Re: [Trac] TracError: The Trac Environment needs to be upgraded.
* Martin Landa [2011-10-19 21:23]: > as root (same when creating trac environment). Anyway it's very > strange that I am asked to upgrade immediately after installing Trac > instance. In my experience in 95% situations it means that apache cannot read access trac.ini. Error is the same. Check permission very carefully. greets silk -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
Re: [Trac] TracError: The Trac Environment needs to be upgraded.
2011/10/19 Matthew Caron : > On 10/19/2011 02:41 PM, Martin Landa wrote: >> >> Hi, >> """ >> Trac Error >> >> TracError: The Trac Environment needs to be upgraded. >> >> Run "trac-admin /opt/trac/qgama upgrade" >> """ >> >> OK, strange, anyway when running `upgrade` command nothing happen. > > What user are you running trac-admin as? as root (same when creating trac environment). Anyway it's very strange that I am asked to upgrade immediately after installing Trac instance. Martin -- Martin Landa * http://geo.fsv.cvut.cz/~landa -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
Re: [Trac] TracError: The Trac Environment needs to be upgraded.
On 10/19/2011 02:41 PM, Martin Landa wrote: Hi, """ Trac Error TracError: The Trac Environment needs to be upgraded. Run "trac-admin /opt/trac/qgama upgrade" """ OK, strange, anyway when running `upgrade` command nothing happen. What user are you running trac-admin as? -- Matthew Caron Build Engineer Sixnet | www.sixnet.com O +1 518 877 5173 Ext. 138 F +1 518 602 9209 matt.ca...@sixnet.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
[Trac] TracError: The Trac Environment needs to be upgraded.
Hi, I have problem with creating a new Trac instance on my server, sample workflow export TRAC=qgama trac-admin /opt/trac/$TRAC initenv chgrp www-data /opt/trac/$TRAC -R chmod g+w /opt/trac/$TRAC -R cat /etc/apache2/sites-enabled/003-trac SetHandler mod_python PythonInterpreter main_interpreter PythonHandler trac.web.modpython_frontend PythonOption TracEnv /opt/trac/qgama PythonOption TracUriRoot /trac/qgama /etc/init.d/apache2 restart When I open Trac instance in my web browser I get """ Trac Error TracError: The Trac Environment needs to be upgraded. Run "trac-admin /opt/trac/qgama upgrade" """ OK, strange, anyway when running `upgrade` command nothing happen. Database is up to date, no upgrade necessary. Debian GNU/Linux stable with Trac 0.12.3.dev. Any ideas what is wrong? Thanks in advance, Martin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
RE: [Trac] What is the difference between svn and svnfs (and direct-svnfs)?
> -Original Message- > From: trac-users@googlegroups.com On Behalf Of Grzegorz Sobanski > Sent: 19 October 2011 11:44 > To: trac-users@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [Trac] What is the difference between svn and > svnfs (and direct-svnfs)? > > * Cooke, Mark [2011-10-19 10:41]: > > > These two are synonyms. It's what you should normally use. > > > > > I was wondering why we had two synonyms, I assumed > something like 'svn' would use e.g. server based access (svn: > or http:) whilst svnfs would use direct (file:) access (which > seemed like it would be dangerous). > > > > Does this require the post-commit changeset hook? > > Well, it does not require it. You can enable synchronizing on every > request, but I would recommend against it. Solution with the hook > is much more effective. > > > > > * direct-svnfs > > > > > > This one bypasses the cache, so you don't need to resync > Trac to the > > > repository, and changesets are picked up automatically. > But it's also > > > much, much slower. > > > > > ..so this is the 0.11 method of checking the repository on > every access (no hook required)? > > No. > 0.11 was caching everything too, but it checked on every request if > there is something new in the repository to be cached. > direct-svnfs does not cache nothing, it always goes to the repository > if it needs some info about it. > > > -- > greets > silk > Thanks for the clarification (from a David Eddings fan). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
Re: [Trac] What is the difference between svn and svnfs (and direct-svnfs)?
* Cooke, Mark [2011-10-19 10:41]: > > These two are synonyms. It's what you should normally use. > > > I was wondering why we had two synonyms, I assumed something like 'svn' would > use e.g. server based access (svn: or http:) whilst svnfs would use direct > (file:) access (which seemed like it would be dangerous). > > Does this require the post-commit changeset hook? Well, it does not require it. You can enable synchronizing on every request, but I would recommend against it. Solution with the hook is much more effective. > > > * direct-svnfs > > > > This one bypasses the cache, so you don't need to resync Trac to the > > repository, and changesets are picked up automatically. But it's also > > much, much slower. > > > ..so this is the 0.11 method of checking the repository on every access (no > hook required)? No. 0.11 was caching everything too, but it checked on every request if there is something new in the repository to be cached. direct-svnfs does not cache nothing, it always goes to the repository if it needs some info about it. -- greets silk -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
RE: [Trac] What is the difference between svn and svnfs (and direct-svnfs)?
> -Original Message- > From: trac-users@googlegroups.com > [mailto:trac-users@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Remy Blank > Sent: 18 October 2011 20:55 > To: trac-users@googlegroups.com > Subject: Re: [Trac] What is the difference between svn and > svnfs (and direct-svnfs)? > > Cooke, Mark wrote: > > * svn > > * svnfs > > These two are synonyms. It's what you should normally use. > I was wondering why we had two synonyms, I assumed something like 'svn' would use e.g. server based access (svn: or http:) whilst svnfs would use direct (file:) access (which seemed like it would be dangerous). Does this require the post-commit changeset hook? > > * direct-svnfs > > This one bypasses the cache, so you don't need to resync Trac to the > repository, and changesets are picked up automatically. But it's also > much, much slower. > ...so this is the 0.11 method of checking the repository on every access (no hook required)? Many thanks, ~ mark c -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Trac Users" group. To post to this group, send email to trac-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to trac-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/trac-users?hl=en.
