signal: 6
  SourcePackage: apport
  StacktraceTop:
   g_assertion_message () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   g_assertion_message_expr () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
   ?? () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
   ?? () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
   ?? () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0
  Title: apport-gtk crashed with SIGABRT in g_assertion_message()
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to zesty on 2017-01-05 (41 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout fax floppy lpadmin plugdev 
pulse-access sambashare

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1665359/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1674072] [NEW] fluidsynth crashed with SIGSEGV in jack_port_get_buffer()

2017-03-19 Thread David Kastrup
Public bug reported:

Just tried starting it from the command line with a midi file.  Jack
available but not running at the time I tried this.

I cannot vouch whether this was started with or without pasuspender: I
tried both since without pasuspender fluidsynth (or jack) complained
about Pulseaudio hogging the device.  It could have crashed after the
complaint, or it could have crashed independently without such a
complaint.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
Package: fluidsynth 1.1.6-4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-11.13-lowlatency 4.10.1
Uname: Linux 4.10.0-11-lowlatency x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.4-0ubuntu2
Architecture: i386
CurrentDesktop: MATE
Date: Sun Mar 19 09:28:47 2017
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/fluidsynth
InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-14 (1982 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
ProcCmdline: fluidsynth /home/username/scores/tabber.midi
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0xf72d9194 :mov
0xc(%esi),%edx
 PC (0xf72d9194) ok
 source "0xc(%esi)" (0x000c) not located in a known VMA region (needed 
readable region)!
 destination "%edx" ok
 Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment)
SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: fluidsynth
StacktraceTop:
 jack_port_get_buffer () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libjack.so.0
 fluid_jack_driver_process () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libfluidsynth.so.1
 ?? () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libjack.so.0
 start_thread (arg=0xf6809b40) at pthread_create.c:333
 clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/clone.S:113
Title: fluidsynth crashed with SIGSEGV in jack_port_get_buffer()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to zesty on 2017-01-05 (72 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout fax floppy lpadmin lxd plugdev 
pulse-access sambashare

** Affects: fluidsynth (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Medium
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-crash i386 zesty

** Information type changed from Private to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to fluidsynth in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1674072

Title:
  fluidsynth crashed with SIGSEGV in jack_port_get_buffer()

Status in fluidsynth package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Just tried starting it from the command line with a midi file.  Jack
  available but not running at the time I tried this.

  I cannot vouch whether this was started with or without pasuspender: I
  tried both since without pasuspender fluidsynth (or jack) complained
  about Pulseaudio hogging the device.  It could have crashed after the
  complaint, or it could have crashed independently without such a
  complaint.

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.04
  Package: fluidsynth 1.1.6-4
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-11.13-lowlatency 4.10.1
  Uname: Linux 4.10.0-11-lowlatency x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.4-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: i386
  CurrentDesktop: MATE
  Date: Sun Mar 19 09:28:47 2017
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/fluidsynth
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-14 (1982 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
  ProcCmdline: fluidsynth /home/username/scores/tabber.midi
  SegvAnalysis:
   Segfault happened at: 0xf72d9194 :  mov
0xc(%esi),%edx
   PC (0xf72d9194) ok
   source "0xc(%esi)" (0x000c) not located in a known VMA region (needed 
readable region)!
   destination "%edx" ok
   Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment)
  SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
  Signal: 11
  SourcePackage: fluidsynth
  StacktraceTop:
   jack_port_get_buffer () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libjack.so.0
   fluid_jack_driver_process () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libfluidsynth.so.1
   ?? () from /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libjack.so.0
   start_thread (arg=0xf6809b40) at pthread_create.c:333
   clone () at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/i386/clone.S:113
  Title: fluidsynth crashed with SIGSEGV in jack_port_get_buffer()
  UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to zesty on 2017-01-05 (72 days ago)
  UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout fax floppy lpadmin lxd plugdev 
pulse-access sambashare

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/fluidsynth/+bug/1674072/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1703176] [NEW] jackd assert failure: jackd: rawmidi.c:268: snd_rawmidi_open_conf: Assertion `err >= 0' failed.

2017-07-09 Thread David Kastrup
Public bug reported:

This may or may not be an artifact of me running a 32-bit userland on a
64-bit kernel (for debugging and testing purposes).

However, preceding the command line with "setarch i386" does not help.

The exact command line used was

jackd -d alsa -X raw -d hw:0

To trigger the bug, it is important that there actually is a raw Midi
device available on the system.  Any such device will trigger the
problem in my experience.

