[Trisquel-users] Re : The FSF's statement on Windows 10
Maybe I could have expressed myself more clearly, because we're on the same page.
[Trisquel-users] Re : The FSF's statement on Windows 10
I have to admit that i'm naïvely assuming that a malicious company would be out of business because of their actions being public. Recent history tells me otherwise. My reasoning was that if they have a malicious product, they're out of business because of the justified bad press. Yeah right. That's me underestimating the mental laziness or good old idiocy of many people (added to the power of good and large scale marketing). Plus the probable holes in the legal system. In this context, I have to agree with the 4 freedoms (yet still following my initial reason).
[Trisquel-users] Re : The FSF's statement on Windows 10
All my attempts to use proprietary software so far resulted in issues, unlike free/libre software. People claim all the time proprietary software is more convenient, but I highly doubt it from a reliability point of view. In my experience, it breaks more often than free/libre software.
[Trisquel-users] Re : The FSF's statement on Windows 10
Here is the extension for the applications menu: https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/6/applications-menu/ And the one for the places menu: https://extensions.gnome.org/extension/8/places-status-indicator/
[Trisquel-users] Re : The FSF's statement on Windows 10
I just wanted to add that the apparent limited flexibility ("apparent" because of the extensions and because a lot can be configured through dconf) does not mean using GNOME Shell is inefficient. See https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/GnomeShell/CheatSheet for useful features, in particular for the list of keybindings at the end of the page.