Re: [Trisquel-users] Scratch discussion: delete or not?
I know this isn't directly related to this post, but is there an Free Software alternative to Scratch 1.0 in the repos or available for download from somewhere? When I looked in the past, I didn't seem much and Scratch 1.0 is relatively limited, especially in comparison to 2.0 (or the version on MIT's website).
Re: [Trisquel-users] Scratch discussion: delete or not?
> This is why we need reproducible builds Exactly, Legimet. Here, if interested --> https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/About
Re: [Trisquel-users] Scratch discussion: delete or not?
Why are you using the Internet if it's evil?
Re: [Trisquel-users] Scratch discussion: delete or not?
This is why we need reproducible builds: https://reproducible-builds.org/
Re: [Trisquel-users] Scratch discussion: delete or not?
The Internet is evil… Spying, non-free software, addiction and other bad things…
Re: [Trisquel-users] Scratch discussion: delete or not?
> But can we trust people that created non-free version before? Hehe, just because you worry I want to make you worry more: Can you trust the adorable free software that is on your computer? Can you be sure that the source code actually represents the executable u run? The answer is blowing in the NOPE!! http://www.dwheeler.com/trusting-trust/dissertation/html/wheeler-trusting-trust-ddc.html be careful, son, who you trust
Re: [Trisquel-users] Scratch discussion: delete or not?
Ok, this versions are free. But can we trust people that created non-free version before?
Re: [Trisquel-users] Scratch discussion: delete or not?
http://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.ru.html#Scratch Remove Scratch versions with this licenses (if exists).
Re: [Trisquel-users] Scratch discussion: delete or not?
Wait for my new post.
Re: [Trisquel-users] Scratch discussion: delete or not?
Scratch 1.0 is free. Scratch 2.0 depends on the proprietary Flash (and changed its license, no idea if the new license is free). I believe that is the subject of this thread. Of course, 2.0 being nonfree has no bearing on distribution of Scratch 1.0!
Re: [Trisquel-users] Scratch discussion: delete or not?
Scratch is a programming environment under a free license. It was developed by MIT to make kids think like programmers. I don't know what you are talking about... I suspect this thread is going to end up like the thing where someone wanted to delete libdrm...
Re: [Trisquel-users] Scratch discussion: delete or not?
Scratch cat is REMOVED Project uploading is REMOVED etc. from open source (non-free) version.
Re: [Trisquel-users] Scratch discussion: delete or not?
If you are talking about the package scretch, that is, the "easy to use programming environment for ages 8 and up", it is free software under free license. http://metadata.ftp-master.debian.org/changelogs//main/s/scratch/scratch_1.4.0.6~dfsg1-5_copyright
Re: [Trisquel-users] Scratch discussion: delete or not?
Now, let's start a discussion!
Re: [Trisquel-users] Scratch discussion: delete or not?
If someone will support Scratch deleting, I will share this info with another free (GNU list) distros.
[Trisquel-users] Scratch discussion: delete or not?
Hello everyone. I am returned. I readed on Wikipedia (Russian) about Scratch licensing. Some code is deleted from free version. Both we have Scratch on FSF Directory and our repos. We need to delete Scratch in Trisquel 8.0. But now we can start a discussion about deleting (or not) Scrath from the free software. Offtopic: About "Kirovohrad" in my profile. I didn't like new names.
