Re: [tryton] Contact Mechanisms - per Party versus per Address/Contact

2013-06-12 Thread Raimon Esteve
>> Example:
>> to delivery: Street 1 - phone 1
>> to invoice: Street 2 - phone 2
>> to delivery: Street 3 - phone 3
>
> Sorry but you don't deliver or invoice to a phone number.

Of course you can't delivery to a phone number (I'm human!), but you
can call a phone related a address, for example, to explain a picking
error.

--
Si us plau, NO adjunti arxius a les seves respostes. Li preguem que
integri el text al cos del missatge. Pot respondre usant NetEtiquete
que li ajudarà a seguir la conversa.
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netiquette

Por favor, NO adjunte archivos a sus respuestas. Le rogamos que
integre el texto en el cuerpo del mensaje. Puede responder usando
NetEtiquete que le ayudará a seguir la
conversación.http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netiquette

Please, DO NOT send attachment files with your answers, just copy and
paste only the text you need to send into the body of your mails.
Repply using NetEtiquete. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netiquette


Re: [tryton] Contact Mechanisms - per Party versus per Address/Contact

2013-06-12 Thread Cédric Krier
On 12/06/13 11:17 +0200, Raimon Esteve wrote:
> 2013/6/12 Cédric Krier :
> > On 12/06/13 01:42 -0700, Chris Larsen wrote:
> >> Dear All,
> >> I have an issue in a number of settings with the fact that Tryton seems to
> >> group all contact mechanisms to the respective party. As a consequence, I
> >> cannot (easily) specify contact mechanism for certain addresses that are
> >> part of the party, such as the mobile phone number of sales manager.
> >
> > Strange, how can a mobile phone be linked to an address ?
> 
> Because every address is a contact, for example, to delivery, to
> invoice, and this address, same us a street, change information.
> 
> Example:
> to delivery: Street 1 - phone 1
> to invoice: Street 2 - phone 2
> to delivery: Street 3 - phone 3

Sorry but you don't deliver or invoice to a phone number.
But of course on an order you could add fields to define a contact
mechanism. But in this case, I would choose to use a link to a "contact"
party (of course it will require to have links between parties).

-- 
Cédric Krier

B2CK SPRL
Rue de Rotterdam, 4
4000 Liège
Belgium
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/


pgpRhu9ItriNr.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Re: [tryton] Contact Mechanisms - per Party versus per Address/Contact

2013-06-12 Thread Raimon Esteve
2013/6/12 Cédric Krier :
> On 12/06/13 01:42 -0700, Chris Larsen wrote:
>> Dear All,
>> I have an issue in a number of settings with the fact that Tryton seems to
>> group all contact mechanisms to the respective party. As a consequence, I
>> cannot (easily) specify contact mechanism for certain addresses that are
>> part of the party, such as the mobile phone number of sales manager.
>
> Strange, how can a mobile phone be linked to an address ?

Because every address is a contact, for example, to delivery, to
invoice, and this address, same us a street, change information.

Example:
to delivery: Street 1 - phone 1
to invoice: Street 2 - phone 2
to delivery: Street 3 - phone 3

--
Si us plau, NO adjunti arxius a les seves respostes. Li preguem que
integri el text al cos del missatge. Pot respondre usant NetEtiquete
que li ajudarà a seguir la conversa.
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netiquette

Por favor, NO adjunte archivos a sus respuestas. Le rogamos que
integre el texto en el cuerpo del mensaje. Puede responder usando
NetEtiquete que le ayudará a seguir la
conversación.http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netiquette

Please, DO NOT send attachment files with your answers, just copy and
paste only the text you need to send into the body of your mails.
Repply using NetEtiquete. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netiquette


