[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1542) BPEL extension to link sca component into a business process
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520469 ] gengshaoguang commented on TUSCANY-1542: My point is: SCA_ClinetAndImplementationforBPEL_V100 mentioned relation between SCA and BPEL as: 1. SCA-BPEL 2. BPEL-SCA Our implementation-bpel module works as the first one. The second one should be a module inside the BPEL runtime not inside Tuscany. BPEL extension to link sca component into a business process Key: TUSCANY-1542 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1542 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Wish Components: Java SCA BPEL Implementation Extension Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next Reporter: gengshaoguang Fix For: Java-SCA-Next What I expect next is: extend a bpel engine, make it interact with Tuscany's sca binding. Of course any bpel engine might link wsdl naturaly. But in the latter case, we make no improvement to SOA tech. BPEL-SCA should work in a more direct way and more effect way. I think SCA_ClinetAndImplementationModelforBPEL_V100 has specified relevants at section 1.4 . I open this issue to arouse collaboration from all of you. Thanks. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1542) BPEL extension to link sca component into a business process
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520473 ] gengshaoguang commented on TUSCANY-1542: Hi, I am not really confident absolutly. So, I may need to discuss this with you here. For my second point(BPEL-SCA), I understood the SPEC. as BPEL need to have a extension (just as ibm's BPEL extension for people). But do you think these extension should be a responsibility of the BPEL engine? One thing I'm sure is we need to embedded a BPEL engin in Tuscany. But without changes, the engine will not know these entension(SCA). My suggestion is this extension should be much delicate that it is independent to Tuscany, in these case, I might be used not only in ODE, but also others like ActiveBPEL. Best Regart BPEL extension to link sca component into a business process Key: TUSCANY-1542 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1542 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Wish Components: Java SCA BPEL Implementation Extension Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next Reporter: gengshaoguang Fix For: Java-SCA-Next What I expect next is: extend a bpel engine, make it interact with Tuscany's sca binding. Of course any bpel engine might link wsdl naturaly. But in the latter case, we make no improvement to SOA tech. BPEL-SCA should work in a more direct way and more effect way. I think SCA_ClinetAndImplementationModelforBPEL_V100 has specified relevants at section 1.4 . I open this issue to arouse collaboration from all of you. Thanks. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1542) BPEL extension to link sca component into a business process
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520446 ] Jean-Sebastien Delfino commented on TUSCANY-1542: - The work started under java/sca/modules/implementation-bpel is about implementing what's described in the SCA Client and Implementation Model Spec for WS-BPEL [1]. Could you please explain why you think this work is different from what's described in the spec or not covering what you're looking for? Thanks. [1] http://www.osoa.org/download/attachments/35/SCA_ClientAndImplementationModelforBPEL_V100.pdf?version=1 BPEL extension to link sca component into a business process Key: TUSCANY-1542 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1542 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Wish Components: Java SCA BPEL Implementation Extension Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next Reporter: gengshaoguang Fix For: Java-SCA-Next What I expect next is: extend a bpel engine, make it interact with Tuscany's sca binding. Of course any bpel engine might link wsdl naturaly. But in the latter case, we make no improvement to SOA tech. BPEL-SCA should work in a more direct way and more effect way. I think SCA_ClinetAndImplementationModelforBPEL_V100 has specified relevants at section 1.4 . I open this issue to arouse collaboration from all of you. Thanks. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1542) BPEL extension to link sca component into a business process
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520141 ] Luciano Resende commented on TUSCANY-1542: -- We have started this under java/sca/modules/implementation.bpel. Any help is appreciated BPEL extension to link sca component into a business process Key: TUSCANY-1542 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1542 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Wish Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next Reporter: gengshaoguang What I expect next is: extend a bpel engine, make it interact with Tuscany's sca binding. Of course any bpel engine might link wsdl naturaly. But in the latter case, we make no improvement to SOA tech. BPEL-SCA should work in a more direct way and more effect way. I think SCA_ClinetAndImplementationModelforBPEL_V100 has specified relevants at section 1.4 . I open this issue to arouse collaboration from all of you. Thanks. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-1542) BPEL extension to link sca component into a business process
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1542?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12520145 ] gengshaoguang commented on TUSCANY-1542: They are different! SCA has specified BPEL from to direction, one is implement a component as a BPEL. Another is to invoke SCA component from BPEL side. I metioned BPEL can invoke and WS, but it is narrowly used since it's performance is slow, so we need to extend a bpel engin to make it interact direct with SCA BINDING (from bpel's partnerlink to a sca component). BPEL extension to link sca component into a business process Key: TUSCANY-1542 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1542 Project: Tuscany Issue Type: Wish Affects Versions: Java-SCA-Next Reporter: gengshaoguang What I expect next is: extend a bpel engine, make it interact with Tuscany's sca binding. Of course any bpel engine might link wsdl naturaly. But in the latter case, we make no improvement to SOA tech. BPEL-SCA should work in a more direct way and more effect way. I think SCA_ClinetAndImplementationModelforBPEL_V100 has specified relevants at section 1.4 . I open this issue to arouse collaboration from all of you. Thanks. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
