[Touch-packages] [Bug 1039420] Re: NTP security vulnerability because not using authentication by default

2015-03-25 Thread Greg Zaverucha
In response to Sami's comments on ANTP:

The MUST is that if you use RSA, the key length is = 2048 bits.  The
protocol supports any public key encryption scheme, and ECDH is listed
as an option as well. Similarly, AES-CBC+HMAC-SHA is one possible
authenticated encryption scheme. The others you mention would work just
fine as well.

Changing the crypto algorithms wouldn't make the protocol much simpler,
IMO.  If you have suggestions for simplifications (while preserving
ANTP's security) I'd like to hear them.  Simplicity was one of our
design goals, and when compared to the other options referenced in the
paper, I think we succeeded.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039420

Title:
  NTP security vulnerability because not using authentication by default

Status in ntp package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Ubuntu implements so much security one way or another. So much
  defenses against network level man in the middle or malicious proxies
  or wifi hotspots. Cryptographic verification generally works well but
  there is one big drawback: it requires correct date/time.

  NTP in Ubuntu does not use any authentication by default, although it
  is supported by NTP.

  I conclude, that almost no one is using authenticated NTP, because
  there are no instructions in a forum or blog how to enable NTP
  authentication. Therefore almost everyone uses standard configuration
  and is at risk.

  An adversary can tamper with the unauthenticated NTP replies and put
  the users time several years back, especially, but not limited, if the
  bios battery or hardware clock is defect. That issue becomes more
  relevant with new devices like RP, which do not even have a hardware
  clock.

  Putting the clock several years back allows an adversary to use
  already revoked, broken, expired certificates; replay old, broken,
  outdated, known vulnerable updates etc.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/1039420/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1039420] Re: NTP security vulnerability because not using authentication by default

2015-02-28 Thread Sami Farin
Authenticated Network Time Synchronization
Benjamin Dowling and Douglas Stebila and Greg Zaverucha
https://eprint.iacr.org/2015/171
http://research.microsoft.com/apps/pubs/?id=240885

Some silly MUSTs, like RSA = 2048 bits..
And instead of e.g. AES-CBC+HMAC-SHA why not NORX or something simple
https://norx.io/
or chacha20-poly1305.. and of course
git://github.com/agl/curve25519-donna.git
...well Microsoft can use 4096 bit RSA for all I care, but does someone want to 
start a Simple ANTP project?

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039420

Title:
  NTP security vulnerability because not using authentication by default

Status in ntp package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Ubuntu implements so much security one way or another. So much
  defenses against network level man in the middle or malicious proxies
  or wifi hotspots. Cryptographic verification generally works well but
  there is one big drawback: it requires correct date/time.

  NTP in Ubuntu does not use any authentication by default, although it
  is supported by NTP.

  I conclude, that almost no one is using authenticated NTP, because
  there are no instructions in a forum or blog how to enable NTP
  authentication. Therefore almost everyone uses standard configuration
  and is at risk.

  An adversary can tamper with the unauthenticated NTP replies and put
  the users time several years back, especially, but not limited, if the
  bios battery or hardware clock is defect. That issue becomes more
  relevant with new devices like RP, which do not even have a hardware
  clock.

  Putting the clock several years back allows an adversary to use
  already revoked, broken, expired certificates; replay old, broken,
  outdated, known vulnerable updates etc.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/1039420/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1039420] Re: NTP security vulnerability because not using authentication by default

2014-12-20 Thread Hanno Böck
Has Ubuntu considered using tlsdate instead of ntp? I think it's the
only working secure solution right now.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039420

Title:
  NTP security vulnerability because not using authentication by default

Status in ntp package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Ubuntu implements so much security one way or another. So much
  defenses against network level man in the middle or malicious proxies
  or wifi hotspots. Cryptographic verification generally works well but
  there is one big drawback: it requires correct date/time.

  NTP in Ubuntu does not use any authentication by default, although it
  is supported by NTP.

  I conclude, that almost no one is using authenticated NTP, because
  there are no instructions in a forum or blog how to enable NTP
  authentication. Therefore almost everyone uses standard configuration
  and is at risk.

  An adversary can tamper with the unauthenticated NTP replies and put
  the users time several years back, especially, but not limited, if the
  bios battery or hardware clock is defect. That issue becomes more
  relevant with new devices like RP, which do not even have a hardware
  clock.

  Putting the clock several years back allows an adversary to use
  already revoked, broken, expired certificates; replay old, broken,
  outdated, known vulnerable updates etc.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/1039420/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1039420] Re: NTP security vulnerability because not using authentication by default

2014-10-22 Thread Marc Deslauriers
Unfortunately, ntp autokey is broken and insecure, it can't be used to
provide any additional security.

http://zero-entropy.de/autokey_analysis.pdf

The only solution for the moment is for system administrators to set up
their own symmetric keys with their own ntp server.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039420

Title:
  NTP security vulnerability because not using authentication by default

Status in “ntp” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Ubuntu implements so much security one way or another. So much
  defenses against network level man in the middle or malicious proxies
  or wifi hotspots. Cryptographic verification generally works well but
  there is one big drawback: it requires correct date/time.

  NTP in Ubuntu does not use any authentication by default, although it
  is supported by NTP.

  I conclude, that almost no one is using authenticated NTP, because
  there are no instructions in a forum or blog how to enable NTP
  authentication. Therefore almost everyone uses standard configuration
  and is at risk.

  An adversary can tamper with the unauthenticated NTP replies and put
  the users time several years back, especially, but not limited, if the
  bios battery or hardware clock is defect. That issue becomes more
  relevant with new devices like RP, which do not even have a hardware
  clock.

  Putting the clock several years back allows an adversary to use
  already revoked, broken, expired certificates; replay old, broken,
  outdated, known vulnerable updates etc.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/1039420/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1039420] Re: NTP security vulnerability because not using authentication by default

2014-10-17 Thread Matthijs ten Kate
So, any updates on this issue now that it has become clear it can be
severely abused?

See:
https://www.blackhat.com/docs/eu-14/materials/eu-14-Selvi-Bypassing-HTTP-Strict-Transport-Security-wp.pdf

At least crank up the importance a bit...

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ntp in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1039420

Title:
  NTP security vulnerability because not using authentication by default

Status in “ntp” package in Ubuntu:
  Confirmed

Bug description:
  Ubuntu implements so much security one way or another. So much
  defenses against network level man in the middle or malicious proxies
  or wifi hotspots. Cryptographic verification generally works well but
  there is one big drawback: it requires correct date/time.

  NTP in Ubuntu does not use any authentication by default, although it
  is supported by NTP.

  I conclude, that almost no one is using authenticated NTP, because
  there are no instructions in a forum or blog how to enable NTP
  authentication. Therefore almost everyone uses standard configuration
  and is at risk.

  An adversary can tamper with the unauthenticated NTP replies and put
  the users time several years back, especially, but not limited, if the
  bios battery or hardware clock is defect. That issue becomes more
  relevant with new devices like RP, which do not even have a hardware
  clock.

  Putting the clock several years back allows an adversary to use
  already revoked, broken, expired certificates; replay old, broken,
  outdated, known vulnerable updates etc.

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ntp/+bug/1039420/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp