[Touch-packages] [Bug 1278780] Re: [Ubuntu-phone] BQ r23 total off and unwilling to react

2015-06-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 02:48:01PM +0200, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> seems that whoopsie refuses to send your report because you are not on
> wifi, perhaps it should check for this earlier and not even run the
> collection, not sure ... 

The only part that should be running when not on wifi is the crash
collection.  We certainly *should* be running that when not on wifi; you
don't get a second chance to run the kernel crash handler, and we want to
know about crashes that only happen when not on wifi (including, possibly,
crashes that happen /because/ you're not on wifi).

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 02:19:10PM +0100, Alan Pope wrote:

> Also, related to the discussion:-
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apport/+bug/1278780

The trouble is that, until the crash handler has finished consuming the
core file from the kernel and exited, the original process is blocked.  So
the shell can't know that the process has died and move on until the crash
handler has finished running.  (The same is true on the desktop, it's just
less impactful because the app is usually not full screen and blocking the
UI at the time.)

We have already taken steps to minimize the amount of processing done on the
core file as part of the apport crash handler, in favor of post-processing
the crash file from a queue.  It's not clear what further optimization of
the crash handler is possible.

On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 02:39:04PM +0200, Oliver Grawert wrote:
> hi,
> Am Montag, den 22.06.2015, 14:28 +0200 schrieb Marco F:

> > Who decided that collection of debug information is the task with
> > highest priority on a phone which wishes to be used by the public?

> i think it already runs at a very low prio (obviously still to high for
> the phone though ... )

Running it with a low priority would NOT improve the user experience.  It
would just cause the app to hang longer in an unkillable, memory-consuming
state.

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1278780

Title:
  apport takes too long to write crash report, appears to lock up phone

Status in Apport crash detection/reporting:
  Confirmed
Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  I can trigger a crash easily on my phone via bug 1262711. Other bugs
  are available.

  When that happens my phone appears to freeze. I am unable to do
  anything for approximately 1 to 1.5 minutes. As a user my initial gut
  reaction is to reboot the phone, thus losing the crash report, and
  wasting my time.

  Having the phone lock up for 1.5 minutes is a terrible user
  experience. Can we fix/mitigate/workaround that?

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: apport 2.13.2-0ubuntu2
  Uname: Linux 3.4.0-3-mako armv7l
  ApportVersion: 2.13.2-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: armhf
  CrashReports:
   664:32011:110:10083:2014-02-10 15:41:18.152893384 +:2014-02-10 
15:11:09.169231740 
+:/var/crash/_usr_lib_arm-linux-gnueabihf_upstart-app-launch_desktop-hook.32011.crash
   640:0:110:1681527:2014-02-10 15:12:10.985193887 +:2014-02-10 
15:12:05.639489630 +:/var/crash/_usr_bin_powerd.0.crash
   640:0:110:21384:2014-02-11 07:58:44.876281991 +:2014-02-11 
07:58:44.876281991 +:/var/crash/_usr_sbin_system-image-dbus.0.crash
   640:32011:110:17122318:2014-02-11 09:19:49.915478726 +:2014-02-11 
09:18:20.850439824 +:/var/crash/_usr_bin_unity8.32011.crash
  Date: Tue Feb 11 09:20:15 2014
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-02-11 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu Trusty Tahr (development branch) - armhf (20140211)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=linux
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: apport
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/1278780/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1278780] Re: [Ubuntu-phone] BQ r23 total off and unwilling to react

2015-06-22 Thread Torsten Sachse
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, Steve Langasek wrote:
> The only part that should be running when not on wifi is the crash
> collection.  We certainly *should* be running that when not on wifi; you
> don't get a second chance to run the kernel crash handler, and we want to
> know about crashes that only happen when not on wifi (including, possibly,
> crashes that happen /because/ you're not on wifi).

While that may be true, there has to be an option to switch off such crash
collection permanently or temporarily. This must not be enforced on the user,
which is the way it is right now, if I understood all this correctly. Not only
because some people might not feel comfortable with this informationbeing sent
before they can review it.

> The trouble is that, until the crash handler has finished consuming the core
> file from the kernel and exited, the original process is blocked.  So the
> shell can't know that the process has died and move on until the crash
> handler has finished running.  (The same is true on the desktop, it's just
> less impactful because the app is usually not full screen and blocking the UI
> at the time.)

Thanks for the explanation. To me, this is just all the more reason to have an
option to disable it, maybe only for a day or a couple. Imagine being somewhere
and urgently needing your phone which then hangs because some crash logs are
being collected? The app that crashed might not even be the one you urgently
need. Crash collection should, imho, not take precedence over the dialog to
accept a call as this is still the main functionaly of a phone, at least for
me.

Cheers,
Torsten

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1278780

Title:
  apport takes too long to write crash report, appears to lock up phone

Status in Apport crash detection/reporting:
  Confirmed
Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  I can trigger a crash easily on my phone via bug 1262711. Other bugs
  are available.

