Re: [TruthTalk] from WND.com

2005-11-01 Thread Marlin halverson




Texas Pastor Electrocuted During BaptismBy ANGELA K. 
BROWNThe Associated 
Press
WACO, Texas - The University Baptist Church band had just led the 
congregation in praise songs when the Rev. Kyle Lake stepped into a tank on the 
stage to baptize a new member, something he did several times a year.
As a packed room of more than 800 people watched, Lake cried out and then 
fell backward.
Several doctors in the Sunday morning crowd rushed up and pulled the 
33-year-old pastor from the water, but Lake had been electrocuted. He was 
pronounced dead shortly afterward at a hospital.
Some at the service, which was packed for Baylor University homecoming 
weekend, said Lake had adjusted a microphone outside the tank. Others said it 
appeared a piece of equipment fell into the water.
"It happened so fast; no one knew what was going on," said Sam Larson, a 
Minneapolis seminary student who was in Waco visiting fellow Baylor graduates. 
"It was horrible. Kyle was a guy who loved everybody; he didn't care who you 
were. And everybody who met him loved him."
Waco police believe it was an accident, said police spokesman Steve 
Anderson.
Detectives and the city's inspection department on Monday examined the 
church's electrical system, microphones and band equipment to try to determine 
exactly what happened, he said.
Randy Childers, who oversees code enforcement for the city, said officials 
also were reviewing previous inspection reports and permits for the building, 
which housed a supermarket before the church moved in about 10 years ago.
The funeral service for Lake, who was married and had a 5-year-old daughter 
and 3-year-old twin sons, was planned for Tuesday at Waco's First Baptist 
Church.

  
  

  
  
Lake, a Tyler native, graduated from Baylor in 1994 and the school's Truett 
Seminary in 1997.
He had been a pastor at University Baptist Church for seven year. The church 
had grown to about 600 members since it was founded in 1995 as a contemporary 
church for students at nearby Baylor, the world's largest Baptist 
university.
"He could speak students' language, and he could capture their attention and 
hold it," said Jeter Basden, Baylor's director of ministry guidance and one of 
Lake's professors. "He was funny and deep, and he could communicate with someone 
who didn't have a church background."
Since news of Lake's death began spreading, several Baptist pastors have 
talked about making sure their baptism practices are safe, said David Hardage, 
executive director of the Waco Baptist Association.
But he said the tragedy won't end the tradition of completely submersing 
someone during a baptism, which symbolizes a Christian's belief that Jesus 
Christ died on the cross and rose from the dead. The woman who was to be 
baptized Sunday wasn't injured, church officials said.
"It's an integral part of the Baptist faith," Hardage said. "For Baptists, we 
don't believe that baptism is an act of salvation. We believe baptism is an act 
of obedience and a testimony for what you believe."
-
AP staff writer Anabelle Garay in Dallas contributed to this 
report.


Re: [TruthTalk] Is it time for the USA to invade Iran?

2005-11-01 Thread Dave Hansen




DAVEH:  This link didn't work, DavidM.    Did you misquote it?

David Miller wrote:

  
  
  
  Eight year old Iranian boy gets punished for stealing bread. 
The punishment?  Run over his arm with a car! 
   
  http://bareknucklepolitics.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=126#126
   
   


-- 
~~~
Dave Hansen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.langlitz.com
~~~
If you wish to receive
things I find interesting,
I maintain six email lists...
JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS,
STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.




Re: [TruthTalk] IS THIS A GREAT COUNTRY, OR WHAT?

2005-11-01 Thread Kevin Deegan
This is a TRUE story! It is not an Urban legend.
http://www.wtv-zone.com/Mary/THISWILLMAKEYOUPROUD.HTML
Brian Chontosh
http://www.usmc.mil/marinelink/mcn2000.nsf/lookupstoryref/200456162723__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 

[TruthTalk] [Fwd: Fwd: Fw: IS THIS A GREAT COUNTRY, OR WHAT?]

2005-11-01 Thread Terry Clifton






--




--- Begin Message ---


--- Begin Message ---



 
--- Begin Message ---
Title: AOL Email





  
  

  
   
--- Begin Message ---



 
--- Begin Message ---


--- Begin Message ---

 The Little Red Hen - Modern Version

Once upon a time, on a farm in Texas, there was a little red hen who scratched about the barnyard until she uncovered quite a few grains of wheat.

She called all of her neighbors together and said, "If we plant is wheat, we shall have bread to eat.
Who will help me plant it?"

 "Not I," said the cow.

 "Not I," said the duck.

 "Not I," said the pig.

 "Not I," said the goose.

 "Then I will do it by myself," said the little red hen. And so she did.   

  The wheat grew very tall and ripened into golden grain.

 "Who will help me reap my wheat?" asked the little red hen.

 "Not I," said the duck.

 "Out of my classification," said the pig.

 "I'd lose my seniority," said the cow.

 "I'd lose my unemployment compensation," said the goose.

 "Then I will do it by myself," said the little red hen, and so she did.



 At last it came time to bake the bread.

 "Who will help me bake the bread! ?" asked the little red hen.

 "That would be overtime for me," said the cow.

 "I'd lose my welfare benefits," said the duck.

 "I'm a dropout and never learned how," said the pig.

 "If I'm to be the only helper, that's discrimination," said the goose.

"Then I will do it by myself," said the little red hen.
She baked five loaves and held them up for all of her neighbors to see.


They wanted some and, in fact, demanded a share.
But the little red hen said, "No, I shall eat all five loaves."

 "Excess profits!" cried the cow.

 "Capitalist leech!" screamed the duck.

 "I demand equal rights!" yelled the goose.

 The pig just grunted in disdain.

And they all painted "Unfair!" picket signs and marched around and around the little red hen, shouting obscenities.
 
Then a government agent came, he said to the little red hen, "You must not be so greedy."

 "But I earned the bread," said the little red hen.
"Exactly," said the agent. "That is what makes our free enterprise system so wonderful. Anyone in the barnyard can earn as much as he wants. But under our modern government regulations, the productive workers must divide the fruits of their labor with those who are lazy and idle,"

And they all lived happily ever after, including the little red hen, who smiled and clucked, "I am grateful, for now I truly understand,"

But her neighbors became quite disappointed in her. She never again baked bread because she joined the "party" and got her bread free.

And all the Democrats smiled. 'Fairness' had been established.
Individual initiative had died, but nobody noticed; perhaps no one cared.as long as there was free bread that "the rich" were paying for.

 Bill Clinton is getting $12 million for his memoirs.

 Hillary got $8 million for hers.

 That's $20 million for memories from two people, who for eight years, repeatedly testified, under oath, that they couldn't remember anything.

 IS THIS A GREAT COUNTRY, OR WHAT?


--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---
--- End Message ---


[TruthTalk] [Fwd: Fw: CHARITY]

2005-11-01 Thread Terry Clifton






-




 
forward attacheed





--- Begin Message ---



  



As 
you open your pockets for yet another natural disaster, keep these facts in 
mind: Marsha J. Evans, 
President and CEO of the  American Red 
Cross... salary 
for year 
ending 06/30/03  was 
$651,957 
plus expenses. Brian Gallagher, 
 President of the United 
Way receives a  $375,000 base 
salary, plus numerous expense benefits. 
The Salvation Army's Commissioner Todd 
Bassett 
receives a salary of only $13,000 per year (plus housing) for managing this 
$2 billion dollar organization. 
No 
further comment necessary. 

