Re: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = Sin

2006-02-23 Thread David Miller



Gary wrote:
 one error in DavidMs theology,who denies 

 that only one Man'sdocumented school of 

 prophecy is biblical, that all other 
'schools'
 are rooted in 'doing''evil'

Why would you think that I believe this Gary? 

I don't know what man you are talking about, or what school of prophecy, 
but I do not believe any one school is Biblical and all other schools are rooted 
in evil. Our Lord is multifaceted and loves diversity.

David Miller


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 10:30 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' 
  = Sin
  
  
  some 
  hereprovide tangible proof that the WoG is correct re: 
  one 
  error in DavidMs theology,
  who denies that only one Man'sdocumented school of prophecy 
  is biblical, that all other 'schools'
  are rooted in 
  'doing''evil'
  
"Watch out 
for false prophets. ..By their fruit you will recognize them...by 
their fruit you will recognize them...

"Not everyone 
who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he 
who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that 
day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in 
your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?' 


Then I will 
tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!' 
--Matthew



Re: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = Sin

2006-02-23 Thread ttxpress



i 
know

On Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:20:48 -0500 "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  Gary wrote:
   one error in DavidMs theology,who denies 
  
   that only one Man'sdocumented school of 
  
   prophecy is biblical, that all other 
  'schools'
   are rooted in 'doing''evil'
  
  ..
  
  I don't know what man you are talking about, or what school of 
  prophecy
  
  ..I do not believe any one school is Biblical and all other schools are 
  rooted in evil
  
  ..Our Lord is multifaceted and loves diversity.
  
  David Miller
  
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 

Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 
10:30 PM
    Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Let 
'Haliburton' = Sin


some 
hereprovide tangible proof that the WoG is correct re: 
one 
error in DavidMs theology,
who denies that only one Man'sdocumented school of 
prophecy is biblical, that all other 'schools'
are rooted in 
'doing''evil'

  "Watch 
  out for false prophets. ..By their fruit you will recognize 
  them...by their fruit you will recognize 
  them...
  
  "Not everyone 
  who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only 
  he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on 
  that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, 
  and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?' 
  
  
  Then I 
  will tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!' 
  --Matthew
  
  


Re: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = Sin

2006-02-22 Thread Lance Muir
David said: 'much' Not not at all then, David? Limbaugh/Cheney both profess 
to be believers. No David, not hyperbole. They are spiritual men and, not 
natural men. Who are you to judge otherwise?


'We might not' David includes you does it not?


- Original Message - 
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 21, 2006 10:06
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = Sin



I don't follow Rush Limbaugh much, but I am skeptical of the assertion that
he thinks Haliburton and Cheney can do no wrong.  Are you using a little
hyperbole to make a point?

In any case, it is dangerous to talk about natural men and compare that to
what happens when one is placed into Christ.  Jesus Christ is not natural.
He is unique, and being placed in him transforms lives in a very
supernatural way.  The problem is that some people claim to have been 
placed

in Christ, but they really have not yet experienced him.  I have been
shocked over seeing this materialize in one person recently.  It is 
amazing

the capacity we have to think good of people who do not deserve it.  We
really need to be looking at Scripture concerning the promise.  If we look
at other people and systems, whether Cheney and Haliburton, or a Christian
and the church, we may not be looking at the right standard concerning the
reality of the promise of Jesus Christ in regards to righteousness and
holiness.

David Miller.


- Original Message - 
From: Lance Muir

To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 7:18 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = Sin

To Rush Limbaugh Haliburton and, by extension, Cheney can do no wrong.

To the critics of Haliburton and, by extension, Cheney can do no right.

IFO view Haliburton and, by extension, Cheney as somewhere in between.

It depends upon the criteria brought to bear on the analysis. I look at 
the

NT epistles and see Paul as taking the 'somewhere in between' stance as to
'Haliburton'.

L

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may 
know how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) 
http://www.InnGlory.org


If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a 
friend who wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.





--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know how you 
ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.


