Re: [Trisquel-users] Who legally owns the Trisquel or 'Asociacion Trisquel'?

2016-04-30 Thread davidvargas1

So my Italian leader shoes are machine made by robots.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Who legally owns the Trisquel or 'Asociacion Trisquel'?

2016-04-30 Thread davidvargas1
The USD conversion sums too 9172.80 EUR. per year,in my opinion, what  
Europeans appreciate the most is their universal health care.


  The entitlement of UN-employment benefits In the USA varies from state,.  
Varies in amount per month, and it limited in duration. still we pay taxes on  
it. Normally, it will last 6 months, 235 dollars per week after that you are  
screw royally. Depending on the length of employment is a big factor.  Yet  
medical is not free, you have to paid for it. So don't complain Europeans.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Who legally owns the Trisquel or 'Asociacion Trisquel'?

2016-04-28 Thread jbar

Well, unemployment seems to be of a great fashion among the OECD countries

https://data.oecd.org/unemp/unemployment-rate.htm


Re: [Trisquel-users] Who legally owns the Trisquel or 'Asociacion Trisquel'?

2016-04-28 Thread greatgnu
Minimum wage in Italy is "unemployment" and it seems to be of a great fashion  
here..


Re: [Trisquel-users] Who legally owns the Trisquel or 'Asociacion Trisquel'?

2016-04-27 Thread jbar
The minimum wage in Spain is 9172.80€/year (756.70€/month), just to put  
in perspective how much a 500€/month stipend is.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Who legally owns the Trisquel or 'Asociacion Trisquel'?

2016-04-27 Thread mnaus

I am also not a lawyer or an accountant.

I agree that paying salaries to employees that run a non-profit is no  
problem.  If one of those employee's is the owner (and probably also either  
the President or CEO), there is nothing wrong.


The only potential problem is if the salary is unreasonable.  The basis for  
choosing a salary is the same as in a for profit business. It is based on  
what the employee can do for the company--what their labor is worth.  If the  
salary is greater than or equal to the surplus, then the whole surplus should  
go to the salary.  If the salary is less than the surplus and the salary is  
then increased to absorb the surplus, that could be a problem (again, if the  
previous salary has already been determined and if the surplus is more than a  
reasonable raise).


For example let us say that a 1,000,000 salary is appropriate: last year you  
pay yourself 50,000 and the surplus is then 0.  Next year you pay yourself  
100,000 and the surplus is then 0. Next year you pay yourself 500,000 and the  
surplus is again 0.  And so on.  When the surplus is 1,000,001 then the  
salary is 1,000,000 and the surplus is 1.  If next year the surplus is  
3,000,000, then after the 1,000,000 salary is deducted as an expense, the  
surplus is 2,000,000


In other words, the employee (whether owner or not) should get an appropriate  
salary or be willing to work for less.  I could see the argument that the  
owner should not be allowed to make that decision as he/she is biased.   
However, in the USA we have the IRS and you do not want to mess with them!   
They are incredibly powerful.  They can throw you in jail if you evade income  
taxes.  This means the owner's income is known and others would sue the owner  
for fraud if he/she could not justify the salary they are taking.


More often than not, an owner/founder of a non-profit is doing the work  
because they love the cause and will tend to pay themselves less than they  
deserve (perhaps a reason why somebody other than the owner should determine  
his/her salary!)


In this case, clearly Ruben was taking a big pay cut to work on Trisquel.  
$500/month if Ruben spends 2 hours per day on the project then he is paying  
himself less than $10/hour.  A good programmer should make at least 5-10  
times that much. Even if he took the whole 8,000 it would be much less than  
he should get paid. If he was doing it for the money he would need to get  
paid much much more.


So, Thank you Ruben!!



Re: [Trisquel-users] Who legally owns the Trisquel or 'Asociacion Trisquel'?

2016-04-27 Thread jason
Imagine that the founder works for the org for 40 or 80 hours a week. And so,  
someone that starts a non-profit there must work for free? How do they pay  
their own bills?


Re: [Trisquel-users] Who legally owns the Trisquel or 'Asociacion Trisquel'?

2016-04-27 Thread onpon4

Yeah, there's nothing wrong with that.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Who legally owns the Trisquel or 'Asociacion Trisquel'?

2016-04-27 Thread 1mehranbaghi

Thank you Salman.
> Nonprofit organizations can pay salary to their employees.
I agree, but can the founder and employee be the same person at the same  
time? (legally)


Re: [Trisquel-users] Who legally owns the Trisquel or 'Asociacion Trisquel'?

2016-04-27 Thread 1mehranbaghi
Thank you for your reply and also your tirelessly contribution to Free  
Software Society. and just for clarity i belief you deserve much more  
financial support than that and i was asking about legal stuff. actually i am  
a little bit confused because in my country law (Iran) the founders of a  
nonprofit organization and even their relatives can't have any transaction  
with their own organization (http://saman.mcls.gov.ir/fa/e/r/ff) (in case  
someone can read persian)


Re: [Trisquel-users] Who legally owns the Trisquel or 'Asociacion Trisquel'?

2016-04-26 Thread sitereg

I'm not a legal advisor.

1. Trisquel trademark is owned by Ruben.

2. Neither Trisquel GNU/Linux is owned by a single person or entity nor any  
other GNU/Linux distribution (like Debian, Fedora, Ubuntu, etc). A lot of  
programmers have invested their time and life to develop many separate pieces  
of software which we glue together to make a GNU/Linux distribution. These  
separate packages have their own copyright holders but they have given us (or  
any other person) the right to modify, and redistribute their code under  
certain conditions (free-software licenses).


3. 'Asociacion Trisquel' is a nonprofit organization under Spanish law formed  
to handle legal aspects needed for development of this GNU/Linux  
distribution.


4. We cannot conclude who the owner of an organization is by considering who  
receives stipends from the organization. Nonprofit organizations can pay  
salary to their employees.


Re: [Trisquel-users] Who legally owns the Trisquel or 'Asociacion Trisquel'?

2016-04-26 Thread albertoefg
Trisquel is based on Spain so I doubt it has a category that exists only on  
the United States law.


Whit that being said, non-profits organizations, at least here in Mexico, are  
able to have money and estate. They can even charge you for somethings they  
do for you. And they can pay a salary to the members. As long as it is not  
the objective of the organization to earn money.


For example, a non-profit can charge you for counsel or advice. But no member  
of the non-profit has the right for a part of the surplus, that this payment  
generated.


Even more if the non-profit is ceased, members won't get anything but what  
they contributed. They won't have a part of the surplus. Those things, by  
law, have to go to another non-profit.





Re: [Trisquel-users] Who legally owns the Trisquel or 'Asociacion Trisquel'?

2016-04-26 Thread ruben
Earning a salary is not the same as distributing a surplus income, otherwise  
non-profits could not have employees.