Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-08-07 Thread matt . ivie
The other problem with the logic that the FCC is using is that if they are to  
follow through with this to try and control the spectrum they now have to  
lock down firmware and drivers for WiFi cards on computers and everything  
else. Also, I can put a really high gain antenna or a signal amplifier on a  
router without even bothering with firmware. Their plan just isn't effective  
at dealing with the issue and if it is causing more harm than good it  
shouldn't be done.


If I can help you in any way Chris, just send me a message.


Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-08-06 Thread cooloutac

Corporations have just as much incentives to spy on you,  if not more.


Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-08-06 Thread chris
Many technology companies are in a position to spy, but it's not always  
within there business model to do so, and could cause PR problems to do so.  
It's these companies for which we have some hope provided the government  
doesn't swoop in and restrict them from letting us have control over own  
hardware.


Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-08-06 Thread milind727
Whatever the given reason is for this decision, you can rest assured that the  
NSA is probably behind it.  There's no easier way to spy on the country than  
to make sure every router sold has a back door to facilitate it.


Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-08-03 Thread davidvargas1

Chris Said:
 There is some other motivator behind this I suspect.

I got to agree with you on this one.  


Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-08-02 Thread chaosesqueteam
How about disobeying the government. The government that rules over us  
worthless scumbag piece-of-shit peons is incompatible with any concept of  
freedom, even freedom to breath for many people in the world who have been  
burned alive by this government.


How about disobeying them and when and if they come for you, physically  
fighting them to the death.


If everyone did that we'd all be free or dead or both.


Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-08-02 Thread chaosesqueteam
How about disobeying their rules and when they come to imprison you, kill  
them dead?


That is what they did when they committed treason against britian, but for  
some reason we have to obey them in everything?





Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-08-02 Thread chris

Please stay tuned...


Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-08-01 Thread amenex

A search on

didn't work for me yesterday, but today a search on

brought me here:
http://trisquel.info/en/forum/ot-foss-skype-replacement
so all is no lost.

What I'm thinking about would be the equivalent of ham radio or citizens band  
radio, given that the wifi built into our computers can talk to other  
computers in the same household or workgroup already, and that there is  
enough signal strength to pick up other workgroups in the vicinity.




Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-08-01 Thread t8mf4nu6lizp

Sounds a bit like https://thefnf.org/


Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-08-01 Thread chris
The problem is more along the lines that it's software defined and the way  
that the chips work that are used in routers is such that the easy/only real  
solution for manufacturers (to be compliant with the new(?) proposed rule) is  
to lock down the router. That is to make it such that you can only flash  
signed firmware.


Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-07-31 Thread amenex

Isn't this the real issue:
 http://www.irjes.com/Papers/vol3-issue11/L3118391.pdf 

If it is, why do I get no Google hits for
 peer to peer network +trisquel 
(or linux, for that matter ?

Isn't a peer to peer network the ultimate aim of free software ?


Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-07-31 Thread tomlukeywood

If it is, why do I get no Google hits for

your saying if you type linux into google nothing comes up??
if that is the case then i guess its censorship

are you saying this?


Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-07-31 Thread jadedml
The aim of the free software movement isn't a peer to peer network. That is a  
separate issue.

The aim of the free software movement is user freedom.
And what do you mean, a peer to peer network? There are already such  
things, aren't there?


Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-07-30 Thread davidvargas1
Agree, well that will be an issue for those 3rd party software for routers. 


Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-07-30 Thread davidvargas1

chaosesqueteam

I tell you what, I believe the person that is not free is you! 


Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-07-30 Thread onpon4
To be honest, I'm inclined to expect this to be the case... I mean, the new  
rule in question is actually a year old (even though devices can still be  
sold under the old rules for another year, if I read the page correctly), so  
if freedom-respecting firmware is forbidden because of it, why hasn't the FSF  
or EFF said anything about it?


I think it's ridiculous that the FCC would require certain hardware to be  
defective by design; if some modifications can cause a problem, those  
behaviors themselves should be made illegal, and the only thing vendors  
should be required to do, maybe, is inform consumers that those behaviors are  
illegal. Still, it looks to me like the fear of alternative operating systems  
being forbidden might be unjustified.


Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-07-30 Thread chaosesqueteam

America is not a free country. There is very little freedom.


Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-07-29 Thread davidvargas1
Apparently some people ACT PARANOIAC AND draw conclusions, without BOTHERING  
RESEARCHING INTO THE MATTER.
The FCC is only wanting to control VERY SPECIFIC items, like transmission  
power and frequency.


The FCC has zero interest in any other aspect of the devices. The FCC ONLY  
cares about the settings that have any (direct) impact on the RF  
transmissions. Too Simple, read the FCC article.


Re: [Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-07-28 Thread tomlukeywood

i just ordered one

well i guess now the world is worse :/...


[Trisquel-users] FCC Rules might force Wifi router vendors to lockdown their firmware!

2015-07-28 Thread lord_abinadi

http://www.cnx-software.com/2015/07/27/new-fcc-rules-may-prevent-installing-openwrt-on-wifi-routers/


You might want to pickup a LibreCMC router while you can...