Here is the complete output:
jackdmp 1.9.11
Copyright 2001-2005 Paul Davis and others.
Copyright 2004-2014 Grame.
jackdmp comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY
This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
under certain conditions; see the file COPYING for details
no message buffer overruns
no message buffer overruns
no message buffer overruns
JACK server starting in realtime mode with priority 10
self-connect-mode is "Don't restrict self connect requests"
audio_reservation_init
Acquire audio card Audio0
creating alsa driver ... hw:0|hw:0|1024|2|48000|0|0|nomon|swmeter|-|32bit
configuring for 48000Hz, period = 1024 frames (21.3 ms), buffer = 2 periods
ALSA: final selected sample format for capture: 32bit integer little-endian
ALSA: use 2 periods for capture
ALSA: final selected sample format for playback: 32bit integer little-endian
ALSA: use 2 periods for playback
scan: added port hw:1,0,0 in-hw-1-0-0-UM-4-MIDI-1
scan: added port hw:1,0,1 in-hw-1-0-1-UM-4-MIDI-2
scan: added port hw:1,0,2 in-hw-1-0-2-UM-4-MIDI-3
scan: added port hw:1,0,3 in-hw-1-0-3-UM-4-MIDI-4
scan: added port hw:1,0,0 out-hw-1-0-0-UM-4-MIDI-1
scan: added port hw:1,0,1 out-hw-1-0-1-UM-4-MIDI-2
scan: added port hw:1,0,2 out-hw-1-0-2-UM-4-MIDI-3
scan: added port hw:1,0,3 out-hw-1-0-3-UM-4-MIDI-4
ALSA lib rawmidi_hw.c:100:(snd_rawmidi_hw_params) SNDRV_RAWMIDI_IOCTL_PARAMS 
failed: Invalid argument
jackd: rawmidi.c:268: snd_rawmidi_open_conf: Assertion `err >= 0' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
Package: jackd2 1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-2ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-26.30-lowlatency 4.10.17
Uname: Linux 4.10.0-26-lowlatency x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.5-0ubuntu5
Architecture: i386
AssertionMessage: jackd: rawmidi.c:268: snd_rawmidi_open_conf: Assertion `err 
>= 0' failed.
CurrentDesktop: MATE
Date: Sun Jul  9 10:27:38 2017
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/jackd
InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-14 (2094 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
ProcCmdline: jackd -d alsa -X raw -d hw:0
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: jackd2
StacktraceTop:
 __assert_fail_base (fmt=0xf743009c "%s%s%s:%u: %s%sAssertion `%s' 
failed.\n%n", assertion=0xf6f38cd3 "err >= 0", file=0xf6f48d35 "rawmidi.c", 
line=268, function=0xf6f49588 "snd_rawmidi_open_conf") at assert.c:92
 __GI___assert_fail (assertion=0xf6f38cd3 "err >= 0", file=0xf6f48d35 
"rawmidi.c", line=268, function=0xf6f49588 "snd_rawmidi_open_conf") at 
assert.c:101
 () at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libasound.so.2
 () at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libasound.so.2
 snd_rawmidi_open () at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libasound.so.2
Title: jackd assert failure: jackd: rawmidi.c:268: snd_rawmidi_open_conf: 
Assertion `err >= 0' failed.
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to artful on 2017-05-03 (66 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout fax floppy lpadmin lxd plugdev 
pulse-access sambashare

** Affects: jackd2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Medium
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-crash artful i386

** Information type changed from Private to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to jackd2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1703176

Title:
  jackd assert failure: jackd: rawmidi.c:268: snd_rawmidi_open_conf:
  Assertion `err >= 0' failed.

Status in jackd2 package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This may or may not be an artifact of me running a 32-bit userland on
  a 64-bit kernel (for debugging and testing purposes).

  However, preceding the command line with "setarch i386" does not help.

  The exact command line used was

  jackd -d alsa -X raw -d hw:0

  To trigger the bug, it is important that there actually is a raw Midi
  device available on the system.  Any such device will trigger the
  problem in my experience.

  Here is the complete output:
  jackdmp 1.9.11
  Copyright 2001-2005 Paul Davis and others.
  Copyright 2004-2014 Grame.
  jackdmp comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY
  This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
  under certain conditions; see the file COPYING for details
  no message buffer overruns
  no message buffer overruns
  no message buffer overruns
  JACK server starting in realtime mode with priority 10
  self-connect-mode is "Don't restrict self connect requests"
  audio_reservation_init
  Acquire audio card Audio0
  creating alsa driver ... hw:0|hw:0|1024|2|48000|0|0|nomon|swmeter|-|32bit
  configuring for 48000Hz, period

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1703176] Re: jackd assert failure: jackd: rawmidi.c:268: snd_rawmidi_open_conf: Assertion `err >= 0' failed.

2017-07-09 Thread David Kastrup
I think that the problem is likely in

/usr/include/sound/asound.h:625

struct snd_rawmidi_params {
int stream;
size_t buffer_size; /* queue size in bytes */
size_t avail_min;   /* minimum avail bytes for wakeup */
unsigned int no_active_sensing: 1; /* do not send active sensing byte 
in close() */
unsigned char reserved[16]; /* reserved for future use */
};

struct snd_rawmidi_status {
int stream;
struct timespec tstamp; /* Timestamp */
size_t avail;   /* available bytes */
size_t xruns;   /* count of overruns since last status 
(in bytes) */
unsigned char reserved[16]; /* reserved for future use */
};

Here are 4 uses of size_t which will result in different structures for
32-bit and 64-bit compilations even though 32-bit binaries can
communicate with a 64-bit kernel via ioctl.

So this would appear to require fixing in the ALSA headers of the kernel
and recompiling alsa-lib with the changed headers.

I think using unsigned rather than size_t should work fine in this
regard.  However, there are also structures using snd_pcm_uframes_t
which is typedeffed to unsigned long and thus should also be
architecture-dependent.

It's not clear to me why or how the respective ioctl calls would work
for PCM here when running with a 32-bit alsalib/executable and a 64-bit
kernel.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to jackd2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1703176

Title:
  jackd assert failure: jackd: rawmidi.c:268: snd_rawmidi_open_conf:
  Assertion `err >= 0' failed.

Status in jackd2 package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  This may or may not be an artifact of me running a 32-bit userland on
  a 64-bit kernel (for debugging and testing purposes).

  However, preceding the command line with "setarch i386" does not help.

  The exact command line used was

  jackd -d alsa -X raw -d hw:0

  To trigger the bug, it is important that there actually is a raw Midi
  device available on the system.  Any such device will trigger the
  problem in my experience.

  Here is the complete output:
  jackdmp 1.9.11
  Copyright 2001-2005 Paul Davis and others.
  Copyright 2004-2014 Grame.
  jackdmp comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY
  This is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it
  under certain conditions; see the file COPYING for details
  no message buffer overruns
  no message buffer overruns
  no message buffer overruns
  JACK server starting in realtime mode with priority 10
  self-connect-mode is "Don't restrict self connect requests"
  audio_reservation_init
  Acquire audio card Audio0
  creating alsa driver ... hw:0|hw:0|1024|2|48000|0|0|nomon|swmeter|-|32bit
  configuring for 48000Hz, period = 1024 frames (21.3 ms), buffer = 2 periods
  ALSA: final selected sample format for capture: 32bit integer little-endian
  ALSA: use 2 periods for capture
  ALSA: final selected sample format for playback: 32bit integer little-endian
  ALSA: use 2 periods for playback
  scan: added port hw:1,0,0 in-hw-1-0-0-UM-4-MIDI-1
  scan: added port hw:1,0,1 in-hw-1-0-1-UM-4-MIDI-2
  scan: added port hw:1,0,2 in-hw-1-0-2-UM-4-MIDI-3
  scan: added port hw:1,0,3 in-hw-1-0-3-UM-4-MIDI-4
  scan: added port hw:1,0,0 out-hw-1-0-0-UM-4-MIDI-1
  scan: added port hw:1,0,1 out-hw-1-0-1-UM-4-MIDI-2
  scan: added port hw:1,0,2 out-hw-1-0-2-UM-4-MIDI-3
  scan: added port hw:1,0,3 out-hw-1-0-3-UM-4-MIDI-4
  ALSA lib rawmidi_hw.c:100:(snd_rawmidi_hw_params) SNDRV_RAWMIDI_IOCTL_PARAMS 
failed: Invalid argument
  jackd: rawmidi.c:268: snd_rawmidi_open_conf: Assertion `err >= 0' failed.
  Aborted (core dumped)

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
  Package: jackd2 1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-2ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.10.0-26.30-lowlatency 4.10.17
  Uname: Linux 4.10.0-26-lowlatency x86_64
  ApportVersion: 2.20.5-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: i386
  AssertionMessage: jackd: rawmidi.c:268: snd_rawmidi_open_conf: Assertion `err 
>= 0' failed.
  CurrentDesktop: MATE
  Date: Sun Jul  9 10:27:38 2017
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/jackd
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-14 (2094 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
  ProcCmdline: jackd -d alsa -X raw -d hw:0
  Signal: 6
  SourcePackage: jackd2
  StacktraceTop:
   __assert_fail_base (fmt=0xf743009c "%s%s%s:%u: %s%sAssertion `%s' 
failed.\n%n", assertion=0xf6f38cd3 "err >= 0", file=0xf6f48d35 "rawmidi.c", 
line=268, function=0xf6f49588 "snd_rawmidi_open_conf") at assert.c:92
   __GI___assert_fail (assertion=0xf6f38cd3 "err >= 0", file=0xf6f48d35 
"rawmidi.c", line=268, function=0xf6f49588 "snd_rawmidi_open_conf") at 
assert.c:101
   () at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libasound.so.2
   () at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/libasound.so.2
   snd_rawmidi_open () at /usr/lib/i386-linux-gnu/lib