  When that happens my phone appears to freeze. I am unable to do
  anything for approximately 1 to 1.5 minutes. As a user my initial gut
  reaction is to reboot the phone, thus losing the crash report, and
  wasting my time.

  Having the phone lock up for 1.5 minutes is a terrible user
  experience. Can we fix/mitigate/workaround that?

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: apport 2.13.2-0ubuntu2
  Uname: Linux 3.4.0-3-mako armv7l
  ApportVersion: 2.13.2-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: armhf
  CrashReports:
   664:32011:110:10083:2014-02-10 15:41:18.152893384 +:2014-02-10 
15:11:09.169231740 
+:/var/crash/_usr_lib_arm-linux-gnueabihf_upstart-app-launch_desktop-hook.32011.crash
   640:0:110:1681527:2014-02-10 15:12:10.985193887 +:2014-02-10 
15:12:05.639489630 +:/var/crash/_usr_bin_powerd.0.crash
   640:0:110:21384:2014-02-11 07:58:44.876281991 +:2014-02-11 
07:58:44.876281991 +:/var/crash/_usr_sbin_system-image-dbus.0.crash
   640:32011:110:17122318:2014-02-11 09:19:49.915478726 +:2014-02-11 
09:18:20.850439824 +:/var/crash/_usr_bin_unity8.32011.crash
  Date: Tue Feb 11 09:20:15 2014
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-02-11 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu Trusty Tahr (development branch) - armhf (20140211)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=linux
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: apport
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/1278780/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1278780] Re: [Ubuntu-phone] BQ r23 total off and unwilling to react

2015-06-22 Thread Steve Langasek
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 08:21:44PM +0200, Torsten Sachse wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, Steve Langasek wrote:
> >The only part that should be running when not on wifi is the crash
> >collection.  We certainly *should* be running that when not on wifi; you
> >don't get a second chance to run the kernel crash handler, and we want to
> >know about crashes that only happen when not on wifi (including, possibly,
> >crashes that happen /because/ you're not on wifi).

> While that may be true, there has to be an option to switch off such crash
> collection permanently or temporarily.

There is an option, and there is reportedly a bug in the handling of that
option, as was already mentioned in this thread.

  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whoopsie-
preferences/+bug/1437633

I was responding to the suggestion that the behavior should somehow be
dependent on whether the device is connected to wifi at the time of the
crash.  That's just wrong.

> >The trouble is that, until the crash handler has finished consuming the core
> >file from the kernel and exited, the original process is blocked.  So the
> >shell can't know that the process has died and move on until the crash
> >handler has finished running.  (The same is true on the desktop, it's just
> >less impactful because the app is usually not full screen and blocking the UI
> >at the time.)

> Thanks for the explanation. To me, this is just all the more reason to
> have an option to disable it, maybe only for a day or a couple.  Imagine
> being somewhere and urgently needing your phone which then hangs because
> some crash logs are being collected?  The app that crashed might not even
> be the one you urgently need.  Crash collection should, imho, not take
> precedence over the dialog to accept a call as this is still the main
> functionaly of a phone, at least for me.

While the shell can't do anything with the crashed app until the crash
handler has finished, that *shouldn't* mean that it prevents the shell from,
e.g., switching apps.  This is why people were asking about crash files for
unity8.  It's unexpected that a crashed app should take out the /whole/ UI,
and if that happens that's a bug in unity8, not just a bug in the app that's
crashing.

-- 
Steve Langasek   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer   to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com vor...@debian.org

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1278780

Title:
  apport takes too long to write crash report, appears to lock up phone

Status in Apport crash detection/reporting:
  Confirmed
Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  I can trigger a crash easily on my phone via bug 1262711. Other bugs
  are available.

  When that happens my phone appears to freeze. I am unable to do
  anything for approximately 1 to 1.5 minutes. As a user my initial gut
  reaction is to reboot the phone, thus losing the crash report, and
  wasting my time.

  Having the phone lock up for 1.5 minutes is a terrible user
  experience. Can we fix/mitigate/workaround that?

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: apport 2.13.2-0ubuntu2
  Uname: Linux 3.4.0-3-mako armv7l
  ApportVersion: 2.13.2-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: armhf
  CrashReports:
   664:32011:110:10083:2014-02-10 15:41:18.152893384 +:2014-02-10 
15:11:09.169231740 
+:/var/crash/_usr_lib_arm-linux-gnueabihf_upstart-app-launch_desktop-hook.32011.crash
   640:0:110:1681527:2014-02-10 15:12:10.985193887 +:2014-02-10 
15:12:05.639489630 +:/var/crash/_usr_bin_powerd.0.crash
   640:0:110:21384:2014-02-11 07:58:44.876281991 +:2014-02-11 
07:58:44.876281991 +:/var/crash/_usr_sbin_system-image-dbus.0.crash
   640:32011:110:17122318:2014-02-11 09:19:49.915478726 +:2014-02-11 
09:18:20.850439824 +:/var/crash/_usr_bin_unity8.32011.crash
  Date: Tue Feb 11 09:20:15 2014
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-02-11 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu Trusty Tahr (development branch) - armhf (20140211)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=linux
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: apport
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/1278780/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp


[Touch-packages] [Bug 1278780] Re: [Ubuntu-phone] BQ r23 total off and unwilling to react

2015-06-22 Thread Torsten Sachse
On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, Oliver Grawert wrote:
>Am Montag, den 22.06.2015, 20:21 +0200 schrieb Torsten Sachse:
>> On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, Steve Langasek wrote:
>> > The only part that should be running when not on wifi is the crash
>> > collection.  We certainly *should* be running that when not on
>> > wifi; you don't get a second chance to run the kernel crash
>> > handler, and we want to know about crashes that only happen when
>> > not on wifi (including, possibly, crashes that happen /because/
>> > you're not on wifi).
>> 
>> While that may be true, there has to be an option to switch off such
>> crash collection permanently or temporarily. This must not be
>> enforced on the user, which is the way it is right now, if I
>> understood all this correctly. 
>
>there is a bug, bugs happen, people make mistakes  ... you make it
>sound like this is intentional ...

I know that people make mistakes as I just made a stupid one myself. To
me, Steve's email sounded as if it was intentional due to the
highlighted "should" which I misunderstood as a "must". I know now that
I completely missed the point of the message.

On Mon, 22 Jun 2015, Steve Langasek wrote:
> There is an option, and there is reportedly a bug in the handling of
> that option, as was already mentioned in this thread.
>  https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/whoopsie-preferences/+bug/1437633

Thank you for the link, I must have overlooked that one somehow. Sorry
for that. However, I can confirm that the option sticks after making the
system writable. Actually, after remounting / as ro again, the option
can no longer be switched on (consistent which what's decribed in the
above thread).

> I was responding to the suggestion that the behavior should somehow be
> dependent on whether the device is connected to wifi at the time of
> the crash.  That's just wrong.

I completely agree. The data should either be collected or not at all,
irrespective of the current network connectivity.

> While the shell can't do anything with the crashed app until the crash
> handler has finished, that *shouldn't* mean that it prevents the shell
> from, e.g., switching apps.  This is why people were asking about
> crash files for unity8.  It's unexpected that a crashed app should
> take out the /whole/ UI, and if that happens that's a bug in unity8,
> not just a bug in the app that's crashing.

Thanks for all the information.

Cheers,
Torsten

-- 
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apport in Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1278780

Title:
  apport takes too long to write crash report, appears to lock up phone

Status in Apport crash detection/reporting:
  Confirmed
Status in apport package in Ubuntu:
  Triaged

Bug description:
  I can trigger a crash easily on my phone via bug 1262711. Other bugs
  are available.

  When that happens my phone appears to freeze. I am unable to do
  anything for approximately 1 to 1.5 minutes. As a user my initial gut
  reaction is to reboot the phone, thus losing the crash report, and
  wasting my time.

  Having the phone lock up for 1.5 minutes is a terrible user
  experience. Can we fix/mitigate/workaround that?

  ProblemType: Bug
  DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
  Package: apport 2.13.2-0ubuntu2
  Uname: Linux 3.4.0-3-mako armv7l
  ApportVersion: 2.13.2-0ubuntu2
  Architecture: armhf
  CrashReports:
   664:32011:110:10083:2014-02-10 15:41:18.152893384 +:2014-02-10 
15:11:09.169231740 
+:/var/crash/_usr_lib_arm-linux-gnueabihf_upstart-app-launch_desktop-hook.32011.crash
   640:0:110:1681527:2014-02-10 15:12:10.985193887 +:2014-02-10 
15:12:05.639489630 +:/var/crash/_usr_bin_powerd.0.crash
   640:0:110:21384:2014-02-11 07:58:44.876281991 +:2014-02-11 
07:58:44.876281991 +:/var/crash/_usr_sbin_system-image-dbus.0.crash
   640:32011:110:17122318:2014-02-11 09:19:49.915478726 +:2014-02-11 
09:18:20.850439824 +:/var/crash/_usr_bin_unity8.32011.crash
  Date: Tue Feb 11 09:20:15 2014
  InstallationDate: Installed on 2014-02-11 (0 days ago)
  InstallationMedia: Ubuntu Trusty Tahr (development branch) - armhf (20140211)
  PackageArchitecture: all
  ProcEnviron:
   TERM=linux
   PATH=(custom, no user)
   XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=
   SHELL=/bin/bash
  SourcePackage: apport
  UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/apport/+bug/1278780/+subscriptions

-- 
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages
More help   : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp