Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Translation:I (Judy) AM WELL GROUNDED IN SCRIPTURE.
I (Judy) disagree with your statement. Therefore, Your statement (Lance) is
false. 'Those' (translation) DavidM, Izzie, Kevin, CPL
also.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 05, 2005 14:30
Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
It's not the fact that you don't quote scripture per
se. If your conclusions were scripturally based those who are
well grounded in scripture would recognize
them. jt
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:13:08 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
FWIW my submissions, in part, are my own
biblically grounded conclusions. Why not cite the scriptures upon which
these conclusions are based? I read what interminable 'conversations' (?)
extend from doing such. I've posted my little formula on this.(biblical
interpretation) I actually believe it.('it' being my little formula
concerning interpretation)
I'm attempting to engage Dave in a conversation
as to his 'take on evangelicalism (not evangelism, Dave) as drawn from TT.
If I were Dave, I'd be in stitches most of the time over much of what is
said herein.
From: Kevin Deegan
G L, rooted and grounded in the
word?
LOL, neither has posted even one scripture reference in how
long?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance"
referenced belwow in my wording - not that anyone one rigth
really cares about what I actually write?
But more than that aside - being rooted and
grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these
brothers. So who decides? You or me?
Or maybe we just agree to live and let live.
JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:14:44
-0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible
Quiz
JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits"
aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true
for
either Lance or Gary. Lance claims
repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment)
and
what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan
than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth
speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because
aperson can be honestly deceived so
being
honest is not a litmus test either.
jt
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
What does this have to do with anything? I believe in
prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who
claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits
to confirm thedifference.
JD
__Do You
Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
TWO-You (metaphorically)
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 05, 2005 22:10
Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
ONE
LANCE chirps I've found a total lack of concern
Here is your opportunity to FLAP your gums.
In what way have you
demonstrated your Concern Lance?
TWO
Who teaches that the incarnation is a book?
Backup your statement, for once in your life. Anyone can make
accusations, what is your basis for such?
Lanceyou areon display for all to see. Be a man for
once in your life and fess up.Lance Muir
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW my submissions, in part, are my own
biblically grounded conclusions. Why not cite the scriptures upon which
these conclusions are based? I read what interminable 'conversations' (?)
extend from doing such. I've posted my little formula on this.(biblical
interpretation) I actually believe it.('it' being my little formula
concerning interpretation)
I'm attempting to engage Dave in a conversation
as to his 'take on evangelicalism (not evangelism, Dave) as drawn from TT.
If I were Dave, I'd be in stitches most of the time over much of what is
said herein.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 05, 2005 07:52
Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was:
Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
G L, rooted and grounded in the word?
LOL, neither has posted even one scripture reference in how
long?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance"
referenced belwow in my wording - not that anyone one rigth
really cares about what I actually write?
But more than that aside - being rooted and
grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these
brothers. So who decides? You or me?
Or maybe we just agree to live and let live.
JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:14:44
-0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible
Quiz
JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits"
aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true
for
either Lance or Gary. Lance claims
repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment)
and
what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan
than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth
speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because
aperson can be honestly deceived so
being
honest is not a litmus test either.
jt
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
What does this have to do with anything? I believe in
prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who
claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits
to confirm thedifference.
JD
__Do You
Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
__Do You
Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Lance it would behoove you to spend more time in
scripture than you do trying to stay two steps ahead
of everyone else. I know enough scripture to know
that you are off in another direction. jt
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 04:17:07 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Translation:I (Judy) AM WELL GROUNDED IN
SCRIPTURE. I (Judy) disagree with your statement. Therefore, Your statement
(Lance) is false. 'Those' (translation) DavidM, Izzie, Kevin, CPL
also.
From: Judy Taylor
It's not the fact that you don't quote scripture
per se. If your conclusions were scripturally based those who
are
well grounded in scripture would recognize
them. jt
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:13:08 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
FWIW my submissions, in part, are my own
biblically grounded conclusions. Why not cite the scriptures upon which
these conclusions are based? I read what interminable 'conversations' (?)
extend from doing such. I've posted my little formula on this.(biblical
interpretation) I actually believe it.('it' being my little formula
concerning interpretation)
I'm attempting to engage Dave in a
conversation as to his 'take on evangelicalism (not evangelism, Dave) as
drawn from TT. If I were Dave, I'd be in stitches most of the time over
much of what is said herein.
From: Kevin Deegan
G L, rooted and grounded in the
word?
LOL, neither has posted even one scripture reference in how
long?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance"
referenced belwow in my wording - not that anyone one
rigth really cares about what I actually write?
But more than that aside - being rooted and
grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these
brothers. So who decides? You or
me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live.
JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:14:44
-0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV
Bible Quiz
JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits"
aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true
for
either Lance or Gary. Lance claims
repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the
enlightenment) and
what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan
than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth
speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because
aperson can be honestly deceived so
being
honest is not a litmus test either.
jt
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
What does this have to do with anything? I believe
in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people
who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the
spirits to confirm thedifference.
JD
__Do You
Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Explicate 'another direction', please. Do be as
detailed and definitive as you are able.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 06, 2005 05:10
Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Lance it would behoove you to spend more time in
scripture than you do trying to stay two steps ahead
of everyone else. I know enough scripture to
know that you are off in another direction. jt
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 04:17:07 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Translation:I (Judy) AM WELL GROUNDED IN
SCRIPTURE. I (Judy) disagree with your statement. Therefore, Your statement
(Lance) is false. 'Those' (translation) DavidM, Izzie, Kevin, CPL
also.
From: Judy Taylor
It's not the fact that you don't quote scripture
per se. If your conclusions were scripturally based those who
are
well grounded in scripture would recognize
them. jt
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:13:08 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
FWIW my submissions, in part, are my own
biblically grounded conclusions. Why not cite the scriptures upon which
these conclusions are based? I read what interminable 'conversations'
(?) extend from doing such. I've posted my little formula on
this.(biblical interpretation) I actually believe it.('it' being my
little formula concerning interpretation)
I'm attempting to engage Dave in a
conversation as to his 'take on evangelicalism (not evangelism, Dave) as
drawn from TT. If I were Dave, I'd be in stitches most of the time over
much of what is said herein.
From: Kevin Deegan
G L, rooted and grounded in the
word?
LOL, neither has posted even one scripture reference in how
long?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance"
referenced belwow in my wording - not that anyone one
rigth really cares about what I actually write?
But more than that aside - being rooted and
grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these
brothers. So who decides? You or
me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live.
JD-Original Message-From: Judy
Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:14:44
-0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV
Bible Quiz
JD it is impossibleto "try the
spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is
not true for
either Lance or Gary. Lance claims
repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the
enlightenment) and
what comes from Gary's computer is more
Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the
mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything
because aperson can be honestly
deceived so being
honest is not a litmus test either.
jt
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
What does this have to do with anything? I
believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few
honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe
in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference.
JD
__Do You
Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Lance - how is it you constantly ask for what you are
unwilling to give? I find it ironic that the king
of the 'one liners' would ask for such detail.
jt
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 05:19:25 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Explicate 'another direction', please. Do be as
detailed and definitive as you are able.
From: Judy Taylor
Lance it would behoove you to spend more time in
scripture than you do trying to stay two steps ahead
of everyone else. I know enough scripture to
know that you are off in another direction. jt
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 04:17:07 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Translation:I (Judy) AM WELL GROUNDED IN
SCRIPTURE. I (Judy) disagree with your statement. Therefore, Your
statement (Lance) is false. 'Those' (translation) DavidM, Izzie, Kevin,
CPL also.
From: Judy
Taylor
It's not the fact that you don't quote
scripture per se. If your conclusions were scripturally based those who
are
well grounded in scripture would recognize
them. jt
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:13:08 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
FWIW my submissions, in part, are my own
biblically grounded conclusions. Why not cite the scriptures upon
which these conclusions are based? I read what interminable
'conversations' (?) extend from doing such. I've posted my little
formula on this.(biblical interpretation) I actually believe it.('it'
being my little formula concerning interpretation)
I'm attempting to engage Dave in a
conversation as to his 'take on evangelicalism (not evangelism, Dave)
as drawn from TT. If I were Dave, I'd be in stitches most of the time
over much of what is said herein.
From: Kevin Deegan
G L, rooted and grounded in the
word?
LOL, neither has posted even one scripture reference in how
long?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or
"Lance" referenced belwow in my wording - not that
anyone one rigth really cares about what I actually
write?
But more than that aside - being rooted and
grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these
brothers. So who decides? You or
me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live.
JD-Original Message-From: Judy
Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:14:44
-0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV
Bible Quiz
JD it is impossibleto "try the
spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which
is not true for
either Lance or Gary. Lance claims
repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the
enlightenment) and
what comes from Gary's computer is more
Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart
the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with
everything because aperson can be
honestly deceived so being
honest is not a litmus test either.
jt
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
What does this have to do with anything? I
believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few
honest people who claim to be prophets. And I
believe in testing the spirits to confirm
thedifference.
JD
__Do You
Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection
around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
All you need do is say: 'No, Lance, I won't do it!'
I can actually live with such a response whereas others cannot. As an aside,
review my posts over the last week or two. They are not 'one liners'.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 06, 2005 05:25
Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Lance - how is it you constantly ask for what you are
unwilling to give? I find it ironic that the king
of the 'one liners' would ask for such detail.
jt
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 05:19:25 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Explicate 'another direction', please. Do be as
detailed and definitive as you are able.
From: Judy Taylor
Lance it would behoove you to spend more time in
scripture than you do trying to stay two steps ahead
of everyone else. I know enough scripture
to know that you are off in another direction. jt
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 04:17:07 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Translation:I (Judy) AM WELL GROUNDED IN
SCRIPTURE. I (Judy) disagree with your statement. Therefore, Your
statement (Lance) is false. 'Those' (translation) DavidM, Izzie, Kevin,
CPL also.
From: Judy
Taylor
It's not the fact that you don't quote
scripture per se. If your conclusions were scripturally based those
who are
well grounded in scripture would recognize
them. jt
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:13:08 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
FWIW my submissions, in part, are my
own biblically grounded conclusions. Why not cite the scriptures
upon which these conclusions are based? I read what interminable
'conversations' (?) extend from doing such. I've posted my little
formula on this.(biblical interpretation) I actually believe
it.('it' being my little formula concerning
interpretation)
I'm attempting to engage Dave in a
conversation as to his 'take on evangelicalism (not evangelism,
Dave) as drawn from TT. If I were Dave, I'd be in stitches most of
the time over much of what is said herein.
From: Kevin Deegan
G L, rooted and grounded in
the word?
LOL, neither has posted even one scripture reference in how
long?[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or
"Lance" referenced belwow in my wording - not that
anyone one rigth really cares about what I actually
write?
But more than that aside - being rooted
and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these
brothers. So who decides? You or
me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let
live.
JD-Original Message-From: Judy
Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:14:44
-0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk]
NIV Bible Quiz
JD it is impossibleto "try the
spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word
which is not true for
either Lance or Gary. Lance
claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the
enlightenment) and
what comes from Gary's computer is more
Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart
the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with
everything because aperson can
be honestly deceived so being
honest is not a litmus test
either. jt
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
What does this have to do with anything? I
believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few
honest people who claim to be prophets. And I
believe in testing the spirits to confirm
thedifference.
JD
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
CMON don't be a mouse BE A MAN
Are you claiming now that I teach such and you have now admitted that you have changed your claim that JUDY, DM IZZY teach such?
The Bible says A double minded man is unstable in ALL his ways
But as amouse you won't qualify.Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TWO-You (metaphorically)
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 05, 2005 22:10
Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
ONE
LANCE chirps I've found a total lack of concern
Here is your opportunity to FLAP your gums.