[Touch-packages] [Bug 1705570] [NEW] jackd crashed with SIGSEGV in Streaming::StreamProcessor::packetsStopped()

2017-07-20 Thread David Kastrup
Public bug reported:

Started jackd (version 2) with

jackd -d firewire -r 96000

and had a Mackie Onyx 1620 (with Firewire extension card) and an Alesis
iO|14 connected in series.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
Package: jackd2 1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-2ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.11.0-10.15-lowlatency 4.11.8
Uname: Linux 4.11.0-10-lowlatency i686
ApportVersion: 2.20.5-0ubuntu5
Architecture: i386
CurrentDesktop: MATE
Date: Thu Jul 20 22:22:11 2017
ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/jackd
InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-14 (2106 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
ProcCmdline: jackd -d firewire -r 96000
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0xb5e9df68 
<_ZN9Streaming15StreamProcessor14packetsStoppedEv+16>:movl   
$0x2,0x34(%eax)
 PC (0xb5e9df68) ok
 source "$0x2" ok
 destination "0x34(%eax)" (0x0034) not located in a known VMA region 
(needed writable region)!
SegvReason: writing NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: jackd2
StacktraceTop:
 Streaming::StreamProcessor::packetsStopped() () at /usr/lib/libffado.so.2
 IsoHandlerManager::IsoHandler::disable() () at /usr/lib/libffado.so.2
 IsoHandlerManager::IsoHandler::~IsoHandler() () at /usr/lib/libffado.so.2
 IsoHandlerManager::pruneHandlers() () at /usr/lib/libffado.so.2
 IsoHandlerManager::unregisterStream(Streaming::StreamProcessor*) () at 
/usr/lib/libffado.so.2
Title: jackd crashed with SIGSEGV in 
Streaming::StreamProcessor::packetsStopped()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout fax floppy lpadmin lxd plugdev 
pulse-access sambashare

** Affects: jackd2 (Ubuntu)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: New


** Tags: apport-crash artful i386 need-i386-retrace

** Information type changed from Private to Public

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to jackd2 in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1705570

Title:
  jackd crashed with SIGSEGV in
  Streaming::StreamProcessor::packetsStopped()

Status in jackd2 package in Ubuntu:
  New

Bug description:
  Started jackd (version 2) with

  jackd -d firewire -r 96000

  and had a Mackie Onyx 1620 (with Firewire extension card) and an
  Alesis iO|14 connected in series.

  ProblemType: Crash
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 17.10
  Package: jackd2 1.9.10+20150825git1ed50c92~dfsg-2ubuntu2
  ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.11.0-10.15-lowlatency 4.11.8
  Uname: Linux 4.11.0-10-lowlatency i686
  ApportVersion: 2.20.5-0ubuntu5
  Architecture: i386
  CurrentDesktop: MATE
  Date: Thu Jul 20 22:22:11 2017
  ExecutablePath: /usr/bin/jackd
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2011-10-14 (2106 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release i386 (20111011)
  ProcCmdline: jackd -d firewire -r 96000
  SegvAnalysis:
   Segfault happened at: 0xb5e9df68 
<_ZN9Streaming15StreamProcessor14packetsStoppedEv+16>:  movl   
$0x2,0x34(%eax)
   PC (0xb5e9df68) ok
   source "$0x2" ok
   destination "0x34(%eax)" (0x0034) not located in a known VMA region 
(needed writable region)!
  SegvReason: writing NULL VMA
  Signal: 11
  SourcePackage: jackd2
  StacktraceTop:
   Streaming::StreamProcessor::packetsStopped() () at /usr/lib/libffado.so.2
   IsoHandlerManager::IsoHandler::disable() () at /usr/lib/libffado.so.2
   IsoHandlerManager::IsoHandler::~IsoHandler() () at /usr/lib/libffado.so.2
   IsoHandlerManager::pruneHandlers() () at /usr/lib/libffado.so.2
   IsoHandlerManager::unregisterStream(Streaming::StreamProcessor*) () at 
/usr/lib/libffado.so.2
  Title: jackd crashed with SIGSEGV in 
Streaming::StreamProcessor::packetsStopped()
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
  UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout fax floppy lpadmin lxd plugdev 
pulse-access sambashare

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/jackd2/+bug/1705570/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp