[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Trusty) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Cosmic) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Disco) Importance: Undecided => Wishlist -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Status in apt source package in Trusty: New Status in apt source package in Xenial: New Status in apt source package in Bionic: New Status in apt source package in Cosmic: New Status in apt source package in Disco: New Bug description: From APT src code : --- * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Bionic and late in APT points to Xenial which generate the doc example with Xenial instead of the actual codename. * ./doc/sources.list.5.xml | grep -i verbatim --- %aptverbatiment; --- It also seems to affect the man page by mentionning 'xenial' for Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1812696/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
juliank will include the ubuntu-codename variable change in his next SRU later this week. Thanks Juliank ! ** Tags added: sts ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Trusty) Status: New => Invalid ** Description changed: From APT src code : - --- - * trusty: - apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: + --- + [GOOD ubuntu-codename] + * trusty: + apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: - * xenial: - apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: + [WRONG ubuntu-codename] + * xenial: + apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: - * bionic: - apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: + * bionic: + apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: - * disco: - apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: - --- + * disco: + apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: + --- - * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in - --- - # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information - # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. - deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted - deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted + * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in + --- + # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information + # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. + deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted + deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted - deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted - deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted + deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted + deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted - deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted - deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted - --- + deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted + deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted + --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Bionic and late in APT points to Xenial which generate the doc example with Xenial instead of the actual codename. - * ./doc/sources.list.5.xml | grep -i verbatim - --- - %aptverbatiment; - --- + * ./doc/sources.list.5.xml | grep -i verbatim + --- + %aptverbatiment; + --- It also seems to affect the man page by mentionning 'xenial' for Bionic: - http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html + http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Status in apt source package in Trusty: Invalid Status in apt source package in Xenial: New Status in apt source package in Bionic: New Status in apt source package in Cosmic: New Status in apt source package in Disco: New Bug description: From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Bionic and late in APT points to Xenial which generate the doc example with Xenial instead of the actual codename. * ./doc/sources.list.5.xml | grep -i verbatim --- %aptverbatiment; --- It also seems to affect the man page by mentionning 'xenial'. Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/+bug/1812696/+subscriptions -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages Post to : touch-packages@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~touch-packages More h
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
** Description changed: From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Bionic and late in APT points to Xenial which generate the doc example with Xenial instead of the actual codename. * ./doc/sources.list.5.xml | grep -i verbatim --- %aptverbatiment; --- - It also seems to affect the man page by mentionning 'xenial' for Bionic: + It also seems to affect the man page by mentionning 'xenial'. Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html ** Description changed: From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Bionic and late in APT points to Xenial which generate the doc example with Xenial instead of the actual codename. * ./doc/sources.list.5.xml | grep -i verbatim --- %aptverbatiment; --- - It also seems to affect the man page by mentionning 'xenial'. Example took from Bionic: + It also seems to affect the man page by mentionning 'xenial'. + Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: New Status in apt source package in Trusty: Invalid Status in apt source package in Xenial: New Status in apt source package in Bionic: New Status in apt source package in Cosmic: New Status in apt source package in Disco: New Bug description: [Impact] From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Bionic and late in APT points to Xenial which generate the doc example with Xenial instead of the actual codename. * ./doc/sources.list.5.xml | grep -i verbatim --- %aptverbatiment; --- It also seems to affect the man page by mentionning 'xenial'. Example took from Bionic: http:/
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
** Description changed: + [Impact] + From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Bionic and late in APT points to Xenial which generate the doc example with Xenial instead of the actual codename. * ./doc/sources.list.5.xml | grep -i verbatim --- %aptverbatiment; --- - It also seems to affect the man page by mentionning 'xenial'. + It also seems to affect the man page by mentionning 'xenial'. Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html + + + [Test Case] + + With Bionic and late : + + * Look sources.list(5) manpage + http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html + + * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage + http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html + + * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list + + $ lsb_release -cs + bionic + + $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list + + # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information + # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. + deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted + deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted + + deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted + deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted + + deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted + deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted + -- + + You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. + + While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I + think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpages + reference the current release. + + [Regression Potential] + + * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior + change in the code APT code. + + [Other Info] + + [Original Description] + From APT src code : + + --- + [GOOD ubuntu-codename] + * trusty: + apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: + + [WRONG ubuntu-codename] + * xenial: + apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: + + * bionic: + apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: + + * disco: + apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: + --- + + * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in + --- + # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information + # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. + deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted + deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted + + deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted + deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted + + deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted + deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted + --- + + The ubuntu-codename variable for Bionic and late in APT points to Xenial + which generate the doc example with Xenial instead of the actual + codename. + + * ./doc/sources.list.5.xml | grep -i verbatim + --- + %aptverbatiment; + --- + + It also seems to affect the man page by mentionning 'xenial'. + Example took from Bionic: + http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html + http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html ** Description changed: [Impact] From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool.
