> On Dec 29, 2017, at 1:17 PM, Spencer Dawkins at IETF
> wrote:
>
> Yes, they're late, but we didn't forget completely.
>
> Thanks, David Black, for your help with this!
>
> Minutes are at
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/100/materials/minutes-100-tsvarea/.
>
> Please let us know if there are any corrections or clarifications we should
> make.
To follow up on a point raised st the meeting that hasn’t made it to the list
(fwiw, I would encourage anyone seeking volunteers or discussion to post to the
list; I’m not the only one who doesn’t attend)
> Brian Carpenter pointed out that the protocol number registry has been the
> subject of neglect for decades, and needs to be cleaned up.
Not sure why. It’s useful to deprecate abandoned code points and protocols, but
we aren’t likely to reuse them for quite a while.
> If you're motivated to help with this, please contact Brian. Lars thinks
> that's more work than is worth doing. Mirja agreed that this is a lot of
> work, but she's in the process of cleaning up the port/service registry now,
That is much less useful. The space is much larger and our current procedures
have been very effective in conservation.
Not to mention that revocation is specifically “NOT RECOMMENDED” in RFC 6335.
Joe