In what way have you demonstrated your Concern Lance?
TWO
Who teaches that the incarnation is a book?
Backup your statement, for once in your life. Anyone can make accusations, what is your basis for such?
Lanceyou areon display for all to see. Be a man for once in your life and fess up.Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW my submissions, in part, are my own biblically grounded conclusions. Why not cite the scriptures upon which these conclusions are based? I read what interminable 'conversations' (?) extend from doing such. I've posted my little formula on this.(biblical interpretation) I actually believe it.('it' being my little formula concerning interpretation)
I'm attempting to engage Dave in a conversation as to his 'take on evangelicalism (not evangelism, Dave) as drawn from TT. If I were Dave, I'd be in stitches most of the time over much of what is said herein.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 05, 2005 07:52
Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
G L, rooted and grounded in the word?
LOL, neither has posted even one scripture reference in how long?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance" referenced belwow in my wording - not that anyone one rigth really cares about what I actually write?
But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. So who decides? You or me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live.
JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:14:44 -0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true for
either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and
what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being
honest is not a litmus test either. jt
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference.
JD
__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Discover Yahoo!
Get on-the-go sports scores, stock quotes, news & more. Check it out!
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
LOSTLance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Explicate 'another direction', please. Do be as detailed and definitive as you are able.
- Original Message -
From: Judy Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 06, 2005 05:10
Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Lance it would behoove you to spend more time in scripture than you do trying to stay two steps ahead
of everyone else. I know enough scripture to know that you are off in another direction. jt
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 04:17:07 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Translation:I (Judy) AM WELL GROUNDED IN SCRIPTURE. I (Judy) disagree with your statement. Therefore, Your statement (Lance) is false. 'Those' (translation) DavidM, Izzie, Kevin, CPL also.
From: Judy Taylor
It's not the fact that you don't quote scripture per se. If your conclusions were scripturally based those who are
well grounded in scripture would recognize them. jt
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:13:08 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW my submissions, in part, are my own biblically grounded conclusions. Why not cite the scriptures upon which these conclusions are based? I read what interminable 'conversations' (?) extend from doing such. I've posted my little formula on this.(biblical interpretation) I actually believe it.('it' being my little formula concerning interpretation)
I'm attempting to engage Dave in a conversation as to his 'take on evangelicalism (not evangelism, Dave) as drawn from TT. If I were Dave, I'd be in stitches most of the time over much of what is said herein.
From: Kevin Deegan
G L, rooted and grounded in the word?
LOL, neither has posted even one scripture reference in how long?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance" referenced belwow in my wording - not that anyone one rigth really cares about what I actually write?
But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. So who decides? You or me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live.
JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:14:44 -0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true for
either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and
what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being
honest is not a litmus test either. jt
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference.
JD
__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Discover Yahoo!
Have fun online with music videos, cool games, IM & more. Check it out!
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
He is unwilling to give but not ask. As long as we use your money, he need not move his finger.
Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lance - how is it you constantly ask for what you are unwilling to give? I find it ironic that the king of the 'one liners' would ask for such detail. jt
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 05:19:25 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Explicate 'another direction', please. Do be as detailed and definitive as you are able.
From: Judy Taylor
Lance it would behoove you to spend more time in scripture than you do trying to stay two steps ahead
of everyone else. I know enough scripture to know that you are off in another direction. jt
On Mon, 6 Jun 2005 04:17:07 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Translation:I (Judy) AM WELL GROUNDED IN SCRIPTURE. I (Judy) disagree with your statement. Therefore, Your statement (Lance) is false. 'Those' (translation) DavidM, Izzie, Kevin, CPL also.
From: Judy Taylor
It's not the fact that you don't quote scripture per se. If your conclusions were scripturally based those who are
well grounded in scripture would recognize them. jt
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:13:08 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW my submissions, in part, are my own biblically grounded conclusions. Why not cite the scriptures upon which these conclusions are based? I read what interminable 'conversations' (?) extend from doing such. I've posted my little formula on this.(biblical interpretation) I actually believe it.('it' being my little formula concerning interpretation)
I'm attempting to engage Dave in a conversation as to his 'take on evangelicalism (not evangelism, Dave) as drawn from TT. If I were Dave, I'd be in stitches most of the time over much of what is said herein.
