Re: [VOTE] Adopt a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy
+1. Thanks - Venkat On 3/26/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts. When replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original authors dignity. We've some tough things to work out over the next days and we're only going to achieve any real consensus if we all feel the environment allows us to say what we really think. I'd really like to see everyone vote on this, surely if nothing else this is something we can all agree on? Here's my +1. ...ant
Re: [VOTE] Adopt a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy
+1 On 3/26/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/26/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Touché :) > > On 3/26/07, Frank Budinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1, and here's a first test case of saying what I "really think". I hope > > nobody is going to "slam" me :-) > > > > I think Ant's suggestion should go without saying. The fact that we need > > to have a vote as juvenile as this one, makes it hard for any of us to > > "maintain our dignity". > > > > Frank. > > > > > > "kelvin goodson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/26/2007 02:38:51 > > PM: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On 26/03/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the > Tuscany > > > > mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's > > posts. > > > > When > > > > replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the > > original > > > > authors dignity. > > > > > > > > We've some tough things to work out over the next days and we're > only > > > > going > > > > to achieve any real consensus if we all feel the environment allows > us > > to > > > > say what we really think. > > > > > > > > I'd really like to see everyone vote on this, surely if nothing else > > this > > > > is > > > > something we can all agree on? > > > > > > > > Here's my +1. > > > > > > > >...ant > > > > > > > > > > - > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > +1
Re: [VOTE] Adopt a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy
On 3/26/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Touché :) On 3/26/07, Frank Budinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1, and here's a first test case of saying what I "really think". I hope > nobody is going to "slam" me :-) > > I think Ant's suggestion should go without saying. The fact that we need > to have a vote as juvenile as this one, makes it hard for any of us to > "maintain our dignity". > > Frank. > > > "kelvin goodson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/26/2007 02:38:51 > PM: > > > +1 > > > > On 26/03/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany > > > mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's > posts. > > > When > > > replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the > original > > > authors dignity. > > > > > > We've some tough things to work out over the next days and we're only > > > going > > > to achieve any real consensus if we all feel the environment allows us > to > > > say what we really think. > > > > > > I'd really like to see everyone vote on this, surely if nothing else > this > > > is > > > something we can all agree on? > > > > > > Here's my +1. > > > > > >...ant > > > > > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1
Re: [VOTE] Adopt a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy
Touché :) On 3/26/07, Frank Budinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1, and here's a first test case of saying what I "really think". I hope nobody is going to "slam" me :-) I think Ant's suggestion should go without saying. The fact that we need to have a vote as juvenile as this one, makes it hard for any of us to "maintain our dignity". Frank. "kelvin goodson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/26/2007 02:38:51 PM: > +1 > > On 26/03/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany > > mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts. > > When > > replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original > > authors dignity. > > > > We've some tough things to work out over the next days and we're only > > going > > to achieve any real consensus if we all feel the environment allows us to > > say what we really think. > > > > I'd really like to see everyone vote on this, surely if nothing else this > > is > > something we can all agree on? > > > > Here's my +1. > > > >...ant > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Adopt a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy
+1, and here's a first test case of saying what I "really think". I hope nobody is going to "slam" me :-) I think Ant's suggestion should go without saying. The fact that we need to have a vote as juvenile as this one, makes it hard for any of us to "maintain our dignity". Frank. "kelvin goodson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/26/2007 02:38:51 PM: > +1 > > On 26/03/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany > > mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts. > > When > > replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original > > authors dignity. > > > > We've some tough things to work out over the next days and we're only > > going > > to achieve any real consensus if we all feel the environment allows us to > > say what we really think. > > > > I'd really like to see everyone vote on this, surely if nothing else this > > is > > something we can all agree on? > > > > Here's my +1. > > > >...ant > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Adopt a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy
+1 from me. Davanum Srinivas wrote: +1 from me. On 3/26/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts. When replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original authors dignity. We've some tough things to work out over the next days and we're only going to achieve any real consensus if we all feel the environment allows us to say what we really think. I'd really like to see everyone vote on this, surely if nothing else this is something we can all agree on? Here's my +1. ...ant -- Jean-Sebastien - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Adopt a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy
+1 On 3/26/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 On 26/03/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany > mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts. > When > replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original > authors dignity. > > We've some tough things to work out over the next days and we're only > going > to achieve any real consensus if we all feel the environment allows us to > say what we really think. > > I'd really like to see everyone vote on this, surely if nothing else this > is > something we can all agree on? > > Here's my +1. > >...ant > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Adopt a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy
+1 On 26/03/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts. When replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original authors dignity. We've some tough things to work out over the next days and we're only going to achieve any real consensus if we all feel the environment allows us to say what we really think. I'd really like to see everyone vote on this, surely if nothing else this is something we can all agree on? Here's my +1. ...ant
Re: [VOTE] Adopt a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy
+1. Thanks, Raymond - Original Message - From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 10:25 AM Subject: [VOTE] Adopt a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts. When replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original authors dignity. We've some tough things to work out over the next days and we're only going to achieve any real consensus if we all feel the environment allows us to say what we really think. I'd really like to see everyone vote on this, surely if nothing else this is something we can all agree on? Here's my +1. ...ant - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Adopt a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy
+1 On 3/26/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts. When replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original authors dignity. We've some tough things to work out over the next days and we're only going to achieve any real consensus if we all feel the environment allows us to say what we really think. I'd really like to see everyone vote on this, surely if nothing else this is something we can all agree on? Here's my +1. ...ant
Re: [VOTE] Adopt a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy
+1 On 26/03/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 On 3/26/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 from me. > > On 3/26/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany > > mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts. > When > > replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original > > authors dignity. > > > > We've some tough things to work out over the next days and we're only > going > > to achieve any real consensus if we all feel the environment allows us > to > > say what we really think. > > > > I'd really like to see everyone vote on this, surely if nothing else > this is > > something we can all agree on? > > > > Here's my +1. > > > >...ant > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers > > - > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende -- Pete - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Adopt a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy
+1 On 3/26/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 from me. On 3/26/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany > mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts. When > replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original > authors dignity. > > We've some tough things to work out over the next days and we're only going > to achieve any real consensus if we all feel the environment allows us to > say what we really think. > > I'd really like to see everyone vote on this, surely if nothing else this is > something we can all agree on? > > Here's my +1. > >...ant > -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende
Re: [VOTE] Adopt a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy
+1 from me. On 3/26/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts. When replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original authors dignity. We've some tough things to work out over the next days and we're only going to achieve any real consensus if we all feel the environment allows us to say what we really think. I'd really like to see everyone vote on this, surely if nothing else this is something we can all agree on? Here's my +1. ...ant -- Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Adopt a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy
I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts. When replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original authors dignity. We've some tough things to work out over the next days and we're only going to achieve any real consensus if we all feel the environment allows us to say what we really think. I'd really like to see everyone vote on this, surely if nothing else this is something we can all agree on? Here's my +1. ...ant
