In a message dated 5/5/2004 10:05:13 AM Eastern Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In a message dated 5/4/2004 11:37:25 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jt: I don't care to hear the voice of the accuser constantly and strife isn't good - so thanks for sharing your side of the story John; you don't stand or fall before us but it does help to (as you say) clear some of the smoke. You wouldn't want Elsman as your biographer eh? Did this whole thing arise from the pro-life, abortion, Paul Hill thing? judyt
Yes it did -- and in addition to that issue, Elsman began a heavy handed campaign against DavidM. When DavidM finally re-posted an email written a couple of years ago proving Elsman's comments to be nothing but lies, well, I jumped into the fray against Els and the rest is history.
John
JOHN, JOHN,
DON'T YOU REALIZE THAT WE ARE TO HAVE NO AD HOMINEMS? THIS IS A NEW DAY. YOU DON'T START A NEW SUBJECT ABOUT "ELSMAN AS A LIAR" ABOUT DAVID MILLER. THAT IS AD HOMINEM, CLEARLY. I WILL LET IT PASS.
FRANKLY, DAVID MILLER IS MY CLOSE FRIEND. WE HAVE NAUGHT AGAINST EACH OTHER. IN THE OLD DAYS, I WOULD CUSS YOU OUT, BUT DAVID HELPED ME GET OVER USING SCATOLOGICAL LANGUAGE, EVEN IF IT WAS USED, AS SUCH, IN THE BIBLE.
JUST LIKE PERRY HAS RECENTLY TAUGHT ME TO NOT COMMENT ON YOUR MANY "SLIGHT CONTRADICTIONS" , I PASS THIS OPPORTUNITY TO RIDDLE YOU WITH THE TRUTH. PERRY WILL HANDLE YOU WITH EVEN-HANDS AND PROTECT ME.
I AM FREE!!! I AM FREE!!! YOU ARE A SLAVE WATCH OUT FOR BURNING COALS UPON YOUR BEANIE.
ELSMANSTEIN