From: Kevin Deegan
G L, rooted and grounded in the word?
LOL, neither has posted even one scripture reference in how long?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance" referenced belwow in my wording - not that anyone one rigth really cares about what I actually write?
But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. So who decides? You or me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live.
JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:14:44 -0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true for
either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and
what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being
honest is not a litmus test either. jt
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference.
JD
__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Discover Yahoo!
Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing & more. Check it out!
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
G L, rooted and grounded in the word? LOL, neither has posted even one scripture reference in how long?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance" referenced belwow in my wording - not that anyone one rigth really cares about what I actually write? But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. So who decides? You or me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live. JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:14:44 -0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true for either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being honest is not a litmus test either. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference. JD__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
FWIW my submissions, in part, are my own biblically
grounded conclusions. Why not cite the scriptures upon which these conclusions
are based? I read what interminable 'conversations' (?) extend from doing such.
I've posted my little formula on this.(biblical interpretation) I actually
believe it.('it' being my little formula concerning interpretation)
I'm attempting to engage Dave in a conversation as
to his 'take on evangelicalism (not evangelism, Dave) as drawn from TT. If I
were Dave, I'd be in stitches most of the time over much of what is said
herein.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 05, 2005 07:52
Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re:
[TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
G L, rooted and grounded in the word?
LOL, neither has posted even one scripture reference in how
long?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance"
referenced belwow in my wording - not that anyone one rigth
really cares about what I actually write?
But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded
in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. So who
decides? You or me? Or maybe we just agree to live
and let live.
JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:14:44
-0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible
Quiz
JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside
from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true
for
either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly
that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment)
and
what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than
scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth
speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because
aperson can be honestly deceived so being
honest is not a litmus test either.
jt
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
What does this have to do with anything? I believe in
prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim
to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to
confirm thedifference.
JD
__Do You
Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Again more evidence of Baseless claims, since it would have been a simple feat to provide the examples of "rooted grounded" posts by the dynamic duo. Avoid dance. Notice JD dance that with only one foot[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First of all, I thought you were responding to my words, since you included them in your response -- callme crazy. Secondly, are you tryng to tell me that nothing written by Gary was (is) biblical -- all of it was rock and roll? Are you trying to convince me that the Bishop from the North only speaks of movies? That seems to be what you just said. There is no point in going onwith this discussionif that is your "recollection." What is your claim against these two men, once again? NOTHING but rock and roll and the movies? Is that what you just said? JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 15:06:15 -0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Gary Lance are referenced in my wording not yours because they are two of the three who are most critical of David Miller and his spiritual gift. I'd be interested in some examples of the rooting and grounding (in God's Word) that you perceive in the writings of both Lance and Gary JD. Lance is an expert in old movies and this is what he writes about. Gary is taken up with his own writings, those of Bob Dylan, and the word "myth" ... So how about giving me some examples of what I have missed. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:42:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance" referenced below in my wording - not that anyone one rigth really cares about what I actually write? But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. So who decides? You or me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live. JDFrom: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true for either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being honest is not a litmus test either. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference. JD __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
RE: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
What does it mean to be rooted grounded in the word? JD must have a diferent definition. A simple verbal profession of devotion? Maybe he means LIP service.ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: They are definitely that! ROFL! Iz But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. JD Discover Yahoo! Find restaurants, movies, travel & more fun for the weekend. Check it out!
RE: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Kevin, you just have to take their word for it that their many opinions are Biblically-based--in spite of the fact that there is norational evidence of such. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin DeeganSent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 5:53 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz G L, rooted and grounded in the word? LOL, neither has posted even one scripture reference in how long?