Re: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = Sin

2006-02-22 Thread Lance Muir



You are simply incorrect on this, Judy. I've heard 
it out of their own mouths. The rest is with God.

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Judy 
  Taylor 
  To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: February 22, 2006 09:45
  Subject: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = 
  Sin
  
  
  Limbaugh's father is or was a believer; he does not 
  profess to be one
  and neither does Cheney other than possibly the 
  nominal kind. Where do you
  get your information from Lance? Nominal ppl 
  who say they are Christians 
  are "natural men"
  From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]David 
  said: 'much' Not not at all then, David? Limbaugh/Cheney both profess to 
  be believers. No David, not hyperbole. They are spiritual men and, not 
  natural men. Who are you to judge otherwise?
  
  'We might not' David includes you does it not?
  
  
  From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: 
  February 21, 2006 10:06Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = 
  Sin
  
  
  I don't follow Rush Limbaugh much, but I am skeptical of the 
  assertion that he thinks Haliburton and Cheney can do no wrong. 
  Are you using a little hyperbole to make a point? In 
  any case, it is dangerous to talk about natural men and compare that 
  to what happens when one is placed into Christ. Jesus Christ is 
  not natural. He is unique, and being placed in him transforms lives in 
  a very supernatural way. The problem is that some people claim 
  to have been  placed in Christ, but they really have not yet 
  experienced him. I have been shocked over seeing this 
  materialize in one person recently. It is  amazing the 
  capacity we have to think good of people who do not deserve it. 
  We really need to be looking at Scripture concerning the 
  promise. If we look at other people and systems, whether Cheney 
  and Haliburton, or a Christian and the church, we may not be looking 
  at the right standard concerning the reality of the promise of Jesus 
  Christ in regards to righteousness and holiness. David 
  Miller. - Original Message -  From: 
  Lance Muir To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 7:18 AM Subject: [TruthTalk] Let 
  'Haliburton' = Sin To Rush Limbaugh Haliburton and, by 
  extension, Cheney can do no wrong. To the critics of 
  Haliburton and, by extension, Cheney can do no right. IFO view 
  Haliburton and, by extension, Cheney as somewhere in between. 
  It depends upon the criteria brought to bear on the analysis. I look at 
   the NT epistles and see Paul as taking the 'somewhere in 
  between' stance as to 'Haliburton'. L 
  -- "Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, 
  that you may  know how you ought to answer every man." 
  (Colossians 4:6)  http://www.InnGlory.org If 
  you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to  [EMAIL PROTECTED] and 
  you will be unsubscribed. If you have a  friend who wants to 
  join, tell him to send an e-mail to  [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he 
  will be subscribed. 
  
  
  --"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, 
  that you may know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) 
  http://www.InnGlory.org
  
  If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and 
  you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, tell 
  him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he 
  will be subscribed.
  
  


Re: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = Sin

2006-02-22 Thread Judy Taylor



Proof of the pudding is in the eating Lance - and out 
of the abundance that fills the
heart the mouth speaks. I would not call what 
comes out of either mouth the "oracles
of God" ie Cheney's expletive to Patrick L. on the 
floor of the Senatealong with 
Limbaughslifestyle and language.None of 
which reflect any part of the 'image of
Christ' TheWrong kind of fruit proceeds 
from the wrong rootLance. 

On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:51:09 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  You are simply incorrect on this, Judy. I've 
  heard it out of their own mouths. The rest is with God.
  

From: 
Judy 
Taylor 
To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org 

Sent: February 22, 2006 09:45
Subject: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = 
Sin


Limbaugh's father is or was a believer; he does not 
profess to be one
and neither does Cheney other than possibly the 
nominal kind. Where do you
get your information from Lance? Nominal ppl 
who say they are Christians 
are "natural men"
From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]David 
said: 'much' Not not at all then, David? Limbaugh/Cheney both profess to 
be believers. No David, not hyperbole. They are spiritual men and, not 
natural men. Who are you to judge otherwise?

'We might not' David includes you does it not?


From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: 
    February 21, 2006 10:06Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = 
Sin


I don't follow Rush Limbaugh much, but I am skeptical of the 
assertion that he thinks Haliburton and Cheney can do no 
wrong. Are you using a little hyperbole to make a 
point? In any case, it is dangerous to talk about natural 
men and compare that to what happens when one is placed into 
Christ. Jesus Christ is not natural. He is unique, and being 
placed in him transforms lives in a very supernatural way. The 
problem is that some people claim to have been  placed in 
Christ, but they really have not yet experienced him. I have 
been shocked over seeing this materialize in one person 
recently. It is  amazing the capacity we have to think 
good of people who do not deserve it. We really need to be 
looking at Scripture concerning the promise. If we look at 
other people and systems, whether Cheney and Haliburton, or a 
Christian and the church, we may not be looking at the right 
standard concerning the reality of the promise of Jesus Christ in 
regards to righteousness and holiness. David 
Miller. - Original Message -  From: 
Lance Muir To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 7:18 AM Subject: [TruthTalk] Let 
'Haliburton' = Sin To Rush Limbaugh Haliburton and, by 
extension, Cheney can do no wrong. To the critics of 
Haliburton and, by extension, Cheney can do no right. IFO 
view Haliburton and, by extension, Cheney as somewhere in 
between. It depends upon the criteria brought to bear on the 
analysis. I look at  the NT epistles and see Paul as taking 
the 'somewhere in between' stance as to 
'Haliburton'. L -- "Let your 
speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may  know 
how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6)  http://www.InnGlory.org 
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a  friend who wants 
to join, tell him to send an e-mail to  [EMAIL PROTECTED] and 
he will be subscribed. 


--"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with 
salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." 
(Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to join, 
tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and 
he will be subscribed.


  


Re: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = Sin

2006-02-22 Thread Lance Muir



I've got a huge difference Judy with the 'sinless 
ones' on TT over just such as this. I ACTUALLY DO BELIEVE that both of the 
aforementioned can be both believers and 'guilty as charged'. Don't 
you?

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Judy 
  Taylor 
  To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: February 22, 2006 09:58
  Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' 
  = Sin
  
  Proof of the pudding is in the eating Lance - and out 
  of the abundance that fills the
  heart the mouth speaks. I would not call what 
  comes out of either mouth the "oracles
  of God" ie Cheney's expletive to Patrick L. on the 
  floor of the Senatealong with 
  Limbaughslifestyle and language.None of 
  which reflect any part of the 'image of
  Christ' TheWrong kind of fruit proceeds 
  from the wrong rootLance. 
  
  On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:51:09 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:
  
You are simply incorrect on this, Judy. I've 
heard it out of their own mouths. The rest is with God.

  
  From: 
  Judy 
  Taylor 
  To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org 
  
  Sent: February 22, 2006 09:45
  Subject: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' 
  = Sin
  
  
  Limbaugh's father is or was a believer; he does 
  not profess to be one
  and neither does Cheney other than possibly the 
  nominal kind. Where do you
  get your information from Lance? Nominal 
  ppl who say they are Christians 
  are "natural men"
  From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]David 
  said: 'much' Not not at all then, David? Limbaugh/Cheney both profess 
  to be believers. No David, not hyperbole. They are spiritual men and, 
  not natural men. Who are you to judge otherwise?
  
  'We might not' David includes you does it not?
  
  
  From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: 
      February 21, 2006 10:06Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = 
  Sin
  
  
  I don't follow Rush Limbaugh much, but I am skeptical of the 
  assertion that he thinks Haliburton and Cheney can do no 
  wrong. Are you using a little hyperbole to make a 
  point? In any case, it is dangerous to talk about natural 
  men and compare that to what happens when one is placed into 
  Christ. Jesus Christ is not natural. He is unique, and being 
  placed in him transforms lives in a very supernatural way. 
  The problem is that some people claim to have been  placed 
  in Christ, but they really have not yet experienced him. I have 
  been shocked over seeing this materialize in one person 
  recently. It is  amazing the capacity we have to 
  think good of people who do not deserve it. We really need 
  to be looking at Scripture concerning the promise. If we 
  look at other people and systems, whether Cheney and Haliburton, 
  or a Christian and the church, we may not be looking at the right 
  standard concerning the reality of the promise of Jesus Christ in 
  regards to righteousness and holiness. David 
  Miller. - Original Message -  
  From: Lance Muir To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
  Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 7:18 AM Subject: [TruthTalk] Let 
  'Haliburton' = Sin To Rush Limbaugh Haliburton and, by 
  extension, Cheney can do no wrong. To the critics of 
  Haliburton and, by extension, Cheney can do no right. IFO 
  view Haliburton and, by extension, Cheney as somewhere in 
  between. It depends upon the criteria brought to bear on 
  the analysis. I look at  the NT epistles and see Paul as 
  taking the 'somewhere in between' stance as to 
  'Haliburton'. L -- "Let 
  your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may 
   know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) 
   http://www.InnGlory.org 
  If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
   [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a  friend who 
  wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  and he will be subscribed. 
  
  
  --"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with 
  salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." 
  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
  
  If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to 
  join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  and he will be subscribed.
  
  



Re: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = Sin

2006-02-22 Thread Judy Taylor



No I do not.
I believe "You will know them by their fruit" lance and 
a good tree does not bring forth
evil fruit. Why wouldyou think 
otherwise?

On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:36:15 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  I've got a huge difference Judy with the 'sinless 
  ones' on TT over just such as this. 
  I ACTUALLY DO BELIEVE that both of the 
  aforementioned can be both believers and 'guilty as charged'. Don't 
  you?
  
From: Judy Taylor 

Proof of the pudding is in the eating Lance - and 
out of the abundance that fills the
heart the mouth speaks. I would not call what 
comes out of either mouth the "oracles
of God" ie Cheney's expletive to Patrick L. on the 
floor of the Senatealong with 
Limbaughslifestyle and language.None of 
which reflect any part of the 'image of
Christ' TheWrong kind of fruit proceeds 
from the wrong rootLance. 

On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:51:09 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
writes:

  You are simply incorrect on this, Judy. I've 
  heard it out of their own mouths. The rest is with God.
  
From: Judy 
Taylor 

Limbaugh's father is or was a believer; he does 
not profess to be one
and neither does Cheney other than possibly the 
nominal kind. Where do you
get your information from Lance? Nominal 
ppl who say they are Christians 
are "natural men"
From: "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED]David 
said: 'much' Not not at all then, David? Limbaugh/Cheney both profess 
to be believers. No David, not hyperbole. They are spiritual men 
and, not natural men. Who are you to judge otherwise?

'We might not' David includes you does it not?


From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: 
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: 
    February 21, 2006 10:06Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = 
Sin


I don't follow Rush Limbaugh much, but I am skeptical of the 
assertion that he thinks Haliburton and Cheney can do no 
wrong. Are you using a little hyperbole to make a 
point? In any case, it is dangerous to talk about 
natural men and compare that to what happens when one is placed 
into Christ. Jesus Christ is not natural. He is unique, 
and being placed in him transforms lives in a very supernatural 
way. The problem is that some people claim to have been  
placed in Christ, but they really have not yet experienced 
him. I have been shocked over seeing this materialize in 
one person recently. It is  amazing the capacity 
we have to think good of people who do not deserve it. We 
really need to be looking at Scripture concerning the promise. If 
we look at other people and systems, whether Cheney and 
Haliburton, or a Christian and the church, we may not be looking 
at the right standard concerning the reality of the promise of 
Jesus Christ in regards to righteousness and 
holiness. David Miller. - 
Original Message -  From: Lance Muir To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org 
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 7:18 AM Subject: [TruthTalk] 
Let 'Haliburton' = Sin To Rush Limbaugh Haliburton and, 
by extension, Cheney can do no wrong. To the critics of 
Haliburton and, by extension, Cheney can do no right. 
IFO view Haliburton and, by extension, Cheney as somewhere in 
between. It depends upon the criteria brought to bear on 
the analysis. I look at  the NT epistles and see Paul as 
taking the 'somewhere in between' stance as to 
'Haliburton'. L -- "Let 
your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may 
 know how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) 
 http://www.InnGlory.org 
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to 
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a  friend who 
wants to join, tell him to send an e-mail to  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and he will be subscribed. 


--"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with 
salt, that you may know how you ought to answer every man." 
(Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email 
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and you will be unsubscribed. If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
and he will be subscribed.


  
  


Re: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = Sin

2006-02-22 Thread ttxpress




some 
hereprovide tangible proof that the WoG is correct re: 
one 
error in DavidMs theology,
who denies that only one Man'sdocumented school of prophecy is 
biblical, that all other 'schools'
are rooted in 
'doing''evil'

  "Watch out 
  for false prophets. ..By their fruit you will recognize them...by 
  their fruit you will recognize them...
  
  "Not everyone who 
  says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he who 
  does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that day, 
  'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in your 
  name drive out demons and perform many miracles?' 

  
  Then I will tell them 
  plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!' 
  --Matthew
  


Re: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = Sin

2006-02-22 Thread ttxpress



..was JC speakin' 
as an Aristotelean, below?

On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:30:44 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  ||
  
"Watch out 
for false prophets. ..By their fruit you will recognize them...by 
their fruit you will recognize them...

"Not everyone 
who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only he 
who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on that 
day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, and in 
your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?' 


Then I will 
tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!' 
--Matthew

  


Re: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = Sin

2006-02-22 Thread ttxpress



..he was really 
into Platonism  dualism, eh?

On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:52:32 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  ..was JC speakin' 
  as an Aristotelean, below?
  
  On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:30:44 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  
||

  "Watch 
  out for false prophets. ..By their fruit you will recognize 
  them...by their fruit you will recognize 
  them...
  
  "Not everyone 
  who says to me, 'Lord, Lord,' will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only 
  he who does the will of my Father who is in heaven. Many will say to me on 
  that day, 'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name, 
  and in your name drive out demons and perform many miracles?' 
  
  
  Then I 
  will tell them plainly, 'I never knew you. Away from me, you evildoers!' 
  --Matthew
  

  


Re: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = Sin

2006-02-22 Thread ttxpress



..thevoice of 
judeochristianity?

On Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:09:09 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  || 
  '..did we not in your name..perform many 
  [Scientific 'miracles']?'


Re: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = Sin

2006-02-21 Thread David Miller
I don't follow Rush Limbaugh much, but I am skeptical of the assertion that 
he thinks Haliburton and Cheney can do no wrong.  Are you using a little 
hyperbole to make a point?

In any case, it is dangerous to talk about natural men and compare that to 
what happens when one is placed into Christ.  Jesus Christ is not natural. 
He is unique, and being placed in him transforms lives in a very 
supernatural way.  The problem is that some people claim to have been placed 
in Christ, but they really have not yet experienced him.  I have been 
shocked over seeing this materialize in one person recently.  It is amazing 
the capacity we have to think good of people who do not deserve it.  We 
really need to be looking at Scripture concerning the promise.  If we look 
at other people and systems, whether Cheney and Haliburton, or a Christian 
and the church, we may not be looking at the right standard concerning the 
reality of the promise of Jesus Christ in regards to righteousness and 
holiness.

David Miller.


- Original Message - 
From: Lance Muir
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Tuesday, February 21, 2006 7:18 AM
Subject: [TruthTalk] Let 'Haliburton' = Sin

To Rush Limbaugh Haliburton and, by extension, Cheney can do no wrong.

To the critics of Haliburton and, by extension, Cheney can do no right.

IFO view Haliburton and, by extension, Cheney as somewhere in between.

It depends upon the criteria brought to bear on the analysis. I look at the 
NT epistles and see Paul as taking the 'somewhere in between' stance as to 
'Haliburton'.

L 

--
Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know 
how you ought to answer every man.  (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org

If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL 
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed.  If you have a friend who wants to 
join, tell him to send an e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and he will be subscribed.