[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Canonical System Image: Fix Released Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu RTM: Fix Released Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-ui-toolkit - 1.3.1984+16.10.20160527.2 --- ubuntu-ui-toolkit (1.3.1984+16.10.20160527.2) yakkety; urgency=medium [ Christian Dywan ] * Slimmer frame for TextFields: 0.5dp. Fixes LP: #1578190. [ Albert Astals Cid ] * Add override The override specifier (since C++11) specifies that a virtual function overrides another virtual function. In a member function declaration or definition, override ensures that the function is virtual and is overriding a virtual function from the base class. [ Tim Peeters ] * Fix reference error in PullToRefreshStyle. Fixes LP: #1582843 * Mark Tab, Tabs, TabBar, PageHeadConfiguration, PageHeadSections, PageHeadState, ToolbarButton, ToolbarItems as deprecated in the documentation. Fixes LP: #1566735, LP: #1566741. [ CI Train Bot ] * Resync trunk. -- Zoltan Balogh Fri, 27 May 2016 07:08:44 + ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Canonical System Image: Fix Committed Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu RTM: Fix Released Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu RTM) Assignee: (unassigned) => Tim Peeters (tpeeters) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Canonical System Image: Fix Committed Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu RTM: Fix Released Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Canonical System Image: Fix Committed Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu RTM: Fix Released Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
This bug was fixed in the package ubuntu-ui-toolkit 1.3.1938+15.04.20160412 in https://launchpad.net/~ci-train-ppa- service/+archive/ubuntu/stable-phone-overlay --- ubuntu-ui-toolkit (1.3.1938+15.04.20160412) vivid; urgency=medium [ Tim Peeters ] * Hide the PageStack back button when depth == 1. Fixes LP: #1565811 * Add header subtitle. Fixes LP: #1399289 * Reveal the header in gallery when changing the layout to two columns. Fixes LP: #1556860 * Set correct colors for disabled actions in the header. Fixes LP: #1393485 * Disable tst_datepicker.qml to unblock the staging.Fixes LP: #1567840 * Prevent invisible header from setting the flickable topMargin. Fixes LP: #1560419, LP: #1560458, LP: #1566231. [ Zsombor Egri ] * Move MouseTouchAdaptor into UbuntuToolkit library. Fix adaptor code for Xenial. Fixes LP: #1561436 [ Christian Dywan ] * Don't use a separate argument to distinguish touch events. If it's touch, it has our overloaded methods. Fixes LP: #1530802 * Use export_qml_dir.sh in qmlapicheck and runtest Also add Usage to runtest. Fixes LP: #1567286. * Summary style error results with sections. Fixes LP: #1568804 [ Andrea Bernabei ] * Mouse filter: check if mouse is inside the area on mouse moves and setHovered accordingly. Fixes LP: #1566378. [ Timo Jyrinki ] * Add latest changes for GLES. * Add back Provides: qtdeclarative5-ubuntu-ui-toolkit-plugin to resolve upgrade issue. Fixes LP: #1568817 * Fix wrapper script auto-generated by Qt that incorrectly tries to execute itself. Fixes LP: #156 * bileto_convert_to_gles: sort and add qml-module-ubuntu-performancemetrics-gles.install. Fixes LP: #1569217 * Add additional Breaks as requested by archive admin. * Add latest changes for GLES. [ Zolán Balogh ] * Fix the UITK test plan script. [ CI Train Bot ] * Resync trunk. added: examples/ubuntu-ui-toolkit-gallery/po/nb.po [ Robert Park ] * Inline GLES packaging. added: debian/bileto_convert_to_gles debian/control.gles debian/rules.gles -- Zoltan Balogh Tue, 12 Apr 2016 11:12:44 + ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu RTM) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Canonical System Image: In Progress Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu RTM: Fix Released Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu RTM) Status: New => Fix Committed ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu RTM) Importance: Undecided => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Canonical System Image: In Progress Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu RTM: Fix Committed Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
** Also affects: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu RTM) Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Also affects: canonical-devices-system-image Importance: Undecided Status: New ** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Assignee: (unassigned) => Zoltan Balogh (bzoltan) ** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Importance: Undecided => High ** Changed in: canonical-devices-system-image Milestone: None => 11 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Canonical System Image: New Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu RTM: New Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: Fix Committed Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Importance: Medium => High -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: In Progress Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
** Branch linked: lp:~tpeeters/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/disabledActions -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: In Progress Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
** Branch unlinked: lp:~tpeeters/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/subtitle -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: In Progress Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
** Branch linked: lp:~tpeeters/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/subtitle -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: In Progress Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
I re-open this bug, because even though for the icon buttons the color is updated when the icon is disabled, icons in the PageHeader currently always have the foregroundColor of the PageHeader so disabled buttons cannot be distinguished from enabled buttons. ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: Fix Released => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: In Progress Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
** Changed in: ubuntu-ux Assignee: Jamie Young (jamiedawsonyoung) => Femma (femma) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
(fixed by the new palette) ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: In Progress => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
The new palette already takes care of the reduced opacity of the icons in the header. For the Icon component itself, I will not change the opacity automatically, because that may conflict with opacities set in other components that use the Icon, as would be the case with the buttons in the header. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
After the recent changes to the UITK we noticed that the enabled property on header actions doesn't work any more and we have to use the visible property. This means that disabled header actions are now hidden from the user until they can be used, heavily reducing their discoverability. For example (in the music-app), if I press'n'hold over an item in a list it turns into multiselect mode, before in the header you could see the greyed out actions informing the user what could be done once they select an item, such as add to queue, add to playlist etc. Now the user has to perform an extra step of selecting an item in the list to be informed what they can do with it. This slows down the user, reduces their confidence in finding features and causes confusion in trying to find header actions as they appear in much less cases now. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: In Progress Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
@nik90 right, this should also apply to header icons. Actually, with the latest palette update that was taken care of, but I need to make sure that the opacity is not multiplied with 0.3 twice (once from the icon, once from the palette) for disabled header icons. That also makes me think that perhaps the icon itself should never change its opacity, but the component that uses the icon should set it for all its contents. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: In Progress Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
** Branch linked: lp:~tpeeters/ubuntu-ui-toolkit/icon-disabled -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: In Progress Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
@tpeeters Does this also apply to the header icons as well that cannot visually be distinguished between active and disabled icons? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: In Progress Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
@zsombi, for the Labels, please report a separate bug. ** Changed in: ubuntu-ui-toolkit (Ubuntu) Status: Triaged => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: In Progress Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
For Icons, you often set the color explicitly (to override the keyColor in the image), so I'm not sure we can use the different palette color for this. Using 0.3 opacity can be done though. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
Same goes for the Labels too. So in general, we need to set different colors for components when they are disabled. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
** Description changed: + [Updated description] + Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer + + ––– + + Desired solution: + + Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be + consistent with our disabled states on buttons. -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: [Updated description] Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer ––– Desired solution: Adjust the opacity to 30% (0.3) for all disabled icons. This will be consistent with our disabled states on buttons. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
** Changed in: ubuntu-ux Assignee: Jouni Helminen (jounihelminen) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: ubuntu-ux Assignee: (unassigned) => Jamie Young (jamiedawsonyoung) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
** Changed in: ubuntu-ux Assignee: Giorgio Venturi (giorgio-venturi) => (unassigned) ** Changed in: ubuntu-ux Assignee: (unassigned) => Jouni Helminen (jounihelminen) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX bugs: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
Disabled icons in the standard list items currently have an opacity of 0.5. Do you want to change that to 0.3 as well? -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX bugs: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1393485] Re: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled
** Summary changed: - Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled + [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to ubuntu-ui-toolkit in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1393485 Title: [SDK] Need a standard way to make an Icon look disabled Status in Ubuntu UX bugs: Fix Committed Status in ubuntu-ui-toolkit package in Ubuntu: Triaged Bug description: Right now if one wants to use an Icon inside a ListItem.Empty or any other AbstractButton derived class, and disable the item, there is no standard way to make the Icon look disabled without directly affecting its opacity and/or colorization. Haviing a standard way to do this would help promoting consistency in the UI. --- UX Solution --- Agreed. Disabled icons should have 30% opacity by default, but that can be changed by the App developer To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-ux/+bug/1393485/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
