*
The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org
*Very, very well done Alberto ! [?][?][?]*
I'm so proud that you made it. Now I really better
get busy to get there too !
Your friend, Aarre
peltomaa.aa...@gmail.com
(647) 202-7267
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:39 PM, wrote:
> *
> The following message is relayed to you by trom@lists.newciv.org
>
> i finish level five no meter the meter is a via, is not neded at all,
> i am in nirvana achived today
>
>
>
> Citando trom-requ...@lists.newciv.org:
>
> > Send Trom mailing list submissions to
> > trom@lists.newciv.org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> > http://lists.newciv.org/mailman/listinfo/trom
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> > trom-requ...@lists.newciv.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> > trom-ow...@lists.newciv.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> > than "Re: Contents of Trom digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >1. Query RE High TA (Colleen Peltomaa)
> >2. Re: Query RE High TA (Happy Harry)
> >3. Re: Query RE High TA (Pete McLaughlin)
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 13:19:01 -0400
> > From: Colleen Peltomaa
> > Subject: [TROM1] Query RE High TA
> > To: trom@lists.newciv.org
> > Message-ID:
> >
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> >
> > Listened to Dennis' lecture re High TA, stuck needle phenomenon. I am
> > currently doing Level 2 and Level 3 Timebreaking plus lots of RI and with
> > good results regularly and formally at least 5 days per week. Have had
> high
> > TA and stuck needle for years and have been doing clearing work all that
> > time too (previously R3x -- a Dianetics type engram running).
> >
> > At this level of Timebreaking what and how should I proceed to finally
> get
> > this monkey off my back? Can I use TROM somehow -- on my own -- to get
> this
> > handled, or do I need to resort to some other technique.
> >
> > Do get periodically keyed out, and then get myself somehow pulled right
> back
> > in -- very uncomfortable, but it does drive me to my knees and get me to
> > address the goal of resolving the mind construct :-) Having great TB'ing
> > sessions and great wins -- until the next "tsunami" hits, lol. Feel I
> will
> > be more stable once I get a good look and address at this High TA issue.
> >
> > Please, anyone have any insights or information to pass on, thank you.
> >
> > cheers!
> > Colleen
> > -- next part --
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL:
> >
> http://lists.newciv.org/pipermail/trom/attachments/20110321/14f80c16/attachment-0001.html
> >
> > --
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2011 10:43:45 -0800
> > From: Happy Harry
> > Subject: Re: [TROM1] Query RE High TA
> > To: The Resolution of Mind list
> > Message-ID: <5cbfcac5950.002chappyha...@inbox.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
> >
> > Hi Colleen,
> >
> > I read your post. I'm not going to assume or pretend to have the answer
> here.
> > But perhaps I can, tentatively, offer a few suggestion or make a few
> > comments.
> > Maybe they'll prove useful...or maybe they won't. I don't know.
> >
> >> From what you're saying you seem to be making good progress with
> >> TROM and you're
> > having wins. That's very positive, and very well done on your part.
> > But you mentioned you're
> > also doing other processes on the side (clearing work, dianetics
> > type engram running)...and you're
> > using a meter too. It seems to me there might be potential for
> > confusion and entanglement here.
> > Perhaps it's not a good idea to mix all these different techniques.
> > Perhaps it would be prudent to go with
> > just one technique rather than several. It's fair and valid to want
> > to resolve the mind as fast
> > as possible and wanting to make quick progress - I totally get that.
> > And it might seem perfectly reasonable
> > to assume that more techniques employed equals more (and faster) gain.
> >
> > Perhaps you could try to do just TROM exclusively (with no other
> > processes on the side) for a couple of weeks
> > (while doing plenty of RI, too); see how that goes. And if the
> > problem you're having hasn't improved you could
> > rule out the mixing of techniques as the cause. And if the problem
> > has improved, it could be an indicator that
> > you'd probably be better off doing only one thing, one technique.
> >
> > As I said, I do not pretend to know the answer. And using a
> > combination of techniques is your prerogative - no one's going to
> > prevent you from doing so. But you asked for comments, and so I'm
> > commenting. :-)
> >
> > In any case, I wish you the best of luck and