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
** Description changed: [Impact] - From APT src code : + APT documentation/example/manpages isn't referencing the current release + which could be misleading for certain users. --- + APT src code: + --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] + * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] + * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- - The ubuntu-codename variable for Bionic and late in APT points to Xenial - which generate the doc example with Xenial instead of the actual - codename. And Xenial point to 'trusty'. + The ubuntu-codename variable for Xenial and late in APT points to + 'trusty or 'xenial' which generate the doc example & manpage with the + wrong release instead of the actual ubuntu-codename. - * ./doc/sources.list.5.xml | grep -i verbatim - --- - %aptverbatiment; - --- + APT in Xenial point to 'trusty'. + APT in Bionic and late to 'xenial' - It also seems to affect the man page by mentionning 'xenial'. + It also affect the man page: + Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html [Test Case] - With Bionic and late (or Xenial) : + With Xenial and late: * Look sources.list(5) manpage + Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage - http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html + Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list $ lsb_release -cs bionic $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted -- You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. - While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I - think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpages - reference the current release. + While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... + I think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpage reference the current release. [Regression Potential] * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior change in the APT code. [Other Info] [Original Description] From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Bionic and late in APT points to Xenial which generate the doc example with Xenial instead of the actual codename. * ./doc/sources.list.5.xml | grep -i verbatim --- %aptverbatiment; --- It also seems to affect the man page by mentionning 'xenia
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Disco) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: In Progress Status in apt source package in Trusty: Invalid Status in apt source package in Xenial: New Status in apt source package in Bionic: New Status in apt source package in Cosmic: New Status in apt source package in Disco: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] APT documentation/example/manpages isn't referencing the current release which could be misleading for certain users. --- APT src code: --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Xenial and late in APT points to 'trusty or 'xenial' which generate the doc example & manpage with the wrong release instead of the actual ubuntu-codename. APT in Xenial point to 'trusty'. APT in Bionic and late to 'xenial' It also affect the man page: Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html [Test Case] With Xenial and late: * Look sources.list(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list $ lsb_release -cs bionic $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted -- You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpage reference the current release. [Regression Potential] * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior change in the APT code. [Other Info] [Original Description] From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Bionic and late in APT points to Xenial which generate the doc example with Xenial instead of the actual codename. * ./doc/sources.list.5.xml | grep -i verbatim --- %aptverbatiment; --- It also seems to affect the man page by mentionning 'xenial'. Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.c
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Cosmic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial) Assignee: (unassigned) => Julian Andres Klode (juliank) ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Cosmic) Status: New => In Progress ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: New => In Progress -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: In Progress Status in apt source package in Trusty: Invalid Status in apt source package in Xenial: In Progress Status in apt source package in Bionic: In Progress Status in apt source package in Cosmic: In Progress Status in apt source package in Disco: In Progress Bug description: [Impact] APT documentation/example/manpages isn't referencing the current release which could be misleading for certain users. --- APT src code: --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Xenial and late in APT points to 'trusty or 'xenial' which generate the doc example & manpage with the wrong release instead of the actual ubuntu-codename. APT in Xenial point to 'trusty'. APT in Bionic and late to 'xenial' It also affect the man page: Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html [Test Case] With Xenial and late: * Look sources.list(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list $ lsb_release -cs bionic $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted -- You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpage reference the current release. [Regression Potential] * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior change in the APT code. [Other Info] [Original Description] From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
** Description changed: [Impact] APT documentation/example/manpages isn't referencing the current release which could be misleading for certain users. --- APT src code: --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Xenial and late in APT points to 'trusty or 'xenial' which generate the doc example & manpage with the wrong release instead of the actual ubuntu-codename. APT in Xenial point to 'trusty'. APT in Bionic and late to 'xenial' It also affect the man page: Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html [Test Case] With Xenial and late: * Look sources.list(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list $ lsb_release -cs bionic $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted -- You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. - While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... + While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpage reference the current release. [Regression Potential] * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior change in the APT code. [Other Info] [Original Description] From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Bionic and late in APT points to Xenial which generate the doc example with Xenial instead of the actual codename. - * ./doc/sources.list.5.xml | grep -i verbatim + * ./doc/sources.list.5.xml --- %aptverbatiment; --- It also seems to affect the man page by mentionning 'xenial'. Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: In Progress Status in apt source package in Trusty: Invalid Status in apt source packag
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
This bug was fixed in the package apt - 1.8.0~beta1 --- apt (1.8.0~beta1) unstable; urgency=medium [ anatoly techtonik ] * README.md: Document that apt is also included * apt.cc: Add "apt info" alias for muscle memory [ Jean-Pierre Giraud ] * French manpages translation update (Closes: #915952) [ Frans Spiesschaert ] * Dutch manpages translation update (Closes: #916358) [ Julian Andres Klode ] * cache hash: Use sse4.2 CRC32c on x86-64 where available * configuration: Compare size first during lookup * debListParser: Avoid native arch lookup in ParseDepends * hash32: Tighten to multiversion to x86-64 ELF and use uint32_t * apt-mark: Introduce minimize-manual * doc/apt-verbatim.ent: Point ubuntu-codename to disco (LP: #1812696) * CI: Use debian:buster as test base image * doc/apt-verbatim.ent: Debian buster is stable * SECURITY UPDATE: content injection in http method (CVE-2019-3462) (LP: #1812353) * debian/control: Drop libcurl4-gnutls-dev build dependency [ Mo Zhou ] * zh_CN.po: Update Simplified Chinese programs translation. [ Khem Raj ] * Remove `register` keyword [ Vasya Novikov ] * bash completion: add keys [ David Kalnischkies ] * Communicate back which key(s) were used for signing -- Julian Andres Klode Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:49:34 +0100 ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Disco) Status: In Progress => Fix Released ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2019-3462 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Trusty: Invalid Status in apt source package in Xenial: In Progress Status in apt source package in Bionic: In Progress Status in apt source package in Cosmic: In Progress Status in apt source package in Disco: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] APT documentation/example/manpages isn't referencing the current release which could be misleading for certain users. --- APT src code: --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Xenial and late in APT points to 'trusty or 'xenial' which generate the doc example & manpage with the wrong release instead of the actual ubuntu-codename. APT in Xenial point to 'trusty'. APT in Bionic and late to 'xenial' It also affect the man page: Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html [Test Case] With Xenial and late: * Look sources.list(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list $ lsb_release -cs bionic $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted -- You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpage reference the current release. [Regression Potential] * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior change in the APT
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
Fixes for other releases are queued up in git for the next SRUs (which include some more substantial changes) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Trusty: Invalid Status in apt source package in Xenial: In Progress Status in apt source package in Bionic: In Progress Status in apt source package in Cosmic: In Progress Status in apt source package in Disco: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] APT documentation/example/manpages isn't referencing the current release which could be misleading for certain users. --- APT src code: --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Xenial and late in APT points to 'trusty or 'xenial' which generate the doc example & manpage with the wrong release instead of the actual ubuntu-codename. APT in Xenial point to 'trusty'. APT in Bionic and late to 'xenial' It also affect the man page: Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html [Test Case] With Xenial and late: * Look sources.list(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list $ lsb_release -cs bionic $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted -- You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpage reference the current release. [Regression Potential] * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior change in the APT code. [Other Info] [Original Description] From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Bionic and late in APT points to Xenial which generate the doc example with Xenial instead of the actual codename. * ./doc/sources.list.5.xml --- %aptverbatiment; --- It also seems to affect the man page by mentionning 'xenial'. Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
** CVE removed: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2019-3462 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Trusty: Invalid Status in apt source package in Xenial: In Progress Status in apt source package in Bionic: In Progress Status in apt source package in Cosmic: In Progress Status in apt source package in Disco: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] APT documentation/example/manpages isn't referencing the current release which could be misleading for certain users. --- APT src code: --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Xenial and late in APT points to 'trusty or 'xenial' which generate the doc example & manpage with the wrong release instead of the actual ubuntu-codename. APT in Xenial point to 'trusty'. APT in Bionic and late to 'xenial' It also affect the man page: Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html [Test Case] With Xenial and late: * Look sources.list(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list $ lsb_release -cs bionic $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted -- You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpage reference the current release. [Regression Potential] * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior change in the APT code. [Other Info] [Original Description] From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Bionic and late in APT points to Xenial which generate the doc example with Xenial instead of the actual codename. * ./doc/sources.list.5.xml --- %aptverbatiment; --- It also seems to affect the man page by mentionning 'xenial'. Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpag
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
Hello Eric, or anyone else affected, Accepted apt into cosmic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/1.7.3 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested and change the tag from verification-needed-cosmic to verification-done-cosmic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-cosmic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Cosmic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-cosmic ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Trusty: Invalid Status in apt source package in Xenial: In Progress Status in apt source package in Bionic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Cosmic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Disco: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] APT documentation/example/manpages isn't referencing the current release which could be misleading for certain users. --- APT src code: --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Xenial and late in APT points to 'trusty or 'xenial' which generate the doc example & manpage with the wrong release instead of the actual ubuntu-codename. APT in Xenial point to 'trusty'. APT in Bionic and late to 'xenial' It also affect the man page: Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html [Test Case] With Xenial and late: * Look sources.list(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list $ lsb_release -cs bionic $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted -- You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpage reference the current release. [Regression Potential] * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior change in the APT code. [Other Info] [Ori
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
Hello Eric, or anyone else affected, Accepted apt into xenial-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/1.2.30 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested and change the tag from verification-needed-xenial to verification-done-xenial. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-xenial. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: In Progress => Fix Committed ** Tags added: verification-needed-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Trusty: Invalid Status in apt source package in Xenial: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Bionic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Cosmic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Disco: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] APT documentation/example/manpages isn't referencing the current release which could be misleading for certain users. --- APT src code: --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Xenial and late in APT points to 'trusty or 'xenial' which generate the doc example & manpage with the wrong release instead of the actual ubuntu-codename. APT in Xenial point to 'trusty'. APT in Bionic and late to 'xenial' It also affect the man page: Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html [Test Case] With Xenial and late: * Look sources.list(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list $ lsb_release -cs bionic $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted -- You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpage reference the current release. [Regression Potential] * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior change in the APT code. [Other Info] [Original Description] From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG u
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
bionic 1.6.9 verified: # man sources.list apt_preferences | grep bionic; grep -H bionic /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates main restricted Suites: bionic bionic-updates Suites: bionic-security priority 990 to all packages from a release starting with bionic. Pin: release n=bionic* /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list:deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic main restricted /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list:deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic main restricted /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list:deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security main restricted /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list:deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-security main restricted /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list:deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates main restricted /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list:deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu bionic-updates main restricted -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Trusty: Invalid Status in apt source package in Xenial: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Bionic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Cosmic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Disco: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] APT documentation/example/manpages isn't referencing the current release which could be misleading for certain users. --- APT src code: --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Xenial and late in APT points to 'trusty or 'xenial' which generate the doc example & manpage with the wrong release instead of the actual ubuntu-codename. APT in Xenial point to 'trusty'. APT in Bionic and late to 'xenial' It also affect the man page: Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html [Test Case] With Xenial and late: * Look sources.list(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list $ lsb_release -cs bionic $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted -- You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpage reference the current release. [Regression Potential] * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior change in the APT code. [Other Info] [Original Description] From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
Verfied cosmic 1.7.3: # man sources.list apt_preferences | grep cosmic deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic-updates main restricted Suites: cosmic cosmic-updates Suites: cosmic-security priority 990 to all packages from a release starting with cosmic. Pin: release n=cosmic* root@test1:~# grep cosmic /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu cosmic-updates main restricted -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Trusty: Invalid Status in apt source package in Xenial: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Bionic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Cosmic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Disco: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] APT documentation/example/manpages isn't referencing the current release which could be misleading for certain users. --- APT src code: --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Xenial and late in APT points to 'trusty or 'xenial' which generate the doc example & manpage with the wrong release instead of the actual ubuntu-codename. APT in Xenial point to 'trusty'. APT in Bionic and late to 'xenial' It also affect the man page: Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html [Test Case] With Xenial and late: * Look sources.list(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list $ lsb_release -cs bionic $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted -- You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpage reference the current release. [Regression Potential] * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior change in the APT code. [Other Info] [Original Description] From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdr
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
xenial 1.2.30 verified: deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted Suites: xenial xenial-updates Suites: xenial-security priority 990 to all packages from a release starting with xenial. Pin: release n=xenial* /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list:deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list:deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list:deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list:deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list:deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list:deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-cosmic verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-bionic verification-done-cosmic verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Trusty: Invalid Status in apt source package in Xenial: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Bionic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Cosmic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Disco: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] APT documentation/example/manpages isn't referencing the current release which could be misleading for certain users. --- APT src code: --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Xenial and late in APT points to 'trusty or 'xenial' which generate the doc example & manpage with the wrong release instead of the actual ubuntu-codename. APT in Xenial point to 'trusty'. APT in Bionic and late to 'xenial' It also affect the man page: Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html [Test Case] With Xenial and late: * Look sources.list(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list $ lsb_release -cs bionic $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted -- You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpage reference the current release. [Regression Potential] * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior change in the APT code. [Other Info] [Original Description] From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/d
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
Hello Eric, or anyone else affected, Accepted apt into cosmic-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apt/1.7.4 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository. Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users. If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested and change the tag from verification-needed-cosmic to verification-done-cosmic. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-cosmic. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed. Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping! N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days. ** Tags removed: verification-done verification-done-cosmic ** Tags added: verification-needed verification-needed-cosmic ** Tags removed: verification-done-bionic ** Tags added: verification-needed-bionic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Trusty: Invalid Status in apt source package in Xenial: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Bionic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Cosmic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Disco: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] APT documentation/example/manpages isn't referencing the current release which could be misleading for certain users. --- APT src code: --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Xenial and late in APT points to 'trusty or 'xenial' which generate the doc example & manpage with the wrong release instead of the actual ubuntu-codename. APT in Xenial point to 'trusty'. APT in Bionic and late to 'xenial' It also affect the man page: Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html [Test Case] With Xenial and late: * Look sources.list(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list $ lsb_release -cs bionic $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted -- You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpage reference the current release. [Regression Potential] * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior change in the APT code. [Other Info] [Original Description] From APT src code : --- [GOOD
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
Package: apt-1.6.10 Series: Bionic OS: Ubuntu 18.04.1 LTS Bug fix verified with success. Package: apt-1.2.31 Series: Xenial OS: Ubuntu 16.04.5 LTS Bug fix verified with success. ** Tags removed: verification-needed-bionic verification-needed-xenial ** Tags added: verification-done-bionic verification-done-xenial -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Trusty: Invalid Status in apt source package in Xenial: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Bionic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Cosmic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Disco: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] APT documentation/example/manpages isn't referencing the current release which could be misleading for certain users. --- APT src code: --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Xenial and late in APT points to 'trusty or 'xenial' which generate the doc example & manpage with the wrong release instead of the actual ubuntu-codename. APT in Xenial point to 'trusty'. APT in Bionic and late to 'xenial' It also affect the man page: Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html [Test Case] With Xenial and late: * Look sources.list(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list $ lsb_release -cs bionic $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted -- You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpage reference the current release. [Regression Potential] * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior change in the APT code. [Other Info] [Original Description] From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Bionic and late in APT points to Xenial which generate the doc example with Xenial instead of the actual