--- End Message ---


Re: [TruthTalk] Perry & Dave: inquiring minds want to know

2005-11-01 Thread Kevin Deegan
All of the doctrines of the Church are demonstratably Evolutionary.
That is why the 1830 BoM does not even include most of the unique doctrines held today. Very interesting is the development of the priesthood doctrine. We have testimony outside of the standard works http://www.greaterthings.com/Topical/DavidWhitmer.htm showing it was not brought into the church until around 1832
"This matter of 'Priesthood,' since the days of Sydney Rigdon, has been the great hobby and stumbling-block of the Latter Day Saints. Priesthood means authority; and authority is the word we should use. I do not think the word priesthood is mentioned in the New Covenant of the Book of Mormon. Authority is the word we used for the first two years in the church--until Sydney Rigdon's days in Ohio. This matter of the two orders of priesthood in the Church of Christ, and lineal priesthood of the old law being in the church, all originated in the mind of Sydney Rigdon. He explained these things to Brother Joseph in his way, out of the old Scriptures, and got Joseph to inquire, etc. He would inquire, and as mouthpiece speak out the revelations just as they had it fixed up in their heartsaccording to the desires of the heart, the inspiration comes, but it may be the spirit of man that gives it This is the way the High Priests and the
 'priesthood' as you have it, was introduced into the Church of Christ almost two years after its beginning--and after we had baptized and confirmed about two thousand souls into the church." (An Address To All Believers In Christ, by David Whitmer p. 64) 
SO
The Book of Commandments being 1833 HAS NOT ONE Priesthood Revelation even though they supposedly happened years earlier!
Revelations that were recieved in 1830 did not appear until the 1835 D&C
 
"I never heard one word of John the baptist, or of Peter, James, and John's visit and ordination till I was told some year afterward in Ohio."  Apostle William E. McLellin
 
A much more believable understanding would be that the revelations were created at a later date and inserted into the record. We have testimony to that fact in these two places.
1) One only need compare some Revelations, that are in the BC to those same ones in the DC to see the books have been cooked!
2) "You have CHANGED THE REVELATIONS from the way they were first given and as they are today in the Book of Commandments, to support the error of Brother Joseph in taking upon himself the office of Seer to the church. You have changed the revelations to support the error of high priests. You have changed the revelations to support the error of a President of the high priesthood, high counselors, etc. You have altered the revelations to support you in going beyond the plain teachings of Christ in the new covenant part of the Book of Mormon." (An Address To All Believers In Christ, p. 49)  NOTE check the revelation that says joe was only given the power to translate in the BC that one had to be fixed real quick.
 

"The important details that are missing from the 'full history' of 1834 are likewise missing from the Book of Commandments in 1833. The student would expect to find all the particulars of the Restoration in this first treasured set of 65 revelations, the dates of which encompassed the bestowals of the two Priesthoods, but they are conspicuously absent... The notable revelations on Priesthood in the Doctrine and Covenants before referred to, Sections 2 and 13, are missing, and Chapter 28 gives no hint of the Restoration which, if actual, had been known for four years. More than four hundred words were added to this revelation of August, 1829 in Section 27 of the Doctrine and Covenants, the additions made to include the names of heavenly visitors and two separate ordinations. The Book of Commandments gives the duties of Elders, Priests, Teachers, and Deacons and refers to Joseph's apostolic calling but there is no mention of Melchezedek Priesthood, High Priesthood,
 Seventies, High Priests, nor High Councilors. These words were later inserted into the revelation on Church organization and government of April, 1830, making it appear that they were known at that date, but they do not appear in the original, Chapter 24 of the Book of Commandments three years later. Similar interpolations were made in the revelations known as Sections 42 and 68." (Problems in Mormon Text, by La Mar Petersen, pp. 7-8) Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks for the extensive demonstration of my point, Kevin. Looks to me like the mormons, at least according to the Bom, are Trinitarians. Or "were". When do you think the mormon apostasy occured and they began to deny the Trinity? I guess that makes mormons today apostate in their own religion. That is an intersting situation.Perry>From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org>To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org>Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry & Dave: inquiring minds want to know>Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 05:14:

[TruthTalk] Is it time for the USA to invade Iran?