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
DAVEH: I confess Lance there are occasions when a smile has been seen to crack my face while reading TT posts. :-) Perhaps my stupidity for equating evangelicalism with evangelism is one of those times.instead, I find myself embarrassed! :-[ Lance Muir wrote: I'm attempting to engage Dave in a conversation as to his 'take on evangelicalism (not evangelism, Dave) as drawn from TT. If I were Dave, I'd be in stitches most of the time over much of what is said herein. -- ~~~ Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.langlitz.com ~~~ If you wish to receive things I find interesting, I maintain six email lists... JOKESTER, OPINIONS, LDS, STUFF, MOTORCYCLE and CLIPS.
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
It's not the fact that you don't quote scripture per
se. If your conclusions were scripturally based those who are
well grounded in scripture would recognize them.
jt
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:13:08 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW my submissions, in part, are my own
biblically grounded conclusions. Why not cite the scriptures upon which these
conclusions are based? I read what interminable 'conversations' (?) extend
from doing such. I've posted my little formula on this.(biblical
interpretation) I actually believe it.('it' being my little formula concerning
interpretation)
I'm attempting to engage Dave in a conversation
as to his 'take on evangelicalism (not evangelism, Dave) as drawn from TT. If
I were Dave, I'd be in stitches most of the time over much of what is said
herein.
From: Kevin Deegan
G L, rooted and grounded in the
word?
LOL, neither has posted even one scripture reference in how
long?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance"
referenced belwow in my wording - not that anyone one rigth
really cares about what I actually write?
But more than that aside - being rooted and
grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers.
So who decides? You or me? Or maybe we just agree
to live and let live.
JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:14:44
-0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible
Quiz
JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits"
aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true
for
either Lance or Gary. Lance claims
repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment)
and
what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan
than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth
speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because
aperson can be honestly deceived so being
honest is not a litmus test either.
jt
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
What does this have to do with anything? I believe in
prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who
claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits
to confirm thedifference.
JD
__Do You
Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Yes. Precisely why I said they were grounded in scripture. Those who do not recognize this truth are obviously not grounded in scripture - or could it be that we are really talking about how eachunderstandsthe biblical message? I vote for the latter.
Jd-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 14:30:00 -0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
It's not the fact that you don't quote scripture per se. If your conclusions were scripturally based those who are
well grounded in scripture would recognize them. jt
On Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:13:08 -0400 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW my submissions, in part, are my own biblically grounded conclusions. Why not cite the scriptures upon which these conclusions are based? I read what interminable 'conversations' (?) extend from doing such. I've posted my little formula on this.(biblical interpretation) I actually believe it.('it' being my little formula concerning interpretation)
I'm attempting to engage Dave in a conversation as to his 'take on evangelicalism (not evangelism, Dave) as drawn from TT. If I were Dave, I'd be in stitches most of the time over much of what is said herein.
From: Kevin Deegan
G L, rooted and grounded in the word?
LOL, neither has posted even one scripture reference in how long?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance" referenced belwow in my wording - not that anyone one rigth really cares about what I actually write?
But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. So who decides? You or me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live.
JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:14:44 -0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true for
either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and
what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being
honest is not a litmus test either. jt
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference.
JD
__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
ONE
LANCE chirps I've found a total lack of concern
Here is your opportunity to FLAP your gums.
In what way have you demonstrated your Concern Lance?
TWO
Who teaches that the incarnation is a book?
Backup your statement, for once in your life. Anyone can make accusations, what is your basis for such?
Lanceyou areon display for all to see. Be a man for once in your life and fess up.Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW my submissions, in part, are my own biblically grounded conclusions. Why not cite the scriptures upon which these conclusions are based? I read what interminable 'conversations' (?) extend from doing such. I've posted my little formula on this.(biblical interpretation) I actually believe it.('it' being my little formula concerning interpretation)
I'm attempting to engage Dave in a conversation as to his 'take on evangelicalism (not evangelism, Dave) as drawn from TT. If I were Dave, I'd be in stitches most of the time over much of what is said herein.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: June 05, 2005 07:52
Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
G L, rooted and grounded in the word?
LOL, neither has posted even one scripture reference in how long?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance" referenced belwow in my wording - not that anyone one rigth really cares about what I actually write?
But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. So who decides? You or me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live.
JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:14:44 -0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true for
either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and
what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being
honest is not a litmus test either. jt
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference.
JD
__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
RE: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
So with most things they state. Izzy are you the one that teaches Jesus was Incarnated in a Book?ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kevin, you just have to take their word for it that their many opinions are Biblically-based--in spite of the fact that there is norational evidence of such. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin DeeganSent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 5:53 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz G L, rooted and grounded in the word? LOL, neither has posted even one scripture reference in how long? Discover Yahoo! Stay in touch with email, IM, photo sharing & more. Check it out!
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Right In your eyes the Bible is the same as the thing you wrap a fish with.[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I like "book chapter and verse" because of my churched traditions. Our two friends perhaps are not the same tradition. But I certainly identify scripture in their context they oftenspeakAS OF the oracles of God. There is a caution to the "b, c and v" thingy -- proof-texting. Might as well be reading out of the newspaper when scripture is used in that manner. Defense Team Representatiive Jd -Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 5 Jun 2005 08:02:06 -0500Subject: RE: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Kevin, you just have to take their word for it that their many opinions are Biblically-based--in spite of the fact that there is norational evidence of such. Izzy From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin DeeganSent: Sunday, June 05, 2005 5:53 AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz G L, rooted and grounded in the word? LOL, neither has posted even one scripture reference in how long?__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference. JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 12:58:11 -0400Subject: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz JD/Perry what about the fact that some (possibly including Gary) hold to a doctrine that teaches them that the spiritual gifts Jesus gave to the Church are not for today - that they died out with the last apostle - as senseless as that may be. A person like that would not accept a genuine prophet in their midst, nor would they be qualified to evaluate the gift operating through them which would make their opinion on the subject without foundation and pointless. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:12:59 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Youknow , Perry, if you are going to get serious with this -- what about "liar" and Deegan. Or just about ANYTHING Izzy says to anyone on the "left? You strike me as being fair minded -- but you areheaded across the line -- big time. As far as David being a false prophet -- tons of evidence on that , Perry. Does not mean that he IS a false prophet -- but it does mean that Gary's opinion is not unsupported. JDFrom: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gary, To call someone's comments a "myth" (even without any evidence) expresses your unsupported opinion. But, your parenthetical comment equates David to a false prophet. Rather than level such an ad hominem attack, please provide exidence to support your claim or retract it.Perry the moderatorFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for manipulativepersonal reasons or as does the author, below)On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]writes: ..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do.--"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.orgIf you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true for either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being honest is not a litmus test either. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference. JDFrom: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] JD/Perry what about the fact that some (possibly including Gary) hold to a doctrine that teaches them that the spiritual gifts Jesus gave to the Church are not for today - that they died out with the last apostle - as senseless as that may be. A person like that would not accept a genuine prophet in their midst, nor would they be qualified to evaluate the gift operating through them which would make their opinion on the subject without foundation and pointless. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 12:12:59 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Youknow , Perry, if you are going to get serious with this -- what about "liar" and Deegan. Or just about ANYTHING Izzy says to anyone on the "left? You strike me as being fair minded -- but you areheaded across the line -- big time. As far as David being a false prophet -- tons of evidence on that , Perry. Does not mean that he IS a false prophet -- but it does mean that Gary's opinion is not unsupported. JDFrom: Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gary, To call someone's comments a "myth" (even without any evidence) expresses your unsupported opinion. But, your parenthetical comment equates David to a false prophet. Rather than level such an ad hominem attack, please provide exidence to support your claim or retract it.Perry the moderatorFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED]myth (false prophets speak of JC in the past tense for manipulativepersonal reasons or as does the author, below)On Fri, 3 Jun 2005 20:09:38 -0400 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]writes: ..Jesus also respected Scripture the way that we do.--"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.orgIf you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.