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
Cosmic remains fixed as well. ** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-cosmic ** Tags added: verification-done verification-done-cosmic -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Trusty: Invalid Status in apt source package in Xenial: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Bionic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Cosmic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Disco: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] APT documentation/example/manpages isn't referencing the current release which could be misleading for certain users. --- APT src code: --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Xenial and late in APT points to 'trusty or 'xenial' which generate the doc example & manpage with the wrong release instead of the actual ubuntu-codename. APT in Xenial point to 'trusty'. APT in Bionic and late to 'xenial' It also affect the man page: Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html [Test Case] With Xenial and late: * Look sources.list(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list $ lsb_release -cs bionic $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted -- You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpage reference the current release. [Regression Potential] * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior change in the APT code. [Other Info] [Original Description] From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Bionic and late in APT points to Xenial which generate the doc example with Xenial instead of the actual codename. * ./doc/sources.list.5.xml --- %aptverbatiment; --- It also seems to affect the man page by mentionning 'xenial'. Example took from Bionic:
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
(cosmic being 1.7.4) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Trusty: Invalid Status in apt source package in Xenial: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Bionic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Cosmic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Disco: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] APT documentation/example/manpages isn't referencing the current release which could be misleading for certain users. --- APT src code: --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Xenial and late in APT points to 'trusty or 'xenial' which generate the doc example & manpage with the wrong release instead of the actual ubuntu-codename. APT in Xenial point to 'trusty'. APT in Bionic and late to 'xenial' It also affect the man page: Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html [Test Case] With Xenial and late: * Look sources.list(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list $ lsb_release -cs bionic $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted -- You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpage reference the current release. [Regression Potential] * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior change in the APT code. [Other Info] [Original Description] From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Bionic and late in APT points to Xenial which generate the doc example with Xenial instead of the actual codename. * ./doc/sources.list.5.xml --- %aptverbatiment; --- It also seems to affect the man page by mentionning 'xenial'. Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_prefere
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
** No longer affects: apt (Ubuntu Trusty) -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Xenial: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Bionic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Cosmic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Disco: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] APT documentation/example/manpages isn't referencing the current release which could be misleading for certain users. --- APT src code: --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Xenial and late in APT points to 'trusty or 'xenial' which generate the doc example & manpage with the wrong release instead of the actual ubuntu-codename. APT in Xenial point to 'trusty'. APT in Bionic and late to 'xenial' It also affect the man page: Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html [Test Case] With Xenial and late: * Look sources.list(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list $ lsb_release -cs bionic $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted -- You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpage reference the current release. [Regression Potential] * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior change in the APT code. [Other Info] [Original Description] From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Bionic and late in APT points to Xenial which generate the doc example with Xenial instead of the actual codename. * ./doc/sources.list.5.xml --- %aptverbatiment; --- It also seems to affect the man page by mentionning 'xenial'. Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html To manage notifi
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
This bug was fixed in the package apt - 1.7.4 --- apt (1.7.4) cosmic; urgency=medium * Fix name of APT::Update::Post-Invoke-Stats (was ...Update-Post...) * CMake: Install auth.conf.d directory (LP: #1818996) * Merge translations from 1.8.0 apt (1.7.3) cosmic; urgency=medium [ Michael Vogt ] * private-json-hooks.cc: deal with EPIPE (LP: #1814543) [ Julian Andres Klode ] * Introduce experimental 'never' pinning for sources (LP: #1814727) * Add a Packages-Require-Authorization Release file field (LP: #1814727) * doc: Set ubuntu-codename to cosmic (LP: #1812696) * update: Provide APT::Update-Post-Invoke-Stats script hook point (LP: #1815760) * Introduce APT::Install::Pre-Invoke / Post-Invoke-Success (LP: #1815761) -- Julian Andres Klode Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:31:46 +0100 ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Cosmic) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Xenial: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Bionic: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Cosmic: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Disco: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] APT documentation/example/manpages isn't referencing the current release which could be misleading for certain users. --- APT src code: --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Xenial and late in APT points to 'trusty or 'xenial' which generate the doc example & manpage with the wrong release instead of the actual ubuntu-codename. APT in Xenial point to 'trusty'. APT in Bionic and late to 'xenial' It also affect the man page: Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html [Test Case] With Xenial and late: * Look sources.list(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list $ lsb_release -cs bionic $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted -- You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpage reference the current release. [Regression Potential] * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior change in the APT code. [Other Info] [Original Description] From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubunt
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
This bug was fixed in the package apt - 1.6.10 --- apt (1.6.10) bionic; urgency=medium * Fix name of APT::Update::Post-Invoke-Stats (was ...Update-Post...) * CMake: Install auth.conf.d directory (LP: #1818996) * Merge translations from 1.7.4 apt (1.6.9) bionic; urgency=medium [ Michael Vogt ] * private-json-hooks.cc: deal with EPIPE (LP: #1814543) [ Julian Andres Klode ] * Introduce experimental 'never' pinning for sources (LP: #1814727) * Add a Packages-Require-Authorization Release file field (LP: #1814727) * doc: Set ubuntu-codename to bionic (LP: #1812696) * update: Provide APT::Update-Post-Invoke-Stats script hook point (LP: #1815760) * Introduce APT::Install::Pre-Invoke / Post-Invoke-Success (LP: #1815761) -- Julian Andres Klode Mon, 11 Mar 2019 10:34:07 +0100 ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Bionic) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Xenial: Fix Committed Status in apt source package in Bionic: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Cosmic: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Disco: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] APT documentation/example/manpages isn't referencing the current release which could be misleading for certain users. --- APT src code: --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Xenial and late in APT points to 'trusty or 'xenial' which generate the doc example & manpage with the wrong release instead of the actual ubuntu-codename. APT in Xenial point to 'trusty'. APT in Bionic and late to 'xenial' It also affect the man page: Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html [Test Case] With Xenial and late: * Look sources.list(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list $ lsb_release -cs bionic $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted -- You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpage reference the current release. [Regression Potential] * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior change in the APT code. [Other Info] [Original Description] From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubun
[Touch-packages] [Bug 1812696] Re: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename
This bug was fixed in the package apt - 1.2.31 --- apt (1.2.31) xenial; urgency=medium * Fix name of APT::Update::Post-Invoke-Stats (was ...Update-Post...) * apt.dirs: Install auth.conf.d directory (LP: #1818996) * Merge translations from 1.6.10 (via 1.4.y branch) apt (1.2.30) xenial; urgency=medium * merge security upload for content injection in http method (CVE-2019-3462); with fixed autopkgtest (LP: #1815750) * Introduce experimental 'never' pinning for sources (LP: #1814727) * Add support for /etc/apt/auth.conf.d/*.conf (netrcparts) (LP: #1811120) * Add a Packages-Require-Authorization Release file field (LP: #1814727) * NeverAutoRemove kernel meta packages (LP: #1787460) * doc: Set ubuntu-codename to xenial (LP: #1812696) * update: Provide APT::Update-Post-Invoke-Stats script hook point (LP: #1815760) * Introduce APT::Install::Pre-Invoke / Post-Invoke-Success (LP: #1815761) -- Julian Andres Klode Tue, 12 Mar 2019 14:59:01 +0100 ** Changed in: apt (Ubuntu Xenial) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released ** CVE added: https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=2019-3462 -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Touch seeded packages, which is subscribed to apt in Ubuntu. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1812696 Title: APT doc and manpage uses wrong ubuntu-codename Status in apt package in Ubuntu: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Xenial: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Bionic: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Cosmic: Fix Released Status in apt source package in Disco: Fix Released Bug description: [Impact] APT documentation/example/manpages isn't referencing the current release which could be misleading for certain users. --- APT src code: --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename; main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu &ubuntu-codename;-updates main restricted --- The ubuntu-codename variable for Xenial and late in APT points to 'trusty or 'xenial' which generate the doc example & manpage with the wrong release instead of the actual ubuntu-codename. APT in Xenial point to 'trusty'. APT in Bionic and late to 'xenial' It also affect the man page: Example took from Bionic: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html [Test Case] With Xenial and late: * Look sources.list(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/sources.list.5.html * Look apt_preferences(5) manpage Ex: http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/bionic/man5/apt_preferences.5.html * Look /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list $ lsb_release -cs bionic $ cat /usr/share/doc/apt/examples/sources.list # See sources.list(5) manpage for more information # Remember that CD-ROMs, DVDs and such are managed through the apt-cdrom tool. deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial main restricted deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-security main restricted deb http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted deb-src http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu xenial-updates main restricted -- You'll notice they all point to the wrong release. While we understand it's not a "bug' and only a reference/example... I think it's for the best interest of all if the examples/manpage reference the current release. [Regression Potential] * None, it only affect documentation/examples and manpages. No behavior change in the APT code. [Other Info] [Original Description] From APT src code : --- [GOOD ubuntu-codename] * trusty: apt-1.0.1ubuntu2.18/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: [WRONG ubuntu-codename] * xenial: apt-1.2.29/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * bionic: apt-1.6.7/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: * disco: apt-1.8.0~alpha3/doc/apt-verbatim.ent: --- * vendor/ubuntu/sources.list.in --- # See