2005-11-01 Thread David Miller



Eight year old Iranian boy gets punished for stealing bread.  The 
punishment?  Run over his arm with a car! 
 
http://bareknucklepolitics.com/forum/viewtopic.php?p=126#126
 
 


Re: [TruthTalk] Perry & Dave: inquiring minds want to know

2005-11-01 Thread Charles Perry Locke
Thanks for the extensive demonstration of my point, Kevin. Looks to me like 
the mormons, at least according to the Bom, are Trinitarians. Or "were". 
When do you think the mormon apostasy occured and they began to deny the 
Trinity? I guess that makes mormons today apostate in their own religion. 
That is an intersting situation.


Perry



From: Kevin Deegan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Perry & Dave: inquiring minds want to know
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2005 05:14:07 -0800 (PST)


It was not a matter of a few "biased" people believing in the Trinity



Thye following Standard Work shows the Trinity and that there is ONE God. 
(Nowhere in the BoM or anywhere else does it say "One in purpose"




Mosiah 15:1,5 I would that ye should understand that God himself shall come 
down among the children of men,...


And thus the flesh becoming subject to the Spirit, or the Son to the 
Father, being one God


(Notice the contrast of Son-Flesh Father - Spirit)



Alma 11:28-29 Now Zeezrom said: Is there more than one God? And he 
answered, No.




Alma 11:44 every thing shall be restored to its perfect frame, as it is 
now, or in the body, and shall be brought and be arraigned before the bar 
of Christ the Son, and God the Father, and the Holy Spirit, which is one 
Eternal God




2 Nephi 31:21 And now, behold, my beloved brethren, this is the way; and 
there is none other way nor name given under heaven whereby man can be 
saved in the kingdom of God. And now, behold, this is the doctrine of 
Christ, and the only and true doctrine of the Father, and of the Son, and 
of the Holy Ghost, which is one God, without end. Amen.




The Father is a Spirit!

Alma 18:2 Behold, is not this the Great Spirit who doth send such great 
punishments upon this people, because of their murders?



Alma 18:24-29And Ammon began to speak unto him with boldness, and said unto 
him: Believest thou that there is a God? And he answered, and said unto 
him: I do not know what that meaneth. And then Ammon said: Believest thou 
that there is a Great Spirit? And he said, Yea. And Ammon said: This is 
God. And Ammon said unto him again: Believest thou that this Great Spirit, 
who is God, created all things which are in heaven and in the earth? And he 
said: Yea




22:8-11 And now when Aaron heard this, his heart began to rejoice, and he 
said: Behold, assuredly as thou livest, O king, there is a God. And the 
king said: Is God that Great Spirit that brought our fathers out of the 
land of Jerusalem? And Aaron said unto him: Yea, he is that Great Spirit, 
and he created all things both in heaven and in earth. Believest thou this? 
And he said: Yea, I believe that the Great Spirit created all things, and I 
desire that ye should tell me concerning all these things, and I will 
believe thy words.




More available upon request.



Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dave wrote:

> BTW.It is not altogether surprising that some early Mormons
>believed it [the Trinity], as most of them came from Protestant stock, 
and

>would have been versed (and biased) in Protestant doctrines.

It was not a matter of a few "biased" people believing in the Trinity...I
understand that the Trinity was taught in official church educational
materials. In the front of the Bom, there is a statement that affirms the
Trinity (unless it has been changed since I got my version!) Unless I am
mistaken they distinctly state that the Father, Son and Holy Ghost are one
God. That sure sounds like the Trinity to me!

Perry


--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may 
know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) 
http://www.InnGlory.org


If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a 
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com



--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man."  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Perry & Dave: inquiring minds want to know

2005-11-01 Thread Kevin Deegan
It was not a matter of a few "biased" people believing in the Trinity
 
Thye following Standard Work shows the Trinity and that there is ONE God. (Nowhere in the BoM or anywhere else does it say "One in purpose"
 
Mosiah 15:1,5 I would that ye should understand that God himself shall come down among the children of men,...
And thus the flesh becoming subject to the Spirit, or the Son to the Father, being one God
(Notice the contrast of Son-Flesh Father - Spirit)
 
Alma 11:28-29 Now Zeezrom said: Is there more than one God? And he answered, No.
 
Alma 11:44 every thing shall be restored to its perfect frame, as it is now, or in the body, and shall be brought and be arraigned before the bar of Christ the Son, and God the Father, and the Holy Spirit, which is one Eternal God
 
2 Nephi 31:21 And now, behold, my beloved brethren, this is the way; and there is none other way nor name given under heaven whereby man can be saved in the kingdom of God. And now, behold, this is the doctrine of Christ, and the only and true doctrine of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost, which is one God, without end. Amen.
 
The Father is a Spirit!
Alma 18:2 Behold, is not this the Great Spirit who doth send such great punishments upon this people, because of their murders?
Alma 18:24-29And Ammon began to speak unto him with boldness, and said unto him: Believest thou that there is a God? And he answered, and said unto him: I do not know what that meaneth. And then Ammon said: Believest thou that there is a Great Spirit? And he said, Yea. And Ammon said: This is God. And Ammon said unto him again: Believest thou that this Great Spirit, who is God, created all things which are in heaven and in the earth? And he said: Yea
 
22:8-11 And now when Aaron heard this, his heart began to rejoice, and he said: Behold, assuredly as thou livest, O king, there is a God. And the king said: Is God that Great Spirit that brought our fathers out of the land of Jerusalem? And Aaron said unto him: Yea, he is that Great Spirit, and he created all things both in heaven and in earth. Believest thou this? And he said: Yea, I believe that the Great Spirit created all things, and I desire that ye should tell me concerning all these things, and I will believe thy words.
 
More available upon request.
 
Charles Perry Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dave wrote:> BTW.It is not altogether surprising that some early Mormons >believed it [the Trinity], as most of them came from Protestant stock, and >would have been versed (and biased) in Protestant doctrines.It was not a matter of a few "biased" people believing in the Trinity...I understand that the Trinity was taught in official church educational materials. In the front of the Bom, there is a statement that affirms the Trinity (unless it has been changed since I got my version!) Unless I am mistaken they distinctly state that the Father, Son and Holy Ghost are one God. That sure sounds like the Trinity to me!Perry--"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.orgIf you do not want
 to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com 

[TruthTalk] From Focus On the Family 11-1-05

2005-11-01 Thread ShieldsFamily








--

Alaska High Court Betrays
Citizens in Gay-Benefits Ruling

 

The Alaska Supreme Court has
defied the will of the people a ruling that gives government employees in
same-sex relationships the same benefits as their married coworkers.

 

Alaska passed one of the
first constitutional amendments defining marriage as a union between one man
and one woman by a significant majority in 1998.  The amendment was immediately
challenged by the American Civil Liberties Union and 14 gay couples.

 

A Superior Court ruling
found for the state, claiming that since non-married heterosexual couples
aren't eligible for benefits, gay couples have no qualm.  Appeals went all the
way to the Supreme Court, which ruled that since there is no remedy in the
state -- i.e. same-sex couples can't get married -- the state is obligated to
give benefits to those couples.

 

Republican state Rep. John
Coghill said he is disappointed by the decision.

 

"This is one of a
string of issues that they have forced on the people of Alaska
-- that have forded the will of Alaska
and changed the face of our Constitution," he told CitizenLink. "So
this flies in the face of, certainly, the popular view, but it flies in the
face of our own constitution."

 

Coghill said it is another
example of the out-of-control judiciary set on making law instead of
interpreting law.

 

"It was not about equal
protection at all; it was just a bold political move," he said. 
"They've made other bold political moves, too.

 

"We in the Legislature
have tried to ban partial-birth abortion.  This court has struck that down. 
We've tried to uphold the parent's right to know and give consent to a child
who is seeking abortion -- and this court has struck that down.

We have, in the Legislature,
forbidden public money to be used for abortions -- and this court has struck
that down.

 

 

"So they've had a whole
line of what I'd call severe

judicial activism.   To go
through the public policy

debate then just have a
panel of judges turn it down, the arrogance is significant."