RE: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
This is so very funny!!! Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment)
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance" referenced belwow in my wording - not that anyone one rigth really cares about what I actually write? But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. So who decides? You or me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live. JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 13:14:44 -0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true for either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being honest is not a litmus test either. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference. JD
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
Gary Lance are referenced in my wording not yours because they are two of the three who are most critical of David Miller and his spiritual gift. I'd be interested in some examples of the rooting and grounding (in God's Word) that you perceive in the writings of both Lance and Gary JD. Lance is an expert in old movies and this is what he writes about. Gary is taken up with his own writings, those of Bob Dylan, and the word "myth" ... So how about giving me some examples of what I have missed. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:42:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance" referenced below in my wording - not that anyone one rigth really cares about what I actually write? But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. So who decides? You or me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live. JDFrom: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true for either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being honest is not a litmus test either. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference. JD
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
First of all, I thought you were responding to my words, since you included them in your response -- callme crazy. Secondly, are you tryng to tell me that nothing written by Gary was (is) biblical -- all of it was rock and roll? Are you trying to convince me that the Bishop from the North only speaks of movies? That seems to be what you just said. There is no point in going onwith this discussionif that is your "recollection." What is your claim against these two men, once again? NOTHING but rock and roll and the movies? Is that what you just said? JD-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 15:06:15 -0400Subject: Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz Gary Lance are referenced in my wording not yours because they are two of the three who are most critical of David Miller and his spiritual gift. I'd be interested in some examples of the rooting and grounding (in God's Word) that you perceive in the writings of both Lance and Gary JD. Lance is an expert in old movies and this is what he writes about. Gary is taken up with his own writings, those of Bob Dylan, and the word "myth" ... So how about giving me some examples of what I have missed. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:42:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance" referenced below in my wording - not that anyone one rigth really cares about what I actually write? But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. So who decides? You or me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live. JDFrom: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true for either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being honest is not a litmus test either. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference. JD
RE: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
They are definitely that! ROFL! Iz But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. JD
Re: Rmoderator Commant: was: Re: [TruthTalk] NIV Bible Quiz
I'd like to see something of substance that is in line with God's Word (not doctrines of men) written by either of them on a subject we have discussed on TT. If you search the archives I think you will find that they both excelin criticism and their own opinion which is OK if this is what they want to contribute.However, this will notqualify themas discerning disciples jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 15:27:05 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: First of all, I thought you were responding to my words, since you included them in your response -- callme crazy. Secondly, are you tryng to tell me that nothing written by Gary was (is) biblical -- all of it was rock and roll? Are you trying to convince me that the Bishop from the North only speaks of movies? That seems to be what you just said. There is no point in going onwith this discussionif that is your "recollection." What is your claim against these two men, once again? NOTHING but rock and roll and the movies? Is that what you just said? JD From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Gary Lance are referenced in my wording not yours because they are two of the three who are most critical of David Miller and his spiritual gift. I'd be interested in some examples of the rooting and grounding (in God's Word) that you perceive in the writings of both Lance and Gary JD. Lance is an expert in old movies and this is what he writes about. Gary is taken up with his own writings, those of Bob Dylan, and the word "myth" ... So how about giving me some examples of what I have missed. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:42:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: And where, pray tell, do you see "Gary" or "Lance" referenced below in my wording - not that anyone one rigth really cares about what I actually write? But more than that aside - being rooted and grounded in Wod's Wod is exactly waht I see in these brothers. So who decides? You or me? Or maybe we just agree to live and let live. JDFrom: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] JD it is impossibleto "try the spirits" aside from being rooted and grounded in God's Word which is not true for either Lance or Gary. Lance claims repeatedly that we can not know anything (because of the enlightenment) and what comes from Gary's computer is more Dylan than scripture (out of the abundance that fills the heart the mouth speaks). To me this has everything to do with everything because aperson can be honestly deceived so being honest is not a litmus test either. jt On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 13:07:23 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: What does this have to do with anything? I believe in prophecy, Judy.And I have known a few honest people who claim to be prophets. And I believe in testing the spirits to confirm thedifference. JD