Re: [tryton] Contact Mechanisms - per Party versus per Address/Contact

2013-06-12 Thread Raimon Esteve
2013/6/12 Chris Larsen :
> Dear All,
> I have an issue in a number of settings with the fact that Tryton seems to
> group all contact mechanisms to the respective party. As a consequence, I
> cannot (easily) specify contact mechanism for certain addresses that are
> part of the party, such as the mobile phone number of sales manager.
> I am aware of the fact that I can add comments to each contact mechanism.
> and indicate that a specific mobile number is for the said sales manager,
> only, but this is still awkward. Ideally, the address facility should offer
> a way to add address-specific contact mechanisms, all of course within the
> given party.
> Or am I missing something?

http://apps.tryton-erp.es/party_communication/


--
Si us plau, NO adjunti arxius a les seves respostes. Li preguem que
integri el text al cos del missatge. Pot respondre usant NetEtiquete
que li ajudarà a seguir la conversa.
http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netiquette

Por favor, NO adjunte archivos a sus respuestas. Le rogamos que
integre el texto en el cuerpo del mensaje. Puede responder usando
NetEtiquete que le ayudará a seguir la
conversación.http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netiquette

Please, DO NOT send attachment files with your answers, just copy and
paste only the text you need to send into the body of your mails.
Repply using NetEtiquete. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netiquette


Re: [tryton] Contact Mechanisms - per Party versus per Address/Contact

2013-06-12 Thread Jesús Martín Jiménez
I think this [1] module could be useful.

Cheers

[1] https://bitbucket.org/trytonspain/trytond-party_communication




2013/6/12 Chris Larsen 

> Dear All,
> I have an issue in a number of settings with the fact that Tryton seems to
> group all contact mechanisms to the respective party. As a consequence, I
> cannot (easily) specify contact mechanism for certain addresses that are
> part of the party, such as the mobile phone number of sales manager.
> I am aware of the fact that I can add comments to each contact mechanism.
> and indicate that a specific mobile number is for the said sales manager,
> only, but this is still awkward. Ideally, the address facility should offer
> a way to add address-specific contact mechanisms, all of course within the
> given party.
> Or am I missing something?
> Thanks a lot.
> Chris
>



-- 

Jesús Martín

Zikzakmedia SL
Dr. Fleming, 28, baixos
08720 Vilafranca del Penedès
☏ 93 890 21 08


Re: [tryton] Contact Mechanisms - per Party versus per Address/Contact

2013-06-12 Thread Cédric Krier
On 12/06/13 01:42 -0700, Chris Larsen wrote:
> Dear All,
> I have an issue in a number of settings with the fact that Tryton seems to 
> group all contact mechanisms to the respective party. As a consequence, I 
> cannot (easily) specify contact mechanism for certain addresses that are 
> part of the party, such as the mobile phone number of sales manager.

Strange, how can a mobile phone be linked to an address ?

> I am aware of the fact that I can add comments to each contact mechanism. 
> and indicate that a specific mobile number is for the said sales manager, 
> only, but this is still awkward. Ideally, the address facility should offer 
> a way to add address-specific contact mechanisms, all of course within the 
> given party.
> Or am I missing something?

Yes, addresses are addresses nothing more.
What is currently missing in Tryton is a way to link parties.

-- 
Cédric Krier

B2CK SPRL
Rue de Rotterdam, 4
4000 Liège
Belgium
Tel: +32 472 54 46 59
Email/Jabber: cedric.kr...@b2ck.com
Website: http://www.b2ck.com/


pgpMqRCpgGAxN.pgp
Description: PGP signature


[tryton] Contact Mechanisms - per Party versus per Address/Contact

2013-06-12 Thread Chris Larsen
Dear All,
I have an issue in a number of settings with the fact that Tryton seems to 
group all contact mechanisms to the respective party. As a consequence, I 
cannot (easily) specify contact mechanism for certain addresses that are 
part of the party, such as the mobile phone number of sales manager.
I am aware of the fact that I can add comments to each contact mechanism. 
and indicate that a specific mobile number is for the said sales manager, 
only, but this is still awkward. Ideally, the address facility should offer 
a way to add address-specific contact mechanisms, all of course within the 
given party.
Or am I missing something?
Thanks a lot.
Chris