 

Republican state Sen. Fred
Dyson agreed that the decision to give homosexual couples the same benefits as
married couples ignored the state's constitution.

 

Both Coghill and Dyson
intend to present to their respective bodies a proposed amendment to the state
constitution that would include language that makes no other union equal to
marriage.

 

 
--

QUOTEWORTHY:

--

"This country wasn't
founded upon Allah; it wasn't founded upon the Quran. It was founded upon the
Holy Bible."

 

-- Then-Alabama Chief
Justice Roy Moore, 2002

 








[TruthTalk] FW: Why Jews Should Support the Nomination of Samuel Alito

2005-11-01 Thread ShieldsFamily








One Rabbi who gets it…..

 









From: Toward Tradition [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005
8:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Why Jews Should Support
the Nomination of Samuel Alito



 




 
  
  For free and unrestricted use with
  attribution.
  
  Rabbi Daniel Lapin writes a letter to American Jews
  advising
  Embrace
  the values of Judaism instead of those of Secular Fundamentalism
  by encouraging your senator to confirm Judge Samuel Alito
  My Friends,
  During the 19th century Rabbi Samson Raphael Hirsch
  wrote, "The more enlightenment you gain in the knowledge of history, the
  clearer will be your insight into the Torah." Since the theater of world
  history follows the screenplay of Torah, history can provide guidance to
  understanding God’s plans.
  For instance, the holocaust did not start in Poland, where
  most Jews lived openly as religious Jews. Instead it erupted in Germany, the
  country whose Jews were most invisible and assimilated. This valuable lesson
  validates ancient Jewish wisdom’s explanation of the Bible verse “The voice
  is Jacob's voice but the hands are the hands of Esau (Genesis 27:22). The
  traditional meaning has an aging Isaac warning his descendants. When the
  voice of Jacob is stilled, the hands of Esau are strengthened. 
  When traditional Judaism is silenced by our
  abandonment of faith, anti-Semitism becomes strong. Contemporary American
  politics suggests that we Jews have failed to learn that our embrace of
  secular liberalism as our new religion could, in the words of the surgeon
  general, be harmful to our health.
  Recently more and more Americans are asking
  themselves whether they really are better off today than they were in 1955.
  They are recognizing that life has become more squalid, expensive and
  dangerous. They correctly attribute these distressing changes to 50 years of
  liberal excess.
  Most of us can recall that an American family used
  to enjoy an enviable middle class lifestyle on the earnings of one worker. We
  think back nostalgically to a time when city parks were safe for all and when
  schools were not only safe but actually taught skills. We remember a time
  when movies did not routinely include scenes and expressions that would have
  made an old-time convict blush. We feel that abortion should not be treated
  like wart removal and that homosexuals should not be accorded special rights.
  We do not think that anybody should claim special rights and we oppose
  affirmative action. Many of us used to think of ourselves as Democrats—we
  don’t any longer.
  At least 78% of Americas believe that the Bible
  is the word of God. They take marriage seriously and work hard at raising
  their children. They are white and black Americans. They are men and women
  and they are found in every profession and occupation. More and more of them
  are turning back to religious orthodoxy by joining evangelical denominations
  or mainstream Catholic churches. Many Jews among them are also returning to
  traditional expressions of faith. 
  Most Jews are unaware that most serious Christians
  in this country really do believe that God has been good to America because America has been good to her
  Jews. Better than most Jews, Christians know the verse "And I will bless
  them that bless you and those who curse you I will curse" (Genesis XII
  3). They are financial and political supporters of the State of Israel. Yes,
  they do so for religious reasons, but friends whose friendship is based on
  principle rather than political expediency should be valued not vilified.
  Not every criticism of Jews constitutes
  anti-Semitism. It is certainly not anti-Semitic when our Christian friends
  ask legitimate questions. For instance, they observe that for the most part
  Jews do not send their children to serve in today's volunteer military. Why,
  they ask, is it so important to Jews in New York that Christian boys in the army
  should serve alongside homosexuals? They are offended by the local Reform
  rabbi heading the annual campaign to remove nativity scenes from the city
  hall lawn. They are confused when another group of Jews erects a large
  Chanukah menorah on the very same lawn. They are hurt when they are accused
  of anti-Semitism while defending their beliefs over abortion.
  Sadly as a community we Jews are not perceived as
  remaining neutral on issues of moral importance to the Christian community.
  We are perceived as being heavily involved—but on the wrong side. 
  Out of 35 or so constituent organizations listed on
  the letterhead of the Religious Coalition for Abortion Rights, fully
  one-third are Jewish. When it comes to special rights for homosexuals,
  opposed by a majority of Americans, the same story is seen. Both nationally
  and in every state in which the issue has surfaced, Jewish organizations have
  vocally and visibly allied themselves with the militant homosexual agenda. 

RE: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead Islam's cause to Bush]

2005-11-01 Thread Dean Moore


 
 

 

- Original Message - 
From: ShieldsFamily 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 10/31/2005 7:32:53 PM 
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead Islam's cause to Bush]


Hold your umbrella upside down. J 
cd: Cute-You go girl:-)
 




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean MooreSent: Monday, October 31, 2005 4:54 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead Islam's cause to Bush]
 

 

 

 


- Original Message - 

From: ShieldsFamily 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org

Sent: 10/31/2005 11:35:10 AM 

Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead Islam's cause to Bush]

 
Goodso just preach to them Brother!!!  (Ill pray the Lord drops the money on you from one of those open windows!) iz
cd: I will be standing outside with outstretched arms,looking up and waiting:-)
 




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean MooreSent: Monday, October 31, 2005 6:35 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead Islam's cause to Bush]
 

cd: I'm ready- when and where and where do I find the money to go? By the way sister we are not protesters-The police give us that title and try and put us in the same group as the peace marchers and the like- but we prefer preachers :-)

 

 


- Original Message - 

From: ShieldsFamily 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org

Sent: 10/31/2005 3:46:44 AM 

Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead Islam's cause to Bush]

 
Id still love to see you and Kevin and David Miller protesting Charles and Camillas nerve to show up here to offer moral advice! iz
 




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dean MooreSent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 7:33 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead Islam's cause to Bush]
 

 cd: News flash-We are stop from using freedom of speech and freedom of religion on a regular basics in the good old USA-and lose in the courts.

 

 


- Original Message - 

From: ShieldsFamily 

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org

Sent: 10/30/2005 7:59:01 PM 

Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead Islam's cause to Bush]

 
Well they are visiting the good old USA where free speech is not (yet) prohibited! iz
 




From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin DeeganSent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 5:20 PMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: RE: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead Islam's cause to Bush]
 

That is against the law in the UKShieldsFamily <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 
PS I wish someone would greet the jolly Prince and his "wife" with someplaccards stating exactly what they are. iz -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Christine MillerSent: Sunday, October 30, 2005 11:02 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to pleadIslam's cause to Bush]Looks like Prince Charles has already pled Islam's case in Australia:Police are told: "In incidents such as domestic violence, police need tohave an understanding of the traditions, ways of life and habits ofMuslims."They are told it would be appreciated in cases of domestic violence ifpolice consult the local Muslim religious leader who will w
 ork against"fragmenting the family unit". http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/printpage/0,5481,17026063,00.htmlBlessings!> -Original Message-> From: Terry Clifton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org> > Sent: Sat, 29 Oct 2005 19:29:45 -0500> Subject: [TruthTalk] [Fwd: Telegraph News Prince Charles to plead > Islam's cause to Bush]> > Get out you story about the girls being murdered and sent it to this > idiot, John> > > > >http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/10/30/nchas30.xml&sSheet=/portal/2005/10/30/ixportaltop.html> > > > __Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.http://farechase.yahoo.com--"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned w
 i th salt, that you may knowhow you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)http://www.InnGlory.orgIf you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have afriend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.--"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.orgIf you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribe